Larry M. Jones

Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

BACKGROUND Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults. METHODS A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended chi2 test. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS A total of 38.5 % of patients went directly to the operating room (group I); 61.5% of patients were admitted with planned nonoperative management. Of the patients admitted with planned observation, 10.8% failed and required laparotomy; 82.1% of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15 and 46.6% of patients with ISS > 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4% of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION In this multicenter study, 38.5% of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.

The use of a permanent dermal allograft in full-thickness burns of the hand and foot: a report of three cases.

The standard method of grafting deep, thermal hand-and-foot burns with either full-thickness sheet grafts or narrowly meshed, thick, split-thickness skin grafts not only leaves a deep donor site, but also becomes complicated by infection, hypertrophic scarring, blistering, and hyper- or hypopigmentation. The availability now of an acellular, immunologically inert dermal transplant (AlloDerm; LifeCell Corp., The Woodlands, Texas) allows the successful use of ultrathin autografts while maximizing the amount of dermis delivered to the wound site. These autografts leave thin donor sites that heal faster and with fewer complications. This case report describes the use of AlloDerm dermal grafts on three patients with full-thickness burns of the distal extremities. Grafts were applied to the hand in two cases and the dorsum of the foot in the third. Range of motion, grip strength, fine motor coordination, and functional performance were quantitatively evaluated. As demonstrated by these patients, cosmetic and functional results were considered good to excellent after the use of AlloDerm grafts with thin autografts.

Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries: safe at any grade?

Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury (BHI) has become more widely accepted. A prospective trial was undertaken to test the belief that clinical state could identify the patients with BHI confirmed by computed tomography (CT) who could be safely managed without a surgical operation. Patients were excluded from nonoperative management only if they manifested hemodynamic instability, the presence or suspicion of any other injury requiring laparotomy, or would be unavailable for controlled monitoring. Of 60 patients treated for BHI, 30 were managed nonoperatively. The 30 who had laparotomies served as a comparative group. The groups were statistically similar in age, sex, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). The group managed nonoperatively had significantly more severe BHI. There were no deaths or delayed laparotomies in the nonoperative management group. The groups had similar ICU and total hospital stays when analyzed as independent variables or with control for BHI grade and ISS. Transfusion requirements were significantly lower for the nonoperative management group when analyzed independently or when controlled for BHI grade, ISS, and the number of non-abdominal injuries. Nineteen (63%) patients managed nonoperatively were followed until their CT scans showed complete resolution. None had complications. We conclude that nonoperative management of BHI is a safe and effective technique applicable to hemodynamically stable patients who lack other indications for laparotomy and who can be adequately monitored.

Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: Multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the contribution of age and gender to outcome after treatment of blunt splenic injury in adults. METHODS Through the Multi-Institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), 1488 adult patients from 27 trauma centers who suffered blunt splenic injury in 1997 were examined retrospectively. RESULTS Fifteen percent of patients were 55 years of age or older. A similar proportion of patients > or = 55 went directly to the operating room compared with patients < 55 (41% vs. 38%) but the mortality for patients > or = 55 was significantly greater than patients < 55 (43% vs. 23%). Patients > or = 55 failed nonoperative management (NOM) more frequently than patients < 55 (19% vs. 10%) and had increased mortality for both successful NOM (8% vs. 4%, p < 0.05) and failed NOM (29% vs. 12%, p = 0.054). There were no differences in immediate operative treatment, successful NOM, and failed NOM between men and women. However, women > or = 55 failed NOM more frequently than women < 55 (20% vs. 7%) and this was associated with increased mortality (36% vs. 5%) (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients > or = 55 had a greater mortality for all forms of treatment of their blunt splenic injury and failed NOM more frequently than patients < 55. Women > or = 55 had significantly greater mortality and failure of NOM than women < 55.

Simultaneous primary closure of four fasciotomy wounds in a single setting using the Sure-ClosureTM device

The Sure-Closurem 75 mm skin stretching system is used in closing wounds when the presence of a skin deficit precludes the safe and effective use of primary closure techniques. The device (Figure 2) consists of two pins that are threaded through the dermis of the wound margins on either side of the defect and which are in turn engaged by the hooks of the stretching device. The stretching force on the skin margins is spread over a wide area, thus preventing damage to the skin that individual hooks applied to the skin might cause. The device is used for up to 30 min for 3 days depending on the condition of the skin adjoining the defect. It can he applied over three different periods of time: (1) preoperatively (presuturing), lasting 1 to 2 days, (2) intraoperatively for acute stretching, and (3) postoperatively for delayed stretching.

Serious silver sulphadiazine and mafenide acetate dermatitis

Infrequently reported, serious allergic reactions to topical antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of burn injuries are a potential source of confusion. To avoid misdirected therapy, an understanding of the manifestations of such reactions is important. Two recent cases of serious allergic reactions, one to silver sulphadiazine, one to mafenide acetate, are presented and the literature is reviewed.

Fluid retention and burn survival.

The relationship between retained fluid and survival has previously been reported from our burn unit. Two hundred thirty cc/kg lean body mass accurately delineated survivors from nonsurvivors. Our previous study did not account for fluid lost through the burn wound. This study was undertaken to evaluate fluid retention per square meter of body surface area which has been corrected for fluid loss from the burn wound using a formula suggested by Mason et al. Data collected from 95 adult patients with burns greater than or equal to 20% body surface area burn (mean age, 42.4 years; mean burn size, 37.7%), who were admitted to our burn unit between January 1978 and September 1985, were evaluated. All patients included in the study were adequately resuscitated and survived the initial 48 hours. A calculation of the total fluid retained during the first 48 hours postburn and estimation of fluid loss from the burn wound were made. A comparison was made between lean body retained fluid and surface area retained fluid. A positive correlation (r = 0.921; p less than 0.001) was demonstrated between these two methods of assessing fluid retention. Fluid retention determined by either method resulted in a higher correlation with survival than any single predictor (age, per cent body surface area burned) of burn survival. Surface area fluid is as accurate as lean body fluid in predicting survival. Additionally, we determined that for the first 48 hours postburn, 4,425 cc fluid retained per meter square body surface area accurately differentiated survivors from nonsurvivors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fluid retention during the first 48 hours as an indicator of burn survival.

The quantity of fluid retained during the first 48 hours of resuscitation has been suggested as an indicator of burn severity and mortality (13). In this study of 82 adult burned patients with more than 20% total body surface burns we found that the net fluid retention during the first 48 hours of resuscitation was a predictor of burn mortality and additionally 230 cc of retained fluid per kilogram of lean body mass in the initial 48 hours postburn was an excellent means for separating survivors from nonsurvivors. Fluid retention as an indicator of burn severity and mortality was compared to other methods of predicting burned patient mortality. Parameters evaluated included the per cent body surface area burned, per cent full thickness burn, presence or absence of inhalation injuries, sex, age, and ultimate outcome. The Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) (14) was determined for each patient using these data. A comparison was made between fluid retention data, per cent body surface area burned, and the calculated Abbreviated Burn Severity Index and patient mortality. The power of each variable to predict mortality was evaluated by stepwise regression analysis. From this analysis net fluid retention during the first 48 hours of resuscitation was as accurate as the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index and was a better predictor of mortality than individual components of that Index.

Interpretation of Nutritional Parameters in Burn Patients

Data frequently used for a nutritional evaluation, eg, estimated calorie and protein needs, weight, triceps skinfold thickness, midarm-muscle circumference, serum albumin and transferrin levels, skin tests, total lymphocyte count, nitrogen balance, and creatinine height index determinations, are conceptualized herein. It is thought that many of these values lack appropriate validation in burn patients. With the accumulation of new data, many nutritional surveillance techniques will require modification and reinterpretation. Therefore, caution is essential when interpreting these data. In the meantime, currently available data are probably best construed by a team as an assemblage of findings that may classify a burn patient at risk of morbidity and mortality unless additional attention is given to meeting nutritional needs

Low Vitamin D Level on Admission for Burn Injury Is Associated With Increased Length of Stay.

Currently, there have been few studies that have evaluated the incidence of vitamin D deficiency in adult burn patients or correlated vitamin D levels with burn-related outcomes. The primary objective of the study was to identify the incidence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in an adult burn population. The secondary objective was to determine the impact of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency on clinical outcomes in burn care. A single-center, retrospective, and observational cohort analysis of adult patients admitted for initial management of burn injury, who had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) level measured on admission, was performed. Patients were categorized as vitamin D deficient (25D <10 ng/ml), insufficient (10–29 ng/ml), or sufficient (30–100 ng/ml) based on admission measurements. Clinical outcomes including complications, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), and survival were compared between patients with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and patients with vitamin D sufficiency. Three-hundred and eighteen patients were eligible for evaluation. Admission 25D level correlated with deficiency in 46 patients (14.5%), insufficiency in 207 (65.1%), and normal in 65 (20.4%). Patients with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency experienced higher rates of complications and longer ICU and hospital LOS compared with those with normal vitamin D levels. A large proportion of patients with burn injury presented with vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency which was associated with poor outcomes, including prolonged ICU and hospital LOS. Additional studies are needed to further describe the relationship between vitamin D status and clinical outcomes.