Lauren Stevenson

Workshop Report: Crystal City V—Quantitative Bioanalytical Method Validation and Implementation: The 2013 Revised FDA Guidance

In September 2013, the FDA released a draft revision of the Bioanalytical Method Validation (BMV) Guidance, which included a number of changes to the expectations for bioanalysis, most notably the inclusion of biomarker assays and data. To provide a forum for an open, inclusive discussion of the revised draft BMV Guidance, the AAPS and FDA once again collaborated to convene a two-and-a-half day workshop during early December 2013 in Baltimore, MD, USA. The resulting format embodied extensive open discussion and each thematic session included only brief, concise descriptions by Agency and industry representatives prior to opening the floor discussion. The Workshop was built around four thematic sessions (Common Topics, Chromatographic, Ligand-Binding Assays, and Biomarkers) and a final session with international regulators, concluding with a review of the outcomes and recommendations from the thematic sessions. This Workshop report summarizes the outcomes and includes topics of agreement, those where the FDA will consider the Industry’s perspective, and those where the workshop provided a first open dialogue. This article will be available to the bioanalytical community at http://www.aaps.org/BMV13.

Parallelism: considerations for the development, validation and implementation of PK and biomarker ligand-binding assays.

The goal of this article is to discuss the fundamental key questions around parallelism assessments: why to do it, when to do it and how to do it, with consideration for different molecule types and the scientific rationale that drives different approaches. Current practices for both PK and biomarker assays regarding which samples to pick, whether to pool or not pool samples, as well as generally accepted acceptance criteria are discussed, while also highlighting the many outstanding questions that remain. In order to reach the long-term goal of understanding and developing best practices for implementation of parallelism testing for both PK and biomarker assays, industry and regulators will need to keep the conversations going, and commit to generating and reviewing data for the purposes of our own education. Means to easily share data in open forums to facilitate and build common understandings should continue and will be necessary to expedite resolution of many of these questions.

Large Molecule Specific Assay Operation: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team

The L2 Global Harmonization Team on large molecule specific assay operation for protein bioanalysis in support of pharmacokinetics focused on the following topics: setting up a balanced validation design, specificity testing, selectivity testing, dilutional linearity, hook effect, parallelism, and testing of robustness and ruggedness. The team additionally considered the impact of lipemia, hemolysis, and the presence of endogenous analyte on selectivity assessments as well as the occurrence of hook effect in study samples when no hook effect had been observed during pre-study validation.

Paradigm of combination biologics: analytical challenges related to pharmacokinetic assays and interpretation of pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity results

BACKGROUND Combination biologic therapy is an emerging area of clinical development and the physiological and analytical impact of one treatment on the other requires careful assessment. Significant analytical challenges are associated with developing the corresponding pharmacokinetic assays and further challenges arise in interpreting the subsequent in vivo data, which may be confounded by immunogenicity to one or both of the biologics. RESULTS A case study of two monoclonal antibody therapeutics, given in combination, is presented where the immunogenicity rates differed significantly when the drug(s) were administered as monotherapy or in combination. CONCLUSION The interpretation of the in vivo data is inextricably linked to an in-depth understanding of the formats and performance attributes of the associated pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assays.

Workshop Report: AAPS Workshop on Method Development, Validation, and Troubleshooting of Ligand-Binding Assays in the Regulated Environment

A novel format was introduced at the recent AAPS NBC Workshop on Method Development, Validation and Troubleshooting in San Diego on 18th May 2014. The workshop format was initiated by Binodh De Silva; Marie Rock and Sherri Dudal joined the initiative to develop and chair the workshop. Questions were solicited by a variety of avenues, including a Linked-In Discussion Group. Once collated and clarified, the topics covered assay development, validation, and analysis of PK, Immunogenicity, and Biomarkers with an additional topic on alternative bioanalytical technologies. A panel of experts (workshop report co-authors) was assigned to each topic to bring forward thought-provoking aspects of each topic. The format of the workshop was developed to target the needs of bioanalytical scientists with intermediate to advanced experience in the field ranging to enable robust discussion and to delve deeper into the current bioanalytical hot topics. While the new format allowed for an interactive session with the topical discussion driven by the audience members, it did not foster equal discussion time for all of the proposed topics, especially Biomarkers and alternative LBA technologies.

Large Molecule Run Acceptance: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team

The L1 Global Harmonization Team provides recommendations specifically for run acceptance of ligand binding methods used in bioanalysis of macromolecules in support of pharmacokinetics. The team focused on standard curve calibrators and quality controls for use in both pre-study validation and in-study sample analysis, including their preparation and acceptance criteria. The team also considered standard curve editing and the concept of total error.

Development of a plug and play ImmunoPCR technique for the analysis of biomolecules

AIM ImmunoPCR technology combines the advantages of specificity and robustness of a ligand binding assay with the amplification potential of PCR. We describe through three case studies a plug-and-play immuno polymerase chain reaction (iPCR) technique to measure biomolecules. RESULTS Case Study 1 demonstrated feasibility of measurement of IgG1 in cerebrospinal fluid at the desired level of sensitivity with minimal cost and timelines of clinical assay implementation. Case Study 2 translated the iPCR protocol to measure multiple IgG1 analytes in cerebrospinal fluid. Case Study 3 demonstrated broad applicability of the technique to yet another analyte IL-6. CONCLUSION The advantages of our iPCR approach were: lack of reliance on a single vendor for technology platform/software, minimal reliance on proprietary reagents and reduced method development times and cost.