Laura Ottini

Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: A meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data

BACKGROUND AND METHODS We have reviewed and pooled data from published studies to evaluate the relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. Thirty-one eligible studies reporting survival in 12782 patients characterised for MSI were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model. RESULTS The summary odds ratio (OR) estimate for overall survival (OS) associated with MSI was 0.6 (95%CI 0.53-0.69, p<0.0001), with no evidence of heterogeneity. The effect was similar for disease-free survival (DFS) (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.47-0.72, p<0.0001). In a subset of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy a significant improved prognosis was found for microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.4-0.6, p<0.0001) with no heterogeneity (p=0.53; I(2)=0%). By contrast a large heterogeneity characterised the data relative to 396 patients with MSI tumours (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.3-1.5, p=0.1; heterogeneity: p=0.03; I(2)=58%). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed the association between MSI and favourable prognosis as determined by both OS and DFS of CRC patients. A significant beneficial effect of 5-FU therapy was found for MSS tumours whilst no clear conclusion was reached for MSI tumours due to the high inter-study heterogeneity. We propose that this inconclusive result is due to the use of a single marker, such as MSI, that cannot account alone for the complexity of the mechanisms underlying 5-FU cytotoxicity. Future studies to predict response to 5-FU chemotherapy should include additional genome stability markers.

Human MRE11 is inactivated in mismatch repair‐deficient cancers

Mutations of the ATM and NBS1 genes are responsible for the inherited Ataxia‐Telangiectasia and Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome, both of which are associated with a predisposition to cancer. A related syndrome, the Ataxia‐Telangiectasia‐like disorder, is due to mutations of the MRE11 gene. However, the role of this gene in cancer development has not been established. Here we describe an often homozygous mutation of the poly(T)11 repeat within human MRE11 intron 4 that leads to aberrant splicing, impairment of wild‐type MRE11 expression and generation of a truncated protein. This mutation is present in mismatch repair‐deficient, but not proficient, colorectal cancer cell lines and primary tumours and is associated with reduced expression of the MRE11–NBS1–RAD50 complex, an impaired S‐phase checkpoint and abrogation of MRE11 and NBS1 ionizing radiation‐induced nuclear foci. Our findings identify MRE11 as a novel and major target for inactivation in mismatch repair‐defective cells and suggest its impairment may contribute to the development of colorectal cancer.

Genome-wide expression profile of sporadic gastric cancers with microsatellite instability

Gastric cancers with mismatch repair (MMR) inactivation are characterised by microsatellite instability (MSI). In this study, the transcriptional profile of 38 gastric cancers with and without MSI was analysed. Unsupervised analysis showed that the immune and apoptotic gene networks efficiently discriminated these two cancer types. Hierarchical clustering analysis revealed numerous gene expression changes associated with the MSI phenotype. Amongst these, the p53-responsive genes maspin and 14-3-3 sigma were significantly more expressed in tumours with than without MSI. A tight immunosurveillance coupled with a functional p53 gene response is consistent with the better prognosis of MSI cancers. Frequent silencing of MLH1 and downregulation of MMR target genes, such as MRE11 and MBD4, characterised MSI tumours. The downregulation of SMUG1 was also a typical feature of these tumours. The DNA repair gene expression profile of gastric cancer with MSI is of relevance for therapy response.

Polymorphic DNA repair and metabolic genes: a multigenic study on gastric cancer

Risk factors for gastric cancer (GC) include inter-individual variability in the inflammatory response to Helicobacter pylori infection, in the ability of detoxifying DNA reactive species and repairing DNA damage generated by oxidative stress and dietary carcinogens. To evaluate the association between polymorphic DNA repair genes and GC risk, a case-control study including 314 histologically confirmed GC patients and 548 healthy controls was conducted in a GC high-risk area in Tuscany, Italy. Polymorphic variants of base excision repair (APE1-D148E, XRCC1-R194W, XRCC1-R399Q and OGG1-S326C), nucleotide excision repair (XPC-PAT, XPA-23G>A, ERCC1-19007T>C and XPD-L751Q), recombination (XRCC3-T241M) and alkylation damage reversal (MGMT-L84F) were tested for their potential role in the development of GC by using logistic regression models. The same population was also characterised for GSTT1 and GSTM1 variant alleles to search for possible functional interactions between metabolic and DNA repair genotypes by two-way interactions using multivariate logistic models. No significant association between any single DNA repair genotype and GC risk was detected with a borderline association with the XPC-PAT homozygous genotype [odds ratio (OR) =1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-2.17]. Gene-gene interaction analysis revealed combinations of unfavourable genotypes involving either multiple DNA repair polymorphisms or DNA repair and GST-specific genotypes. The combination of the XPC-PAT and the XPA variant alleles significantly increased GC risk (OR=2.15; 95% CI 1.17-3.93, P=0.0092). A significant interaction was also found between the APE1 wild-type genotype and either the single GSTT1 (OR=4.90; 95% CI 2.38-10.11, P=0.0079) or double GSTM1-GSTT1 null (OR=7.84; 95% CI 3.19-19.22, P=0.0169) genotypes or the XPA-mutant allele (OR=3.56; 95% CI 1.53-8.25, P=0.0012). These findings indicate that a complex interaction between host factors such as oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity and efficiency of multiple DNA repair pathways underlies the inter-individual variability in GC risk.

Male breast cancer.

Male breast cancer (MaleBC) is a rare disease, accounting for <1% of all male tumors. During the last few years, there has been an increase in the incidence of this disease, along with the increase in female breast cancer (FBC). Little is known about the etiology of MaleBC: hormonal, environmental and genetic factors have been reported to be involved in its pathogenesis. Major risk factors include clinical disorders carrying hormonal imbalances, radiation exposure and, in particular, a positive family history (FH) for BC, the latter suggestive of genetic susceptibility. Rare mutations in high-penetrance genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) confer a high risk of BC development; low-penetrance gene mutations (i.e. CHEK-2) are more common but involve a lower risk increase. About 90% of all male breast tumors have proved to be invasive ductal carcinomas, expressing high levels of hormone receptors with evident therapeutic returns. The most common clinical sign of BC onset in men is a painless palpable retroareolar lump, which should be evaluated by means of mammography, ultrasonography and core biopsy or fine needle aspiration (FNA). To date, there are no published data from prospective randomized trials supporting a specific therapeutic approach in MaleBC. Tumor size together with the number of axillary nodes involved are the main prognostic factors and should guide the treatment choice. Locoregional approaches include surgery and radiotherapy (RT), depending upon the initial clinical presentation. When systemic treatment (adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic) is delivered, the choice between hormonal and or chemotherapy (CT) should depend upon the clinical and biological features, according to the FBC management guidelines. However great caution is required because of high rates of age-related comorbidities.

Gastric cancer with high-level microsatellite instability: target gene mutations, clinicopathologic features, and long-term survival

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide, and although the incidence has decreased in Western countries, specific high-risk areas are present in Italy. Gastric cancer with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) represents a well-defined subset of carcinomas showing distinctive clinicopathologic features. We examined clinicopathologic associations and long-term survival in a series of 159 gastric cancer cases from a high-risk population in Tuscany (central Italy). MSI-H was associated with antral location of the tumor (P = .001), intestinal type according to Lauren classification (P = .002), expanding type according to Ming classification (P = .0001), and mucinous histologic type according to the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer classification (P = .002). In addition, MSI-H was strongly associated with a higher survival at 15 years (P = .01) and with loss of hMLH1 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry (P = .001). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association between the absence of hMLH1 reactivity and the expanding tumor type (P = .002). We also investigated the MSI-H-related genetic changes by analyzing coding repeats within target genes involved in pathways that control cell growth (TGFbetaRII, IGFIIR, RIZ, TCF4, DP2), apoptosis (BAX, BCL10, FAS, CASPASE5, APAF1), and DNA repair genes (hMSH6, hMSH3, MED1, RAD50, BLM, ATR, BRCA2, MRE11). Gastric cancer cases with MSI-H were found to accumulate heterozygous mutations affecting multiple molecular pathways and multiple genes within each pathway. Intriguingly, in this subset, TGFbetaRII mutations appeared to be inversely related to BLM mutations (P = .006), whereas RAD50 mutation carriers showed significantly reduced survival (P = .03).

Interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in a high-risk Italian population

OBJECTIVES:Host genetic factors, including the IL1 gene cluster, play a key role in determining the long-term outcome of Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between selected IL1 loci polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in an Italian population.METHODS:In a case-control study we compared the IL1B−31 and IL1B+3954 biallelic and IL1RN pentaallelic variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphisms in 185 gastric cancer patients and 546 controls randomly sampled from the general population of an area at high gastric cancer risk (Tuscany, Central Italy).RESULTS:Genotype frequencies of the IL1B−31 T/C, IL1B+3954 C/T, and IL1RN polymorphisms among our population controls were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In multivariate analyses, no increase in gastric cancer risk was observed for the IL1B−31*C− and IL1B+3954*T− carriers; a significant 50% increase emerged for IL1RN*2 allele carriers (OR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.01–2.21).Analyses based on combined genotypes showed also that the association with IL1RN*2 allele was limited to two-variant allele carriers who were also homozygous for the IL1B−31*T allele (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.18–4.23) with a statistically significant interaction between these two genotypes (p= 0.043). Haplotype analysis showed an increased risk for the haplotype IL1RN*2/IL1B−31*T.CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that host genetic factors (such as the IL1RN and the IL1B−31 polymorphisms) interact in the complex process of gastric carcinogenesis in this high-risk Italian population. Overall, this effect appears more modest than previously reported in other populations, supporting the hypothesis that other still-to-be-defined factors are important in gastric carcinogenesis. These findings might be due to a haplotype effect.

Subcellular localization of the BRCA1 gene product in mitotic cells

The product of the hereditary breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is a multifunctional protein involved in the maintenance of genomic integrity, in transcriptional coactivation, and in the control of cell growth. BRCA1‐deficient cells manifest chromosomal instability. During mitosis, BRCA1 is known to interact with γ‐tubulin in the centrosomes, key elements of the mitotic spindle. Using confocal microscopy and immunogold electron microscopy, we investigated the distribution of endogenous BRCA1 relative to mitotic spindle markers in breast cancer cells. By confocal analysis, BRCA1 and β‐tubulin colocalized to microtubules of the mitotic spindle and to the centrosomes. Immunogold electron microscopy confirmed these results and further revealed that BRCA1 and α‐tubulin codistributed to the walls of the centrioles and to pericentriolar fibers at centrosomes. During chromatid segregation, codistribution was also detected along individual spindle microtubules and at sites of insertion of microtubules on chromosomes. At cytokinesis, BRCA1 and α‐tubulin codistributed to the midbody. Coimmunoprecipitation supported the association of full‐length BRCA1 with α‐ and β‐tubulin. These results are consistent with an involvement of BRCA1 in the dynamics of the mitotic spindle and in the segregation of duplicated chromosomes.

Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk

We conducted a genome-wide association study of male breast cancer comprising 823 cases and 2,795 controls of European ancestry, with validation in independent sample sets totaling 438 cases and 474 controls. A SNP in RAD51B at 14q24.1 was significantly associated with male breast cancer risk (P = 3.02 × 10−13; odds ratio (OR) = 1.57). We also refine association at 16q12.1 to a SNP within TOX3 (P = 3.87 × 10−15; OR = 1.50).

The OncoArray Consortium: a Network for Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Common Cancers.

Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.