Laura Säisänen

Factors influencing cortical silent period: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction

Inhibitory silent period (SP) is a transient suppression of voluntary muscle activity after depolarization of representative motor neuronal populations following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Our aim was to evaluate and present an optimal protocol for the measurement of SP by (1) determining the impact of muscle activation level and stimulus intensity (SI) on the duration of SP, and, (2) studying the relationship between motor evoked potential (MEP) and SP, using targeted stimulus delivery. Single magnetic pulses were focused on the optimal representation area of the thenar musculature on primary motor cortex. We utilized real-time 3D-positioning of TMS-evoked electric field on anatomical structures derived from individual MR-images. The SI varied from 80% to 120% of individual resting motor threshold (MT). Muscle activation levels varied from 20% to 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Contralateral SP lengthened significantly with increasing SI independent of target muscle activation. The peak amplitude of the MEP was affected by SI and force. Latency and duration of the MEP were practically unaffected by SI or force. Focal stimulation at 110-120% MT and approximately 50% MVC (with only negligible need for control) provides most stable and informative SP. MEP should be included in SP as the error from marking the onset diminishes. This study provides a guideline for the consistent measurement of SP, which is applicable when using navigated or traditional TMS.

Motor potentials evoked by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.

Summary: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a tool for targeted, noninvasive stimulation of cerebral cortex. Transcranial stimuli can depolarize neurons and evoke measurable effects which are unique in two ways: the effects are caused directly and without a consciousness of the subject, and, the responses from peripheral muscles provide a direct measure for the integrity of the whole motor pathway. The clinical relevance of the method has not always been fully exposed because localizing the optimal stimulation site and determining the optimal stimulation strength have been dependent on time-consuming experimentation and skill. Moreover, in many disorders it has been uncertain, whether the lack of motor responses is the result of true pathophysiological changes or merely because of unoptimal stimulation. We characterized the muscle responses from human primary motor cortex system by navigated TMS to provide normative values for the clinically relevant TMS parameters on 65 healthy volunteers aged 22 to 81 years. We delivered focal TMS pulses on the primary motor area (M1) and recorded muscle responses on thenar and anterior tibial muscles. Motor threshold, latencies and amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials, and silent period duration were measured. The correction of the motor-evoked potential latency for subjects’ height is provided. In conclusion, we provide a modified baseline of TMS-related parameters for healthy subjects. Earlier such large-scale baseline material has not been available.

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold

The motor threshold (MT) is a fundamental parameter for evaluating cortical excitability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) despite remarkable variation, both within, and between subjects. We intended to test whether the variation could be reduced by targeting the stimulation on-line and modeling the TMS-induced electric field on individual MR images. Navigated TMS was used to map the primary motor cortex for the representation area of the thenar muscles (abductor pollicis brevis) and to determine the MT. Thirteen healthy subjects participated in the study. To determine the between-subject variation, the MTs of nine subjects were measured with two different stimulators (comparison study). To study the individual variation, the MT measurement was repeated 20 times in four subjects always using the same stimulator (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the MTs differed significantly between the two stimulators over all subjects (p<0.001), whereas the electric field strengths did not exhibit significant difference between the stimulators. Both, the MTs, and the electric field strengths showed similar variations, which were greater between subjects (comparison study) than within subjects (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the distance between the locations of the two different coils on the scalp was significantly greater than the distance between the induced electric field maxima in the brain (p<0.001). We conclude that on-line navigation can be used to reduce the variation caused by different stimulator types and individual subject anatomy. In addition, cortical excitability can be evaluated by using computed electric field strength as well as stimulator-dependent MT.

Non-primary motor areas in the human frontal lobe are connected directly to hand muscles

Structural studies in primates have shown that, in addition to the primary motor cortex (M1), premotor areas are a source of corticospinal tracts. The function of these putative corticospinal neuronal tracts in humans is still unclear. We found frontal non-primary motor areas (NPMAs), which react to targeted non-invasive magnetic pulses and activate peripheral muscles as fast as or even faster than those in M1. Hand muscle movements were observed in all our subjects about 20 ms after transcranial stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus (Brodmann areas 6 and 8). Stimulation of NPMA could activate both proximal and distal upper limb muscles with the same delay as a stimulation of the M1, indicating converging motor representations with direct functional connections to the hand. We suggest that these non-primary cortical motor representations provide additional capacity for the fast execution of movements. Such a capacity may play a role in motor learning and in recovery from motor deficits.

Group-level variations in motor representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscles: Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to stimulate functional cortical areas at precise anatomical location to induce measurable responses. The stimulation has commonly been focused on anatomically predefined motor areas: TMS of that area elicits a measurable muscle response, the motor evoked potential. In clinical pathologies, however, the well‐known homunculus somatotopy theory may not be straightforward, and the representation area of the muscle is not fixed. Traditionally, the anatomical locations of TMS stimulations have not been reported at the group level in standard space. This study describes a methodology for group‐level analysis by investigating the normal representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscle in the primary motor cortex. The optimal representation area for these muscles was mapped in 59 healthy right‐handed subjects using navigated TMS. The coordinates of the optimal stimulation sites were then normalized into standard space to determine the representation areas of these muscles at the group‐level in healthy subjects. Furthermore, 95% confidence interval ellipsoids were fitted into the optimal stimulation site clusters to define the variation between subjects in optimal stimulation sites. The variation was found to be highest in the anteroposterior direction along the superior margin of the precentral gyrus. These results provide important normative information for clinical studies assessing changes in the functional cortical areas because of plasticity of the brain. Furthermore, it is proposed that the presented methodology to study TMS locations at the group level on standard space will be a suitable tool for research purposes in population studies. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010.

Altered cortical inhibition in Unverricht—Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1)

PURPOSE Progressive myoclonus epilepsies (PMEs) comprise a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal mechanisms. The aim of this study was to assess the function of the motor cortex in Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD), progressive myoclonus epilepsy type 1 (EPM1). METHODS Genetically verified EPM1 patients (n=24) were studied and compared with healthy subjects (n=24). MRI-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to study the function of the motor cortex. Motor threshold (MT) and cortical silent period (SP) were used as parameters to evaluate cortical excitability. Peripheral muscle responses were recorded at the thenar and hypothenar using on-line electromyography (EMG). RESULTS The normal shortening of SP duration with age was not evident in EPM1. Thus, older patients exhibited significantly prolonged SPs in comparison to healthy control subjects (p<0.05). The MTs, measured as both stimulator output percentage and induced electric field strength (EF), were significantly higher in EPM1 patients than in control subjects (p<0.001). The stimulation of the thenar caused a co-activation in the hypothenar with significantly higher amplitudes as compared to controls (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The prolongation of the SPs with age in EPM1 patients suggests a prevailing inhibitory tonus of the primary motor cortex (M1) as possible reactive mechanism to the disease. Antiepileptic drugs may contribute to the increased MT but do not affect the SP. The results and methodology of this study can lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of EPM1.

Non-invasive preoperative localization of primary motor cortex in epilepsy surgery by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a non-invasive method to localize the primary motor cortex (M1). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS To assess the safety and feasibility of nTMS as a non-invasive preoperative mode of functional localization of M1 in epilepsy surgery candidates with intractable focal epilepsy due to lesions in the vicinity of M1. METHODS We mapped the muscle representation areas of M1 with nTMS in 10 patients (age 2 to 55 years) with intractable epilepsy. The lesions were focal cortical dysplasia (n=6), ganglioglioma (n=2) polymicrogyria (n=1) or dysembryoblastic neuroepithelial tumour (n=1). The optimal stimulation sites and motor threshold (MT) of the distal hand or leg muscles were determined in both hemispheres. Cortical areas were mapped with stimulation intensities 100-120% of the MT to localize functional M1. Patients were on their stabile antiepileptic medication, and EEG was continuously monitored. The clinical benefit obtained with the preoperative nTMS mapping in the surgical decision making was scored as (1) essential, (2) beneficial, or (3) not beneficial, depending mainly on the difference between the functional and the presumed anatomic M1. RESULTS The M1 was successfully assessed in all but the 2 youngest patients (aged 2 and 5 years), in whom nTMS was unable to elicit motor responses. nTMS was regarded as essential or beneficial in the localization of M1 in relation to the lesions in 6 out of 10 cases. The optimal motor representation areas were mainly located symmetrically on the precentral gyrus, and corresponded to the presumed location of M1 in MRI. No clinical or EEG evidence of acute epileptogenic adverse effects were observed during the localization procedure. None of the operated patients developed post-operative motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS nTMS is a safe and feasible clinical tool for the non-invasive preoperative localization of motor cortex in patients with intractable epilepsy due to focal lesions adjacent or within the presumed M1 in MRI.

The effect of fMRI task combinations on determining the hemispheric dominance of language functions.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to establish the most suitable combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) language tasks for clinical use in determining language dominance and to define the variability in laterality index (LI) and activation power between different combinations of language tasks.MethodsActivation patterns of different fMRI analyses of five language tasks (word generation, responsive naming, letter task, sentence comprehension, and word pair) were defined for 20 healthy volunteers (16 right-handed). LIs and sums of T values were calculated for each task separately and for four combinations of tasks in predefined regions of interest. Variability in terms of activation power and lateralization was defined in each analysis. In addition, the visual assessment of lateralization of language functions based on the individual fMRI activation maps was conducted by an experienced neuroradiologist.ResultsA combination analysis of word generation, responsive naming, and sentence comprehension was the most suitable in terms of activation power, robustness to detect essential language areas, and scanning time. In general, combination analyses of the tasks provided higher overall activation levels than single tasks and reduced the number of outlier voxels disturbing the calculation of LI.ConclusionsA combination of auditory and visually presented tasks that activate different aspects of language functions with sufficient activation power may be a useful task battery for determining language dominance in patients.

Short- and intermediate-interval cortical inhibition and facilitation assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE To characterize the behaviour of primary motor cortex and to determine appropriate measurement parameters for short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with the aid of MRI-based neuronavigation. METHODS Paired-pulse TMS was targeted to the optimal cortical representation sites of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle in 48 healthy right-handed volunteers. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the APB and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles. The conditioning stimulus (CS) intensities were 80% and 90% and the test stimulus was 120% of the resting motor threshold (rMT). The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were 3, 7, 13, 22 and 28 ms. RESULTS Inhibition was observed at 3 ms with a CS of 80%. Facilitation emerged at ISIs of 7 and 13 ms with both CS intensities, more prominently with 90%. At ISI of 22 ms, facilitation was observed in ADM (p<0.01) but not in APB. No uniform amplitude change was observed at ISI of 28 ms. For both muscles, MEP latencies were shortened (p<0.01) at ISIs of 3 and 7 ms and prolonged (p<0.01) at 28 ms. CONCLUSIONS Inhibition is most prominent at ISI of 3 ms and CS of 80% of rMT, whereas CS of 90% of rMT and ISIs of 7 and 13 ms are preferable for facilitation. Latencies appear to be stable and independent indicators of both phenomena should be taken into account. SIGNIFICANCE Both the latency and amplitude of MEPs are important parameters when paired-pulse paradigms are used in clinical studies.

Corticospinal Output and Cortical Excitation-Inhibition Balance in Distal hand Muscle Representations in Nonprimary Motor Area

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the superior frontal gyrus in the non‐primary motor area (NPMA) can evoke motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs) at 20 ms latency range in contralateral distal hand muscles similar to stimulation of M1 and indicating monosynaptic corticospinal tracts. We compared the intracortical inhibitory and excitatory balance in primary motor cortex (M1) and in NPMA by navigated single‐ and paired‐pulse TMS (ppTMS). We also evaluated the spatial stability of muscle representations in M1 and NPMA by remapping 11 healthy subjects one year after the initial mapping. Resting motor threshold (rMT) was higher in NPMA than in M1 as were the MEP amplitudes evoked by 120% rMT stimulation intensity of the local MT. Short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was significantly weaker in NPMA than in M1 at ISI of 2 ms and conditioning stimulus (CS) 80% rMT. Our findings suggest that the cortical hand representations in NPMA 1) are connected to lower motoneurons monosynaptically, 2) are less strictly organized, i.e. motoneuron population representing a discrete hand muscle is sparser and less dense than in M1 and 3) have the capacity to generate powerful, rapid muscle contraction if sufficient number of motoneurones are activated. In NPMA, local intracortical inhibitory and excitatory activity is mainly similar to that in M1. The lower SICI in NPMA at an ISI of 2 ms may reflect less strict topographic organization and readiness to reorganization of neural circuits during motor learning or after motor deficits. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010.