Laura-Jane Smith
Imperial College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laura-Jane Smith.
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2017
Laura-Jane Smith; Elizabeth Moore; Ifrah Ali; Liam Smeeth; Patrick Stone; Jennifer Quint
Introduction COPD is a major cause of mortality, and the unpredictable trajectory of the disease can bring challenges to end-of-life care. We aimed to investigate known prognostic variables and scores that predict prognosis in COPD in a systematic literature review, specifically including variables that contribute to risk assessment of patients for death within 12 months. Methods We conducted a systematic review on prognostic variables, multivariate score or models for COPD. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE and CINAHL were searched up to May 1, 2016. Results A total of 5,276 abstracts were screened, leading to 516 full-text reviews, and 10 met the inclusion criteria. No multivariable indices were developed with the specific aim of predicting all-cause mortality in stable COPD within 12 months. Only nine indices were identified from four studies, which had been validated for this time period. Tools developed using expert knowledge were also identified, including the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance, the RADboud Indicators of Palliative Care Needs, the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and the Necesidades Paliativas program tool. Conclusion A number of variables contributing to the prediction of all-cause mortality in COPD were identified. However, there are very few studies that are designed to assess, or report, the prediction of mortality at or less than 12 months. The quality of evidence remains low, such that no single variable or multivariable score can currently be recommended.
BMJ Open | 2016
Laura-Jane Smith; Ifrah Ali; Patrick Stone; Liam Smeeth; Jennifer Quint
Introduction People living with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suffer from significant morbidity, reduced quality of life and high mortality, and are likely to benefit from many aspects of a palliative care approach. Prognostic estimates are a meaningful part of decision-making and better evidence for such estimates would facilitate advance care planning. We aim to provide quality evidence on known prognostic variables and scores which predict a prognosis in COPD of <12 months for use in the community. Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review of randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials, prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort and case–control studies on prognostic variables, multivariate scores or models for COPD. The search will cover the period up to April 2016. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with data extraction using fields from the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist for multivariate models, and study quality will be assessed using a modified version of the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Ethics and dissemination The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and national and international conference presentations. Systematic review registration number CRD42016033866.
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown
Archive | 2015
Laura-Jane Smith; Jennifer Quint; Jeremy S. Brown