Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Laura C. Coates is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Laura C. Coates.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2010

Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment

Laura C. Coates; Jaap Fransen; Philip S. Helliwell

Objective: To create minimal disease activity (MDA) criteria for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). With recent therapeutic advances, this is now a goal for treatment and may represent a measure to compare therapies. It defines a satisfactory state of disease activity rather than a change, and encompasses all aspects of the disease. Methods: 40 patient profiles were sampled from an observational PsA database. Sixty experts in PsA classified these as in MDA or not. A consensus of ⩾70% was accepted, identifying 13 profiles in MDA. Summary statistics created possible cut-off points for the definition. Considering the number of measures that must be met, 35 candidate definitions were created and tested using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Four candidate definitions showed high area under the curve values on ROC testing. Definitions with high outlying values were excluded as they were not considered to represent MDA. Aiming for high specificity to reduce false positives resulted in a preference for the following definition: “A patient is classified as achieving MDA when meeting 5 of the 7 following criteria: tender joint count ⩽1; swollen joint count ⩽1; Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index ⩽1 or body surface area ⩽3; patient pain visual analogue score (VAS) ⩽15; patient global disease activity VAS ⩽20; health assessment questionnaire ⩽0.5; tender entheseal points ⩽1”. Conclusion: This study provides the first definition of a “state” of MDA in PsA and defines a target for treatment. It must now be validated in other populations and tested in clinical trials.


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2009

Clinical and imaging efficacy of infliximab in HLA–B27–Positive patients with magnetic resonance imaging–determined early sacroiliitis

Nick Barkham; Helen Keen; Laura C. Coates; Philip O'Connor; Elizabeth M. A. Hensor; Alexander Fraser; Lorna Cawkwell; Alexander N. Bennett; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Emery

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab in HLA-B27-positive patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined early sacroiliitis, using both clinical and MRI assessments. METHODS Forty patients with recent-onset inflammatory back pain, as assessed by the Calin criteria, HLA-B27 positivity, clinical disease activity as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), pain and morning stiffness, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined sacroiliac joint bone edema were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at 0, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. MRI scans were performed at baseline and 16 weeks and scored by 2 observers (blinded to both the order of the scans and to treatment group), using the Leeds scoring system. Clinical assessments included the BASDAI, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) instrument, the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group criteria (ASAS) for improvement, and markers of inflammation. RESULTS The mean reduction in the total MRI score from week 0 to week 16 was significantly greater in infliximab-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients (P = 0.033). On average, significantly more lesions resolved in the infliximab group (P < 0.001), while significantly more new lesions developed in the placebo group (P = 0.004). Significantly greater improvement in the infliximab group versus the placebo group was also observed for changes from week 0 to week 16 in the BASDAI (P = 0.002), BASFI (P = 0.004), and ASQoL (P = 0.007) scores. Responses according to the ASAS criteria for 40% improvement, the ASAS criteria for 20% improvement in 5 of 6 domains, and ASAS partial remission were achieved by 61%, 44%, and 56% of infliximab-treated patients, respectively. Infliximab was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Infliximab was an effective therapy for early sacroiliitis, providing a reduction in disease activity by week 16. This study is the first to show that infliximab is effective for reducing clinical and imaging evidence of disease activity in patients with MRI-determined early axial spondylarthritis.


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2016

Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis.

Laura C. Coates; Arthur Kavanaugh; Philip J. Mease; Enrique R. Soriano; Maria Laura Acosta-Felquer; April W. Armstrong; Wilson Bautista-Molano; Wolf-Henning Boehncke; Willemina Campbell; Alberto Cauli; Luis R. Espinoza; Oliver FitzGerald; Dafna D. Gladman; Alice B. Gottlieb; Philip S. Helliwell; M. Elaine Husni; Thorvardur Jon Love; Ennio Lubrano; Neil McHugh; Peter Nash; Alexis Ogdie; Ana Maria Orbai; Andrew Parkinson; Denis O'Sullivan; Cheryl F. Rosen; Sergio Schwartzman; Evan L. Siegel; Sergio Toloza; William Tuong; Christopher T. Ritchlin

To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).


Arthritis Care and Research | 2010

Validation of Minimal Disease Activity Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis Using Interventional Trial Data

Laura C. Coates; Philip S. Helliwell

New criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been developed. The aim is to provide further validation of these criteria using data obtained in interventional trials with infliximab, a drug with proven efficacy in PsA.


The Lancet | 2014

Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Laura C. Coates; Anna R. Moverley; Lucy McParland; Sarah Brown; Nuria Navarro-Coy; John L O'Dwyer; David M Meads; Paul Emery; Philip G. Conaghan; Philip S. Helliwell

BACKGROUND Early intervention and tight control of inflammation optimise outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis but these approaches have not yet been studied in psoriatic arthritis. We aimed to assess the effect of tight control on early psoriatic arthritis using a treat-to-target approach. METHODS For this open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with early psoriatic arthritis (<24 months symptom duration), who had not previously received treatment with any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, were enrolled from eight secondary care rheumatology centres in the UK. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tight control (with review every 4 weeks and with escalation of treatment if minimal disease activity criteria not met) or standard care (standard therapy according to the treating clinician, with review every 12 weeks) for 48 weeks. Randomisation was done by minimisation incorporating a random element, to ensure treatment groups were balanced for randomising centre and pattern of arthritis (oligoarticular vs polyarticular). The randomisation procedure was done through a central 24-h automated telephone system based at the Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (Leeds, UK). This was an open-label study in which patients and clinicians were aware of treatment group assignment. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a masked assessor every 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20) response at 48 weeks, analysed by intention to treat with multiple imputation for missing ACR components. Cost-effectiveness was also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01106079, and the ISCRCTN registry, number ISCRCTN30147736. FINDINGS Between May 28, 2008, and March 21, 2012, 206 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive tight control (n=101) or standard care (n=105). In the intention-to-treat patient population, the odds of achieving an ACR20 response at 48 weeks were higher in the tight control group than in the standard care group (odds ratio 1·91, 95% CI 1·03-3·55; p=0·0392). Serious adverse events were reported by 20 (10%) patients (25 events in 14 [14%] patients in the tight control group and eight events in six [6%] patients in the standard care group) during the course of the study. No unexpected serious adverse events or deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION Tight control of psoriatic arthritis disease activity through a treat-to-target approach significantly improves joint outcomes for newly diagnosed patients, with no unexpected serious adverse events reported. FUNDING Arthritis Research UK and Pfizer.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2011

Development of a preliminary composite disease activity index in psoriatic arthritis

Aizad Mumtaz; P. Gallagher; Brian J. Kirby; Robin Waxman; Laura C. Coates; Douglas Veale J; Philip S. Helliwell; Oliver FitzGerald

Objectives To develop a preliminary composite psoriatic disease activity index (CPDAI) for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Methods Five domains were assessed and specific instruments were employed for each domain to determine the extent of domain involvement and the effect of that involvement on quality of life/function. Disease activity for each domain was then graded from 0 to 3 giving a CPDAI range of 0–15. Patient and physician global disease activity measures were also recorded and an independent physician was asked to indicate if treatment change was required. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed. Factor, tree analysis and standardised response means were also calculated. Results Significant correlation was seen between CPDAI and both patient (r=0.834) and physician (r=0.825) global disease activity assessments (p=0.01). Tree analysis revealed that 96.3% of patients had their treatment changed when CPDAI values were greater than 6; no patient had their treatment changed when CPDAI values were less than 5. Conclusion CPDAI correlates well with patient and physician global disease activity assessments and is an effective tool that clearly distinguishes those who require a treatment change from those who do not.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2009

The OMERACT Psoriatic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (PsAMRIS): Definitions of Key Pathologies, Suggested MRI Sequences, and Preliminary Scoring System for PsA Hands

Mikkel Østergaard; Fiona M. McQueen; Charlotte Wiell; Paul Bird; Pernille Bøyesen; B. O. Ejbjerg; Charles Peterfy; Frédérique Gandjbakhch; Anne Duer-Jensen; Laura C. Coates; Espen A. Haavardsholm; Kay-Geert A. Hermann; Marissa Lassere; Philip O'Connor; Paul Emery; Harry K. Genant; Philip G. Conaghan

This article describes a preliminary OMERACT psoriatic arthritis magnetic resonance image scoring system (PsAMRIS) for evaluation of inflammatory and destructive changes in PsA hands, which was developed by the international OMERACT MRI in inflammatory arthritis group. MRI definitions of important pathologies in peripheral PsA and suggestions concerning appropriate MRI sequences for use in PsA hands are also provided.


Arthritis Care and Research | 2010

Frequency, predictors, and prognosis of sustained minimal disease activity in an observational psoriatic arthritis cohort

Laura C. Coates; Richard J. Cook; Ker-Ai Lee; Vinod Chandran; Dafna D. Gladman

To establish the frequency and predictors of minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to investigate the prognostic ability of minimal disease activity criteria to predict future joint damage.


British Journal of Dermatology | 2013

Comparison of three screening tools to detect psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis (CONTEST study)

Laura C. Coates; Tariq Aslam; F. Al Balushi; A.D. Burden; E Burden-The; Anna R. Caperon; R. Cerio; C. Chattopadhyay; Hector Chinoy; Mark Goodfield; Lesley Kay; Stephen Kelly; Bruce Kirkham; C.R. Lovell; Helena Marzo-Ortega; Neil McHugh; Ruth Murphy; Nick Reynolds; Catherine Smith; Elizabeth J. C. Stewart; Richard B. Warren; Robin Waxman; H. E. Wilson; P. Helliwell

Background  Multiple questionnaires to screen for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been developed but the optimal screening questionnaire is unknown.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2011

Confirmation of TNIP1 and IL23A as susceptibility loci for psoriatic arthritis

John Bowes; Gisela Orozco; Edward Flynn; Pauline Ho; Rasha Brier; Helena Marzo-Ortega; Laura C. Coates; Ross McManus; Anthony W. Ryan; David Kane; Eleanor Korendowych; Neil McHugh; Oliver FitzGerald; Jonathan Packham; Ann W. Morgan; Ian N. Bruce; Anne Barton

Objectives To investigate a shared genetic aetiology for skin involvement in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by genotyping single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), reported to be associated in genome-wide association studies of psoriasis, in patients with PsA. Methods SNPs with reported evidence for association with psoriasis were genotyped in a PsA case and control collection from the UK and Ireland. Genotype and allele frequencies were compared between PsA cases and controls using the Armitage test for trend. Results Seven SNPs mapping to the IL1RN, TNIP1, TNFAIP3, TSC1, IL23A, SMARCA4 and RNF114 genes were successfully genotyped. The IL23A and TNIP1 genes showed convincing evidence for association (rs2066808, p = 9.1×10−7; rs17728338, p = 3.5×10−5, respectively) whilst SNPs mapping to the TNFAIP3, TSC1 and RNF114 genes showed nominal evidence for association (rs610604, p = 0.03; rs1076160, p = 0.03; rs495337, p = 0.0025). No evidence for association with IL1RN or SMARCA4 was found but the power to detect association was low. Conclusions SNPs mapping to previously reported psoriasis loci show evidence for association to PSA, thus supporting the hypothesis that the genetic aetiology of skin involvement is the same in both PsA and psoriasis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Laura C. Coates's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil McHugh

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Nash

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge