Laura C. Lovato

Recruitment for controlled clinical trials : Literature summary and annotated bibliography

This article is a literature summary and annotated bibliography of research on recruitment for controlled clinical trials published through 1995. It extends and revises a similar review published in this journal a decade ago. The current commentary focuses on intervening developments in recruitment, including diverse populations, HIV trials, primary prevention trials, recruitment strategies, overall planning and management, patient and physician attitudes, adherence, generalizability, and cost. Profound barriers may exist in the recruitment of diverse populations, involving language, cultural factors, beliefs about medical research, and the appropriateness of available protocols. Extensive literature exists on patient and physician barriers to participation. Trials in HIV-infected or AIDs-diagnosed individuals introduce special considerations, including issues of confidentiality, parallel track design, and populations difficult to define and track. Recruitment strategies such as patient registries, occupational screening, direct mail, and the media are now prominent in the literature. Successful planning and management of an overall recruitment plan include piloting strategies, monitoring recruitment by data tracking systems, and hiring quality staff. Generalizability of study results is influenced by the characteristics of participants and by their adherence to study protocol. With increasingly limited funding to conduct clinical trials, efforts to quantify and reduce recruitment costs are being made. While over 4000 titles were identified, primarily by MEDLINE literature search, the articles summarized emphasize data-supported and -confirmed conclusions, and broad coverage of disease areas. We annotate here 91 outstanding articles useful for formulation of overall recruitment approaches in clinical trials.

Minority Recruitment in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

PURPOSE African American men have a higher prostate cancer risk profile than that of other men in the United States. The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize the challenges associated with enrolling and randomizing African American and other minority participants in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT). METHODS The PCPT is a randomized trial of finasteride versus placebo for preventing prostate cancer in healthy men age 55 years and older; it is coordinated by the Southwest Oncology Group. The manuscript describes demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the PCPT randomized sample (18,882 men) by four racial and ethnic groups (Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and other). African American men comprised 4% of the total randomized sample compared to our goal of 8%. Minority recruitment was emphasized through the Study Manual and training that occurred at trial activation. Supplemental minority recruitment activities were initiated a year after study activation and continued through the end of the accrual period. Minority recruitment was emphasized as follows: minority recruitment presentations at PCPT training seminars (held during twice yearly Southwest Oncology Group meetings); distribution of additional minority recruitment materials; engagement of four consultants for minority recruitment; production of a Minority Recruitment Manual; and a small pilot study involving minority outreach recruiters at five PCPT sites. RESULTS The consultants were helpful in implementing the pilot project and in suggesting and reviewing materials for minority recruitment. The five-site pilot project did not increase either enrollment or randomization of minorities (with a possible exception at one site). CONCLUSIONS We suggest that a long-term perspective is required for successful recruitment of minority participants in clinical trials. Likewise, extensive minority recruitment efforts must be ready to implement at trial activation.

Quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial*

Purpose: The main purpose of this paper is to present the results of a randomized trial comparing the effects of two chemotherapy regimens on the Quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Trials in advanced stage disease represent an important treatment context for QOL assessment. A second purpose of this paper is to examine methods for handling the level of missing data commonly observed in the advanced stage disease context. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin plus vinorelbine or carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The QOL of 222 patients was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung (FACT-L) prior to randomization; follow-up assessments occurred at 13 and 25 weeks. Three methods were used to analyze the QOL data: (1) cross-sectional analysis of four patient categories (improved, stable, missing, and declined) based on changes in the FACT-L score, (2) a mixed linear model, and (3) a pattern mixture model. The longitudinal analyses addressed two potential data biases. Results: Questionnaire submission rates were 91% at baseline, 68% at 13 weeks, and 47% at 25 weeks. The cross-sectional and mixed linear model analyses did not show significant differences by treatment arm in patient-reported QOL. The pattern mixture model analysis, more appropriate given non-ignorable missing data, also found no statistically significant effect of treatment on patient QOL. Conclusion: We present a sensitivity analysis approach with multiple methods for analyzing treatment effects on patient QOL in the presence of substantial, non-ignorable missing data in an advanced stage disease clinical trial. We conclude that the two treatment arms did not differ statistically in their effects on patient QOL over a 25-week treatment period.

