László Lempert
Purdue University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by László Lempert.
Duke Mathematical Journal | 2013
László Lempert; Liz Vivas
Let (X,ω) be a compact Kähler manifold. As discovered in the late 1980s by Mabuchi, the set H0 of Kähler forms cohomologous to ω has the natural structure of an infinite dimensional Riemannian manifold. We address the question whether any two points in H0 can be connected by a smooth geodesic, and show that the answer, in general, is “no”.
Duke Mathematical Journal | 1985
László Lempert
On definit des transformations tangentes en utilisant la structure symplectique holomorphe du fibre cotangent holomorphe
Inventiones Mathematicae | 2000
László Lempert
Abstract.We prove that the sheaf cohomology groups Hq(Ω,?) vanish if Ω is a pseudoconvex open subset of a Banach space with unconditional basis, and q≥1.
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin | 2001
László Lempert; Róbert Szőke
Motivated by deformation theory of holomorphic maps between almost complex manifolds we endow, in a natural way, the tangent bundle of an almost complex manifold with an almost complex structure. We describe various properties of this structure.
arXiv: Complex Variables | 2017
László Lempert
This paper was inspired by Guan and Zhou’s recent proof of the socalled strong openness conjecture for plurisubharmonic functions. We give a proof shorter than theirs and extend the result to possibly singular Hermitian metrics on vector bundles.
Archive | 1993
László Lempert
It is well known that any (paracompact) differentiable manifold M has a complexification, i.e., a complex manifold X ⊃ M, dimc X = dimℝ M, such that M is totally real in X (see Ref. 8). It is also known that a small neighborhood U of M in X is diffeomorphic to the tangent bundle TM of M. Thus, the tangent bundle TM of any differentiable manifold carries a complex manifold structure. This complex structure is, of course, not unique. One way of finding a “canonical” complex structure is to endow M with some extra structure and require that the complex structure on TM interact with the structure of M. Here we consider smooth (meaning infinitely differentiable) Riemannian manifolds M. When M = ℝ, there is a natural identification Tℝ ≅ ℂ given by
Journal of Geometric Analysis | 1992
David Catlin; László Lempert
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society | 1991
László Lempert; Lee A. Rubel
{{T}_{\sigma }}\mathbb{R} \mathrel\backepsilon \tau \frac{\partial }{{\partial \sigma }} \leftrightarrow \sigma + i\tau \in \mathbb{C},
Archive | 1986
László Lempert
Bulletin of The London Mathematical Society | 2012
László Lempert; Róbert Szőke
(1.1) and this endows Tℝ with a complex structure. In (1.1) σ denotes the coordinate on R. This coordinate depends on the algebraic structure of the identification (1.1); however, the complex structure on Tℝ depends only on the metric of ℝ. In other words, an isometry of ℝ induces a biholomorphic mapping on Tℝ.