Laurence E. Shields
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laurence E. Shields.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
Laurence E. Shields; Kathy Smalarz; Lester Reffigee; Sandra Mugg; Theodore J. Burdumy; Marilyn Propst
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of instituting a comprehensive protocol for the treatment of maternal hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN The protocol was separated into 4 stages, designated 0-3, based on the degree of blood loss and the patient response to interventions. Key components included admission risk assessment, measurement of blood loss, early but limited use of uterotonic agents, early presence of obstetrical and anesthesia staff, and transfusion with fixed ratios of blood products. Data were collected retrospectively and prospectively relative to the start of the protocol. RESULTS We noted a significant shift toward resolution of maternal bleeding at an earlier stage (P < .01), use of fewer blood products (P < .01), and a 64% reduction in the rate of disseminated intravascular coagulation. In addition, there were significant improvements in staff and physician perceptions of patient safety (P < .01). CONCLUSION Comprehensive maternal hemorrhage treatment protocols improve patient safety and reduce utilization of blood products.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1991
Edward R. Newton; Laurence E. Shields; Louis E. Ridgway; Michael D. Berkus; Byron D. Elliott
Subclinical infection may play a role in the failure of magnesium sulfate tocolysis. Using a double-blind randomized study design, we administered a combination of ampicillin-sulbactam and indomethacin or corresponding placebos to patients in preterm labor who were receiving intravenous magnesium sulfate tocolysis. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 30.1 weeks, and mean cervical dilatation was 2.15 cm. No differences were noted between placebo (n = 43) and study patients (n = 43) in gestational age at delivery, term deliveries, days gained, or neonatal outcome. Preterm delivery (less than 36 weeks) occurred in 61% of the total population. The likelihood of a beta error was 0.07 to 0.23 on the basis of outcome analysis. In our population adjunctive ampicillin-sulbactam with indomethacin did not improve the success of magnesium sulfate tocolysis.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2017
Peter S. Bernstein; James N. Martin; John R. Barton; Laurence E. Shields; Maurice L. Druzin; Barbara M. Scavone; Jennifer Frost; Christine H. Morton; Catherine Ruhl; Joan Slager; Eleni Z. Tsigas; Sara Jaffer; M. Kathryn Menard
Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Womens Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health | 2017
Peter S. Bernstein; Martin Jn; John R. Barton; Laurence E. Shields; Maurice L. Druzin; Barbara M. Scavone; Jennifer Frost; Christine H. Morton; Catherine Ruhl; Joan Slager; Eleni Z. Tsigas; Sara Jaffer; M. Kathryn Menard
Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Womens Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2017
Peter S. Bernstein; C. Andrew Combs; Laurence E. Shields; Steven L. Clark; Catherine Eppes
&NA; Checklists have been long used as a cognitive aid in various high‐stakes environments to improve the reliability and performance of individuals and teams. When designed well, implemented thoughtfully, and monitored closely, they offer the opportunity to improve the performance of health care teams and advance patient safety. There are different types of checklists; examples include task lists, troubleshooting lists, coordination lists, discipline lists, and to‐do lists. Each is useful in different situations and requires different implementation strategies. Checklists also are different from algorithms, care maps and protocols, and educational tools. Therefore, they are not useful in all situations. In appropriate selected clinical circumstances, checklists are tools that can help standardize care, improve communication, and help teams perform optimally.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1997
Laurence E. Shields; Robert G. Andrews
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2000
Laurence E. Shields; Hans Peter Kiem; Robert G. Andrews
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2018
Laurence E. Shields; Cathrine Klein; Barbara Pelletreau; Suzanne Wiesner
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2016
Laurence E. Shields; Suzanne Wiesner; Barbara Pelletreau; Herman L. Hedriana
/data/revues/00029378/v214i1sS/S0002937815013241/ | 2015
Laurence E. Shields; Suzanne Wiesner; Barbara Pelletreau; Herman Hedriana
Collaboration
Dive into the Laurence E. Shields's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs