Laurence M. Epstein

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias. Results and mechanisms.

BACKGROUNDnRadio frequency catheter ablation is accepted therapy for patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and has a low rate of complications. For patients with atrial arrhythmias, catheter ablation of the His bundle has been an option when drugs fail or produce untoward side effects. Although preventing rapid ventricular response, this procedure requires a permanent pacemaker and does not restore the atrium to normal rhythm. Therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation directed at the atrial substrate.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThirty-seven patients with 42 atrial arrhythmias (mean +/- SD age, 41 +/- 24 years) who had failed a median of three drugs were enrolled. Diagnoses were automatic atrial tachycardia in 12, atypical atrial flutter in 1, typical atrial flutter in 18, reentrant atrial tachycardia in 8, and sinus node reentry in 3 patients. Sites for atrial flutter ablation were based on anatomic barriers in the floor of the right atrium. For automatic atrial tachycardia, the site of earliest activation before the P wave was sought. All with reentrant atrial tachycardia had previous surgery for congenital heart disease and reentry around a surgical scar, anatomic defect, or atriotomy incision and our goal was to identify a site of early activation in a zone of slow conduction. At target sites, 20 to 50 W of radiofrequency energy was delivered during tachycardia between the 4- or 5-mm catheter tip and a skin patch, except in 4 patients with atrial flutter, in whom a catheter with a 10-mm thermistor-embedded tip was used. Procedure end point was inability to reinduce tachycardia. Acute success was achieved in 11 of 12 (92%) with automatic atrial tachycardia, 17 of 18 (94%) with typical atrial flutter, 7 of 8 (88%) with reentrant atrial tachycardia, and 3 of 3 (100%) with sinus node reentry but not in the patient with atypical atrial flutter. For tachycardia involving reentry (reentrant atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter), successful ablation required severing an isthmus of slow conduction. For those with atrial flutter, this was between the tricuspid annulus and the coronary sinus os (10) or posterior (4) or posterolateral (3) between the inferior vena cava (2) or an atriotomy scar (1) and the tricuspid annulus. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient. At mean follow-up of 290 +/- 40 days, the ablated arrhythmia recurred in 1 (9%) with automatic atrial tachycardia, 5 (29%) with atrial flutter, and 1 (14%) with reentrant atrial tachycardia, all of whom had successful repeat ablation. Previously undetected arrhythmias occurred in 2 patients who are either asymptomatic or controlled with medication.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAblation of automatic and reentrant atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter had a high success rate and caused no complications from energy application. Repeat procedures may be required for long-term success, especially in patients with atrial flutter. The mechanism by which ablation is successful is similar for atrial flutter and other forms of atrial reentry and involves severing a critical isthmus of slow conduction bounded by anatomic or structural obstacles. Automatic arrhythmias are abolished by directing lesions at the focus of abnormal impulse formation.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation as a cure for idiopathic tachycardia of both left and right ventricular origin.

OBJECTIVESnThe purpose of this study was 1) to investigate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency energy catheter ablation as curative treatment for idiopathic tachycardia of both left and right ventricular origin, and 2) to compare the usefulness of different methods used to map the site of origin of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia.nnnBACKGROUNDnPercutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation has been used with dramatic success in the treatment of patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and bundle branch reentrant tachycardia. Limited data are available on the use of radiofrequency energy catheter ablation as curative treatment for idiopathic tachycardia of both left and right ventricular origin.nnnMETHODSnTwenty-eight consecutive patients (13 to 71 years old) presenting with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia were enrolled in the study. The site of origin of both left and right ventricular tachycardia was mapped using earliest endocardial activation times during tachycardia and by pace mapping. These mapping techniques were compared.nnnRESULTSnRadiofrequency ablation was successful in all eight patients (100%) with left ventricular tachycardia. Tachycardia recurred in one patient. The ablation procedure was complicated by mild aortic insufficiency in one patient. Right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia was successfully ablated in 17 (85%) of 20 patients. The success rate at follow-up was 85%. In one patient, the ablation procedure was complicated by acute ventricular perforation and death. Pace maps from successful ablation sites were better than pace maps from unsuccessful sites (p < 0.004). Endocardial activation times at successful ablation sites were not different from unsuccessful sites (p < 0.13).nnnCONCLUSIONSnRadiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. The site of origin of tachycardia is best identified using pace mapping. Significant complications can occur and should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis for each patient.

Use of P wave configuration during atrial tachycardia to predict site of origin

OBJECTIVESnThis study sought to construct an algorithm to differentiate left atrial from right atrial tachycardia foci on the basis of surface electrocardiograms (ECGs).nnnBACKGROUNDnAtrial tachycardia is an uncommon form of supraventricular tachycardia, often resistant to drug therapy.nnnMETHODSnA total of 31 consecutive patients with atrial tachycardia due to either abnormal automaticity or triggered rhythm underwent detailed atrial endocardial mapping and successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of a single atrial focus. P wave configuration was analyzed from 12-lead ECGs during tachycardia during either spontaneous or pharmacologically induced atrioventricular block. P waves inscribed above the isoelectric line (TP interval) were classified as positive, below as negative, above and below (or conversely, below and above) as biphasic and flat P waves as isoelectric (0). In 17 patients the tachycardia was located in the right atrium: crista terminalis (n = 4); right atrial appendage (n = 4); lateral wall (n = 4); posteroinferior right atrium (n = 3); tricuspid annulus (n = 1); and near the coronary sinus (n = 1). In 14 patients, atrial tachycardia was located in the left atrium: at the entrance of the right (n = 6) or left (n = 4) superior pulmonary veins; left inferior pulmonary vein (n = 1); inferior left atrium (n = 1); base of left atrial appendage (n = 1); and high lateral left atrium (n = 1).nnnRESULTSnThere were no differences in P wave vectors between sites at the right atrial lateral wall versus the right atrial appendage or between sites at the entrance of right versus left superior pulmonary veins. However, analysis of P wave configuration showed that leads aVL and V1 were most helpful in distinguishing right atrial from left atrial foci. The sensitivity and specificity of using a positive or biphasic P wave in lead aVL to predict a right atrial focus was 88% and 79%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of a positive P wave in lead V1 in predicting a left atrial focus was 93% and 88%, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSn1) Analyses of surface P wave configuration proved to be reasonably good in differentiating right atrial from left atrial tachycardia foci. 2) Leads II, III and aVF were helpful in providing clues for differentiating superior from inferior foci.

Quality of life and outcomes after radiofrequency His-bundle catheter ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation : Impact of treatment in paroxysmal and established atrial fibrillation

One hundred seven patients underwent atrioventricular (AV)-junctional ablation and pacing for atrial fibrillation, and 90 were alive 2.3 +/- 1.2 years later. Quality of life index (1.9 +/- 1.2 to 3.6 +/- 1.1; 3.6 +/- 1.1; p<0.001) and ease of activities of daily living (2 +/- 0.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.3; p<0.001) were significantly improved. Doctor visits (10 +/- 13 to 5.06 +/-7; p<0.03), hospital admissions (2.8 +/- 6.8 vs 0.17 +/- 0.54; p<0.03, and antiarrhythmic drug trials (6.2 +/- 4 to 0.46 +/- 1.5; p<0.001) decreased significantly after treatment. Congestive heart failure episodes decreased from 18 before to 8 afterward. Twenty-eight of 36 patients with dual-chamber pacemakers remained in a dual-chamber mode at follow-up. Radiofrequency AV-junctional catheter ablation and pacing is a highly successful form of treatment for medically refractory atrial fibrillation.

Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of the Sinus Node for “Inappropriate” Sinus Tachycardia

BACKGROUNDnRadiofrequency catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias refractory to medical therapy. However, in symptomatic patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia resistant to drug therapy, catheter ablation of the His bundle with permanent pacemaker insertion is currently applied. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency modification of the sinus node as alternative therapy for patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnSixteen patients with disabling episodes of inappropriate sinus tachycardia refractory to drug therapy (4.2 +/- 0.3 drug trials) underwent either total sinus node ablation or sinus node modification. The region of the sinus node was identified as the region of earliest atrial activation in sinus rhythm during electrophysiological study. This region was further defined by use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in 9 patients, in whom it was found that an ablation catheter could be guided reliably and maintained on the crista terminalis. Radiofrequency energy was delivered during tachycardia between either a standard 4-mm or custom 10-mm thermistor-imbedded catheter tip and a skin patch. Total sinus node ablation was performed successfully in all 4 patients in whom it was attempted and was characterized by a junctional escape rhythm. Sinus node modification was successfully achieved in all 12 patients in whom it was attempted and was characterized by a 25% reduction in the sinus heart rate. For the group as a whole, exercise stress testing after ablation revealed a gradual chronotropic response, with a significant reduction in maximal heart rate (132.8 +/- 6.5 versus 179.5 +/- 3.6 beats per minute [bpm]; P < .001) without evidence of an exaggerated heart rate response to a light workload (103.0 +/- 4.1 versus 139.5 +/- 3.5 bpm; P < .001). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring revealed a significant decrease in maximal heart rate and mean heart rate after ablation (167.2 +/- 2.6 versus 96.7 +/- 5.0 bpm, P < .001, and 125.6 +/- 5.0 versus 54.1 +/- 5.3 bpm, P < .001, respectively). There was a significant decrease in the number of applications of radiofrequency energy required in patients undergoing modification of the sinus node when guided by ICE compared with fluoroscopy alone (3.6 +/- 0.8 versus 10.4 +/- 2.1; P < .01) as well as a decrease in fluoroscopy time (33.0 +/- 9.5 versus 58.5 +/- 8.4 minutes). After a mean follow-up period of 20.5 +/- 0.3 months, there were no recurrences of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in patients who underwent a total sinus node ablation. However, 2 patients who had a total sinus node ablation subsequently required permanent pacing because of symptomatic pauses, and 1 patient developed an ectopic atrial tachycardia. After a mean follow-up of 7.1 +/- 1.7 months, there were two recurrences of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in patients who underwent sinus node modification. However, no significant bradycardia or pauses were observed. Complications encountered during the study included 1 patient who developed transient right diaphragmatic paralysis and another patient who developed transient superior vena cava syndrome.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSinus node modification is feasible in humans and should be considered as an alternative to complete atrioventricular junctional ablation for patients with disabling inappropriate sinus tachycardia refractory to medical management. Sinus node modification may be aided by ICE.

Intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in humans

OBJECTIVESnThe purpose of this study was to describe our preliminary experience using catheter-based intracardiac echocardiography as an adjunct to biplane fluoroscopy for guiding radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in the right side of the heart.nnnBACKGROUNDnCatheter ablation requires precise positioning and stable ablation electrode-endocardial contact. This procedure is currently guided by an analysis of intracardiac electrograms and fluoroscopy. However, the use of fluoroscopy does not allow the endocardium and certain anatomic landmarks to be identified and is associated with the hazards of radiation exposure.nnnMETHODSnSeventeen symptomatic patients were studied. A 10F 10-MHz intracardiac imaging catheter was used to visualize specific anatomic landmarks in the right atrium for directing the ablation electrode in 15 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of 19 arrhythmias and to assist with interatrial septal puncture in 3 patients.nnnRESULTSnContinuous intracardiac imaging was performed for a mean +/- SD of 63.6 +/- 39.2 min and demonstrated distal electrode-endocardial tissue contact in 81 (60%) of 134 radiofrequency applications. Movement of the catheter was demonstrated during 36 (44%), microcavitations during 39 (48%) and thrombus during 15 (19%) of the 81 imaged applications. In 7 of 10 procedures for atrial flutter, successful ablation was directed at anatomic corridors in the right atrium visualized with intracardiac echocardiography. During ablation of atrial tachycardia, imaging identified abnormal atrial anatomy related to previous surgery and guided successful ablation of a reentrant tachycardia circulating around these anatomic obstacles. In two procedures for slow pathway modification of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia, intracardiac echocardiography confirmed catheter stability at the tricuspid annulus anterior to the coronary sinus.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDuring catheter ablation, intracardiac echocardiography augments fluoroscopy by visualizing anatomic landmarks, ensuring stable endocardial contact and assisting in transseptal puncture. Ablation of typical atrial flutter can be successfully directed at anatomic corridors identified using intracardiac imaging.

Percutaneous catheter modification of the atrioventricular node. A potential cure for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Our purpose was to describe a technique of atrioventricular (AV) node modification for patients with drug refractory AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nine patients (mean age, 45 +/- 20; range, 14-82) with recurrent drug refractory AVNRT (n = 8) or sudden cardiac death thought to be precipitated by AVNRT (n = 1) underwent a percutaneous catheter procedure to modify AV nodal function. The area between the electrode recording the maximal His-bundle electrogram and the ostium of the coronary sinus was divided into three zones. Perinodal direct current shocks of 100-300 J were delivered to one (n = 2), two (n = 3), or three (n = 4) zones without complications. The procedure endpoints were modification of AV conduction (either first degree AV block or complete retrograde ventriculo-atrial [VA] block) and failure to induce AVNRT before or after isoproterenol and/or atropine administration. Six of nine patients (67%) have had no inducible or spontaneous AVNRT over a mean follow-up of 12.3 +/- 4.1 months (range, 4.5-17). One of the six underwent repeat, successful modification, because AVNRT was inducible at restudy 2 days after the initial procedure. AVNRT recurred in three patients (33%), one early (3 days) and two late (3-4 months). Two of these patients underwent complete ablation of the AV junction and permanent pacemaker placement, whereas one is controlled with drug therapy. Therefore, AV nodal modification resulted in tachycardia control without antiarrhythmic drugs in six of nine (67%) and obviated the need for complete AV junctional ablation in seven of nine patients (78%). Elimination of AVNRT appears to result from either block in the retrograde fast pathway or modification of the antegrade slow pathway, such that AVNRT cannot be sustained. Additional findings suggest that an atrio-Hisian accessory connection may not be involved in AVNRT in some of these patients. Percutaneous catheter AV nodal modification appears to be a promising technique for treatment of refractory AVNRT and may obviate need for complete AV junctional ablation in a substantial number of patients with drug/pacemaker refractory AVNRT.

Electrophysiological laboratory, electrophysiologist-implanted, nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillators.

BACKGROUNDnImplantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) have conventionally been implanted in the operating room by surgeons. However, technological developments have reduced size and increased simplicity, bringing the procedure into the realm of the electrophysiologist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of the entire ICD system by electrophysiologists in an electrophysiology laboratory.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnBetween July 1993 and February 1994, 23 patients (21 men; age, 64 +/- 11 years) underwent transvenous ICD implantation by electrophysiologists working alone, entirely in the electrophysiology laboratory. Indications for ICD were sudden death in 10 patients, uncontrolled life-threatening ventricular tachycardia in 12, and syncope with cardiomyopathy and familial sudden death in 1. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease and a past history of acute myocardial infarction. Four patients had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 had coronary ectasia and poor left ventricular function, and another had poor left ventricular function related to valvular dysfunction. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34 +/- 10% (range, 20% to 50%). General anesthesia was administered in 22 cases, and deep sedation was used in 1 elderly patient. After positioning of transvenous leads and subcutaneous patch/array lead positioning, defibrillation testing was performed. After transvenous and subcutaneous lead tunneling, all generators were placed subcutaneously in an abdominal pocket. The mean total time in the electrophysiology laboratory was 254 +/- 68 minutes (range, 150 to 375 minutes), with 104 +/- 42 minutes for anesthetic and other preparation, 159 +/- 45 minutes for implantation, and 8.7 +/- 5 minutes (range, 3 to 25 minutes) of fluoroscopy required for positioning of transvenous and subcutaneous lead systems. Implant times showed a significant improvement when the first 10 cases (188 +/- 44 minutes) were compared with the last 10 in the series (124 +/- 44 minutes, P < .01). The mean defibrillation threshold was 17 +/- 5 J (range, 5 to 25 J). There were 5 complications (22%): 1 patch-site hematoma, 1 pneumothorax related to subclavian venous puncture, 1 pulmonary embolism, and 2 patients requiring overnight ventilation after hemodynamic deterioration following defibrillation testing. There were no deaths, and there were no infections. The mean time to hospital discharge after the implant was 5.1 +/- 3.5 days. After 11.6 +/- 9 weeks of follow-up, all devices were functioning satisfactorily, all patients had successfully defibrillated at postimplant predischarge checkup with 29 +/- 5 J, and there had been no late complications.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis is the first report to show that nonthoracotomy ICD implantation may be successfully carried out by electrophysiologists working alone in the electrophysiology laboratory, with a high rate of success and few complications, even in high-risk patients. This high rate of success and safety probably relates to the availability of high-quality fluoroscopy and familiarity with electrophysiology laboratory equipment and personnel.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atriofascicular and nodoventricular Mahaim tracts.

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of tachycardia in patients with Mahaim tracts. The tachycardia may involve antegrade conduction over an atriofascicular pathway with decremental properties or a nodofascicular pathway. Methods and ResultsWe report six patients with recurrent episodes of preexcited tachycardia with findings consistent with “Mahaim tract” conduction. All patients exhibited decremental antegrade preexcited conduction with atrial pacing and a preexcited tachycardia with initial activation of the proximal right bundle branch. In four patients (group 1), atrial premature complexes (APCs) induced at the tricuspid annulus just after the inscription of the septal atrial electrogram and during left bundle branch block preexcited tachycardia advanced the next preexcited ventricular complex. In these patients, discrete Mahaim potentials were inscribed over the right anterolateral or lateral tricuspid annulus. Two patients (group 2) had evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal conduction. APCs during left bundle branch block tachycardia just after inscription of the septal atrial electrogram failed to advance the next ventricular complex with similar preexcited morphology, and no Mahaim potentials could be recorded from the tricuspid annulus. In group 1 patients, application of radiofrequency energy to sites recording the Mahaim potentials resulted in tachycardia cure. For patients in group 2, selective slow atrioventricular nodal pathway ablation in the midseptal region resulted in complete ablation of both the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway and Mahaim conduction in two patients. ConclusionsMahaim tachycardia can be due to atriofascicular pathways, which may be ablated over the right tricuspid annulus, or to septal pathways, which may arise from the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology. In the latter circumstance, successful ablation is achieved by placing the lesion in the midseptal region.

Clinical and electrophysiologic features and role of catheter ablation techniques in adult patients with automatic atrioventricular junctional tachycardia

A total of 8 patients with junctional tachycardia (JT) were included for study. Patients with JT had a supraventricular arrhythmia that was initiated by a junctional complex without PR prolongation and episodes of atrioventricular (AV) dissociation. JT could not be initiated by pacing and occurred either spontaneously (3 patients) or with isoproterenol (5 patients). Tachycardia could be consistently terminated by either carotid sinus massage (1 patient), intravenous adenosine (2 patients), or critically timed ventricular premature complexes (3 patients). In 6 of the 8 other patients, tachycardia foci (atrial or ventricular) or mechanisms (AV node reentry) were found. Two patients underwent complete AV junctional ablation and 2 had termination of tachycardia without change in the AV conduction by perinodal application of radiofrequency lesions. AVJT appears to be due to abnormal automaticity and may be successfully ablated by application of radiofrequency energy to perinodal areas.