Profile of Men Randomized to the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: Baseline Health-Related Quality of Life, Urinary and Sexual Functioning, and Health Behaviors

PURPOSE To describe men who agreed to be randomized to the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), a 7-year, double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. METHODS Comprehensive health-related quality-of-life data are presented for 18,882 randomized PCPT participants. RESULTS PCPT participants are highly educated, middle to upper income, and primarily white (92%). Participants reported healthy lifestyles. The mean American Urological Association Symptom Index score was well below the maximum entry score of less than 19; existing urinary symptoms were generally not bothersome. The scores for two sexual functioning scales could range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting worse sexual functioning. The mean score for the Sexual Problem Scale was 19.2 out of 100, and the mean Sexual Activities Scale was 44.1 out of 100. Scores for seven of the eight Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey scales (higher scores are better) were 10 to 20 points higher than those reported by a general population sample and differed minimally by race but not by age. Previously reported associations between sexual dysfunction and hypertension, diabetes, and depression were also observed. Men who never smoked reported less sexual dysfunction than did those who either had quit or still smoked. CONCLUSION Individuals who are likely to enroll in primary prevention trials have a high socioeconomic status, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and better health than the general population. These data help oncologists design chemoprevention trials with respect to the selection of health-related quality-of-life assessments and recruitment strategies.

Challenges posed by non-random missing quality of life data in an advanced-stage colorectal cancer clinical trial

Effects of variations in agent, dose, and route of treatment administration on patient reported quality of life (QOL) were examined for 279 patients enrolled on a seven‐arm randomized clinical trial (S8905) of 5‐FU and its modulation for advanced colorectal cancer. Patients completed QOL questionnaires at randomization and weeks 6, 11, and 21 post‐randomization with five QOL endpoints considered primary: three treatment‐specific symptoms (stomatitis, diarrhea, and hand/foot sensitivity); physical functioning; and emotional functioning. Patient compliance with the QOL assessment schedule was good, supporting the feasibility of including QOL measures in cooperative group trials. However, death and deteriorating health produced substantial missing data. Cross‐sectional analyses indicated that the seven therapeutic arms did not differ in their impact on QOL. Unfortunately, longitudinal analyses of the QOL data were inappropriate given non‐random missing data. Graphical presentation of non‐random missing data identified the seriousness of this problem and its effect on potential conclusions about QOL during treatment. This problem appears to be particularly challenging in the context of advanced‐stage disease. Failure to recognize the presence of non‐random missing data can lead to serious overestimates of patient QOL over time. Copyright

Mass Mailing and Staff Experience in a Total Recruitment Program for a Clinical Trial: The SHEP Experience

The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) staff contacted 447,921 screenees, of whom 11,919 (2.7%) were originally eligible and 4,736 (1.1%) maintained eligibility and were randomized. The total number of participants enrolled at the 16 clinical centers ranged from 133 to 559. The low yield of screenees to randomizations resulted from the study design, not from low levels of agreement to participate, and required the employment of a variety of recruitment strategies in a prudent overall plan. SHEP was one of the first clinical trials to use mass mailing as a primary strategy of recruitment. The study used mailing lists from seven generic sources. More than 3.4 million letters of invitation were mailed; they yielded an overall response rate of 4.3%. Motor vehicle and voter registration lists provided the greatest numbers of names. Mailings to members of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and registrants of the Health Care Finance Administration (HCFA) provided the greatest response rates. Considerable variability in response rates existed among clinical centers using generically similar mailing lists. Generally, the number of hours spent on recruitment showed a positive, but not statistically significant, association with randomization yields. The recruitment yield was statistically significantly higher in clinics with experienced recruitment coordinators than in clinics with inexperienced ones (p = 0.0008). From these findings we conclude that mass mailing is an important strategy in an overall recruitment program, that the involvement of experienced recruitment staff is important, and that although the total time spent by staff on recruitment may also improve results, it matters less than the staffs level of recruiting experience.

Army and Air Force Leadership in The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

Prostate cancer is now the most common solid tumor in men in the United States. Although the current public health approach to this disease is early diagnosis and treatment, investigations are also focusing on the possibility of disease prevention. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, begun in 1993, has completed recruitment of 18,000 men who will be randomized to receive either finasteride or placebo to determine if finasteride can prevent the development of this disease. Both Army and Air Force institutions are participating in this trial, with four Department of Defense institutions contributing over 10% of the patients randomized. The results of this study may have a major impact on active duty personnel for whom prevention of prostate cancer may become possible.