Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lars Videbæk is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lars Videbæk.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016

Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure

Lars Køber; Jens Jakob Thune; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Lars Videbæk; Eva Korup; Gunnar V.H. Jensen; Per Hildebrandt; Flemming Hald Steffensen; Niels Eske Bruun; Hans Eiskjær; Axel Brandes; Anna Margrethe Thøgersen; Finn Gustafsson; Kenneth Egstrup; Regitze Videbæk; Christian Hassager; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Dan Eik Høfsten; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Steen Pehrson

BACKGROUND The benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure caused by coronary artery disease has been well documented. However, the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic ICDs in patients with systolic heart failure that is not due to coronary artery disease has been based primarily on subgroup analyses. The management of heart failure has improved since the landmark ICD trials, and many patients now receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS In a randomized, controlled trial, 556 patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction, ≤35%) not caused by coronary artery disease were assigned to receive an ICD, and 560 patients were assigned to receive usual clinical care (control group). In both groups, 58% of the patients received CRT. The primary outcome of the trial was death from any cause. The secondary outcomes were sudden cardiac death and cardiovascular death. RESULTS After a median follow-up period of 67.6 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 120 patients (21.6%) in the ICD group and in 131 patients (23.4%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.12; P=0.28). Sudden cardiac death occurred in 24 patients (4.3%) in the ICD group and in 46 patients (8.2%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.82; P=0.005). Device infection occurred in 27 patients (4.9%) in the ICD group and in 20 patients (3.6%) in the control group (P=0.29). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure not caused by coronary artery disease was not associated with a significantly lower long-term rate of death from any cause than was usual clinical care. (Funded by Medtronic and others; DANISH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00542945 .).


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2017

Effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on left ventricular function in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes (LIVE)—a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Anders Jorsal; Caroline Kistorp; Pernille Holmager; Rasmus Stilling Tougaard; Roni Nielsen; Anja Hänselmann; Brian Nilsson; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jakob Hjort; Jon B. Rasmussen; Trine Welløv Boesgaard; Morten Schou; Lars Videbæk; Ida Gustafsson; Allan Flyvbjerg; Henrik Wiggers; Lise Tarnow

To determine the effect of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue liraglutide on left ventricular function in chronic heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes.


Circulation-cardiovascular Imaging | 2012

Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement.

Jordi S. Dahl; Lars Videbæk; Mikael K. Poulsen; Torsten R. Rudbæk; Patricia A. Pellikka; Jacob E. Møller

Background— Global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) is often reduced in aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction. The importance of reduced preoperative GLS on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement is unknown. Methods and Results— A total of 125 patients with severe aortic stenosis and ejection fraction >40% scheduled for aortic valve replacement were evaluated preoperatively and divided into 4 groups according to GLS quartiles. Patients were followed up for 4 years. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as cardiovascular mortality and cardiac hospitalization because of worsening of heart failure; the secondary end point was cardiovascular mortality. MACE and cardiac mortality were significantly increased in patients with lower GLS. Estimated 5-year MACE was increased: first quartile 19% (n=6) / second quartile 20% (n=6) / third quartile 35% (n=11) / fourth quartile 49% (n=15); P =0.04. Patients with increased age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left atrial dilatation were at increased risk. In Cox regression analysis, after correcting for standard risk factors and ejection fraction, GLS was found to be significantly associated with cardiac morbidity and mortality. In a stepwise Cox model with forward selection, GLS was the sole independent predictor: hazard ratio=1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.25), P =0.04. Comparing the overall log likelihood χ2 of the predictive power of the multivariable model containing GLS was statistically superior to models based on EuroScore, history with ischemic heart disease, and ejection fraction. Conclusions— In patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, reduced GLS provides important prognostic information beyond standard risk factors. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov][1]. Unique identifier: [NCT00294775][2]. [1]: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov [2]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00294775&atom=%2Fcirccvim%2F5%2F5%2F613.atomBackground—Global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) is often reduced in aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction. The importance of reduced preoperative GLS on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement is unknown. Methods and Results—A total of 125 patients with severe aortic stenosis and ejection fraction >40% scheduled for aortic valve replacement were evaluated preoperatively and divided into 4 groups according to GLS quartiles. Patients were followed up for 4 years. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as cardiovascular mortality and cardiac hospitalization because of worsening of heart failure; the secondary end point was cardiovascular mortality. MACE and cardiac mortality were significantly increased in patients with lower GLS. Estimated 5-year MACE was increased: first quartile 19% (n=6) / second quartile 20% (n=6) / third quartile 35% (n=11) / fourth quartile 49% (n=15); P=0.04. Patients with increased age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left atrial dilatation were at increased risk. In Cox regression analysis, after correcting for standard risk factors and ejection fraction, GLS was found to be significantly associated with cardiac morbidity and mortality. In a stepwise Cox model with forward selection, GLS was the sole independent predictor: hazard ratio=1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.25), P=0.04. Comparing the overall log likelihood &khgr;2 of the predictive power of the multivariable model containing GLS was statistically superior to models based on EuroScore, history with ischemic heart disease, and ejection fraction. Conclusions—In patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, reduced GLS provides important prognostic information beyond standard risk factors. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00294775.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2011

Prevalence and prognostic significance of hyponatraemia in outpatients with chronic heart failure

Louise Balling; Morten Schou; Lars Videbæk; Per Hildebrandt; Henrik Wiggers; Finn Gustafsson

Hyponatraemia has been reported to be a potent predictor of poor outcome in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of hyponatraemia in a large cohort of HF outpatients followed in clinics participating in the Danish Heart Failure Clinics Network.


European Heart Journal | 2013

Extended heart failure clinic follow-up in low-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial (NorthStar)

Morten Schou; Finn Gustafsson; Lars Videbæk; Chr Tuxen; Niels Keller; Jens Handberg; Anne Sejr Knudsen; G. T. Espersen; John Markenvard; Kenneth Egstrup; Hans Ulriksen; Per Hildebrandt

BACKGROUND Outpatient follow-up in specialized heart failure clinics (HFCs) is recommended by current guidelines and implemented in most European countries, but the optimal duration of HFC programmes has not been established. Nor is it known whether all or only high-risk patients, e.g. identified by NT-proBNP, might benefit from an extended HFC follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS In a multi-centre setting, we randomly assigned 921 clinically stable systolic heart failure (HF) outpatients on optimal medical therapy to undergo either an extended follow-up in the HFC (n = 461) or referral back to their general practitioner (GP) (n = 460). The primary composite endpoint was death or a cardiovascular admission. Secondary endpoints included mortality, an HF admission, quality of life, number of days admitted, and number of admissions. The median age of the patients was 69 years; 23% were females; the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.30; and the median NT-proBNP was 801 pg/mL; 89% were in NYHA class I-II. The median follow-up was 2.5 years. Time-to-event did not differ between groups (HFC vs. GP) (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.95-1.45, P = 0.149). The two groups did not differ with respect to any of the secondary endpoints at the follow-up (P> 0.05 for all). In high-risk patients identified by NT-proBNP ≥1000 pg/mL, no benefit from HFC follow-up was found (P = 0.721). CONCLUSION Irrespective of the level of NT-proBNP stable HF patients on optimal medical therapy do not benefit from long-term follow-up in a specialized HFC in a publicly funded universal access healthcare system. Heart failure patients on optimal medical therapy with mild or moderate symptoms are safely managed by their personal GP. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.Centerwatch.com: 173491 (NorthStar).


Circulation-cardiovascular Imaging | 2014

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Is Associated With Symptom Status in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Jordi S. Dahl; Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen; Lars Videbæk; Mikael K. Poulsen; Rasmus Carter-Storch; Thomas M. Hey; Patricia A. Pellikka; Flemming Hald Steffensen; Jacob Eifer Møller

Background—In aortic valve stenosis (AS), the occurrence of heart failure symptoms does not always correlate with severity of valve stenosis and left ventricular (LV) function. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that symptomatic patients with AS have impaired diastolic, longitudinal systolic function, and left atrial dilatation compared with asymptomatic patients. Methods and Results—In a retrospective descriptive study, we compared clinical characteristics and echocardiographic parameters in 99 symptomatic and 139 asymptomatic patients with severe AS and LV ejection fraction ≥50%. Independent predictors of symptomatic state were identified using logistic regression analysis. Symptomatic patients were younger (72±10 versus 76±12 years of age; P=0.002), presented less often with atrial fibrillation (13% versus 24%; P=0.05) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2% versus 19%; P<0.001), and had a lower prevalence of hypertension (73% versus 40%; P<0.001). Despite similar AS severity, symptomatic patients had higher LV mass index (120±39 versus 95±25 g/m2; P<0.0001), increased relative wall thickness (0.61±0.15 versus 0.50±0.11; P<0.0001), shorter mitral deceleration time (199±58 versus 268±62 ms; P<0.0001), and increased left atrial volume index (49±18 versus 42±15 mL/m2; P=0.02). When adjusting for age, history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, LV mass index, relative wall thickness, left atrial volume index, and deceleration time were still associated with the presence of symptoms. Conclusions—The present study demonstrates that symptomatic status in severe AS is associated with impaired diastolic function, LV hypertrophy, concentric remodeling, and left atrial dilatation when corrected for indices of AS severity. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00294775.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2008

Effect of repeated intracoronary injection of bone marrow cells in patients with ischaemic heart failure the Danish stem cell study--congestive heart failure trial (DanCell-CHF)

Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen; Jacob Eifer Møller; Per Thayssen; Anders Junker; Lars Videbæk; Susanne G. Sækmose; Torben Barington; Malthe Kristiansen; Moustapha Kassem

It has been suggested that myocardial regeneration may be achieved by a single intracoronary bone marrow derived stem cell infusion in selected patients with ischaemic heart disease. The effect is uncertain in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure and it is not known whether repeated infusions would have additional positive effects.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2006

Tei index and neurohormonal activation in patients with incident heart failure: Serial changes and prognostic value

Kirsten V. Mikkelsen; Jacob Eifer Møller; Peter Bie; Henrik Ryde; Lars Videbæk; Torben Haghfelt

Natriuretic peptides and Tei index are useful indices for risk stratification in advanced left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Their role in early stages is less clear.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2007

Treatment with beta-blockers in nurse-led heart failure clinics : Titration efficacy and predictors of failure

Finn Gustafsson; Morten Schou; Lars Videbæk; Tonny Nielsen; Hans Ulriksen; John Markenvard; Tage Lysbo Svendsen; Henrik Ryde; Else Vigholt; Per Hildebrandt

Beta‐blockers (BBs) are a cornerstone in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF), but several surveys have documented that many patients are not offered treatment or are not titrated to target doses. In part to address this problem, specialized, nurse‐led HF clinics have been initiated in many countries. However, little information is available to describe if such programs are successful in initiating and up‐titrating BBs in daily clinical practice.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2013

Patient adherence to evidence‐based pharmacotherapy in systolic heart failure and the transition of follow‐up from specialized heart failure outpatient clinics to primary care

Anne Gjesing; Morten Schou; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber; Finn Gustafsson; Per Hildebrandt; Lars Videbæk; Henrik Wiggers; Malene Nøhr Demant; Mette Charlot; Gunnar H. Gislason

Undertreatment with evidence‐based pharmacotherapy for heart failure (HF) is an important problem, and it has been suggested that specialized HF clinics (HFCs) can improve treatment initiation and correct dosing. The objective of this study was to examine long‐term adherence to and dosages of evidence‐based pharmacotherapy during and after participation in specialized HFCs.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lars Videbæk's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordi S. Dahl

Odense University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Morten Schou

Copenhagen University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Finn Gustafsson

Copenhagen University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mikael K. Poulsen

Odense University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Torben Haghfelt

Odense University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge