Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where LaPricia Lewis-Boyer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by LaPricia Lewis-Boyer.


Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2011

Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioner/Community Health Worker Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Urban Community Health Centers

Jerilyn K. Allen; Cheryl R. Dennison-Himmelfarb; Sarah L. Szanton; Lee R. Bone; Martha N. Hill; David M. Levine; Murray West; Amy Barlow; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Mary Donnelly-Strozzo; Carol Curtis; Katherine Anderson

Background—Despite well-publicized guidelines on the appropriate management of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, the implementation of risk-reducing practices remains poor. This report describes the results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of cardiovascular disease risk reduction delivered by nurse practitioner /community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care (EUC) to improve lipids, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care in patients in urban community health centers. Methods and Results—A total of 525 patients with documented cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension and levels of LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, or HbA1c that exceeded goals established by national guidelines were randomly assigned to NP/CHW (n=261) or EUC (n=264) groups. The NP/CHW intervention included aggressive pharmacological management and tailored educational and behavioral counseling for lifestyle modification and problem solving to address barriers to adherence and control. Compared with EUC, patients in the NP/CHW group had significantly greater 12-month improvement in total cholesterol (difference, 19.7 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (difference,15.9 mg/dL), triglycerides (difference, 16.3 mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (difference, 6.2 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (difference, 3.1 mm Hg), HbA1c (difference, 0.5%), and perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care (difference, 1.2 points). Conclusions—An intervention delivered by an NP/CHW team using individualized treatment regimens based on treat-to-target algorithms can be an effective approach to improve risk factor status and perceptions of chronic illness care in high-risk patients. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00241904.


Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2011

Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial

Jerilyn K. Allen; Cheryl R. Dennison-Himmelfarb; Sarah L. Szanton; Lee R. Bone; Martha N. Hill; David M. Levine; Murray West; Amy Barlow; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Mary Donnelly-Strozzo; Carol Curtis; Katherine Anderson

Background—Despite well-publicized guidelines on the appropriate management of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, the implementation of risk-reducing practices remains poor. This report describes the results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of cardiovascular disease risk reduction delivered by nurse practitioner /community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care (EUC) to improve lipids, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care in patients in urban community health centers. Methods and Results—A total of 525 patients with documented cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension and levels of LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, or HbA1c that exceeded goals established by national guidelines were randomly assigned to NP/CHW (n=261) or EUC (n=264) groups. The NP/CHW intervention included aggressive pharmacological management and tailored educational and behavioral counseling for lifestyle modification and problem solving to address barriers to adherence and control. Compared with EUC, patients in the NP/CHW group had significantly greater 12-month improvement in total cholesterol (difference, 19.7 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (difference,15.9 mg/dL), triglycerides (difference, 16.3 mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (difference, 6.2 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (difference, 3.1 mm Hg), HbA1c (difference, 0.5%), and perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care (difference, 1.2 points). Conclusions—An intervention delivered by an NP/CHW team using individualized treatment regimens based on treat-to-target algorithms can be an effective approach to improve risk factor status and perceptions of chronic illness care in high-risk patients. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00241904.


Patient Preference and Adherence | 2013

Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members

Sarah J. Flynn; Jessica M. Ameling; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Jennifer L. Wolff; Lee R. Bone; David M. Levine; Debra L. Roter; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Annette Fisher; Leon Purnell; Patti L. Ephraim; Barbers J; Fitzpatrick Sl; Michael Albert; Lisa A. Cooper; Peter J. Fagan; Martin D; Ramamurthi Hc; Boulware Le

Introduction We aimed to inform the design of behavioral interventions by identifying patients’ and their family members’ perceived facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management. Materials and methods We conducted focus groups of African American patients with hypertension and their family members to elicit their views about factors influencing patients’ hypertension self-management. We recruited African American patients with hypertension (n = 18) and their family members (n = 12) from an urban, community-based clinical practice in Baltimore, Maryland. We conducted four separate 90-minute focus groups among patients with controlled (one group) and uncontrolled (one group) hypertension, as well as their family members (two groups). Trained moderators used open-ended questions to assess participants’ perceptions regarding patient, family, clinic, and community-level factors influencing patients’ effective hypertension self-management. Results Patient participants identified several facilitators (including family members’ support and positive relationships with doctors) and barriers (including competing health priorities, lack of knowledge about hypertension, and poor access to community resources) that influence their hypertension self-management. Family members also identified several facilitators (including their participation in patients’ doctor’s visits and discussions with patients’ doctors outside of visits) and barriers (including their own limited health knowledge and patients’ lack of motivation to sustain hypertension self-management behaviors) that affect their efforts to support patients’ hypertension self-management. Conclusion African American patients with hypertension and their family members reported numerous patient, family, clinic, and community-level facilitators and barriers to patients’ hypertension self-management. Patients’ and their family members’ views may help guide efforts to tailor behavioral interventions designed to improve hypertension self-management behaviors and hypertension control in minority populations.


BMC Nephrology | 2013

Selecting renal replacement therapies: what do African American and non-African American patients and their families think others should know? A mixed methods study

Nicole DePasquale; Patti L. Ephraim; Jessica M. Ameling; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Deidra C. Crews; Raquel C. Greer; Hamid Rabb; Neil R. Powe; Bernard G. Jaar; Luis F. Gimenez; Priscilla Auguste; Mollie W. Jenckes; L. Ebony Boulware

BackgroundLittle is known regarding the types of information African American and non-African American patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their families need to inform renal replacement therapy (RRT) decisions.MethodsIn 20 structured group interviews, we elicited views of African American and non-African American patients with CKD and their families about factors that should be addressed in educational materials informing patients’ RRT selection decisions. We asked participants to select factors from a list and obtained their open-ended feedback.ResultsTen groups of patients (5 African American, 5 non-African American; total 68 individuals) and ten groups of family members (5 African American, 5 non-African American; total 62 individuals) participated. Patients and families had a range (none to extensive) of experiences with various RRTs. Patients identified morbidity or mortality, autonomy, treatment delivery, and symptoms as important factors to address. Family members identified similar factors but also cited the effects of RRT decisions on patients’ psychological well-being and finances. Views of African American and non-African American participants were largely similar.ConclusionsEducational resources addressing the influence of RRT selection on patients’ morbidity and mortality, autonomy, treatment delivery, and symptoms could help patients and their families select RRT options closely aligned with their values. Including information about the influence of RRT selection on patients’ personal relationships and finances could enhance resources’ cultural relevance for African Americans.


BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | 2012

Development of a decision aid to inform patients’ and families’ renal replacement therapy selection decisions

Jessica M. Ameling; Priscilla Auguste; Patti L. Ephraim; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Nicole DePasquale; Raquel C. Greer; Deidra C. Crews; Neil R. Powe; Hamid Rabb; L. Ebony Boulware

BackgroundFew educational resources have been developed to inform patients’ renal replacement therapy (RRT) selection decisions. Patients progressing toward end stage renal disease (ESRD) must decide among multiple treatment options with varying characteristics. Complex information about treatments must be adequately conveyed to patients with different educational backgrounds and informational needs. Decisions about treatment options also require family input, as families often participate in patients’ treatment and support patients’ decisions. We describe the development, design, and preliminary evaluation of an informational, evidence-based, and patient-and family-centered decision aid for patients with ESRD and varying levels of health literacy, health numeracy, and cognitive function.MethodsWe designed a decision aid comprising a complementary video and informational handbook. We based our development process on data previously obtained from qualitative focus groups and systematic literature reviews. We simultaneously developed the video and handbook in “stages.” For the video, stages included (1) directed interviews with culturally appropriate patients and families and preliminary script development, (2) video production, and (3) screening the video with patients and their families. For the handbook, stages comprised (1) preliminary content design, (2) a mixed-methods pilot study among diverse patients to assess comprehension of handbook material, and (3) screening the handbook with patients and their families.ResultsThe video and handbook both addressed potential benefits and trade-offs of treatment selections. The 50-minute video consisted of demographically diverse patients and their families describing their positive and negative experiences with selecting a treatment option. The video also incorporated health professionals’ testimonials regarding various considerations that might influence patients’ and families’ treatment selections. The handbook was comprised of written words, pictures of patients and health care providers, and diagrams describing the findings and quality of scientific studies comparing treatments. The handbook text was written at a 4th to 6th grade reading level. Pilot study results demonstrated that a majority of patients could understand information presented in the handbook. Patient and families screening the nearly completed video and handbook reviewed the materials favorably.ConclusionsThis rigorously designed decision aid may help patients and families make informed decisions about their treatment options for RRT that are well aligned with their values.


BMC Nephrology | 2012

The providing resources to enhance African American patients' readiness to make decisions about kidney disease (PREPARED) study: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Patti L. Ephraim; Neil R. Powe; Hamid Rabb; Jessica M. Ameling; Priscilla Auguste; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Raquel C. Greer; Deidra C. Crews; Tanjala S. Purnell; Bernard G. Jaar; Nicole DePasquale; L. Ebony Boulware

BackgroundLiving related kidney transplantation (LRT) is underutilized, particularly among African Americans. The effectiveness of informational and financial interventions to enhance informed decision-making among African Americans with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and improve rates of LRT is unknown.Methods/designWe report the protocol of the Providing Resources to Enhance African American Patients’ Readiness to Make Decisions about Kidney Disease (PREPARED) Study, a two-phase study utilizing qualitative and quantitative research methods to design and test the effectiveness of informational (focused on shared decision-making) and financial interventions to overcome barriers to pursuit of LRT among African American patients and their families. Study Phase I involved the evidence-based development of informational materials as well as a financial intervention to enhance African American patients’ and families’ proficiency in shared decision-making regarding LRT. In Study Phase 2, we are currently conducting a randomized controlled trial in which patients with new-onset ESRD receive 1) usual dialysis care by their nephrologists, 2) the informational intervention (educational video and handbook), or 3) the informational intervention in addition to the option of participating in a live kidney donor financial assistance program. The primary outcome of the randomized controlled trial will include patients’ self-reported rates of consideration of LRT (including family discussions of LRT, patient-physician discussions of LRT, and identification of a LRT donor).DiscussionResults from the PREPARED study will provide needed evidence on ways to enhance the decision to pursue LRT among African American patients with ESRD.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01439516


Journal of School Nursing | 2006

Asthma Education for Rural School Nurses: Resources, Barriers, and Outcomes.

Marilyn Winkelstein; Ruth Quartey; Luu Pham; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; C.J. Lewis; K.L. Hill; Arlene M. Butz

This paper describes a school-based asthma education program for rural elementary school nurses. The program was designed to teach school nurses in 7 rural counties in Maryland how to implement and to reinforce asthma management behaviors in children with asthma and their caregivers. Rural nurses who participated in this program increased their mean asthma knowledge scores more than nurses who did not take the program. The program also increased self-efficacy among intervention school nurses, but the difference in self-efficacy between intervention and control nurses was not statistically significant at follow-up. No effects on documentation or communication behaviors were noted. Only 25% of the nurses reported an interest in implementing future asthma educational programs for children with asthma. This study indicates the importance of understanding the unique characteristics of rural school nurses, the resources they need, and the barriers and challenges they face in their practice.


Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2011

COACH Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioner/Community Health Worker Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Urban Community Health Centers

Jerilyn K. Allen; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sarah L. Szanton; Lee R. Bone; Martha N. Hill; David M. Levine; Murray West; Amy Barlow; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Mary Donnelly-Strozzo; Carol Curtis; Katherine Anderson

Background—Despite well-publicized guidelines on the appropriate management of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, the implementation of risk-reducing practices remains poor. This report describes the results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of cardiovascular disease risk reduction delivered by nurse practitioner /community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care (EUC) to improve lipids, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care in patients in urban community health centers. Methods and Results—A total of 525 patients with documented cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension and levels of LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, or HbA1c that exceeded goals established by national guidelines were randomly assigned to NP/CHW (n=261) or EUC (n=264) groups. The NP/CHW intervention included aggressive pharmacological management and tailored educational and behavioral counseling for lifestyle modification and problem solving to address barriers to adherence and control. Compared with EUC, patients in the NP/CHW group had significantly greater 12-month improvement in total cholesterol (difference, 19.7 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (difference,15.9 mg/dL), triglycerides (difference, 16.3 mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (difference, 6.2 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (difference, 3.1 mm Hg), HbA1c (difference, 0.5%), and perceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care (difference, 1.2 points). Conclusions—An intervention delivered by an NP/CHW team using individualized treatment regimens based on treat-to-target algorithms can be an effective approach to improve risk factor status and perceptions of chronic illness care in high-risk patients. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00241904.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2013

Effectiveness of Educational and Social Worker Interventions to Activate Patients' Discussion and Pursuit of Preemptive Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

L. Ebony Boulware; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Edward S. Kraus; J. Keith Melancon; Brenda Falcone; Patti L. Ephraim; Bernard G. Jaar; Luis F. Gimenez; Michael Choi; Mikiko Senga; Maria Kolotos; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Courtney Cook; Laney Light; Nicole DePasquale; Todd Noletto; Neil R. Powe


Journal of Pediatric Health Care | 2008

Factors That Influence Quality of Life in Rural Children With Asthma and Their Parents

Jennifer Walker; Marilyn Winkelstein; Cassia Land; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Ruth Quartey; Luu Pham; Arlene M. Butz

Collaboration


Dive into the LaPricia Lewis-Boyer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee R. Bone

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K.L. Hill

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.J. Lewis

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luu Pham

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy Barlow

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge