Laura McHugh

A Transition Pilot Program for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease

INTRODUCTION Transition from pediatric to adult care is challenging for adolescents with chronic illnesses, including those with sickle cell disease (SCD). We describe a pilot program created to facilitate transition from pediatric to adult care by helping adolescents with SCD identify an adult medical home. METHODS We investigated the feasibility of this program by evaluation of overall participation, satisfaction, and acceptance. A secondary objective was to compare the proportion of adolescents who fulfilled a first appointment with an adult hematologist among participants and nonparticipants. RESULTS During the first 18 months of the program, 83 adolescents were invited and 34 (41%) agreed to participate; 25 (74%) completed their first visit within 3 months after leaving the pediatric program, compared with 16 of 49 (33%) of nonparticipants (p = .0002). Overall, 41 of 83 adolescents (49%) completed an appointment with an adult SCD program, regardless of program participation, in contrast with 11 of 75 adolescents (15%) who did so during the 18 months before the program was created (p < .0001). DISCUSSION This transition pilot program was feasible, and most adolescent participants with SCD established an adult medical home.

'One-stop shop': lung cancer patients' and caregivers' perceptions of multidisciplinary care in a community healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary care is rarely practiced in community healthcare settings where the majority of patients receive lung cancer care in the US. We sought direct input from patients and their informal caregivers on their experience of lung cancer care delivery. METHODS We conducted focus groups of patient and caregiver dyads. Patients had received care for lung cancer in or out of a multidisciplinary thoracic oncology clinic coordinated by a nurse navigator. Focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using Creswells 7-step process. Recurring overlapping themes were developed using constant comparative methods within the Grounded Theory framework. RESULTS A total of 46 participants were interviewed in focus groups of 5 patient-caregiver dyads. Overlapping themes were a perception that multidisciplinary care improved physician collaboration, patient-physician communication, and patient convenience, while reducing redundancy in testing. Improved coordination decreased confusion, stress, and anxiety. Negative experience of serial care included poor communication among physicians, insensitive communication about illness, delays in diagnosis and treatment, misdiagnosis, and mistreatment. Physician-to-physician communication and patient education were suggested areas for improvement in the multidisciplinary model. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary care was perceived as more patient-centered, effective, safe, and efficient than standard serial care. It was also believed to improve the timeliness of care and equitable access to high quality care. Additional studies to compare these perspectives to those of other key stakeholders, including clinicians, hospital administrators and representatives of third party payers, will facilitate better understanding of the role of multidisciplinary care programs in lung cancer care delivery.

Evolution in the Surgical Care of Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Mid-South Quality of Surgical Resection Cohort

Surgery is the most important curative treatment modality for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined the pattern of surgical resection for NSCLC in a high incidence and mortality region of the United States over a 10-year period (2004-2013) in the context of a regional surgical quality improvement initiative. We abstracted patient-level data on all resections at 11 hospitals in 4 contiguous Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions in North Mississippi, East Arkansas, and West Tennessee. Surgical quality measures focused on intraoperative practice, with emphasis on pathologic nodal staging. We used descriptive statistics and trend analyses to assess changes in practice over time. To measure the effect of an ongoing regional quality improvement intervention with a lymph node specimen collection kit, we used period effect analysis to compare trends between the preintervention and postintervention periods. Of 2566 patients, 18% had no preoperative biopsy, only 15% had a preoperative invasive staging test, and 11% underwent mediastinoscopy. The rate of resections with no mediastinal lymph nodes examined decreased from 48%-32% (P < 0.0001), whereas the rate of resections examining 3 or more mediastinal stations increased from 5%-49% (P < 0.0001). There was a significant period effect in the increase in the number of N1, mediastinal, and total lymph nodes examined (all P < 0.0001). A quality improvement intervention including a lymph node specimen collection kit shows early signs of having a significant positive effect on pathologic nodal examination in this population-based cohort. However, gaps in surgical quality remain.