Lancelot Pinto

Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India: Has Anything Changed in Two Decades?

Setting Mumbai, India. A study conducted in Mumbai two decades ago revealed the extent of inappropriate tuberculosis (TB) management practices of private practitioners. Over the years, Indias national TB programme has made significant progress in TB control. Efforts to engage private practitioners have also been made with several successful documented public-private mix initiatives in place. Objective To study prescribing practices of private practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis, two decades after a similar study conducted in the same geographical area revealed dismal results. Methods Survey questionnaire administered to practicing general practitioners attending a continuing medical education programme. Results The participating practitioners had never been approached or oriented by the local TB programme. Only 6 of the 106 respondents wrote a prescription with a correct drug regimen. 106 doctors prescribed 63 different drug regimens. There was tendency to over treat with more drugs for longer durations. Only 3 of the 106 respondents could write an appropriate prescription for treatment of multidrug-resistant TB. Conclusions With a vast majority of private practitioners unable to provide a correct prescription for treating TB and not approached by the national TB programme, little seems to have changed over the years. Strategies to control TB through public sector health services will have little impact if inappropriate management of TB patients in private clinics continues unabated. Large scale implementation of public-private mix approaches should be a top priority for the programme. Ignoring the private sector could worsen the epidemic of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant forms of TB.

Maternal sleep-disordered breathing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE Symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are increased in pregnancy compared to the nongravid state. Maternal SDB may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, but this is still under investigation. We performed a systematic literature review, and where feasible, a metaanalysis, to evaluate whether women with SDB in pregnancy have a higher risk of specific adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with women without SDB. STUDY DESIGN Original studies published until June 2012 evaluating the association between gestational hypertension/preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight infants, and maternal SDB, defined either by symptoms or the reference standard polysomnography, were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data were extracted on study design and outcome estimates. When appropriate, effect estimates from each study were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS Of the 4386 studies identified, 31 met the defined criteria. Twenty-one studies, all observational in design, reported dichotomous outcomes; 9 of these adjusted for potential confounders. Maternal SDB was significantly associated with gestational hypertension/preeclampsia (pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-3.09; 5 studies), and gestational diabetes (pooled aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.30-2.42; 5 studies). CONCLUSION Based on published observational studies to date, maternal SDB is associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes after adjusting for potential confounders. However, large-scale, prospective cohort, and interventional studies are needed to further elucidate the relationship between maternal SDB and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility of WHO-Endorsed Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing Methods for First-Line and Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs

ABSTRACT In an effort to update and clarify policies on tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing (DST), the World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned a systematic review evaluating WHO-endorsed diagnostic tests. We report the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of phenotypic DST for first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs. This review provides support for recommended critical concentrations for isoniazid and rifampin in commercial broth-based systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate critical concentrations for ethambutol and streptomycin that accurately detect susceptibility to these drugs. Evidence is limited on the performance of DST for pyrazinamide and second-line drugs.

Widespread use of serological tests for tuberculosis: data from 22 high-burden countries

To the Editors: There is great excitement over the introduction of new tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics [1]. Since 2007, several TB diagnostics and approaches have been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2],with Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) being the most recent [3]. Amidst this excitement, there is growing concern surrounding the use of inappropriate and suboptimal TB diagnostics [4, 5]. Currently available commercial serological (antibody detection) tests for TB are inaccurate and highly inconsistent [6–8]. The International Standards for TB Care explicitly discourage their use [9]. Even so, serological tests are known to be widely used in countries such as India [2, 4, 5]. In addition to posing an economic burden on patients and healthcare systems, use of serological tests also entails potential harm to patients ( e.g. unnecessary TB therapy because of false-positive results, or morbidity and mortality because of false-negative serology results). After reviewing the evidence, including the findings of an updated meta-analysis [10], the WHO recently announced its first negative policy in TB, against the use of current TB serological tests [5 …

The Use of an Automated Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (Xpert MTB/RIF) to Predict the Sputum Smear Status of Tuberculosis Patients

Xpert MTB/RIF-generated cycle-threshold (C(T)) values have poor clinical utility as a rule-in test for smear positivity (cut-point ≤20.2; sensitivity 32.3%, specificity 97.1%) but moderately good rule-out value (cut-point >31.8; negative predictive value 80.0%). Thus, 20% of individuals with C(T) values >31.8 were erroneously ruled out as smear-negative. This group had a significantly lower sputum bacillary load relative to correctly classified smear-positive patients (C(T) ≤ 31.8; P < .001). These data inform on public health and contact tracing strategies.

Immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: state of the art.

Undiagnosed and mismanaged tuberculosis (TB) continues to fuel the global TB epidemic. Rapid, accurate and early diagnosis of TB is therefore a priority to improve TB case detection and interrupt transmission. Although considerable improvements have been made in TB diagnostics, there are two major gaps in the existing diagnostics pipeline: (1) lack of a simple accurate point-of-care test that can be used for rapid diagnosis at the primary care level; (2) lack of a biomarker (or combination of biomarkers) that can be used to identify latently infected individuals who will benefit most from preventive therapy. Currently available commercial serological (antibody detection) tests are inaccurate and do not improve patient outcomes. Despite this evidence, dozens of serological tests are sold and used in countries (e.g. India) with weak regulatory systems, especially in the private sector. Recognizing the threat posed by these suboptimal tests, a World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Group has strongly recommended against the use of serological tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB. Another WHO Expert Group has discouraged the use of interferon-γ release assays for active pulmonary TB diagnosis in low- and middle-income countries. All existing tests for latent TB infection appear to have only modest predictive value and further research is needed to identify highly predictive biomarkers.

Private patient perceptions about a public programme; what do private Indian tuberculosis patients really feel about directly observed treatment?

BackgroundIndia accounts for one-fifth of the global incident cases of tuberculosis(TB). The country presently has the worlds largest directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) programme, that has shown impressive results and covers almost 100% of the billion-plus Indian population. Despite such a successful programme, the majority of Indian patients with tuberculosis prefer private healthcare, although repeated audits of this sector have shown the quality to be poor.We aimed to ascertain the level of awareness and knowledge of private patients with tuberculosis attending our clinic at a tertiary private healthcare institute with regards to the DOTS programme, understanding the reasons behind their preference for private healthcare, and evaluating their perceptions and reasons for accepting or failing to accept directly observed therapy as a treatment option.MethodsA structured interview schedule was administered to private patients with tuberculosis at the P.D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India between January 2006 to November 2007.ResultsOnly 30 of 200 patients (15%) were aware of the DOTS programme. After being explained what directly observed therapy was, 136 patients (68%) found this form of treatment unacceptable.183 patients (91.5%) preferred buying the drugs themselves to visiting a DOTS centre. 90 patients (45%) were not prepared to be observed while swallowing their TB drugs, finding it an intrusion of privacy.ConclusionsOur study reveals a poor knowledge and awareness of the DOTS programme among the cohort of TB patients that we interviewed. The control of TB in India will undoubtedly benefit from more patients being attracted to and treated by the existing DOTS programmes. However, directly observed treatment, in its present form, is considered too rigid and intrusive and is unlikely to be accepted by a majority of patients seeking private healthcare. Novel strategies and more flexible options will have to be devised to ensure higher cure rates without compromising patient choice.

Scoring systems using chest radiographic features for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review

Chest radiography for the diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is limited by poor specificity and reader inconsistency. Scoring systems have been employed successfully for improving the performance of chest radiography for various pulmonary diseases. We conducted a systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of scoring systems for PTB. We searched multiple databases for studies that evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of chest radiograph scoring systems for PTB. We summarised results for specific radiographic features and scoring systems associated with PTB. Where appropriate, we estimated pooled performance of similar studies using a random effects model. 13 studies were included in the review, nine of which were in low tuberculosis (TB) burden settings. No scoring system was based solely on radiographic findings. All studies used systems with various combinations of clinical and radiological features. 11 studies involved scoring systems that were used for making decisions concerning hospital respiratory isolation. None of the included studies reported data on intra- or inter-reporter reproducibility. Upper lobe infiltrates (pooled diagnostic OR 3.57, 95% CI 2.38–5.37, five studies) and cavities (diagnostic OR range 1.97–25.66, three studies) were significantly associated with PTB. Sensitivities of the scoring systems were high (median 96%, IQR 93–98%), but specificities were low (median 46%, IQR 35–50%). Chest radiograph scoring systems appear useful in ruling out PTB in hospitals, but their low specificity precludes ruling in PTB. There is a need to develop accurate scoring systems for people living with HIV and for outpatient settings, especially in high TB burden settings.

Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis

Clinical question: What is the best approach to the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB)? Results: Evidence-based treatment of drug-susceptible TB is the best means of preventing the development of drug-resistant disease. Suspecting the possibility of drug-resistant TB, and prompt detection of all forms of drug-resistant TB, not only multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant TB, should be part of the algorithm for diagnosis and management of all patients with active TB. Implementation: Treatment of all forms of drug-resistant TB must be tailored to the specific form of resistance with appropriate and effective drug regimens.

Early COPD Exacerbation Treatment with Combination of ICS and LABA for Patients Presenting with Mild-to-Moderate Worsening of Dyspnea.

ABSTRACT This is a proof of concept study that aims to establish feasibility and safety of a new strategy that includes an action plan for early treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) with doubling dose of a combination of a long-acting beta2 agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid, and to explore its potential for avoiding the requirement of prednisone and its safety. Thirty-seven COPD outpatients with previous exacerbations were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months. The written action plan included a standing prescription to be used in the event of an AECOPD: Antibiotic, for 5 days (for purulent exacerbations) and doubling a combination of Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate for 10 days. The primary outcome was “treatment success” defined as “no need of prednisone within 30 days of the onset.” Twenty-seven patients experienced an AECOPD and doubled their combination dose. Among the 27 patients, there were 21 patients (78%) who did not require prednisone, and none of those had cardiovascular events, pneumonia, ER and hospital admissions. We have assessed that an early treatment of AECOPD with doubling the dose of a combination of Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate appears to be safe, well-tolerated and adhered to, and results in no requirement of systemic corticosteroid in a large proportion of patients presenting with mild-to-moderate worsening of dyspnea. This trial has the potential to change the approach of treatment of AECOPD and reduce the use of oral corticosteroids.