Laura C. Sullivan

Functional Selectivity of Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonists in Peripheral Sensory Neurons

Activation of kappa opioid receptors (KORs) expressed by peripheral sensory neurons that respond to noxious stimuli (nociceptors) can reduce neurotransmission of pain stimuli from the periphery to the central nervous system. We have previously shown that the antinociception dose-response curve for peripherally restricted doses of the KOR agonist (–)-(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide (U50488) has an inverted U shape. Here, we found that the downward phase of the U50488 dose-response curve was blocked by an inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation U0126. Local administration of the selective KOR agonist salvinorin A (Sal-A), also resulted in an inverted U-shaped curve; however, the downward phase was insensitive to U0126. By contrast, inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) partially blocked the downward phase of the dose-response curve to Sal-A, suggesting a role for JNK. In cultures of peripheral sensory neurons, U50488 and Sal-A inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity with similar efficacies; however, their ability to activate ERK and JNK differed. Whereas U50488 activated ERK but not JNK, Sal-A activated JNK but not ERK. Moreover, although both U50488 and Sal-A produced homologous desensitization, desensitization to U50488 was blocked by inhibition of ERK activation, whereas desensitization to Sal-A was blocked by inhibition of JNK. Substitution of an ethoxymethyl ether for the C2 position acetyl group of Sal-A reduced stimulation of JNK, prevented desensitization by ethoxymethyl ether for the C2 position acetyl group of Sal-A, and resulted in a monotonic antinociception dose-response curve. Collectively, these data demonstrate the functional selectivity of KOR ligands for signaling in peripheral sensory neurons, which results in differential effects on behavioral responses in vivo.

Dual Regulation of δ-Opioid Receptor Function by Arachidonic Acid Metabolites in Rat Peripheral Sensory Neurons

The regulation of opioid receptor system function in peripheral sensory neurons is not well understood. Opioid agonist efficacy to inhibit nociceptor function and to promote antinociception is generally weak under basal conditions and frequently no response occurs. However, in response to a cyclooxygenase-dependent metabolite of arachidonic acid (AA) after exposure to inflammatory mediators, such as bradykinin (BK) or exogenous AA, peripheral opioid receptor systems become much more responsive to opioid agonists. In this study, we examined the time course for the induction and maintenance of functional competence of the δ-opioid receptor (DOR) system in adult rat nociceptors in culture and in vivo. We found that the responsive state of DOR after pretreatment with BK or exogenous AA is transient (30–60 minutes) and persists for 15–30 minutes after a 15-minute exposure of nociceptors to BK or AA. Interestingly, whereas functional competence of the DOR system could be reinduced with a second application of BK 60 minutes after the first, responsiveness of the DOR system could not be reinduced after an initial exposure to AA. This nonresponsive state of DOR after exogenous AA was mediated by a lipoxygenase (LOX)-dependent metabolite of AA. Intraplantar carrageenan also produced transient DOR functional competence and responsiveness was also reinduced by inhibition of LOX. Thus, the DOR system expressed by peripheral sensory neurons is under dual regulation by cyclooxygenase- and LOX-dependent metabolites of AA.

Signalling profile differences: paliperidone versus risperidone

Paliperidone is an active metabolite of the second‐generation atypical antipsychotic, risperidone recently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Because paliperidone differs from risperidone by only a single hydroxyl group, questions have been raised as to whether there are significant differences in the effects elicited between these two drugs.

Signalling profile differences

Paliperidone is an active metabolite of the second‐generation atypical antipsychotic, risperidone recently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Because paliperidone differs from risperidone by only a single hydroxyl group, questions have been raised as to whether there are significant differences in the effects elicited between these two drugs.

Constitutive Desensitization of Opioid Receptors in Peripheral Sensory Neurons

Opioid receptors expressed by peripheral pain-sensing neurons are functionally inactive for antinociceptive signaling under most basal conditions; however, tissue damage or exposure to inflammatory mediators (e.g., bradykinin) converts these receptors from a nonresponsive state to a functionally competent state. Here we tested the hypothesis that the basal, nonresponsive state of the mu- and delta-opioid receptors (MOR and DOR, respectively) is the result of constitutive receptor activity that activates desensitization mechanisms, resulting in MOR and DOR receptor systems that are constitutively desensitized. Consistent with our previous findings, under basal conditions, neither the MOR agonist [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin nor the DOR agonist [d-Pen2,5]-enkephalin, inhibited prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-stimulated cAMP accumulation in peripheral sensory neurons in culture (ex vivo) or inhibited PGE2-stimulated thermal allodynia in the rat hind paw in vivo. Prolonged treatment with naloxone induced MOR and DOR responsiveness both in vivo and ex vivo to a similar magnitude as that produced by bradykinin. Also similar to bradykinin, the effect of naloxone persisted for 60 minutes after washout of the ligand. By contrast, prolonged treatment with 6β-naltrexol, did not induce functional competence of MOR or DOR but blocked the effect of naloxone. Treatment with siRNA for β-arrestin-2, but not β-arrestin-1, also induced MOR and DOR functional competence in cultured peripheral sensory neurons. These data suggest that the lack of responsiveness of MOR and DOR to agonist for antinociceptive signaling in peripheral sensory neurons is due to constitutive desensitization that is likely mediated by β-arrestin-2.

Long-term reduction of kappa opioid receptor function by the biased ligand, norbinaltorphimine, requires c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity and new protein synthesis in peripheral sensory neurons

A single administration of the κ opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist, norbinaltorphimine (norBNI), produces long-term reduction in KOR function in heterologous expression systems and brain that is mediated by activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). In this study, we examined the long-term effects of norBNI on adult rat peripheral sensory neurons in vivo and ex vivo. Following a single intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of norBNI into the hind paw, peripheral KOR-mediated antinociception in the ipsilateral, but not the contralateral, hindpaw was abolished for at least 9 days. By contrast, the antinociceptive response to mu and delta opioid receptor agonists was unaltered. The long-term inhibitory effect on antinociception produced by pretreatment with norBNI required occupancy of peripheral KOR and was completely blocked by i.pl. injection of the JNK inhibitor, SP600125. In cultures of peripheral sensory neurons, norBNI activated JNK for at least 30 minutes. Furthermore, norBNI blocked KOR-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity measured 24 hours later in a JNK-dependent manner, but did not block activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). The long-term inhibitory effect of norBNI on KOR function in vivo and ex vivo was blocked by inhibitors of mRNA translation, cycloheximide and rapamycin. These data suggest that in peripheral sensory neurons norBNI is a KOR-biased ligand for activation of JNK signaling, resulting in long-term blockade of some (antinociception, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity), but not all (ERK), KOR signaling. Importantly, norBNI elicits de novo protein synthesis in sensory neuron terminals that produces selective long-term regulation of KOR.

Regulation of δ opioid receptor-mediated signaling and antinociception in peripheral sensory neurons by arachidonic acid-dependent 12/15-lipoxygenase metabolites

The function of δ opioid receptors (DOR) expressed by peripheral pain-sensing neurons (nociceptors) is regulated by both cyclooxygenase- and lipoxygenase (LOX)-dependent arachidonic acid (AA) metabolites. Whereas cyclooxygenase metabolites enhance responsiveness, LOX metabolites elicit a refractory, nonsignaling state of the DOR receptor system for antinociceptive signaling. In this study, using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses, we have found that the 12-/15-LOX metabolites, 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HETE) and 15-HETE, were elevated after treatment of adult rat primary sensory neuron cultures with AA. Exogenously applied 12-HETE and 15-HETE, but not 5-HETE, completely prevented DOR and κ opioid receptor (KOR) agonist–mediated inhibition of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-stimulated cAMP accumulation, but not inhibition, by the 5-HT1 receptor agonist 5-carboxamidotryptamine in cultured peripheral sensory neurons and in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells heterologously expressing DOR or KOR. Similarly, intraplantar injection of 12- or 15-HETE, either alone or in combination, prevented DOR agonist-mediated inhibition of PGE2-evoked thermal allodynia. Further, both AA- and carrageenan-mediated induction of the nonresponsive state of the DOR system was blocked by an intraplantar coinjection of the 12-/15-LOX inhibitors baicalein and luteolin. In contrast to the regulation of cAMP signaling, pretreatment with 12- and 15-HETE had no effect on either DOR or KOR agonist- mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in peripheral sensory neurons or CHO cells. These results suggest that the analgesic efficacy of peripherally restricted opioids for treatment of inflammatory pain may be enhanced by adjunct inhibition of LOX activity.

Abstract IA3: Lung cancer stem cells, acquired vulnerabilities, and molecular portraits: Translation to the clinic

Recent advances in detailed molecular understanding of lung cancer including complete genome sequences affords the possibility of developing molecularly targeted therapy for potentially all lung cancers. Currently the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC) has developed an integrated approach and network for identifying lung cancers with specific mutations and funneling these patients into clinical trials targeting the specific mutations identified. However, another approach is to use genome wide and chemical library screens to identify genetic and epigenetic changes that have been created in lung cancer cells during tumor pathogenesis that are absolutely required for the activated oncogenic pathways to function. These are often referred to as “synthetic lethal” changes and represent adaptations the cancer cell has to make to allow the “oncogene addictions” to drive tumor growth and survival. They are present in tumor but not normal cells and thus represent “acquired vulnerabilities” that can be therapeutically targeted. The NCIs “Cancer Target Discovery and Development Network” (CTD2N) exemplifies this combined genetic and pharmacologic approach. A most important subgroup of these vulnerabilities are changes that are required for the continued function and survival of a subpopulation of tumor cells that have acquired tumor initiating and often metastatic and drug resistant characteristics including many of the properties of stem cells that are referred to as cancer stem cells (CSCs) or “cancer initiating cells.” To achieve these goals we have developed a large integrated research platform. We have also: developed assays for identifying lung CSCs, “molecular portraits” (clades) that group lung cancers into subsets of clinical and molecular relevance; genome wide siRNA and chemical library functional screens to test for portrait/clade specificity. From these efforts we have learned that: There are a subset of cells within lung cancers (ranging from 0.1–30% of non small cell lung cancers, NSCLCs) and 50% + of small cell lung cancers, SCLCs) identified by elevated aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity that have dramatically enhanced clonogenic, tumorigenic, and self renewal capacity; Patients whose tumors are enriched is such ALDH+ tumor cells have significantly impaired prognosis; The notch pathway (particularly Notch3) and ALDH1A3 are major vulnerabilities in lung CSCs; NSCLCs can be subdivided by mRNA expression profiles into “molecular portraits” (or “clades”) that have relevant clinical, oncogenotype, and drug response phenotypes; Genome wide siRNA and large chemical library screens identify targets that are specific for lung cancer over normal lung epithelial cells; The identified targets show dramatic clade and oncogenotype specificity as well as specificity for lung cancers with different responses to available chemotherapy and targeted therapy for lung cancer; The newly identified vulnerabilities provide coverage of essentially all lung cancers and as such, provide a new functional “vulnerability classification” of lung cancer. All of these findings set the stage for the development of a rational approach to developing therapy targeted at lung cancer acquired vulnerabilities including those in lung CSCs that will include personalizing the therapy for each patient. (Supported by Lung Cancer SPORE P50CA70907, DOD Prospect, CPRIT, and NCI CTD2N CA148225.)