Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lauren Zeise is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lauren Zeise.


Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-part B-critical Reviews | 2010

TOXICITY TESTING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: A VISION AND A STRATEGY

Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin E. Andersen; Henry A. Anderson; John C. Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert L. Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G. Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T. Kelsey; Nancy I. Kerkvliet; Abby A. Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D. Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A. Scala; Gina Solomon; Martin L. Stephens; James D. Yager; Lauren Zeise

With the release of the landmark report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in 2007, precipitated a major change in the way toxicity testing is conducted. It envisions increased efficiency in toxicity testing and decreased animal usage by transitioning from current expensive and lengthy in vivo testing with qualitative endpoints to in vitro toxicity pathway assays on human cells or cell lines using robotic high-throughput screening with mechanistic quantitative parameters. Risk assessment in the exposed human population would focus on avoiding significant perturbations in these toxicity pathways. Computational systems biology models would be implemented to determine the dose-response models of perturbations of pathway function. Extrapolation of in vitro results to in vivo human blood and tissue concentrations would be based on pharmacokinetic models for the given exposure condition. This practice would enhance human relevance of test results, and would cover several test agents, compared to traditional toxicological testing strategies. As all the tools that are necessary to implement the vision are currently available or in an advanced stage of development, the key prerequisites to achieving this paradigm shift are a commitment to change in the scientific community, which could be facilitated by a broad discussion of the vision, and obtaining necessary resources to enhance current knowledge of pathway perturbations and pathway assays in humans and to implement computational systems biology models. Implementation of these strategies would result in a new toxicity testing paradigm firmly based on human biology.


Risk Analysis | 2010

Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment.

Eileen Abt; Joseph V. Rodricks; Jonathan I. Levy; Lauren Zeise; Thomas A. Burke

At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Research Council (NRC) recently completed a major report, Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment, that is intended to strengthen the scientific basis, credibility, and effectiveness of risk assessment practices and subsequent risk management decisions. The report describes the challenges faced by risk assessment and the need to consider improvements in both the technical analyses of risk assessments (i.e., the development and use of scientific information to improve risk characterization) and the utility of risk assessments (i.e., making assessments more relevant and useful for risk management decisions). The report tackles a number of topics relating to improvements in the process, including the design and framing of risk assessments, uncertainty and variability characterization, selection and use of defaults, unification of cancer and noncancer dose-response assessment, cumulative risk assessment, and the need to increase EPAs capacity to address these improvements. This article describes and summarizes the NRC report, with an eye toward its implications for risk assessment practices at EPA.


Epidemiology | 2008

Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in drinking water.

James J. Beaumont; Richard M. Sedman; Stephen D. Reynolds; Claire D. Sherman; Ling-Hong Li; Robert A. Howd; Martha S. Sandy; Lauren Zeise; George V. Alexeeff

Background: In 1987, investigators in Liaoning Province, China, reported that mortality rates for all cancer, stomach cancer, and lung cancer in 1970–1978 were higher in villages with hexavalent chromium (Cr+6)-contaminated drinking water than in the general population. The investigators reported rates, but did not report statistical measures of association or precision. Methods: Using reports and other communications from investigators at the local Jinzhou Health and Anti-Epidemic Station, we obtained data on Cr+6 contamination of groundwater and cancer mortality in 9 study regions near a ferrochromium factory. We estimated: (1) person-years at risk in the study regions, based on census and population growth rate data, (2) mortality counts, based on estimated person-years at risk and previously reported mortality rates, and (3) rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The all-cancer mortality rate in the combined 5 study regions with Cr+6-contaminated water was negligibly elevated in comparison with the rate in the 4 combined study regions without contaminated water (rate ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.86–1.46), but was somewhat more elevated in comparison with the whole province (1.23; 0.97–1.53). Stomach cancer mortality in the regions with contaminated water was more substantially elevated in comparison with the regions without contaminated water (1.82; 1.11–2.91) and the whole province (1.69; 1.12–2.44). Lung cancer mortality was slightly elevated in comparison with the unexposed study regions (1.15; 0.62–2.07), and more strongly elevated in comparison with the whole province (1.78; 1.03–2.87). Mortality from other cancers combined was not elevated in comparison with either the unexposed study regions (0.86; 0.53–1.36) or the whole province (0.92; 0.58–1.38). Conclusions: While these data are limited, they are consistent with increased stomach cancer risk in a population exposed to Cr+6 in drinking water.


Atmospheric Environment | 1987

The Carcinogenic Risk of Some Organic Vapors Indoors: A Theoretical Survey

M. Tancrède; Richard Wilson; Lauren Zeise; Edmund A. C. Crouch

This exploratory report examines the risk of selected organic air pollutants measured in homes in the United States and the Netherlands. After several theoretical assumptions, estimates are made for the carcinogenic potency of each chemical; combined with the exposure measurements, these give estimates of cancer risk. These estimates are compared with risks of these same pollutants outdoors and in drinking water and also with other well-known indoor air pollutants: cigarette smoke, radon gas, and formaldehyde. These comparisons indicate priorities for action. Some suggestions are made for future studies.


Risk Analysis | 2009

Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment.

Daniel Krewski; Melvin E. Andersen; Ellen Mantus; Lauren Zeise

At the request of the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Research Council (NRC) recently completed a major report entitled Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. The terms of reference for this report were to develop a long-range vision and strategic plan to advance the practices of toxicity testing and human health assessment of environmental agents. The report describes how current and anticipated scientific advances can be expected to transform toxicity testing to permit broader coverage of the universe of potentially toxic chemicals to which humans may be exposed, using more timely and more cost-effective methods for toxicity testing. The report envisages greatly expanded use of high- and medium-throughput in vitro screening assays, computational toxicology, and systems biology, along with other emerging high-content testing methodologies, such as functional genomics and transcriptomics. When fully implemented, the vision will transform the ways toxicity testing and chemical risk assessment are conducted, moving away from measuring apical health endpoints in experimental animals toward identification of significant perturbations of toxicity pathways using in vitro tests in human cells and cell lines. Population-based studies incorporating relevant biomarkers will also be useful in identifying pathway perturbations directly in humans and in interpreting the results of in vitro tests in the context of human health risk assessment. The present article summarizes and extends the NRC report and examines its implications for risk assessment practice.


Birth Defects Research Part B-developmental and Reproductive Toxicology | 2010

Bisphenol A: developmental toxicity from early prenatal exposurea

Mari S. Golub; Katherine Lily Wu; Farla L. Kaufman; Ling-Hong Li; Francisco Moran-Messen; Lauren Zeise; George V. Alexeeff; James M. Donald

Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure has been documented in pregnant women, but consequences for development are not yet widely studied in human populations. This review presents research on the consequences for offspring of BPA exposure during pregnancy. Extensive work in laboratory rodents has evaluated survival and growth of the conceptus, interference with embryonic programs of development, morphological sex differentiation, sex differentiation of the brain and behavior, immune responsiveness, and mechanism of action. Sensitive measures include RAR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and Hox A10 gene expression, anogenital distance, sex differentiation of affective and exploratory behavior, and immune hyperresponsiveness. Many BPA effects are reported at low doses (10-50 µg/kg d range) by the oral route of administration. At high doses (>500,000 µg/kg d) fetal viability is compromised. Much of the work has centered around the implications of the estrogenic actions of this agent. Some work related to thyroid mechanism of action has also been explored. BPA research has actively integrated current knowledge of developmental biology, concepts of endocrine disruption, and toxicological research to provide a basis for human health risk assessment.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2013

Addressing human variability in next-generation human health risk assessments of environmental chemicals.

Lauren Zeise; Frédéric Y. Bois; Weihsueh A. Chiu; Dale Hattis; Ivan Rusyn; Kathryn Z. Guyton

Background: Characterizing variability in the extent and nature of responses to environmental exposures is a critical aspect of human health risk assessment. Objective: Our goal was to explore how next-generation human health risk assessments may better characterize variability in the context of the conceptual framework for the source-to-outcome continuum. Methods: This review was informed by a National Research Council workshop titled “Biological Factors that Underlie Individual Susceptibility to Environmental Stressors and Their Implications for Decision-Making.” We considered current experimental and in silico approaches, and emerging data streams (such as genetically defined human cells lines, genetically diverse rodent models, human omic profiling, and genome-wide association studies) that are providing new types of information and models relevant for assessing interindividual variability for application to human health risk assessments of environmental chemicals. Discussion: One challenge for characterizing variability is the wide range of sources of inherent biological variability (e.g., genetic and epigenetic variants) among individuals. A second challenge is that each particular pair of health outcomes and chemical exposures involves combinations of these sources, which may be further compounded by extrinsic factors (e.g., diet, psychosocial stressors, other exogenous chemical exposures). A third challenge is that different decision contexts present distinct needs regarding the identification—and extent of characterization—of interindividual variability in the human population. Conclusions: Despite these inherent challenges, opportunities exist to incorporate evidence from emerging data streams for addressing interindividual variability in a range of decision-making contexts.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2010

Research Recommendations for Selected IARC-Classified Agents

Elizabeth Ward; Paul A. Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B. Hopf; Jane C. Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M. DeMarini; Bruce A. Fowler; Bernard D. Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J. Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen D. Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M. Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien McElvenny; H. Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W. Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M. Ruder; Mary K. Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra T. Silverman; Martyn T. Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G. Stevens; Paolo Vineis

Objectives There are some common occupational agents and exposure circumstances for which evidence of carcinogenicity is substantial but not yet conclusive for humans. Our objectives were to identify research gaps and needs for 20 agents prioritized for review based on evidence of widespread human exposures and potential carcinogenicity in animals or humans. Data sources For each chemical agent (or category of agents), a systematic review was conducted of new data published since the most recent pertinent International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monograph meeting on that agent. Data extraction Reviewers were charged with identifying data gaps and general and specific approaches to address them, focusing on research that would be important in resolving classification uncertainties. An expert meeting brought reviewers together to discuss each agent and the identified data gaps and approaches. Data synthesis Several overarching issues were identified that pertained to multiple agents; these included the importance of recognizing that carcinogenic agents can act through multiple toxicity pathways and mechanisms, including epigenetic mechanisms, oxidative stress, and immuno- and hormonal modulation. Conclusions Studies in occupational populations provide important opportunities to understand the mechanisms through which exogenous agents cause cancer and intervene to prevent human exposure and/or prevent or detect cancer among those already exposed. Scientific developments are likely to increase the challenges and complexities of carcinogen testing and evaluation in the future, and epidemiologic studies will be particularly critical to inform carcinogen classification and risk assessment processes.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2009

State-of-the-Science Workshop Report: Issues and Approaches in Low-Dose― Response Extrapolation for Environmental Health Risk Assessment

Ronald H. White; Ila Cote; Lauren Zeise; Mary A. Fox; Francesca Dominici; Thomas A. Burke; Paul D. White; Dale Hattis; Jonathan M. Samet

Low-dose extrapolation model selection for evaluating the health effects of environmental pollutants is a key component of the risk assessment process. At a workshop held in Baltimore, Maryland, on 23–24 April 2007, sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Johns Hopkins Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, a multidisciplinary group of experts reviewed the state of the science regarding low-dose extrapolation modeling and its application in environmental health risk assessments. Participants identified discussion topics based on a literature review, which included examples for which human responses to ambient exposures have been extensively characterized for cancer and/or noncancer outcomes. Topics included the need for formalized approaches and criteria to assess the evidence for mode of action (MOA), the use of human versus animal data, the use of MOA information in biologically based models, and the implications of interindividual variability, background disease processes, and background exposures in threshold versus nonthreshold model choice. Participants recommended approaches that differ from current practice for extrapolating high-dose animal data to low-dose human exposures, including categorical approaches for integrating information on MOA, statistical approaches such as model averaging, and inference-based models that explicitly consider uncertainty and interindividual variability.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2008

Meeting Report: Moving Upstream—Evaluating Adverse Upstream End Points for Improved Risk Assessment and Decision-Making

Tracey J. Woodruff; Lauren Zeise; Daniel A. Axelrad; Kathryn Z. Guyton; Sarah J. Janssen; Mark D. Miller; Gregory G. Miller; Jackie M. Schwartz; George V. Alexeeff; Henry A. Anderson; Linda S. Birnbaum; Frédéric Y. Bois; Vincent Cogliano; Kevin M. Crofton; Susan Y. Euling; Paul M. D. Foster; Dori R. Germolec; Earl Gray; Dale Hattis; Amy D. Kyle; Robert W. Luebke; Michael I. Luster; Chris Portier; Deborah C. Rice; Gina Solomon; John Vandenberg; R. Thomas Zoeller

Background Assessing adverse effects from environmental chemical exposure is integral to public health policies. Toxicology assays identifying early biological changes from chemical exposure are increasing our ability to evaluate links between early biological disturbances and subsequent overt downstream effects. A workshop was held to consider how the resulting data inform consideration of an “adverse effect” in the context of hazard identification and risk assessment. Objectives Our objective here is to review what is known about the relationships between chemical exposure, early biological effects (upstream events), and later overt effects (downstream events) through three case studies (thyroid hormone disruption, antiandrogen effects, immune system disruption) and to consider how to evaluate hazard and risk when early biological effect data are available. Discussion Each case study presents data on the toxicity pathways linking early biological perturbations with downstream overt effects. Case studies also emphasize several factors that can influence risk of overt disease as a result from early biological perturbations, including background chemical exposures, underlying individual biological processes, and disease susceptibility. Certain effects resulting from exposure during periods of sensitivity may be irreversible. A chemical can act through multiple modes of action, resulting in similar or different overt effects. Conclusions For certain classes of early perturbations, sufficient information on the disease process is known, so hazard and quantitative risk assessment can proceed using information on upstream biological perturbations. Upstream data will support improved approaches for considering developmental stage, background exposures, disease status, and other factors important to assessing hazard and risk for the whole population.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lauren Zeise's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frédéric Y. Bois

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George V. Alexeeff

California Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gina Solomon

Natural Resources Defense Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Wilson

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martha S. Sandy

California Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge