Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Laura Cañas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Laura Cañas.


Clinical Transplantation | 2012

Is adiponectin a marker of preclinical atherosclerosis in kidney transplantation

Laura Cañas; Beatriz Bayés; María Luisa Granada; Meritxell Ibernon; Esteban Porrini; Rosa Benítez; Juan M. Sánchez Díaz; Ricardo Lauzurica; Francesc Moreso; Armando Torres; Ildefonso Lampreabe; Assumpta Serra; Ramón Romero

Cañas L, Bayés B, Granada ML, Ibernon M, Porrini E, Benítez R, Díaz JM, Lauzurica R, Moreso F, Torres A, Lampreabe I, Serra A, Romero R. Is adiponectin a marker of preclinical atherosclerosis in kidney transplantation? 
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01490.x. 
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.


Transplantation | 2017

Effector Antitumor and Regulatory T Cell Responses Influence the Development of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Kidney Transplant Patients

Elena Crespo; Loreto Fernandez; Marc Lúcia; Edoardo Melilli; Ricardo Lauzurica; Rosa Maria Penin; Ariadna Quer; Sergio Luque; Maria Quero; Anna Manonelles; Joan Torras; Josep Maria Cruzado; Laura Cañas; Josep M. Grinyó; Oriol Bestard

Background Chronic immunosuppression promotes nonmelanocytic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after kidney transplantation. Adaptive and innate immunity play a key role controlling tumor growth and are influenced by different immunosuppressive agents. We hypothesized that functional impairment of tumor-specific T cell responses due to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) could contribute to SCC development, whereas conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-i) could recover this protective immune response. Methods Peripheral tumor-specific T cell responses against main SCC-derived antigens using the IFN-&ggr; enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intratumor (IT) and circulating immune phenotypes (CD4 + T, CD8 + T, CD20 + B, CD56 + NK, FOXP3 + regulatory T [Treg] cells) were explored in a cross-sectional analysis in 59 kidney transplant patients with SCC on CNI (KT-CNI-SCC) or mTOR-i (KT-mTORi-SCC), 25 nontransplants developing SCC (NoKT-SCC) and 6 healthy controls. Moreover, 25 KT-CNI-SCC were switched to mTOR-i and evaluated after 12 months. Results Kidney transplant patients showed lower IT infiltrates and tumor-specific T cell responses than NoKT-SCC, and intratumoral and circulating FOXP3 + Treg cells were higher in KT-mTORi-SCC (P < 0.05). Tumor-specific T cell responses were significantly lower in KT-CNI-SCC than KT-mTORi-SCC and NoKT-SCC and predicted SCC relapses (area under the curve = 0.837; P < 0.05). One-year after mTOR-i conversion, a significant increase in FOXP3 + Treg cell numbers and tumor-specific T cell responses were observed, reaching similar levels than KT-mTORi-SCC and NoKT-SCC patients. Conclusions Tumor-specific T cell responses are strongly impaired in CNI-treated patients but recover after mTOR-i conversion, reducing SCC relapses.


Nefrologia | 2016

Late onset of de novo atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome presented on a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipient successfully treated with eculizumab.

Francisco Javier Juega-Mariño; Neus Sala; Dolores López; Laura Cañas; Josep Bonet; Ricardo Lauzurica

typical hemolytic–uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an extremely are, genetic, chronic, and progressive inflammatory disease1 aused by defects in complement system. These defects result n systemic thrombotic microangiopathy involving damage o multiple organ systems including renal dysfunction.1–7 enetic mutations have been detected in around 50% of the eported cases. Regarding renal transplant patients, expanded riteria donors, infection by cytomegalovirus or BK, use of NI or m-TOR inhibitors and antibody-mediated rejection AMR) have been related to de novo post-transplant aHUS.8 raft failure is reported in 60–90% of patients within 1 year.10 culizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to C5 comlement protein avoiding the formation of the cell membrane ttack complex.6,7 We report herein a case of late onset of de ovo post-transplant aHUS on a simultaneous pancreas and idney recipient with severe systemic manifestations, withut presenting acute graft rejection, successfully treated with imited doses of eculizumab remaining stable after one year f follow-up. A 46-year-old woman with end stage renal disease econdary to type 1 Diabetes Mellitus underwent simulaneous pancreas and kidney transplant on October 2012 rom deceased donor. Received induction with Basiliximab nd maintenance treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, acrolimus, and prednisone. Pancreatic and renal function ere stable, creatinine (SCr) of 110 mol/L. Tacrolimus through evels remained between 6 and 8 ng/ml. Seven months fter transplant presented fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea nd vomiting, acute graft dysfunction (SCr 438 mol/L) and


Transplantation | 2018

Technical Characteristics, Optimization and Outcomes of Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Performed on Kidney Transplant Patients

Javier Juega; Laura Cañas; Monica Perez; Ricardo Lauzurica

REDinREN. REMAR. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to August 2016, 183 US-guided biopsies were performed in our institution on renal transplanted patients. Over that period We decided to optimize our biopsy protocol, switching from the initial 24 hours hospitalization and observation period of every patient undergoing a graft biopsy to an outpatient protocol of 6 hours observation and discharge after blood count control. Furthermore, we evolved from an initially shared technique made by radiologists and nephrologist together to the current US guided biopsy performed by the nephrologist alone. On the other hand we decided to change from the 14 G biopsy needle to the more suitable 16 G needle over the same period of time, being used on the outcome and the nephrologist alone protocols. We retrospectively analyzed the results of those changes and compared outcomes of each group Results 183 renal graft biopsies performed. 79,8% by radiologist and nephrologist together. 20,2% by nephrologist alone. Outpatient protocol with 6 hours observation performed on 51,4% of patients. 48,6% underwent programed admission and discharge after 24 hours observation. Automatic biopsy gun 14 G were used in 43,2%, 16 G in 37,7%, 18 G in 6%. 13,1% needle information not recorded. Mean age was 54 ± 14, 66,7% male. Mean needle passes 2 ± 1, mean number of useful samples 1,5 ±0,5. Mean pre-biopsy hemoglobin 11,5 ± 1,8 gr/dl, post-biopsy 10,9 ± 1,75 gr/dl, and mean Hb change was 0,65 ± 0,62. Mean obtained glomeruli was 18 ± 11. The 14 G biopsy gun was mainly used for the inpatient protocol ( 52%) and for the nephrologist and radiologist shared technique ( 54,8%), while 16 G biopsy gun was mainly used in outpatient cases ( 47%) and in all nephrologist independent technique cases. The overall rate of complications was 7,7%. It was higher in the shared technique cases vs. Nephrologist independent cases ( 8,2 vs 5,4%). There were no differences between complications observed in the inpatient vs. outpatient cases ( 7,8 vs. 7,4%). There were more complications observed in those biopsies using 14 G compared to 16 G ( 11,2 vs. 4,3%) Only one case ( 0,3%) required intravascular segmental embolization of transplanted kidney due to severe active bleeding after biopsy. There were no nephrectomies or deaths during the study period. Conclusion We observed fewer complications with appropriate sample obtainment using 16 G biopsy needle compared with 14 G. We found no differences in complications rate between inpatient vs. outpatient with 6 hours of observation protocol. We found less complications when biopsy performed by nephrologist alone compared with shared technique, although when comparing only cases in which 16 G needle was used, complication rates were similar. We believe US-guided renal graft biopsy using 16 G needle, with only 6 hours of observation after procedure and performed by nephrologist alone is safe,efficient, cost-saving and optimizes the renal graft biopsy process.


Transplantation | 2018

Which Spanish Living Kidney Donors Fear Post Donation Kidney Failure

Nuria Avinyo; Xavier Torres; Ana Menjivar; Isabel Delgado; Teresa Rangil; Laura Cañas; Dolores Lorenzo; Anton Fernandez; Montserrat Martinez; Carmen Valles; Anna Vila; Emma Arcos; David Paredes; Eva Baillés; Raquel Ojeda; Mireia Musquera; James R. Rodrigue

PI15/00550 - Characterization of the fear of kidney failure in the living kidney donor. Background The impact of fearing the failure of the non-donated kidney is unknown in Spanish donors. For this reason, we aimed at assessing the validity of the Spanish version of the Fear of Kidney Failure Questionnaire (FKF), along with characterizing living donors with higher fear of kidney failure. Methods 205 living kidney donors (LKDs) were randomly selected and stratified by year of donation (2005-2015). 139 general population participants without history of, or a current renal disease and/or without first-degree relatives suffering a renal disease were recruited as comparison group. Reliability of the FKF was assessed. The FKF criterion validity was evaluated by calculating its linear relationship with anxiety, depression, and fear-related personality dimensions. Divergent validity was verified by assessing whether the FKF was unrelated to personality dimensions non-relevant for fear states. LKDs were grouped by Cluster Analysis of the FKF scores. Clusters were compared on demographic and clinical variables to describe those LKDs with higher scores in the FKF, which were further characterized by calculating the most specific logistic regression model. Results The internal consistency of the FKF was acceptable for the whole sample (&agr;=0.95), and the LKDs (&agr;=0.91) and general population (&agr;=0.94) subsamples. Temporal stability of the FKF was acceptable (ICC=0.93). Factor analysis showed that the FKF was composed by a single factor explaining 83.5% of variance. Both for the whole sample and the LKDs and general population subsamples, the FKF was positively correlated with depressive and anxiety symptoms, and neuroticism (convergent validity). The FKF was unrelated to extroversion, openness to experience and conscientiousness (divergent validity). Fear of Kidney Failure in the general population subsample almost doubled the mean of the LKDs subsample. The FKF Cluster Analysis classified LKDs in three groups: absence of fear (68%), moderate fear (20%), and high fear of kidney failure (12%). Groups did not differ in demographics or donation outcomes. No differences were observed between groups in regret for having donated. However, higher FKF scorers were somewhat less satisfied with the experience of donation. This subgroup also showed a higher percentage of potential cases of depressive (16%) and anxiety disorders (20%), a worse quality of life, and higher scores in neuroticism. A higher percentage of these donors (20%) were followed both by the Nephrologist and the Family Doctor. Multivariate logistic regression showed that, once controlled the effect of presenting a potential depressive or anxiety disorder, FKF higher scorers were best characterized by higher scores in neuroticism. Conclusions Post donation fear of kidney failure is infrequent in Spanish LKDs. However, a subgroup of them, best characterized by a higher neuroticism, shows elevated FKF scores, a worse quality of life, and might present with anxiety and depressive disorders. This work has been funded by the project PI15/00550, integrated in the Plan Nacional I+D+I and co-funded by ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).


Transplantation | 2018

Urinary miRNA as a Potential Biomarker in Kidney Transplantation

Ioana Bancu; Inés Lozano-Ramos; Laura Cañas; Javier Juega; Mónica Pérez-Mir; Ricardo Lauzurica; Francesc Borràs-Serres

Introduction and Aims Kidney transplantation is the best available treatment for patients with end stage chronic kidney disease. The diagnosis of the pathology of the kidney graft relies on the determination of the creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. These parameters are altered after the onset of renal injury and they are not able to discern between various pathologies. The kidney biopsy, an invasive and not extent of complications procedure, remains essential for the diagnosis of the renal pathology. Hence the importance of finding parameters that allow an early diagnosis of the pathology involved in graft dysfunction. Urine is ideal for the study of possible biomarkers, its collection is easy, non-invasive and repeatable. Our aim was to analyse the miRNA content of urinary extracellular vesicles of the transplanted patients and define differential patterns of expression of miRNA specific to the different pathologies of the transplanted kidney. Methods Kidney transplanted patients with a kidney biopsy performed for clinical indication were selected. The biopsies were assessed according to Banff classification. From all biopsies those exhibiting acute cellular rejection (ACR), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and calcineurin inhibitors toxicity (CIT) were selected. Kidney transplanted patients with normal function (defined as eGFR CKD-EPI >90ml/min/1,72m2) and without proteinuria were defined as control group. First morning void urine was collected from patients. After low speed centrifugation to eliminate cell debris, Urine EVs were obtained by Size exclusion chromatography after urine concentration. EV-contained fractions selected as CD63 and CD9 positive fractions were pooled. Then, total RNA was extracted using mirCURY kit and high-throughput sequencing was done. Taqman qPCR were performed using the Taqman Advance miRNA assays for the following miRNAs (hsa-miR-1; has-miR-2, hsa-miR-3; hsa-miR-4, hsa-miR-5, hsa-miR-6; hsa-miR-7; hsa-miR-8; hsa-miR-9, has-miR-10). hsa-miR-10a-5p was used as internal control and Total RNA kidney (Thermosfisher) was used as positive control. Ct values of triplicates were averaged and used for &Dgr;Ct calculations. Principal component analysis (PCA), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Mann-Whitney test were done using GraphPrims v5 and SPSS v15. P<0.05 were set as significant. Results A total of 8 control samples and 14 pathological samples (3 IFTA, 6 ACR and 5 CIT) were processed by next generation sequencing. A total of 1500 miRNAs were identified, then after normalization and principal component analysis 12 miRNAs were selected to be tested in a new cohort. A new control group(N=8) and patients (IFTA: n=9; ACR: n=9; CIT: n=6) were selected as mentioned before. Then, uEVs and total RNA were isolated as described above. We found that eight miRNAs had different expression patterns in the urine of patients with any kind of graft pathology compared to controls. Conclusion miRNA profiling in urine has potential as a novel method for detecting pathology in kidney transplant.


BMC Nephrology | 2018

Molecular profile of urine extracellular vesicles from normo-functional kidneys reveal minimal differences between living and deceased donors

S. Inés Lozano-Ramos; Ioana Bancu; Laura Carreras-Planella; Marta Monguió-Tortajada; Laura Cañas; Javier Juega; Josep Bonet; M. Pilar Armengol; Ricardo Lauzurica; Francesc E. Borràs

BackgroundKidney transplantation (KTx) is the best therapeutic approach for chronic kidney diseases leading to irreversible kidney failure. Considering the origin of the graft, several studies have reported differences between living (LD) and deceased donors (DD) in graft and patient survival. These differences seem to be related to multiple factors including, donor age and time of cold ischemia among others. Many of transplanted organs come from old-aged DDs, in which pre-transplant biopsy is recommended. However, kidney biopsy has several limitations, and there is a need to develop alternatives to assess the status of a kidney before transplantation. As the analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) rendered promising results as non-invasive biomarkers of kidney-related pathologies, this pilot study aimed to investigate whether profiling uEVs of LDs and DDs may be of help to assess the quality of the kidney before nephrectomy.MethodsuEVs from 5 living donors and 7 deceased donors were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography, and their protein and miRNA content were analysed by liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometry and next generation sequencing, respectively. Then, hierarchical clustering and venn diagrams were done with Perseus software and InteractiVenn tool. Specific EVs data bases were also used for Gene Ontology analysis.ResultsNext generation sequencing revealed that uEVs from DDs contained less miRNAs than LDs, but most of the DD-expressed miRNAs were shared with LDs (96%). Only miR-326 (targeting the apoptotic-related Bcl2) was found significantly over-represented in LD. Focusing on the protein content, we detected a low intra-group correlation in both types of donors. Despite these differences, hierarchical clustering of either miRNA or protein data could not identify a differential profile between LDs and DDs. Of note, 90% of transplanted patients had a functional graft after a year from KTx.ConclusionsIn this pilot study we found that, in normo-functional grafts, minor differences in uEVs profile could not discriminate between LDs and DDs.


European Journal of Pharmacology | 2013

Magnetic bead-based proteomic technology to study paricalcitol effect in kidney transplant recipients

Vanessa Pérez; Anna Sánchez-Escuredo; Ricardo Lauzurica; Beatriu Bayés; Maribel Navarro-Muñoz; M.C. Pastor; Laura Cañas; Josep Bonet; Ramón Romero


International Urology and Nephrology | 2017

Inflammation and oxidation: do they improve after kidney transplantation? Relationship with mortality after transplantation.

Laura Cañas; Eva Iglesias; M.C. Pastor; Jaume Barallat; Javier Juega; Ioana Bancu; Ricardo Lauzurica


Transplantation | 2018

Similar Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Program from Controlled Cardiac Death Donors compared with Kidney Transplant from Brain Dead Donors after 2 Years of Follow Up

Javier Juega; Monica Perez; Laura Cañas; Elena Burgos; Ricardo Lauzurica

Collaboration


Dive into the Laura Cañas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ricardo Lauzurica

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier Juega

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ioana Bancu

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Josep Bonet

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dolores López

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesc E. Borràs

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fredzzia Graterol

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.C. Pastor

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramón Romero

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ana Menjivar

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge