Laura Tom
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laura Tom.
Annals of Plastic Surgery | 2015
Christopher L. Spock; Laura Tom; Karina Canadas; Gloria R. Sue; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Cheryl L. Maier; Jordan S. Pober; Anjela Galan; Brent Schultz; Milton Waner; Deepak Narayan
AbstractInfantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign tumors of infancy and occur with greater than 60% prevalence on the head and neck. Despite their prevalence, little is known about the pathogenesis of this disease. Given the predilection of hemangioma incidence on the face and its nonrandom distribution on embryological fusion plates, we postulated that IHs are derived from pericytes of the neural crest. We performed an analysis on 15 specimens at various stages of the IH progression. Experiments performed included immunohistochemical staining, immunofluorescent staining, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry. We analyzed a number of cell markers using these methods, including cell markers for the neural crest, pericytes, endothelial cells, stem cells, and the placenta. We observed that neural crest markers such as NG2 and nestin were expressed in the hemangioma samples, in addition tomultiple pericytes markers including &dgr;-like kinase, smooth muscle actin, calponin, and CD90. Stem cell markers such as c-myc, oct4, nanog, and sox2 were also more highly expressed in hemangioma samples compared to controls. Our work demonstrates that hemangiomas express pericyte, neural crest, and stem cell markers suggesting a possible pathogenetic mechanism.
Annals of Plastic Surgery | 2012
Salem Samra; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Laura Tom; Britt Colebunders; Bernard Salameh; Carolyn Truini; Stephan Ariyan; Deepak Narayan
IntroductionCutaneous melanoma is on the rise in the United States, and the head and neck region is the primary site in 20% of patients. Lymph node status is the best indicator of prognosis for melanoma. In the head and neck, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy presents particular challenges, with the parotid region posing difficulties that include locating the lymph nodes, less frequent visualization of blue dye, and the possibility of higher morbidity because of the proximity of lymph nodes to important neurovascular structures. Surgical approaches to the SLN dissection in the parotid region are variable, and may include superficial or total parotidectomies. Parotid-sparing SLN biopsies for head and neck melanomas were evaluated to determine rates of local recurrence. MethodsThe charts of 301 patients from the Yale Melanoma Unit who underwent resection of their head and neck melanoma were reviewed. The location of the primary melanoma was noted, and the sentinel lymph node dissections from the operative reports were documented. Demographic and outcome data were recorded, including course of melanoma management, local recurrence, and postoperative course. ResultsFifty-eight patients underwent SLN biopsy of lymph nodes in the parotid region. Parotid-sparing SLN biopsies comprised 94.8% of total surgical approaches for SLN biopsies in the parotid region. Of the remaining patients who underwent SLN biopsies in the parotid region, 5.17% had a superficial parotidectomy and none had a total parotidectomy. Sentinel lymph nodes were found in all depth layers of the parotid, and LNs were dissected out successfully without the need to remove the parotid in the most cases. The parotid region recurrence rate was 0% for SLN biopsies that either included or spared the parotid gland. There were no localized complications from the sentinel lymph node biopsies. ConclusionsThe parotid-sparing SLN biopsy was performed without any local recurrence in the parotid region. The parotid-sparing SLN biopsy can be carried out in a safe, efficient manner without affecting the rate of local recurrence or postoperative complication. This less-invasive SLN biopsy procedure precludes the complications associated with parotidectomies and may reduce the morbidity for patients with melanomas of the head and neck.
Annals of Plastic Surgery | 2012
Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Bernard Salameh; Britt Colebunders; Laura Tom; Salem Samra; Carolyn Truini; Stephan Ariyan; Deepak Narayan
IntroductionExcision of regional lymph nodes (LNs) in the neck as part of the management for tumors of the head and neck dates back to the 19th century. Crile originally reported the technique of performing a radical neck block dissection in 1905, with notable modifications to the extensive dissection reported throughout the 20th century by Suarez, Ballantyne, Ariyan, and Shah among others. These modifications have aimed to reduce the morbidity encountered by performing the radical neck dissection while balancing the need to remove diseased structures in the head and neck. In this report, we evaluate the outcomes of performing a functional radical neck dissection while sparing the level I LNs as indicated by lymphoscintigraphy. MethodsThe charts of patients from the Yale Melanoma Unit who underwent resection of their head and neck melanoma from January 2000 to December 2006 were reviewed. The location of the primary melanoma and clinical course was noted. Those patients who underwent neck dissections were documented and the extent of the dissections from the operative reports was noted. Demographic and outcome data were recorded, including clinical course of melanoma presentation, local recurrence, and postoperative management. Student t test and &khgr;2 tests were used to determine statistical significance between groups. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ResultsA total of 41 patients who were documented to have had a head and neck primary melanoma underwent a functional radical neck dissection. Level I dissections were deemed necessary in 39% of these cases, whereas 61% of patients received functional radical neck dissections with sparing of level I LNs. Specific recurrence of melanoma in the submandibular basin was equivocal for LN sparing dissections (n = 1) as compared to excision of level I LNs (n = 1) (4% vs 6.25%, P = 0.488). Follow-up metastatic rates between the 2 groups were also comparable (44% vs 56%, P = 0.328). Overall metastatic rate in follow-up for all patients undergoing LN dissection was 48.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between the average age of patients at diagnosis, Breslow depth, Clark level, and staging between patients who underwent functional radical neck dissections with either excision or sparing of level I LNs. ConclusionsClinical and pathological presentation between patients who needed level I sparing dissections and those who did not, failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference allowing for an adequate comparison. Our results indicate that if lymphoscintigraphy does not show drainage to level I LNs, the functional radical neck dissection can be tailored to spare level I LNs without affecting local recurrence. When not indicated by lymphoscintigram, sparing of level I nodes can be performed safely without changing clinical outcomes, while saving operating room time and minimizing potential damage to the buccal branch of facial nerve and the submandiblular gland.
Annals of Plastic Surgery | 2011
Simon H. Chin; Laura Tom; J. Grant Thomson
A retrospective chart analysis was performed of 66 patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) who underwent either single endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) or staged bilateral ECTR to determine the frequency and timing of contralateral surgery.Bilateral CTS patients with contralateral severe CTS underwent bilateral staged ECTR 86% of the time and the second operation was performed 6 ± 5 weeks after the initial ECTR. Patients with contralateral moderate CTS underwent bilateral staged ECTR 74% of the time with a mean of 11 ± 3 months between operations. Patients with contralateral mild CTS underwent bilateral staged ECTR 20% of the time and averaged 7 ± 3 years between procedures.For patients with bilateral CTS, the severity of CTS on the contralateral side to the initial release affects both the frequency and timing of the contralateral surgery. This information may be used to establish guidelines for treatment with bilateral simultaneous CTR.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Brent Schultz; Xiaopan Yao; Yanhong Deng; Milton Waner; Christopher Spock; Laura Tom; John A. Persing; Deepak Narayan
Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common tumor of the pediatric age group, affecting up to 4% of newborns ranging from inconsequential blemishes, to highly aggressive tumors. Following well defined growth phases (proliferative, plateau involutional) IH usually regress into a fibro-fatty residuum. Despite the high prevalence of IH, little is known regarding the pathogenesis of disease. A reported six fold decrease in IGF2 expression (correlating with transformation of proliferative to involuted lesions) prompted us to study the IGF-2 axis further. We demonstrate that IGF2 expression in IH is strongly related to the expression of a cancer testes and suspected oncogene BORIS (paralog of CTCF), placing IH in the unique category of being the first known benign BORIS positive tumor. IGF2 expression was strongly and positively related to BORIS transcript expression. Furthermore, a stronger association was made when comparing BORIS levels against the expression of CTCF via either a percentage or difference between the two. A common C/T polymorphism at CTCF BS6 appeared to modify the correlation between CTCF/BORIS and IGF2 expression in a parent of origin specific manner. Moreover, these effects may have phenotypic consequences as tumor growth also correlates with the genotype at CTCF BS6. This may provide a framework for explaining the clinical variability seen in IH and suggests new insights regarding CTCF and BORIS related functionality in both normal and malignant states.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2011
Laura Tom; K. Ragins; B. Colebunders; Jg Thomson
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2016
Laura Tom; Tom Wright; Dara Horn; Eileen M. Bulger; Tam N. Pham; Kari A. Keys
/data/revues/10727515/unassign/S107275151600051X/ | 2016
Laura Tom; Tom Wright; Dara Horn; Eileen M. Bulger; Tam N. Pham; Kari A. Keys
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2015
Laura Tom; Thomas Wright; Dara Horn; Eileen M. Bulger; Tam N. Pham; Kari A. Keys
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2011
Laura Tom; Niclas Broer; Don Hoang; Deepak Narayan