Larissa A. Maltseva
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Larissa A. Maltseva.
The Journal of General Physiology | 2014
Michael D. Stern; Larissa A. Maltseva; Magdalena Juhaszova; Steven J. Sollott; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Numerical modeling indicates that hierarchical clustering of ryanodine receptors in cells of the sinoatrial node is crucial to the calcium clock and thereby to regulation of heart rate.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Oliver Monfredi; Larissa A. Maltseva; Harold A. Spurgeon; Mark R. Boyett; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Spontaneous, submembrane local Ca2+ releases (LCRs) generated by the sarcoplasmic reticulum in sinoatrial nodal cells, the cells of the primary cardiac pacemaker, activate inward Na+/Ca2+-exchange current to accelerate the diastolic depolarization rate, and therefore to impact on cycle length. Since LCRs are generated by Ca2+ release channel (i.e. ryanodine receptor) openings, they exhibit a degree of stochastic behavior, manifested as notable cycle-to-cycle variations in the time of their occurrence. Aim The present study tested whether variation in LCR periodicity contributes to intrinsic (beat-to-beat) cycle length variability in single sinoatrial nodal cells. Methods We imaged single rabbit sinoatrial nodal cells using a 2D-camera to capture LCRs over the entire cell, and, in selected cells, simultaneously measured action potentials by perforated patch clamp. Results LCRs begin to occur on the descending part of the action potential-induced whole-cell Ca2+ transient, at about the time of the maximum diastolic potential. Shortly after the maximum diastolic potential (mean 54±7.7 ms, n = 14), the ensemble of waxing LCR activity converts the decay of the global Ca2+ transient into a rise, resulting in a late, whole-cell diastolic Ca2+ elevation, accompanied by a notable acceleration in diastolic depolarization rate. On average, cells (n = 9) generate 13.2±3.7 LCRs per cycle (mean±SEM), varying in size (7.1±4.2 µm) and duration (44.2±27.1 ms), with both size and duration being greater for later-occurring LCRs. While the timing of each LCR occurrence also varies, the LCR period (i.e. the time from the preceding Ca2+ transient peak to an LCR’s subsequent occurrence) averaged for all LCRs in a given cycle closely predicts the time of occurrence of the next action potential, i.e. the cycle length. Conclusion Intrinsic cycle length variability in single sinoatrial nodal cells is linked to beat-to-beat variations in the average period of individual LCRs each cycle.
Science Signaling | 2018
Kenta Tsutsui; Oliver Monfredi; Syevda G. Sirenko-Tagirova; Larissa A. Maltseva; Rostislav Bychkov; Mary S. Kim; Bruce D. Ziman; Kirill V. Tarasov; Yelena S. Tarasova; Jing Zhang; Mingyi Wang; Alexander V. Maltsev; Jaclyn A. Brennan; Igor R. Efimov; Michael D. Stern; Victor A. Maltsev; Edward G. Lakatta
The mechanisms that generate pacemaking activity in human sinoatrial nodal cells are revealed. Two clocks for a steadily beating heart The sinoatrial node is the endogenous pacemaker of the heart. Using isolated human sinoatrial node cells, Tsutsui et al. investigated the molecular mechanisms that enabled these cells to generate electrical signals at regular intervals to trigger rhythmic cardiac contractions. They found that periodic oscillations in Ca2+ and membrane potentials formed the basis for two interdependent “clocks” that together regularly generated spontaneous electrical signals. These clocks were uncoupled in human sinoatrial node cells that were not beating. Moreover, signaling downstream of β-adrenergic receptors enhanced the coupling between these two clocks and could induce electrical activity in some cells that were not beating. Understanding the mechanisms that generate pacemaking activity in human sinoatrial node cells may lead to the development of better therapies for sinus arrest, a condition that is caused by malfunction of the sinoatrial node and currently treated with a permanently implanted pacemaker. The spontaneous rhythmic action potentials generated by the sinoatrial node (SAN), the primary pacemaker in the heart, dictate the regular and optimal cardiac contractions that pump blood around the body. Although the heart rate of humans is substantially slower than that of smaller experimental animals, current perspectives on the biophysical mechanisms underlying the automaticity of sinoatrial nodal pacemaker cells (SANCs) have been gleaned largely from studies of animal hearts. Using human SANCs, we demonstrated that spontaneous rhythmic local Ca2+ releases generated by a Ca2+ clock were coupled to electrogenic surface membrane molecules (the M clock) to trigger rhythmic action potentials, and that Ca2+–cAMP–protein kinase A (PKA) signaling regulated clock coupling. When these clocks became uncoupled, SANCs failed to generate spontaneous action potentials, showing a depolarized membrane potential and disorganized local Ca2+ releases that failed to activate the M clock. β-Adrenergic receptor (β-AR) stimulation, which increases cAMP concentrations and clock coupling in other species, restored spontaneous, rhythmic action potentials in some nonbeating “arrested” human SANCs by increasing intracellular Ca2+ concentrations and synchronizing diastolic local Ca2+ releases. When β-AR stimulation was withdrawn, the clocks again became uncoupled, and SANCs reverted to a nonbeating arrested state. Thus, automaticity of human pacemaker cells is driven by a coupled-clock system driven by Ca2+-cAMP-PKA signaling. Extreme clock uncoupling led to failure of spontaneous action potential generation, which was restored by recoupling of the clocks. Clock coupling and action potential firing in some of these arrested cells can be restored by β-AR stimulation–induced augmentation of Ca2+-cAMP-PKA signaling.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Syevda Sirenko; Dongmei Yang; Larissa A. Maltseva; Mary S. Kim; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Uptake and release calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) (dubbed “calcium clock”), in the form of spontaneous, rhythmic, local diastolic calcium releases (LCRs), together with voltage-sensitive ion channels (membrane clock) form a coupled system that regulates the action potential (AP) firing rate. LCRs activate Sodium/Calcium exchanger (NCX) that accelerates diastolic depolarization and thus participating in regulation of the time at which the next AP will occur. Previous studies in rabbit SA node cells (SANC) demonstrated that the basal AP cycle length (APCL) is tightly coupled to the basal LCR period (time from the prior AP-induced Ca2+ transient to the diastolic LCR occurrence), and that this coupling is further modulated by autonomic receptor stimulation. Although spontaneous LCRs during diastolic depolarization have been reported in SANC of various species (rabbit, cat, mouse, toad), prior studies have failed to detect LCRs in spontaneously beating SANC of guinea-pig, a species that has been traditionally used in studies of cardiac pacemaker cell function. We performed a detailed investigation of whether guinea-pig SANC generate LCRs and whether they play a similar key role in regulation of the AP firing rate. We used two different approaches, 2D high-speed camera and classical line-scan confocal imaging. Positioning the scan-line beneath sarcolemma, parallel to the long axis of the cell, we found that rhythmically beating guinea-pig SANC do, indeed, generate spontaneous, diastolic LCRs beneath the surface membrane. The average key LCR characteristics measured in confocal images in guinea-pig SANC were comparable to rabbit SANC, both in the basal state and in the presence of β-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Moreover, the relationship between the LCR period and APCL was subtended by the same linear function. Thus, LCRs in guinea-pig SANC contribute to the diastolic depolarization and APCL regulation. Our findings indicate that coupled-clock system regulation of APCL is a general, species-independent, mechanism of pacemaker cell normal automaticity. Lack of LCRs in prior studies is likely explained by technical issues, as individual LCRs are small stochastic events occurring mainly near the cell border.
Biophysical Journal | 2011
Anna Maltsev; Victor A. Maltsev; Maxim Mikheev; Larissa A. Maltseva; Syevda Sirenko; Edward G. Lakatta; Michael D. Stern
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology | 2011
Ihor Zahanich; Syevda Sirenko; Larissa A. Maltseva; Yelena S. Tarasova; Harold A. Spurgeon; Kenneth R. Boheler; Michael D. Stern; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology | 2014
Syevda Sirenko; Victor A. Maltsev; Larissa A. Maltseva; Dongmei Yang; Yevgeniya O. Lukyanenko; Tatiana M. Vinogradova; Larry R. Jones; Edward G. Lakatta
Biophysical Journal | 2011
Oliver Monfredi; Larissa A. Maltseva; Mark R. Boyett; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Biophysical Journal | 2014
Michael D. Stern; Larissa A. Maltseva; Magdalena Juhaszova; Steven J. Sollott; Edward G. Lakatta; Victor A. Maltsev
Biophysical Journal | 2010
Anna Maltsev; Victor A. Maltsev; Maxim Mikheev; Larissa A. Maltseva; Syevda Sirenko; Edward G. Lakatta; Michael D. Stern