Lauren Young

Identification of Recurrent FGFR3–TACC3 Fusion Oncogenes from Lung Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: Targetable oncogenic alterations are detected more commonly in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who never smoked cigarettes. For such patients, specific kinase inhibitors have emerged as effective clinical treatments. However, the currently known oncogenic alterations do not account for all never smokers who develop NSCLC. We sought to identify additional oncogenic alterations from patients with NSCLC to define additional treatment options. Experimental Design: We analyzed 576 lung adenocarcinomas from patients of Asian and Caucasian ethnicity. We identified a subset of cancers that did not harbor any known oncogenic alteration. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay on 24 patients from this set with >75% tumor cell content. Results: EGFR mutations were the most common oncogenic alteration from both Asian (53%) and Caucasian (41.6%) patients. No known oncogenic alterations were present in 25.7% of Asian and 31% of Caucasian tumor specimens. We identified a FGFR3–TACC3 fusion event in one of 24 patients from this subset using targeted NGS. Two additional patients harboring FGFR3–TACC3 were identified by screening our entire cohort (overall prevalence, 0.5%). Expression of FGFR3–TACC3 led to IL3 independent growth in Ba/F3 cells. These cells were sensitive to pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (pan-FGFR) inhibitors but not the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib. Conclusions: FGFR3–TACC3 rearrangements occur in a subset of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Such patients should be considered for clinical trials featuring FGFR inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6551–8. ©2014 AACR.

Emergence of Preexisting MET Y1230C Mutation as a Resistance Mechanism to Crizotinib in NSCLC with MET Exon 14 Skipping

Introduction: MET proto‐oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase gene exon 14 skipping (METex14) alterations represent a unique subset of oncogenic drivers in NSCLC. Preliminary clinical activity of crizotinib against METex14‐positive NSCLC has been reported. The full spectrum of resistance mechanisms to crizotinib in METex14‐positive NSCLC remains to be identified. Methods: Hybrid capture–based comprehensive genomic profiling performed on a tumor specimen obtained at diagnosis, and a hybrid capture–based assay of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at the time of progression during crizotinib treatment was assessed in a pairwise fashion. Results: A METex14 alteration (D1010H) was detected in the pretreatment tumor biopsy specimen, as was MET proto‐oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) Y1230C, retrospectively, at very low frequency (0.3%). After a confirmed response during crizotinib treatment for 13 months followed by progression, both MET proto‐oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase gene Y1230C and D1010H were detected prospectively in the ctDNA. Conclusion: Emergence of the preexisting MET Y1230C likely confers resistance to crizotinib in this case of METex14‐positive NSCLC. Existence of pretreatment MET Y1230C may eventually modulate the response of METex14‐positive NSCLC to type I MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Noninvasive plasma‐based ctDNA assays can provide a convenient method to detect resistance mutations in patients with previously known driver mutations.

Dual occurrence of ALK G1202R solvent front mutation and small cell lung cancer transformation as resistance mechanisms to second generation ALK inhibitors without prior exposure to crizotinib. Pitfall of solely relying on liquid re-biopsy?

Development of the acquired ALK G1202R solvent front mutation and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation have both been independently reported as resistance mechanisms to ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients but have not been reported in the same patient. Here we report an ALK+ NSCLC patient who had disease progression after ceritinib and then alectinib where an ALK G1202R mutation was detected on circulating tumor (ct) DNA prior to enrollment onto a trial of another next generation ALK inhibitor, lorlatinib. The patients central nervous system (CNS) metastases responded to lorlatinib together with clearance of ALK G1202R mutation by repeat ctDNA assay. However, the patient developed a new large pericardial effusion. Resected pericardium from the pericardial window revealed SCLC transformation with positive immunostaining for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and ALK (D5F3 antibody). Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of the tumor infiltrating pericardium revealed the retainment of an ALK rearrangement with emergence of an inactivating Rb1 mutation (C706Y) and loss of exons 1-11 in p53 that was not detected in the original tumor tissue at diagnosis. The patient was subsequently treated with carboplatin/etoposide and alectinib, but had rapid clinical deterioration and died. The patient never received crizotinib. This case illustrates that multiple/compound resistance mechanisms to ALK inhibitors can occur and provide supporting information that loss of p53 and Rb1 are important in SCLC transformation. If clinically feasible, tissue-based re-biopsy allowing histological examination and CGP remains the gold standard to assess resistance mechanism(s) and to direct subsequent rational clinical care.

Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA from patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Genomic changes that occur in breast cancer during the course of disease have been informed by sequencing of primary and metastatic tumor tissue. For patients with relapsed and metastatic disease, evolution of the breast cancer genome highlights the importance of using a recent sample for genomic profiling to guide clinical decision-making. Obtaining a metastatic tissue biopsy can be challenging, and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood may provide a minimally invasive alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling was carried out on ctDNA from 254 female patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Peripheral blood samples were submitted by clinicians in the course of routine clinical care between May 2016 and March 2017. Sequencing of 62 genes was carried out to a median unique coverage depth of 7503×. Genomic alterations (GAs) in ctDNA were evaluated and compared with matched tissue samples and genomic datasets of tissue from breast cancer. RESULTS At least 1GA was reported in 78% of samples. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (38%), ESR1 (31%) and PIK3CA (31%). Temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples were available for 14 patients; 89% of mutations detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA. Diverse ESR1 GAs including mutation, rearrangement and amplification, were observed. Multiple concurrent ESR1 GAs were observed in 40% of ESR1-altered cases, suggesting polyclonal origin; ESR1 compound mutations were also observed in two cases. ESR1-altered cases harbored co-occurring GAs in PIK3CA (35%), FGFR1 (16%), ERBB2 (8%), BRCA1/2 (5%), and AKT1 (4%). CONCLUSIONS GAs relevant to relapsed/metastatic breast cancer management were identified, including diverse ESR1 GAs. Genomic profiling of ctDNA demonstrated sensitive detection of mutations found in tissue. Detection of amplifications was associated with ctDNA fraction. Genomic profiling of ctDNA may provide a complementary and possibly alternative approach to tissue-based genomic testing for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.Abstract Background Genomic changes that occur in breast cancer during the course of disease have been informed by sequencing of primary and metastatic tumor tissue. For patients with relapsed and metastatic disease, evolution of the breast cancer genome highlights the importance of using a recent sample for genomic profiling to guide clinical decision-making. Obtaining a metastatic tissue biopsy can be challenging, and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood may provide a minimally invasive alternative. Patients and methods Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling was carried out on ctDNA from 254 female patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Peripheral blood samples were submitted by clinicians in the course of routine clinical care between May 2016 and March 2017. Sequencing of 62 genes was carried out to a median unique coverage depth of 7503×. Genomic alterations (GAs) in ctDNA were evaluated and compared with matched tissue samples and genomic datasets of tissue from breast cancer. Results At least 1 GA was reported in 78% of samples. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (38%), ESR1 (31%) and PIK3CA (31%). Temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples were available for 14 patients; 89% of mutations detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA. Diverse ESR1 GAs including mutation, rearrangement and amplification, were observed. Multiple concurrent ESR1 GAs were observed in 40% of ESR1-altered cases, suggesting polyclonal origin; ESR1 compound mutations were also observed in two cases. ESR1-altered cases harbored co-occurring GAs in PIK3CA (35%), FGFR1 (16%), ERBB2 (8%), BRCA1/2 (5%), and AKT1 (4%). Conclusions GAs relevant to relapsed/metastatic breast cancer management were identified, including diverse ESR1 GAs. Genomic profiling of ctDNA demonstrated sensitive detection of mutations found in tissue. Detection of amplifications was associated with ctDNA fraction. Genomic profiling of ctDNA may provide a complementary and possibly alternative approach to tissue-based genomic testing for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

A Case of Metastatic Atypical Neuroendocrine Tumor with ALK Translocation and Diffuse Brain Metastases

A challenge in precision medicine is the identification of actionable driver mutations. Alterations can be identified within the tumor tissue, by small biopsy or fine‐needle aspirates, or by noninvasive methods, such as circulating tumor cells or circulating tumor DNA. This article presents a case of atypical neuroendocrine tumor metastatic to the bone and brain for which circulating tumor DNA analysis found an ALK translocation.

Hybrid Capture–Based Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA from Patients with Advanced Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Anus

Purpose: Genomic profiling of tumor biopsies from advanced gastrointestinal and anal cancers is increasingly used to inform treatment. In some cases, tissue biopsy can be prohibitive, and we sought to investigate whether analysis of blood-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may provide a minimally invasive alternative. Experimental Design: Hybrid capture–based genomic profiling of 62 genes was performed on blood-based ctDNA from 417 patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas to assess the presence of genomic alterations (GA) and compare with matched tissue samples. Results: Evidence of ctDNA was detected in 344 of 417 samples (82%), and of these, ≥1 reportable GA was detected in 89% (306/344) of samples. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (72%), KRAS (35%), PIK3CA (14%), BRAF (8%), and EGFR (7%). In temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples available from 25 patients, 86% of alterations detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA, including 95% of short variants, but only 50% of amplifications. Conversely, 63% of alterations detected in ctDNA were also detected in matched tissue. Examples demonstrating clinical utility are presented. Conclusions: Genomic profiling of ctDNA detected potentially clinically relevant GAs in a significant subset of patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas. In these tumor types, most alterations detected in matched tissue were also detected in ctDNA, and with the exception of amplifications, ctDNA sequencing routinely detected additional alterations not found in matched tissue, consistent with tumor heterogeneity. These results suggest feasibility and utility of ctDNA testing in advanced gastrointestinal cancers as a complementary approach to tissue testing, and further investigation is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1881–90. ©2018 AACR.

Targeted genomic landscape of metastases compared to primary tumours in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundThe genomic landscape of primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has been well described. However, little is known about cohort genomic alterations (GA) landscape in ccRCC metastases, or how it compares to primary tumours in aggregate. The genomic landscape of metastases may have biological, clinical, and therapeutic implications.MethodsWe collected targeted next-generation sequencing mutation calls from two independent cohorts and described the metastases GA landscape and descriptively compared it to the GA landscape in primary tumours.ResultsThe cohort 1 (n = 578) consisted of 349 primary tumours and 229 metastases. Overall, the most common mutations in the metastases were VHL (66.8%), PBRM1 (41.87%), and SETD2 (24.7%). TP53 was more frequently mutated in metastases compared to primary tumours (14.85% versus 8.9%; p = 0.031). No other gene had significant difference in the cohort frequency of mutations between the metastases and primary tumours. Mutation burden was not significantly different between the metastases and primary tumours or between metastatic sites. The second cohort (n = 257) consisted of 177 primary tumours and 80 metastases. No differences in frequency of mutations or mutational burden were observed between primaries and metastases.ConclusionsThese data support the theory that ccRCC primary tumours and metastases encompass a uniform distribution of common genomic alterations tested by next-generation sequencing targeted panels. This study does not address variability between matched primary tumours and metastases or the change in genomic alterations over time and after sequential systemic therapies.

Analytical Validation of a Hybrid Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA.

Genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA derived from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in blood can provide a noninvasive method for detecting genomic biomarkers to guide clinical decision making for cancer patients. We developed a hybrid capture–based next-generation sequencing assay for genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA from blood (FoundationACT). High-sequencing coverage and molecular barcode–based error detection enabled accurate detection of genomic alterations, including short variants (base substitutions, short insertions/deletions) and genomic re-arrangements at low allele frequencies (AFs), and copy number amplifications. Analytical validation was performed on 2666 reference alterations. The assay achieved >99% overall sensitivity (95% CI, 99.1%–99.4%) for short variants at AF >0.5%, >95% sensitivity (95% CI, 94.2%–95.7%) for AF 0.25% to 0.5%, and 70% sensitivity (95% CI, 68.2%–71.5%) for AF 0.125% to 0.25%. No false positives were detected in 62 samples from healthy volunteers. Genomic alterations detected by FoundationACT demonstrated high concordance with orthogonal assays run on the same clinical cfDNA samples. In 860 routine clinical FoundationACT cases, genomic alterations were detected in cfDNA at comparable frequencies to tissue; for the subset of cases with temporally matched tissue and blood samples, 75% of genomic alterations and 83% of short variant mutations detected in tissue were also detected in cfDNA. On the basis of analytical validation results, FoundationACT has been approved for use in our Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified/College of American Pathologists–accredited/New York State–approved laboratory.

Abstract P6-07-08: The complete spectrum of ESR1 mutations from 7590 breast cancer tumor samples

Background: Approximately 70% of newly diagnosed breast cancers express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), and are treated with agents that block ER signaling. Acquired mutations in ESR1, the gene that encodes ERα, have been associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitor therapy in patients with ER positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC). The most frequently occurring ESR1 mutations are clustered between amino acids 536 to 538 within the ligand binding domain (LBD), although limited data exists characterizing the full mutation profile in a large number of breast cancer samples. Methods: We surveyed the Foundation Medicine dataset of 7590 primary and metastatic breast cancer tumor samples for ESR1 short variants and copy number alterations. Hormone receptor status was unavailable, therefore two assumptions were made to provide an estimate of prevalence in the ER+ HER2- population: 70% of the tumor samples are from ER+ HER2- patients, and all ESR1 mutations from non-HER2 amplified metastatic sites are from ER+ HER2- patients. In a separate cohort of 48 ER+ mBC patients, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was analyzed for ESR1 mutations using the BEAMing method by Sysmex and with Foundation Medicine9s sequencing assay, FoundationACT (Assay for Circulating Tumor DNA). Results: The prevalence of mutations in ER+ HER2- breast cancer was estimated to be 22% in samples from metastatic sites but less than 3% in samples from primary sites. ESR1 amplification was rare in samples from both primary and metastatic disease sites at 1.3% and 2.0% respectively. A total of 153 unique short variants of known and unknown status were identified. In addition to hotspot mutations at 537 and 538, previously undescribed rare mutations were identified throughout the entire length of the LBD, although 10 alterations at amino acids 380, 463, 536, 537, and 538 account for 86% of all ESR1 mutations in the ER+ HER2- metastatic sites. We also characterized the overlap of ESR1 alterations with commonly altered and clinically relevant genes in breast cancer, including PIK3CA mutations and HER2 amplification, and we report here a landscape of co-occurring alterations. In the cohort of patient samples where ctDNA was analyzed, BEAMing and FoundationAct assays both detected ESR1 mutations in 19 out of 48 samples, and overall concordance of mutation status (wild-type vs mutant) was 100%. A total of 51 individual mutations were detected with the BEAMing assay, 42 of which were detected with the FoundationACT assay. Seven mutations that were undetected by FoundationACT had mutant allele frequencies less than 0.1%. Ten ESR1 mutations were detected only by FoundationACT, 9 of which are not covered with the BEAMing assay. Alterations in PIK3CA, CDH1, TP53, ERBB2, and other breast cancer relevant genes were also detected with FoundationACT. Conclusions: Understanding the mutational landscape of ESR1 and co-occurring alterations is important for diagnostic development in conjunction with the clinical development of novel anti-endocrine therapies. Our data demonstrate a large spectrum of mutations in the LBD in addition to known hotspot mutations. In addition, the FoundationACT assay offers a robust NGS-based method to screen for mutations in ctDNA that is highly concordant with digital PCR methods. Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Schleifman E, Clark TA, Young G, Nahas M, Kennedy M, Young L, Chmielecki J, Otto GA, Lipson D, Wilson TR, Gendreau S, Lackner MR. The complete spectrum of ESR1 mutations from 7590 breast cancer tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-08.

Abstract 3965: Rigorous validation of a clinical circulating tumor DNA assay for cancer molecular profiling

Background: Profiling cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for genomic alterations which drive oncogenesis in patients with cancer promises to provide information important for understanding cancer biology, informing therapy selection when conventional FFPE biopsies are unobtainable and potentially monitoring response to therapy. To allow routine use of blood-based ctDNA molecular profiling with clinical samples we developed and performed analytic validation of an accurate, targeted NGS-based assay. The analytic validation included over 400 samples demonstrating ≥99% sensitivity and ≥99% positive predictive value for base substitutions, indels and rearrangements with limit-of-detection below 1%. Methods: To ensure robust performance, the ctDNA assay was developed as part of an integrated workflow including sample collection, storage and transport, and ctDNA purification, followed by optimized construction of adaptor-ligated sequencing libraries and enrichment by solution hybridization and then sequencing to high depth (Illumina HiSeq). Computational methodologies were developed to enable sensitive and specific detection of base substitutions, indels, genomic rearrangements and high-level amplifications from ctDNA. Accuracy and reproducibility were analytically validated in a CLIA-certified laboratory using reference samples with known alterations (117 cell-line mixtures and synthetic constructs) and 268 clinical ctDNA samples. Many alterations found in clinical ctDNA samples were validated with orthogonal reference methods including a CLIA-validated NGS assay, droplet digital PCR and break-point PCR. Results: The ctDNA assay validation demonstrated ≥99% sensitivity and ≥99% positive predictive value for base substitutions, indels and rearrangements with a limit-of-detection below 1% and robust detection of high-level, focal amplifications when present at adequate tumor fraction. In addition, the assay accurately reports the allele frequency of alterations in the sample. In 48 clinical ctDNA samples, 95 alterations of all classes were 100% confirmed by orthogonal testing. As part of our extensive clinical utility study, we report results comparing alterations from patient-matched ctDNA and FFPE biopsies across more than 200 lung, breast and other cancer samples. Conclusions: Accurate clinical profiling of ctDNA enables detection of genomic alterations in patient plasma samples to provide rationale targeted therapeutic options. Our rigorous analytic validation study demonstrates high-sensitivity detection of alterations present in blood at low frequency with a very low rate of false positives, realizing the potential of ctDNA-based molecular profiling for the management of patients with cancer. This validated assay allows us to embark upon a rigorous investigation of clinical best-practices based on tumor-type specific assessment of matched ctDNA and solid biopsy specimens. Citation Format: Travis A. Clark, Mark Kennedy, Jie He, Geneva Young, Mandy Zhao, Mike Coyne, Virginia Breese, Lauren Young, Shan Zhong, Mark Bailey, Bernard Fendler, Erica Schleifman, Eric Peters, Phil J. Stephens, Geoff A. Otto, Doron Lipson. Rigorous validation of a clinical circulating tumor DNA assay for cancer molecular profiling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3965.