Larry K. Kvols

TREATMENT OF THE MALIGNANT CARCINOID SYNDROME: EVALUATION OF A LONG-ACTING SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUE

We studied the effects of a long-acting analogue of somatostatin (SMS 201-995, Sandoz) in 25 patients with histologically proved metastatic carcinoid tumors and the carcinoid syndrome. This drug was self-administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 150 micrograms three times daily. Flushing and diarrhea associated with the syndrome were promptly relieved in 22 patients. All 25 patients had an elevated 24-hour urinary excretion of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) (mean, 265 mg per 24 hours; range, 14 to 1079), which served as an objective indicator of disease activity. Eighteen of the 25 patients (72 percent) had a decrease of 50 percent or more in their urinary 5-HIAA levels, as compared with the pretreatment values. The median duration of this biochemical response was more than 12 months (range, 1 to greater than 18). Since no serious toxicity was observed, we conclude that SMS 201-995 may be appropriate for use as early therapy in patients with symptoms due to the carcinoid syndrome who have not responded to simpler measures.

Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms

Forty‐five patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors were treated with a regimen of etoposide 130 mg/m2/d for 3 days plus cisplatin 45 mg/m2/d on days 2 and 3. Both drugs were given by continuous intravenous infusion. Among 27 patients with well‐differentiated carcinoid tumors or islet cell carcinomas, only two partial objective tumor regressions were observed (7%). Among 18 patients prospectively classified as having anaplastic neuroendocrine carcinomas, however, there were nine partial regressions and three complete regressions, an overall regression rate of 67%. For anaplastic disease, the median duration of regression was 8 months (range to 21 months). Tumor response was unrelated to primary site, endocrine hyperfunction, or prior therapy experience. The median survival of all patients with anaplastic tumors was 19 months; this seemed favorable when considering the small experiences with these rare tumors reported in the literature. Toxicity, which was severe for most patients, consisted primarily of vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, alopecia, and neuropathy. The anaplastic neuroendocrine tumor is strongly responsive to therapy with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Patients with undifferentiated carcinomas, originating in typical neuroendocrine tumor sites (small and large bowel, pancreas, and stomach) or of unknown origin, who have consistent histologic findings by light microscopy should be evaluated for this possibility with appropriate immune staining or electron microscopy.

Daily Oral Everolimus Activity in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Failure of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy: A Phase II Trial

PURPOSE No established treatment exists for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression after failure of chemotherapy. Everolimus (RAD001), an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, in combination with octreotide has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in patients with NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, phase II study assessed the clinical activity of everolimus in patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs who experienced progression on or after chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by prior octreotide therapy (stratum 1: everolimus 10 mg/d, n = 115; stratum 2: everolimus 10 mg/d plus octreotide long-acting release [LAR], n = 45). Tumor assessments (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were performed every 3 months. Chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were assessed monthly if elevated at baseline. Trough concentrations of everolimus and octreotide were assessed. Results By central radiology review, in stratum 1, there were 11 partial responses (9.6%), 78 patients (67.8%) with stable disease (SD), and 16 patients (13.9%) with progressive disease; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months. In stratum 2, there were two partial responses (4.4%), 36 patients (80%) with SD, and no patients with progressive disease; median PFS was 16.7 months. Patients with an early CgA or NSE response had a longer PFS compared with patients without an early response. Coadministration of octreotide LAR and everolimus did not impact exposure to either drug. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were consistent with those previously seen with everolimus. CONCLUSION Daily everolimus, with or without concomitant octreotide LAR, demonstrates antitumor activity as measured by objective response rate and PFS and is well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs after failure of prior systemic chemotherapy.

First-Line Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Temozolomide in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Endocrine Carcinomas

Temozolomide is an active agent in metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. In vitro data indicate that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is synergistic for induction of apoptosis in neuroendocrine tumor cell lines. The authors retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of capecitabine and temozolomide in 30 patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas to assess response rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND Metastatic neuroendocrine malignancies frequently cause incapacitating endocrinopathies, and metastases predominant in the liver. Hepatic resection of metastases from such tumors is attractive because the natural history of neuroendocrine tumors is protracted, clinical severity of the endocrinopathy correlates with tumor volume, and local and intrahepatic growth characteristics often allow complete resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS To define the role of hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the records of 74 patients who underwent hepatic resection for such tumors between 1984 and 1992 were reviewed. Neuroendocrine tumors were classified by site of origin and clinical endocrinopathy. Survival, and type and duration of symptomatic response, were assessed as the major outcomes of this study. RESULTS There were 50 carcinoid, 23 islet-cell, and 1 atypical neuroendocrine tumors. Resections included 36 hemihepatectomies or extended hepatectomies and 38 nonanatomic resections. Thirty-eight primary tumors were resected concomitantly. Perioperative mortality was 2.7% and morbidity was 24%. Four-year survival was 73%. Overall postoperative symptomatic response rate was 90% with a mean duration of response of 19.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine malignancies is safe, provides effective palliation, and probably prolongs survival.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Diethylstilbestrol versus Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

Before the introduction of tamoxifen, diethylstilbestrol (DES) was widely considered to be the hormonal treatment of choice in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. We performed a randomized clinical trial of these two agents to determine their relative efficacy and toxicity. The trial involved 143 evaluable patients, of whom 99 had received no prior systemic therapy and 44 had received previous chemotherapy. The regression rates (complete plus partial) were higher in patients receiving DES (41 per cent) than in those receiving tamoxifen (33 per cent), but not significantly so (P = 0.37). In patients who had had no prior systemic therapy, the rates were 44 per cent and 38 per cent, respectively (P = 0.55), and in those who had had previous chemotherapy, 32 per cent vs. 23 per cent (P = 0.50). Analysis of the time until treatment failure for the two treatment groups showed no significant difference (medians: DES, 142 days; tamoxifen, 171 days). Toxicity was greater in patients receiving DES; nine of 74 patients (12 per cent) discontinued therapy solely because of adverse reactions. Since there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy and since tamoxifen was less toxic, tamoxifen appears to be the preferred agent.

The Management of Patients with Advanced Carcinoid Tumors and Islet Cell Carcinomas

Among the rarest of cancers, the gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (islet cell carcinomas and carcinoid tumors) present difficult and complex challenges for individual patient management. When the tumors metastasize, patients have a variety of clinical presentations including manifestations of tumor bulk and bizarre syndromes resulting from massive hormone production. Table 4. SI Units When physicians analyze therapeutic options for patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors or islet cell carcinomas, they should consider the course of the patients malignant disease, the distribution of metastasis, the severity of clinical manifestations, and the relative contributions of the hormonal syndromes and tumor bulk to symptoms and disability. The oncologist must be conservative, because these diseases frequently run an indolent course, allowing years of comfortable life with no treatment whatsoever. However, aggressive approaches may be justified when the patient develops disabling symptoms because tumor debulking or correction of mechanical problems may sometimes provide the patient with additional years of comfortable life. If the patient has a clinically dominant hormonal syndrome and has no imminent threat from tumor bulk, it is frequently possible to produce substantial palliation with minimal therapeutic risk. In earlier years, only patients with gastrinoma could be helped in this manner by the use of histamine-2 blockers (for example, adequate doses of cimetidine or ranitidine or, more recently, omeprazole [Prilosec, Merck and Company, West Point, Pennsylvania]). The development and clinical application of an analog of somatostatin (octreotide; Sandostatin, Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey) has provided a novel and frequently highly effective tool for control of almost all the endocrine syndromes. Striking decreases in hormonal levels and substantial or complete relief from symptoms can be achieved in approximately 80% of patients [1, 2]. Although octreotide usually produces only minimal immediate side effects, gallstones are a frequent long-term complication. However, octreotide therapy is cumbersome to the patient and is costly. Further, most patients become resistant to this therapy; for patients with carcinoid tumor, the median interval is about 1 year and for patients with islet cell carcinomas, only a few months. For these reasons, octreotide therapy for the carcinoid syndrome should be reserved for patients with severe flushing or diarrhea. In those with islet cell carcinomas, it should be used primarily to restore the patient to a better general and nutritional status so that more aggressive and definitive therapy can be undertaken with an acceptable risk. Regression rates after systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy (using either single drugs or drug combinations) for metastatic carcinoid tumors and islet cell carcinomas have been variable, as is typical for solid tumors [3]. For carcinoid tumors, regression rates (even with our most effective regimens) seldom exceed 20%, and the discouragingly short duration of these responses hardly justifies the risks and side effects of treatment. For this reason, we urge that systemic therapy for carcinoid tumors be carried out in a research setting. For islet cell carcinoma, however, treatment may be of true clinical value. Streptozocin (Zanosar, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan) seems to have specific cytotoxicity for the islet cell carcinoma and produces credible tumor regressions in about 30% of patients. Because of its minimal hematologic toxicity, it is useful in drug combinations with chemotherapeutic agents that are dose limited by leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. In a randomized trial, fluorouracil plus streptozocin was found to produce a 45% regression rate and seemed to improve survival when compared with streptozocin alone [4]. In a recent randomized trial, the combination of doxorubicin and streptozocin increased the regression rate to 69% and produced a statistically significant increase in survival [5]. However, fewer than one third of patients have a substantive and prolonged response to chemotherapy, and it produces considerable toxicity. A special consideration in managing these patients is the usually dominant involvement of the liver in the metastatic process. For selected patients, the surgeon can make a major and usually long-lasting contribution by resection of large solitary tumor masses or well-localized clusters of metastatic lesions [6]. With modern surgical technology, operative morbidity and mortality have been reduced to acceptable levels. Among 40 such patients reported by McEntee and colleagues [6], only a single postoperative death occurred. Usually, however, the diffuse nature of hepatic metastasis precludes effective surgical debulking. Therefore, hepatic artery infusion of various drugs has been attempted but with little documented evidence of success. Occlusion of hepatic arterial flow is attractive, because metastatic tumor neovascularity and oxygenation derive almost entirely from the hepatic artery. In contrast, hepatocytes are resilient, and viability may be maintained through the portal vein until rearterialization occurs. Although many researchers have shown that hepatic artery occlusion effectively shrinks primary or metastatic cancer in the liver, for the more common and more aggressive malignant diseases, tumor regrowth occurs so quickly that any net gain is difficult to discern. Because carcinoid tumors and islet cell carcinomas usually grow slowly, lasting benefit may be possible using hepatic artery occlusion. This review documents our experience with hepatic arterial occlusion, by either surgical ligation or embolization, in selected patients with neuroendocrine tumors and hepatic-dominant metastatic disease. Although frequent and substantial tumor regressions were produced, the duration of these regressions, even with these indolent neoplasms, was discouragingly short. We therefore developed and tested a regimen of sequential hepatic arterial occlusion and chemotherapy with the hope that regressions could be enhanced and prolonged. For chemotherapy, we elected to give each of the drugs that have been most active for these tumors when used alone (that is, fluorouracil, streptozocin, doxorubicin, and dacarbazine [DTIC]). Methods Patient Selection All patients selected for study had histologically confirmed carcinoid tumor or islet cell carcinoma with metastasis clinically limited to or dominant in the liver. They were ambulatory and maintaining a reasonable state of oral nutrition (at least 1200 calories daily). One or more measurable parameters of malignant disease were required to serve as objective indicators of response to therapy. For liver metastasis, this required clearly demarcated lesions on liver imaging that measured at least 5 cm in greatest diameter using radioisotope scanning or at least 3 cm in diameter using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Alternatively, if the patient had malignant hepatomegaly with a distinct liver edge extended at least 5 cm below the xiphoid or costal margins on quiet respiration, this was also used as a marker for response to therapy. In the absence of measurable liver involvement, hormonal assays could be used alone as markers for response to therapy, if they were greater than twice the upper limit of normal. Contraindications to study entry were a total serum bilirubin level more than 51.3 mol/L (3 mg/dL), previous radiation therapy to the liver or hepatic arterial chemotherapy, and the standard contraindications for each of the involved cytotoxic drugs. In practice, protocol entry was limited to those patients who, in the judgment of the physician, had clinically significant symptoms related to tumor bulk or to the endocrine syndrome or had extensive metastasis associated with abnormal test results for liver function. Treatment Hepatic artery occlusion was done by surgical ligation in those patients who had other specific indications for abdominal surgery (for example, an obstructing carcinoid tumor of the small bowel) or for those patients in whom catheterization and embolization were not considered to be technically feasible. For all other patients, occlusion was done by catheterization and embolization. Before hepatic artery occlusion by either method, the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature was determined by angiography. If any evidence of portal vein occlusion or compromise of portal vein flow was noted, occlusion was not done. In patients having operative tumor devascularization, the hepatic artery was approached for ligation through the gastrohepatic ligament of the lesser omentum. The primary right and left hepatic arteries were ligated and divided individually distal to the gastroduodenal artery. Dearterialization was completed by division of the entire gastrohepatic omentum from the diaphragm to the bile duct. Any accessory or replaced hepatic arteries were also identified, ligated, and divided; lymphoareolar tissue in the hepatoduodenal ligament was also divided. Cholecystectomy was done to avoid gallbladder ischemia. For occlusion by embolization, the hepatic artery was selectively catheterized with injection of embolic material, usually gel foam or polyvinyl alcohol or both. Because of the technical difficulty encountered in the procedure, the pretreatment impairment of liver function, and the total mass and distribution of hepatic metastasis, eight patients had embolization done at two or three sittings separated by 3 to 4 work-week intervals. After hepatic artery occlusion, the patient was observed in the hospital for a minimum of 5 days to monitor complications. In some instances, prophylactic antibiotics were used. The patient was released from hospital when there was no clinical evidence of complications, definite recovery of abnormal test results for liver function, and reduction of fever. Sequential chemother

Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver metastases from digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: Foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary

a DRK Kliniken Westend, Berlin , Germany; b UFR Bichat-Beaujon-Louis Mourier, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hopital Louis Mourier, Colombes , France; c Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Section, MED/18 – General Surgery and d Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona , Italy; e Netherlands Cancer Centre, Amsterdam , and f Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam , The Netherlands;

External beam versus intraoperative and external beam irradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

One hundred fifty‐nine patients with unresectable but localized pancreatic cancer, as defined at exploratory laparotomy, were treated at the Mayo Clinic between February 1974 to April 1985. Postoperative therapy consisted of 4000 to 6000 cGy external beam irradiation (XRT) alone in 122 patients or 4500 to 5500 cGy XRT in combination with an intraoperative electron boost in 37. In addition, 132 (both groups) received 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) chemotherapy. Local control (LC) at 1 year was 82% with XRT + intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) versus 48% with XRT and 66% versus 20% at 2 years respectively (P < 0.0005). Due to the high incidence of hematogenous and/or peritoneal spread in both groups (abdominal failure in 54 and 56% of patients at risk), the decreased frequency of local progression did not translate into an improved survival. Neither median nor long‐term survival of the two treatment groups (XRT versus XRT + IORT) was statistically different (median 12.6 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.25). With tumor arising in the head of the pancreas, survival at 2 years was 18% as opposed to 0% for other locations (P < 0.01). On the basis of a Cox multivariate analysis, no other treatment or prognostic factor significantly altered survival. Until the problem with systemic failure (usually abdominal) can be resolved, the median and long‐term survival of patients with pancreatic carcinoma is likely to remain unchanged. Since IORT appears to improve local control, we will continue to utilize IORT in phase 1,2 studies which also attempt to decrease the incidence of abdominal failures. Even with IORT + XRT combinations, the incidence of local progression is excessive and radiation dose modifiers need to be evaluated.

Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal and tumor tissue

Specific receptors for somatostatin (SS), mediating the various actions of this peptide, have been described in SS target tissues in animal and man. Using homogenate binding assays, as well as receptor autoradiography, the presence of SS receptors has been demonstrated in various regions of the brain (cortex, limbic system, basal ganglia), the anterior pituitary, the endocrine and exocrine pancreas, the gastrointestinal tract, and the adrenals. There are species-, as well as age-, related variations. Furthermore, there is evidence for different SS receptor subtypes. Interestingly, a large variety of human tumors also contain SS receptors with similar characteristics as those found in normal tissue; in numerous tumors, the SS receptor density is even higher than in healthy tissue counterparts. Most GH- and TSH-producing pituitary adenomas, but also a subgroup of endocrine inactive pituitary adenomas, have SS receptors; most carcinoids and islet cell carcinomas, as well as their metastases, also contain SS receptors. Several differentiated (usually EGF receptor negative) glia tumors possess SS receptors, whereas undifferentiated (EGF receptor positive) glia tumors lack such receptors. Furthermore, a subgroup of breast tumors, usually steroid receptor positive and neuroendocrine-differentiated, contain SS receptors. Finally, small cell lung carcinomas, but not non-small cell carcinomas, often possess SS receptors. These receptors are likely to be functional since in 11 acromegalics and 18 gastroenteropancreatic tumor patients, a positive correlation was observed between their SS receptor status and their hormone secretion sensitivity to Sandostatin.