Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Latham Boyle is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Latham Boyle.


Physical Review D | 2008

Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early universe

Latham Boyle; A. Buonanno

gw 0 (f1) and gw 0 (f2). Here r is the so-called “tensor-to-scalar ratio,” which is constrained by cosmic-microwave-background (CMB) experiments; and gw (f) is the energy spectrum of primordial gravitational-waves, which is constrained e.g. by pulsar-timing (PT) measurements, laser-interferometer (LI) experiments, and the standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) bound. Differentiating the master equation yields a new expression for the tilt dln gw (f)/dlnf of the present-day gravitational-wave spectrum. The relationship between r and gw (f) depends sensitively on the uncertain physics of the early universe, and we show that this uncertainty may be encapsulated (in a model-independent way) by two quantities: ˆ w(f) and ˆ nt(f), where ˆ nt(f) is a certain logarithmic average over nt(k) (the primordial tensor spectral index); and ˆ w(f) is a certain logarithmic average over ˜ w(a) (the effective equation-of-state parameter in the early universe, after horizon re-entry). Here the effective equation-of-state parameter ˜ w(a) is a combination of the ordinary equation-of-state parameter w(a) and the bulk viscosity �(a). Thus, by comparing observational constraints on r and gw (f), one obtains (remarkably tight) constraints in the { ˆ w(f), ˆ nt(f)} plane. In particular, this is the best way to constrain (or detect) the presence of a “stiff” energy component (with w > 1/3) in the early universe, prior to BBN. (The discovery of such a component would be no more surprising than the discovery of a tiny cosmological constant at late times!) Finally, although most of our analysis does not assume inflation, we point out that if CMB experiments detect a non-zero value for r, then we will immediately obtain (as a free by-product) a new upper bound ˆ w < 0.55 on the logarithmically averaged effective equation-of-state parameter during


Physical Review D | 2004

New duality relating density perturbations in expanding and contracting Friedmann cosmologies

Latham Boyle; Paul J. Steinhardt; Neil Turok

For a 4-dimensional spatially-flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe with a scalar field


Physical Review Letters | 2008

Binary–Black-Hole Merger: Symmetry and the Spin Expansion

Latham Boyle; Michael Kesden; Samaya Nissanke

\phi(x)


Physical Review Letters | 2014

Quantifying the BICEP2-Planck tension over gravitational waves.

Kendrick M. Smith; Cora Dvorkin; Latham Boyle; Neil Turok; M. Halpern; G. Hinshaw; Ben Gold

, potential


New Journal of Physics | 2015

Rethinking Connes? Approach to the Standard Model of Particle Physics Via Non-Commutative Geometry

Shane Farnsworth; Latham Boyle

V(\phi)


Physical Review D | 2015

Testing and extending the inflationary consistency relation for tensor modes

Latham Boyle; Kendrick M. Smith; Cora Dvorkin; Neil Turok

and constant equation of state


Journal of High Energy Physics | 2015

Non-Associative Geometry and the Spectral Action Principle

Shane Farnsworth; Latham Boyle

w=p/\rho


Journal of High Energy Physics | 2018

A new algebraic structure in the standard model of particle physics

Latham Boyle; Shane Farnsworth

, we show that an expanding solution characterized by


International Conference on Quantum Information (2011), paper PDPB1 | 2011

Longer Baseline Telescope Arrays Using Quantum Repeaters

Daniel Gottesman; Thomas Jennewein; Sarah Croke; Latham Boyle

\epsilon=3(1+w)/2


Physical Review D | 2004

Cosmic gravitational-wave background in a cyclic universe

Latham Boyle; Paul J. Steinhardt; Neil Turok

produces the same scalar perturbations as a contracting solution with

Collaboration


Dive into the Latham Boyle's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Turok

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kendrick M. Smith

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Kesden

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Gottesman

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Hinshaw

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jun Yong Khoo

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Halpern

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge