Laura G. Remsen

Delivery of virus-sized iron oxide particles to rodent cns neurons

Delivery of viral particles to the brain is limited by the volume of distribution that can be obtained. Additionally, there is currently no way to non-invasively monitor the distribution of virus following delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). To examine the delivery of virus-sized particles across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), dextran coated, superparamagnetic monocrystalline iron oxide particles, with a hydrodynamic diameter of 20 +/- 4 nm, were delivered to rat brain by direct intracerebral inoculation or by osmotic BBB disruption with hypertonic mannitol. Delivery of these particles was documented by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and, unexpectedly, neuronal uptake was demonstrated by histochemical staining. Electron microscopy (EM) confirmed iron particle delivery across the capillary basement membrane and localization within CNS parenchymal cells following administration with BBB disruption. This is the first histologic and ultrastructural documentation of the delivery of particles the size of virions across the blood-brain barrier. Additionally, these dextran-coated, iron oxide particles may be useful, in and of themselves, as vectors for diagnostic and/or therapeutic interventions directed at the CNS.

The influence of anesthetic choice, PaCO2, and other factors on osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in rats with brain tumor xenografts.

UNLABELLED Increasing the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain improves outcome for patients with brain tumors. Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can markedly increase drug delivery, but achieving consistent, good quality BBB disruption (BBBD) is essential. We evaluated four experiments compared with our standard isoflurane/O2 protocol to improve the quality and consistency of BBBD and drug delivery to brain tumor and normal brain in a rat model. Success of BBBD was assessed qualitatively with the large molecular weight marker Evans blue albumin and quantitatively by measuring delivery of the low molecular weight marker [3H]-methotrexate. With isoflurane/O2 anesthesia, the effects of two BBBD drugs of different osmolalities were evaluated at two different infusion rates and infusion durations. Arabinose was superior to saline (P = 0.006) in obtaining consistent Evans blue staining in 16 of 24 animals, and it significantly increased [3H]-methotrexate delivery compared with saline in the tumor (0.388 +/- 0.03 vs 0.135 +/-0.04; P = 0.0001), brain around the tumor (0.269 +/- 0.03 vs 0.035 +/- 0.03; P = 0.0001), brain distant to the tumor (0.445 +/- 0.05 vs 0.034 +/- 0.07; P = 0.001), and opposite hemisphere (0.024 +/- 0.00 vs 0.016 +/- 0.00; P = 0.0452). Forty seconds was better than 30 s (P = 0.0372) for drug delivery to the tumor. Under isoflurane/O2 anesthesia (n = 30), maintaining hypocarbia was better than hypercarbia (P = 0.025) for attaining good BBBD. A propofol/ N2O regimen was compared with the isoflurane/O2 regimen, altering blood pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 as covariates (n = 48). Propofol/N2O was superior to isoflurane/O2 by both qualitative and quantitative measures (P < 0.0001). Neurotoxicity and neuropathology with the propofol/N2O regimen was evaluated, and none was found. These data support the use of propofol/N2O along with maintaining hypocarbia to optimize BBBD in animals with tumors. IMPLICATIONS Propofol/N2O anesthesia may be better than isoflurane/O2 for optimizing osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to brain tumor and normal brain.

Enhanced delivery improves the efficacy of a tumor-specific doxorubicin immunoconjugate in a human brain tumor xenograft model

OBJECTIVE To evaluate dose intensification with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) and the potential use of drug targeting with monoclonal antibody (MAb) BR96 conjugated to doxorubicin (BR96-DOX, now called SGN15) for treatment of intracerebral and subcutaneous human LX-1 small cell lung carcinoma xenografts in rats. METHODS LX-1 tumors with high, low, or heterogeneous levels of the Lewis(y) antigen for BR96 were evaluated. Rats were treated with intracarotid or intravenous BR96-DOX, with or without osmotic BBBD. RESULTS Both BR96-DOX and MAb BR96 treatment resulted in significant regression of subcutaneous tumors, in contrast to control groups including doxorubicin alone, saline, or nonbinding doxorubicin immunoconjugate. BR96-DOX delivered with BBBD to brain tumors with low antigen expression resulted in significantly (P < 0.001) increased rat survival time compared with animals that received intravenous or intra-arterial BR96-DOX. CONCLUSION The combination of an effective drug such as doxorubicin with a MAb to facilitate tumor-selective localization and osmotic BBBD to increase tumor delivery may have practical application in the clinic, because an increased delivery of drug to tumor can be obtained without increasing the dose of systemic drug.

Unexpected Neurotoxicity of Etoposide Phosphate Administered in Combination with Other Chemotherapeutic Agents after Blood-Brain Barrier Modification to Enhance Delivery, Using Propofol for General Anesthesia, in a Rat Model

OBJECTIVE Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) increases brain and brain tumor delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, which results in increased efficacy against brain tumors. We previously noted that the use of propofol anesthesia for BBBD increased the percentage of successful disruptions, resulting in delivery of increased amounts of chemotherapeutic drugs. This study evaluated the neurotoxicity of combination chemotherapeutic administration with this enhanced delivery system. METHODS Osmotic BBBD was performed in Long-Evans rats with isoflurane (n = 11) or propofol (n = 90) anesthesia. Carboplatin and/or melphalan, methotrexate, or etoposide phosphate was administered intra-arterially (IA) after BBBD using propofol anesthesia. Animals were assessed for systemic and neurological toxicity. Animals were killed for neuropathological evaluation 30 days after treatment. RESULTS With propofol or isoflurane anesthesia, BBBD alone produced no systemic or neurological toxicity. Single agents were relatively non-neurotoxic when administered IA with BBBD, as were the combinations of carboplatin or melphalan with methotrexate. Etoposide phosphate in combination with any other agent was observed to be highly neurotoxic if both agents were administered after BBBD. Administration of etoposide phosphate before BBBD completely eliminated neurotoxicity, although acute pulmonary toxicity occurred with any combination of etoposide phosphate and methotrexate, regardless of the timing of administration. CONCLUSION Neurotoxicity was significantly increased for etoposide phosphate combination groups, particularly when both drugs were administered IA after BBBD. This increase in neurotoxicity may reflect on increase in drug delivery observed with propofol anesthesia. The neurotoxicity of IA administered etoposide phosphate with BBBD and propofol anesthesia could be minimized by administering etoposide phosphate IA before BBBD and administering carboplatin or melphalan IA after BBBD.

Long-term toxicity and neuropathology associated with the sequencing of cranial irradiation and enhanced chemotherapy delivery.

OBJECTIVE The goal was to evaluate, at 1 year, 75 Long-Evans rats for survival rates and toxicity associated with the sequencing of cranial irradiation and enhanced chemotherapy delivery. METHODS Seventy-five Long-Evans rats were randomized into four groups and evaluated at 1 year for survival rates and toxicity associated with the sequencing of cranial irradiation and enhanced chemotherapy delivery. Radiation (2,000 cGy) was administered as a single fraction, by using parallel opposed portals, 30 days before chemotherapy (Group 1), 24 hours before chemotherapy (Group 2), 30 days after chemotherapy (Group 3), or without chemotherapy or without radiation (control group, Group 4). Five subgroups within each treatment group included rats receiving intra-arterially administered methotrexate (1 g/m2) or intravenously administered etoposide (200 mg/m2) combined with intra-arterially administered carboplatin (200 mg/m2), administered with or without osmotic blood-rain barrier disruption, and a group receiving normal saline solution after blood-brain barrier disruption. RESULTS There was a significant increase in total toxic effects when the three experimental groups were compared with the control group (P = 0.001, 0.006, and 0.013 for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). All groups receiving radiation and chemotherapy (particularly carboplatin and etoposide) had an increased incidence of hind limb paralysis, resembling experimental allergic neuritis (P = 0.053). Statistical analysis showed a trend toward increased mortality rates in Group 1 (antecedent radiation), compared with the control group (P = 0.082), and an increased incidence of intracerebral calcification (P = 0.019). No differences in mortality rates were observed for Group 2 or 3, compared with the control group. CONCLUSION Radiation before chemotherapy was a more toxic sequence and, surprisingly, carboplatin/etoposide administered in combination with radiotherapy was more detrimental than methotrexate. Additional studies are in progress to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of sequences of cranial irradiation and enhanced chemotherapy in tumor-bearing rats.

Efficacy after sequencing of brain radiotherapy and enhanced antibody targeted chemotherapy delivery in a rodent human lung cancer brain xenograft model

PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sequencing radiation therapy (RT) and antibody targeted chemotherapy (BR96-DOX) in nude rats bearing human lung cancer (B.5 LX-1) intracerebral (i.c.) xenografts. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our approach was to administer RT using 20 Gy single-fraction cranial irradiation either before, concurrent with, or after BR96-DOX treatment via osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption to enhance immunoconjugate delivery. All rats were inoculated with i.c. B.5 LX-1 tumors and were randomly assigned to treatment groups. RESULTS BR96-DOX alone on Day 6 or Day 12 significantly increased survival compared to negative control rats receiving no treatment (25.9 +/- 2.1 and 23.3 +/- 2.5 days vs. 14.8 +/- 1.9 days, p < 0.05). Rats that received chemotherapy before radiation (34.0 +/- 2.0 days) lived the longest compared to the other sequences (RT prior, 29.5 +/- 1.9; RT concurrent, 27.1 +/- 2.1). Histopathology of 39 rat brains did not reveal any neuropathology. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced delivery of immunoconjugates is more effective in combination with RT for the treatment of experimental metastatic brain tumors. Moreover, BR96-DOX administration prior to RT significantly increased survival compared to those receiving RT and chemotherapy concurrently (p < 0.05).