Laurence Edmund Jones
Aberystwyth University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laurence Edmund Jones.
Annals of Botany | 2013
Sarah Jane Purdy; Anne Louise Maddison; Laurence Edmund Jones; Richard Webster; John Andralojc; Iain S. Donnison; John Clifton-Brown
Background and Aims The bioenergy grass Miscanthus is native to eastern Asia. As Miscanthus uses C4 photosynthesis, the cooler temperatures experienced in much of northern Europe are expected to limit productivity. Identification of genetic diversity in chilling tolerance will enable breeders to generate more productive varieties for these cooler regions. Characterizing the temporal relationships between photosynthesis, carbohydrate and molecular expression of relevant genes is key to understanding genotypic differences in tolerance or sensitivity. Methods To characterize chilling responses in four Miscanthus genotypes, plants were exposed to a sudden reduction in temperature. The genotypes studied comprised of two M. sinensis, one M. sacchariflorus and one inter-species hybrid, M. × giganteus. Changes in photosynthesis (Asat), carbohydrate composition and the expression of target transcripts were observed following chilling-shock. After 4 d the decline in leaf elongation rate (LER) in the different genotypes was measured. Results Following chilling-shock the greatest decline in Asat was observed in M. sacchariflorus and one M. sinensis genotype. Carbohydrate concentrations increased in all genotypes following chilling but to a lesser extent in M. sacchariflorus. Two stress inducible genes were most highly expressed in the genotypes that experienced the greatest declines in Asat and LER. Miscanthus × giganteus retained the highest Asat and was unique in exhibiting no decline in LER following transfer to 12 °C. Conclusions Miscanthus × giganteus exhibits a superior tolerance to chilling shock than other genotypes of Miscanthus. The absence of sucrose accumulation in M. sacchariflorus during chilling-shock suggests an impairment in enzyme function. A candidate transcription factor, MsCBF3, is most highly expressed in the most sensitive genotypes and may be a suitable molecular marker for predicting chilling sensitivity.
Gcb Bioenergy | 2017
Christopher Lyndon Davey; Laurence Edmund Jones; Michael Squance; Sarah Jane Purdy; Anne Louise Maddison; Jennifer Cunniff; Iain S. Donnison; John Clifton-Brown
Miscanthus is a rhizomatous C4 grass of great interest as a biofuel crop because it has the potential to produce high yields over a wide geographical area with low agricultural inputs on marginal land less suitable for food production. At the moment, a clonal interspecific hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus is the most widely cultivated and studied in Europe and the United States, but breeding programmes are developing newer more productive varieties. Here, we quantified the physiological processes relating to whole season yield in a replicated plot trial in Wales, UK. Light capture and conversion efficiency were parameterized for four carefully selected genotypes (M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus and Miscanthus × giganteus). Differences in the canopy architecture in mature stands as measured by the extinction coefficient (k) were small (0.55–0.65). Sensitivity analysis on a mathematical model of Miscanthus was performed to quantify the accumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (iPAR) in the growing season using (i) k, (ii) variation in the thermal responses of leaf expansion rate, (iii) base temperature for degree days and (iv) date start of canopy expansion. A 10% increase in k or leaf area per degree day both had a minimal effect on iPAR (3%). Decreasing base temperature from 10 to 9 °C gave an 8% increase in iPAR. If the starting date for canopy expansion was the same as shoot emergence date, then the iPAR increases by 12.5%. In M. × giganteus, the whole season above ground and total (including below ground) radiation‐use efficiency (RUE) ranged from 45% to 37% higher than the noninterspecific hybrid genotypes. The greater yields in the interspecific hybrid M. × giganteus are explained by the higher RUE and not by differences in iPAR or partitioning effects. Studying the mechanisms underlying this complex trait could have wide benefits for both fuel and food production.
Acta Crystallographica Section C-crystal Structure Communications | 2008
Amber L. Thompson; David J. Watkin; Zoltan A. Gal; Laurence Edmund Jones; Jackie Hollinshead; Sarah F. Jenkinson; George W. J. Fleet; Robert J. Nash
The absolute and relative configurations of 1-epialexine are established by X-ray crystallographic analysis, giving (1S,2R,3R,7S,7aS)-1,2,7-trihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)pyrrolizidine. The compound crystallizes as the hemihydrate C(8)H(15)NO(4) x 0.5H(2)O, with hydrogen bonds holding the water molecule in a hydrophilic pocket between epialexine bilayers. In addition, a comparison was made between results obtained from examination of the Bijvoet pairs from data sets collected using molybdenum and copper radiation.
Acta Crystallographica Section E-structure Reports Online | 2009
Sarah F. Jenkinson; Kathrine V. Booth; Scott Newberry; George W. J. Fleet; Ken Izumori; Kenji Morimoto; Robert J. Nash; Laurence Edmund Jones; David J. Watkin; Amber L. Thompson
The title molecule, C7H15NO5, the major product from selective enzymatic oxidation followed by hydrogenolysis of the corresponding azidoheptitol, was found by X-ray crystallography to exisit in a chair conformation with three axial hydroxyl groups. One of the hydroxymethyl groups is disordered over two sets of sites in a 0.590 (3):0.410 (3) ratio. In the crystal, O—H⋯O, O—H⋯(O,O), O—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding occurs.
Phytochemistry Letters | 2010
Agnieszka Michalik; Jackie Hollinshead; Laurence Edmund Jones; George W. J. Fleet; Chu-Yi Yu; Xiang-Guo Hu; Renate van Well; Graeme Horne; Francis X. Wilson; Atsushi Kato; Sarah F. Jenkinson; Robert J. Nash
Bioenergy Research | 2015
Sarah Jane Purdy; Jennifer Cunniff; Anne Louise Maddison; Laurence Edmund Jones; T. Barraclough; March Castle; Christopher Lyndon Davey; Charlotte Jones; I. Shield; Joseph Gallagher; Iain S. Donnison; John Clifton-Brown
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2015
Jennifer Cunniff; Sarah Jane Purdy; T. Barraclough; March Castle; Anne Louise Maddison; Laurence Edmund Jones; I. Shield; Andrew S. Gregory; A. Karp
Bioenergy Feedstocks: Breeding and Genetics | 2013
John Clifton-Brown; Paul Robson; Christopher L. Davey; Kerrie Farrar; Charlotte Mary Hayes; Lin Shiow-Fen Huang; Elaine Jensen; Laurence Edmund Jones; Maurice Edward Hinton Jones; Anne Louise Maddison; Heike Meyer; John Norris; Sarah Jane Purdy; Charlie Rodgers; Kai-Uwe Schwarz; Cosentino Salvatore; Gancho Trifonu Slavov; John Valentine; Richard Webster; Susan Jean Youell; Iain S. Donnison
Phytochemistry Letters | 2010
Laurence Edmund Jones; Jacqueline Hollinshead; George W. J. Fleet; Amber L. Thompson; David J. Watkin; Zoltan A. Gal; Sarah F. Jenkinson; Atsushi Kato; Robert J. Nash
Aspects of applied biology | 2011
Jennifer Cunniff; I. Shield; T. Barraclough; March Castle; Steven J. Hanley; J. Andralojc; Goetz M. Richter; Marianna Cerasuolo; Sarah Jane Purdy; John Clifton-Brown; Anne Louise Maddison; Laurence Edmund Jones; Iain S. Donnison; A. Karp; E. Booth; N. Halford; Gail Taylor; D. Turley; Thomas B. Voigt