Laure Crabbe

Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription

Topoisomerase I (Top1) is a key enzyme in functioning at the interface between DNA replication, transcription and mRNA maturation. Here, we show that Top1 suppresses genomic instability in mammalian cells by preventing a conflict between transcription and DNA replication. Using DNA combing and ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation)-on-chip, we found that Top1-deficient cells accumulate stalled replication forks and chromosome breaks in S phase, and that breaks occur preferentially at gene-rich regions of the genome. Notably, these phenotypes were suppressed by preventing the formation of RNA–DNA hybrids (R-loops) during transcription. Moreover, these defects could be mimicked by depletion of the splicing factor ASF/SF2 (alternative splicing factor/splicing factor 2), which interacts functionally with Top1. Taken together, these data indicate that Top1 prevents replication fork collapse by suppressing the formation of R-loops in an ASF/SF2-dependent manner. We propose that interference between replication and transcription represents a major source of spontaneous replication stress, which could drive genomic instability during the early stages of tumorigenesis.

Telomere dysfunction as a cause of genomic instability in Werner syndrome

Werner syndrome (WS) is a rare human premature aging disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the RecQ helicase WRN. In addition to the aging features, this disorder is marked by genomic instability, associated with an elevated incidence of cancer. Several lines of evidence suggest that telomere dysfunction is associated with the aging phenotype of the syndrome; however, the origin of the genomic instability observed in WS cells and the reason for the high incidence of cancer in WS have not been established. We previously proposed that WRN helicase activity was necessary to prevent dramatic telomere loss during DNA replication. Here we demonstrate that replication-associated telomere loss is responsible for the chromosome fusions found in WS fibroblasts. Moreover, using metaphase analysis we show that telomere elongation by telomerase can significantly reduce the appearance of new chromosomal aberrations in cells lacking WRN, similar to complementation of WS cells with WRN. Our results suggest that the genome instability in WS cells depends directly on telomere dysfunction, linking chromosome end maintenance to chromosomal aberrations in this disease.

dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress

Intracellular deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pools must be tightly regulated to preserve genome integrity. Indeed, alterations in dNTP pools are associated with increased mutagenesis, genomic instability and tumourigenesis. However, the mechanisms by which altered or imbalanced dNTP pools affect DNA synthesis remain poorly understood. Here, we show that changes in intracellular dNTP levels affect replication dynamics in budding yeast in different ways. Upregulation of the activity of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) increases elongation, indicating that dNTP pools are limiting for normal DNA replication. In contrast, inhibition of RNR activity with hydroxyurea (HU) induces a sharp transition to a slow‐replication mode within minutes after S‐phase entry. Upregulation of RNR activity delays this transition and modulates both fork speed and origin usage under replication stress. Interestingly, we also observed that chromosomal instability (CIN) mutants have increased dNTP pools and show enhanced DNA synthesis in the presence of HU. Since upregulation of RNR promotes fork progression in the presence of DNA lesions, we propose that CIN mutants adapt to chronic replication stress by upregulating dNTP pools.

Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response

Maintenance of genome integrity relies on surveillance mechanisms that detect and signal arrested replication forks. Although evidence from budding yeast indicates that the DNA replication checkpoint (DRC) is primarily activated by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), studies in higher eukaryotes have implicated primer ends in this process. To identify factors that signal primed ssDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have screened a collection of checkpoint mutants for their ability to activate the DRC, using the repression of late origins as readout for checkpoint activity. This quantitative analysis reveals that neither RFCRad24 and the 9-1-1 clamp nor the alternative clamp loader RFCElg1 is required to signal paused forks. In contrast, we found that RFCCtf18 is essential for the Mrc1-dependent activation of Rad53 and for the maintenance of paused forks. These data identify RFCCtf18 as a key DRC mediator, potentially bridging Mrc1 and primed ssDNA to signal paused forks.

The Telomere Deprotection Response Is Functionally Distinct from the Genomic DNA Damage Response

Loss of chromosome end protection through telomere erosion is a hallmark of aging and senescence. Here we developed an experimental system that mimics physiological telomere deprotection in human cells and discovered that the telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response. We found that, unlike genomic breaks, deprotected telomeres that are recognized as DNA damage but remain in the fusion-resistant intermediate state activate differential ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling where CHK2 is not phosphorylated. Also unlike genomic breaks, we found that deprotected telomeres do not contribute to the G2/M checkpoint and are instead passed through cell division to induce p53-dependent G1 arrest in the daughter cells. Telomere deprotection is therefore an epigenetic signal passed between cell generations to ensure that replication-associated telomere-dependent growth arrest occurs in stable diploid G1 phase cells before genome instability can occur.

Oxaliplatin-induced mitochondrial apoptotic response of colon carcinoma cells does not require nuclear DNA

We previously established a model of acquired oxaliplatin resistance derived from the HCT116 oxaliplatin-sensitive cell line (HCT116S) and consisting in two resistant clones (HCT116R1, HCT116R2) and their total or partial revertants (HCT116Rev1 and HCT116Rev2, respectively). Using this cellular model, we explored the contribution of mitochondrial apoptosis and nuclear DNA to oxaliplatin-mediated apoptosis induction and oxaliplatin resistance. We showed that the activity of oxaliplatin is mediated by the induction of Bax/Bak-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis and that oxaliplatin resistance is mediated by a defect in Bax/Bak activation correlating with a reduced loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm). In addition, we observed that p53 only contributed marginally to oxaliplatin-induced cytotoxicity and was not involved in oxaliplatin resistance. Moreover and surprisingly, depletion of the nucleus in HCT116S cells did not abolish the oxaliplatin-induced ΔΨm loss indicative of imminent apoptosis. Enucleation abolished the oxaliplatin resistance of HCT116R1 cells, while HCT116R2 cytoplasts conserved their resistant phenotype. Altogether, these data demonstrate that oxaliplatin exerts its cytotoxic effects by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis and that these effects can be initiated by interacting on other cellular structures than nuclear DNA. Resistance to oxaliplatin may imply both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments.

Drug specific resistance to oxaliplatin is associated with apoptosis defect in a cellular model of colon carcinoma.

To investigate acquired resistance to oxaliplatin, we selected two resistant clones from the HCT116 cell line. We found that the resistant phenotype was associated with resistance to oxaliplatin‐induced apoptosis as demonstrated by FACS analysis and by Western blotting of caspase 3 activation. In addition, the resistant phenotype showed a concomitant resistance to lonidamine and arsenic trioxide which are inducers of mitochondrial apoptosis. Furthermore, a complete loss of Bax expression due to a frameshift mutation was observed in the most resistant clone. Taken together, these findings suggest that altered mitochondrial‐mediated apoptosis could play a role in oxaliplatin resistance.

Human Telomeres Are Tethered to the Nuclear Envelope during Postmitotic Nuclear Assembly

Telomeres are essential for nuclear organization in yeast and during meiosis in mice. Exploring telomere dynamics in living human cells by advanced time-lapse confocal microscopy allowed us to evaluate the spatial distribution of telomeres within the nuclear volume. We discovered an unambiguous enrichment of telomeres at the nuclear periphery during postmitotic nuclear assembly, whereas telomeres were localized more internally during the rest of the cell cycle. Telomere enrichment at the nuclear rim was mediated by physical tethering of telomeres to the nuclear envelope, most likely via specific interactions between the shelterin subunit RAP1 and the nuclear envelope protein Sun1. Genetic interference revealed a critical role in cell-cycle progression for Sun1 but no effect on telomere positioning for RAP1. Our results shed light on the dynamic relocalization of human telomeres during the cell cycle and suggest redundant pathways for tethering telomeres to the nuclear envelope.

Does interference between replication and transcription contribute to genomic instability in cancer cells

We have recently reported that topoisomerase 1 (Top1) cooperates with ASF/SF2, a splicing factor of the SR family, to prevent unscheduled replication fork arrest and genomic instability in human cells. Our results suggest that Top1 execute this function by suppressing the formation of DNA-RNA hybrids during transcription, these so-called R-loops interfering with the progression of replication forks. Using ChIP-chip, we have shown that γ-H2AX, a marker of DNA damage, accumulates at gene-rich regions of the genome in Top1-deficient cells. This is best illustrated at histone genes, which are highly expressed during S phase and display discrete γ-H2AX peaks on ChIP-chip profiles. Here, we show that these γ-H2AX domains are different from those induced by camptothecin, a Top1 inhibitor inducing double-strand DNA breaks throughout the genome. These data support the view that R-loops promote genomic instability at specific sites by blocking fork progression and inducing chromosome breaks. Whether this type of transcription-dependent fork arrest contributes to the replication stress observed in precancerous lesions is an important question that deserves further attention.

In the end, it's all structure.

Chromosome end protection is essential for all organisms with linear genomes. Specialized structures, called telomeres, accomplish this protection by forming DNA-protein complexes that hide the natural chromosome ends from the DNA damage machinery. In mammalian cells protection takes place on several levels. Telomeric DNA forms large duplex loops with the help of telomeric proteins, consequently hiding the very tip of the telomere. Telomeric proteins play additional roles in protecting the end from degradation, regulating telomere length, and suppressing the DNA damage response machinery. Here we summarize the current knowledge about telomere structure, and discuss the future directions of the field.