Lars Kroener
University of Bonn
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lars Kroener.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2002
Frank Musshoff; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea
The technique of automated headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was evaluated for the determination of amphetamines and synthetic designer drugs in hair samples. Headspace SPDE is a novel method for the solventless extraction of organic compounds in aqueous samples. In a so-called inside needle capillary absorption trap a hollow needle with an internal coating of polydimethylsiloxane is used as extraction and preconcentration medium. Sampling is performed on the solution headspace by passing the gas through the device actively by a syringe. Analytes present in the sample are sorbed onto the deposited stationary phase. The syringe needle is placed into the injection port of a GC and rapid heating of the metal needle induces the desorption of analytes. For the determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylendioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine, 3,4-methylendioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA), 3,4-methylendioxyphenyl-2-butanamine and N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylendioxyphenyl)-2-butanamine in human hair samples, 10 mg of hair were hydrolysed with sodium hydroxide. After absorption of analytes for an on-coating derivatization procedure the SPDE needle was directly placed into the headspace of a second vial containing N-methyl-bis(trifluoroacetamide). A validation procedure revealed absolute analyte recoveries between 10.2 and 16.7%. Linearity was obtained from 0.1 to 20 ng/mg with coefficients of correlation between 0.992 and 0.999. Intra- and inter-day precision were determined at two different concentrations and resulted in ranges between 1.4 and 4.1% (intra-day) and 4.2-14.6% (inter-day). Limits of detection between 0.03 ng/mg (MDA) and 0.19 ng/mg (MDEA) were achieved. Results indicated that SPDE is a rapid and sensitive method for the analysis of biological samples. Compared to solid-phase microextraction we found a higher extraction rate coupled with a faster automated operation.
Forensic Science International | 2003
Frank Musshoff; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea
This article describes a fully automated procedure for detecting cannabinoids in human hair samples. The procedure uses alkaline hydrolysis and headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction (HS-SPDE), followed by on-coating derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). SPDE is a further development of solid-phase microextraction (SPME), based on an inside needle capillary absorption trap. It uses a hollow needle with an internal coating of polydimethylsiloxane as extraction and pre-concentration medium. Ten mg of hair were washed with deionised water, petroleum ether and dichloromethane. After adding deuterated internal standards, the sample was hydrolyzed with sodium hydroxide and directly submitted to HS-SPDE. After absorption of analytes for an on-coating derivatization procedure, the SPDE-needle was directly placed into the headspace of a second vial containing N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide before GC-MS analysis. The limit of detection was 0.14 ng/mg for Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, 0.09 ng/mg for cannabidiol, and 0.12ng/mg for cannabinol. Absolute recoveries were in the range of 0.6 to 8.4%. Linearity was verified over a range from 0.2 to 20 ng/mg, with coefficients of correlation between 0.998 and 0.999. Intra- and inter-day precision were determined at two different concentrations and resulted in ranges between 2.3 and 6.0% (intra-day) and 3.3 and 7.6% (inter-day). Compared with conventional methods of hair analysis, this automated HS-SPDE-GC-MS procedure is substantially faster. It is easy to perform without using solvents and with minimal sample quantities, and it yields the same sensitivity and reproducibility. Compared to SPME, we found a higher extraction rate, coupled with a faster automated operation and greater stability of the device.
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry | 2003
Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Frank Musshoff; Burkhard Madea
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2004
Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Frank Musshoff; Burkhard Madea
Journal of Chromatographic Science | 2002
Frank Musshoff; Heike P. Junker; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea
American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology | 2006
Frank Musshoff; Stephan A. Padosch; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea
Archive | 2003
Frank Musshoff; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; E. Al
Archive | 2003
Frank Musshoff; F. Driever; Lars Kroener; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Burkhard Madea
Archive | 2002
Frank Musshoff; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea
Archive | 2002
Frank Musshoff; Heike Junker; Dirk W. Lachenmeier; Lars Kroener; Burkhard Madea