Lara J. Thomas

Asthma Action Plans and Patient Satisfaction Among Women With Asthma

BACKGROUND Asthma action plans (AAPs) are a priority recommendation of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program and have been shown to positively affect health outcomes. Patient satisfaction is an important clinical outcome, yet little is known about its association with receiving an AAP. This study examined the association between having an AAP and behaviors to keep asthma in control and patient satisfaction with care. METHODS The study design was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized trial evaluating a self-management program among 808 women with asthma. Participants reported demographic information, interactions with clinicians, whether they had an AAP and owned a peak flow meter, self-management behaviors, and symptoms. RESULTS The mean age of the participants was 48 ±13.6 years, 84% (n= 670) were satisfied with their asthma care, and 48% (n= 383) had a written AAP from their physician. Women not having an AAP were less likely to take asthma medication as prescribed [ x 2 (1) = 13.68, P , .001], to initiate a discussion about asthma with their physicians [ x 2 (1) = 26.35, P < .001], and to own a peak fl ow meter [ x 2 (1) =77.84, P < .001]. Adjusting for asthma control, income, and medical specialty,women who did not have an AAP were more likely to report dissatisfaction with their asthma care (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35-3.17; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Women without an AAP were less likely to initiate discussions with their physicians,take medications as prescribed, and own a peak fl ow meter to monitor asthma, all considered important self-management behaviors. They were also less satisfied with their care. Not having an AAP may affect interactions between patient and physician and clinical outcomes.

Study protocol for Women of Color and Asthma Control: a randomized controlled trial of an asthma-management intervention for African American women.

BackgroundAmong adults in the United States, asthma prevalence is disproportionately high among African American women; this group also experiences the highest levels of asthma-linked mortality and asthma-related health care utilization. Factors linked to biological sex (e.g., hormonal fluctuations), gender roles (e.g., exposure to certain triggers) and race (e.g., inadequate access to care) all contribute to the excess asthma burden in this group, and also shape the context within which African American women manage their condition. No prior interventions for improving asthma self-management have specifically targeted this vulnerable group of asthma patients. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a culturally- and gender-relevant asthma-management intervention among African American women.Methods/DesignA randomized controlled trial will be used to compare a five-session asthma-management intervention with usual care. This intervention is delivered over the telephone by a trained health educator. Intervention content is informed by the principles of self-regulation for disease management, and all program activities and materials are designed to be responsive to the specific needs of African American women. We will recruit 420 female participants who self-identify as African American, and who have seen a clinician for persistent asthma in the last year. Half of these will receive the intervention. The primary outcomes, upon which the target sample size is based, are number of asthma-related emergency department visits and overnight hospitalizations in the last 12 months. We will also assess the effect of the intervention on asthma symptoms and asthma-related quality of life. Data will be collected via telephone survey and medical record review at baseline, and 12 and 24 months from baseline.DiscussionWe seek to decrease asthma-related health care utilization and improve asthma-related quality of life in African American women with asthma, by offering them a culturally- and gender-relevant program to enhance asthma management. The results of this study will provide important information about the feasibility and value of this program in helping to address persistent racial and gender disparities in asthma outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01117805

A current picture of asthma diagnosis, severity, and control in a low-income minority preteen population.

Background. Asthma severity, control, type of medical regimen provided, and compliance with it are not well understood in minority patients at the transition stage from childhood to adolescence. Objective. Describe the level of asthma severity and control and the clinical regimens provided to a large population of low-income, African American children at this developmentally significant period. Methods. Parents of 1292 children with asthma among 6827 preteens in 19 middle schools in predominantly African American (94%), low-income neighborhoods in Detroit, Michigan, were enrolled in the study. Data were collected through self-administered survey and telephone interviews and were useable for 936 participants. Study queries related to demographics, asthma symptoms, and medication use. Mixed effects models with a random intercept for school were used to determine severity and control and the association of medical regimens to these. Results. Sixty-seven percent of children with probable asthma had received a physicians diagnosis. Being female was associated with being undiagnosed (p = .02). Forty-seven with no diagnosis had persistent asthma and 10% of these were classified as severe. Sixty-eight percent with a diagnosis and asthma medicine prescriptions were not controlled. Compliant use of controller medicine was associated with poorer asthma control compared to noncompliant controller users (p = .04) and reliever-only users (p < .001). Thirty-nine percent of children had controller medicine; of those 40% were not compliant with controller use; 9% nebulized their controller medicine. Conclusions. Care provided low-income minority children at an important stage in their development was not consistent with guidelines for asthma control. Therapy choices for treatment did not account for the actual level of their symptoms. Lack of an asthma diagnosis was significant in the population. Adolescent girls were at risk for not receiving a diagnosis. Patient compliance with asthma regimens was limited. Both clinician and patient education regarding effective asthma management appears needed regarding preteens in low-income minority communities.

Long-term effects of negotiated treatment plans on self-management behaviors and satisfaction with care among women with asthma.

Objective. To examine characteristics of women with negotiated treatment plans, factors that contribute to newly forming a treatment plan, and the impact of plans on asthma management, and their satisfaction with care over 2 years. Methods. Data came from telephone interviews with 324 women with asthma at baseline, 12 and 24 months. The effect of having a negotiated treatment plan on medication adherence, asking the physician questions about asthma, asthma management self-efficacy, and satisfaction with care was assessed over 24 months. Data were analyzed using mixed models. Analyses controlled for patient characteristics. Results. Thirty-eight percent of participants reported having a negotiated treatment plan at three time points. Seeing an asthma specialist (χ2(1) = 24.07, p < .001), was associated with having a plan. Women who did not have a negotiated treatment plan at baseline, but acquired one at 12 or 24 months, were more likely to report greater urgent office visits for asthma (odds ratio (OR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07–1.61). No associations were observed between having a plan and urgent healthcare use or symptom frequency. When adjusting for household income, level of asthma control, and specialty of the caregiving provider, women who did not have a negotiated treatment plan (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09–0.79) and those with a plan at fewer than three time points (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.11–0.83) were less likely to report medication adherence and satisfaction with their care (regression coefficient (standard error) = –0.65 (0.17), p < .001). No differences in asthma management self-efficacy or asking the doctor questions about asthma were observed. Conclusion. Women with asthma who had a negotiated treatment plan were more likely to see an asthma specialist. In the long-term, not having a treatment plan that is developed in partnership with a clinician may have an adverse impact on medication use and patient views of clinical services.

Impact of Goal Setting and Goal Attainment Methods on Asthma Outcomes Findings From an Asthma Self-Management Intervention for African American Women

Optimal use of goal-setting strategies in self-management efforts with high-risk individuals with asthma is not well understood. This study aimed to describe factors associated with goal attainment in an asthma self-management intervention for African American women with asthma and determine whether goal attainment methods proved beneficial to goal achievement and improved asthma outcomes. Data came from 212 African American women in the intervention arm of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a telephone-based asthma self-management program. Telephone interview data were collected to assess goals and goal attainment methods identified, asthma symptoms, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the long-term impact of goal setting and goal attainment methods on outcomes. The average age of the sample was 42.1 years (SD = 14.8). Factors associated with goal attainment included higher education (p < .01) and fewer depressive symptoms (p < .01). Using a goal attainment method also resulted in more goals being achieved over the course of the intervention (Estimate [SE] = 1.25 [0.18]; p < .001) when adjusted for clinical and demographic factors. Use of and types of goal attainment methods and goals were not found to significantly affect asthma control, quality of life, or frequency of nighttime asthma symptoms at follow-up. Using a method to achieve goals led to greater goal attainment. Goal attainment alone did not translate into improved asthma outcomes in our study sample. Further studies are warranted to assess the challenges of self-management in chronic disease patients with complex health needs and how goal setting and goal attainment methods can be strategically integrated into self-management efforts to improve health endpoints.