Laurence M. Kruger
University of Cape Town
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laurence M. Kruger.
Biological Reviews | 2015
Gareth P. Hempson; Sally Archibald; William J. Bond; Roger P. Ellis; Cornelia C. Grant; Fred J. Kruger; Laurence M. Kruger; Courtney Moxley; Norman Owen-Smith; Mike J. S. Peel; Izak P.J. Smit; Karen J. Vickers
Grazing lawns are a distinct grassland community type, characterised by short‐stature and with their persistence and spread promoted by grazing. In Africa, they reveal a long co‐evolutionary history of grasses and large mammal grazers. The attractiveness to grazers of a low‐biomass sward lies in the relatively high quality of forage, largely due to the low proportion of stem material in the sward; this encourages repeat grazing that concomitantly suppresses tall‐grass growth forms that would otherwise outcompete lawn species for light. Regular grazing that prevents shading and maintains sward quality is thus the cornerstone of grazing lawn dynamics. The strong interplay between abiotic conditions and disturbance factors, which are central to grazing lawn existence, can also cause these systems to be highly dynamic. Here we identify differences in growth form among grazing lawn grass species, and assess how compositional differences among lawn types, as well as environmental variables, influence their maintenance requirements (i.e. grazing frequency) and vulnerability to degradation. We also make a clear distinction between the processes of lawn establishment and lawn maintenance. Rainfall, soil nutrient status, grazer community composition and fire regime have strong and interactive influences on both processes. However, factors that concentrate grazing pressure (e.g. nutrient hotspots and sodic sites) have more bearing on where lawns establish. Similarly, we discuss the relevance of enhanced rates of nitrogen cycling and of sodium levels to lawn maintenance. Grazer community composition and density has considerable significance to grazing lawn dynamics; not all grazers are adapted to foraging on short‐grass swards, and differences in body size and relative mouth dimensions determine which species are able to convert tall‐grass swards into grazing lawns under different conditions. Hence, we evaluate the roles of different grazers in lawn dynamics, as well as the benefits that grazer populations derive from having access to grazing lawns. The effects of grazing lawns can extend well beyond their borders, due to their influence on grazer densities, behaviour and movements as well as fire spread, intensity and frequency. Variation in the area and proportion of a landscape that is grazing lawn can thus have a profound impact on system dynamics. We provide a conceptual model that summarises grazing lawn dynamics, and identify a rainfall range where we predict grazing lawns to be most prevalent. We also examine the biodiversity associated with grazing lawn systems, and consider their functional contribution to the conservation of this biodiversity. Finally, we assess the utility of grazing lawns as a resource in a rangeland context.
Journal of Tropical Ecology | 2008
Glenn R. Moncrieff; Laurence M. Kruger; Jeremy J. Midgley
One manner in which elephants utilize trees is by removing their bark. This type of utilization is concentrated on the largest trees in the landscape. The role of bark removal in increasing the vulnerability of large trees to fire and the mechanism through which fire damage is mediated were investigated in Kruger National Park, South Africa, by experimentally removing bark and burning Acacia nigrescens stems with diameters ranging between 30 and 68 mm. Also, field surveys were conducted subsequent to natural fires in order to investigate mortality patterns of large trees with dbh greater than 15 cm with bark removed by elephants. An increasing probability of mortality was associated with increasing amounts of bark removal but only if trees were burned. When trees had bark removed but were not burnt, simulating damage only to cambium and phloem, none of the 12 treated stems died in the 4-mo period over which the experiment ran. Moreover, low levels of cambium damage were detected in large burned stems. This suggests that bark removal increases fire-induced xylem damage and that this damage contributes towards stem mortality. In a survey of 437 large trees, bark removal by elephants was frequent on large stems (44%) and larger trees have greater amounts of bark removed. Post-fire mortality of large trees was significantly associated with increasing bark removal and stem diameter. These results indicate that bark removal by elephants increases the vulnerability of stems to fire, resulting in mortality of large stems otherwise protected from fire.
Journal of Tropical Ecology | 2012
Jeremy J. Midgley; Kirsten Gallaher; Laurence M. Kruger
The marula ( Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst., Anacardiaceae) has a strongly lignified endocarp or stone which contains several seeds, each of which is within its own locule that is sealed by an individual operculum (Figure 1). The strong casing prevents germination, not by preventing the passage of water to the seeds, but by preventing oxygen from reaching the seeds (von Teichman et al . 1985). It is well known that marula fruits taken from the dung of the African elephant ( Loxodonta africana Blumenbach) have more rapid germination than those that have not been eaten by elephants (Dudley 2000, Lewis 1987). This positive impact of elephants on marula germination continues to be considered to be through acid treatment in the digestion system of the elephant (Helm et al . 2011). We hypothesize that the primary mechanism which favours germination is mastication by elephants which physically loosens the opercula, rather than digestive dissolution of the stone. If true, the relevance of this is that only elephants would be the legitimate dispersers of marula seeds, because none of the many other species that are attracted to marula fruits would have jaws powerful enough to loosen the opercula.
African Journal of Ecology | 2008
M. T. Edkins; Laurence M. Kruger; K. Harris; Jeremy J. Midgley
South African Journal of Botany | 2009
Chantal Helm; E.T.F. Witkowski; Laurence M. Kruger; M. Hofmeyr; Norman Owen-Smith
South African Journal of Botany | 2011
Jeremy J. Midgley; Laurence M. Kruger; R.P. Skelton
Austral Ecology | 2011
Chantal Helm; Gwyneth Wilson; Jeremy J. Midgley; Laurence M. Kruger; E.T.F. Witkowski
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2014
Gareth P. Hempson; Jeremy J. Midgley; Michael J. Lawes; Karen J. Vickers; Laurence M. Kruger
Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2001
Laurence M. Kruger; Jeremy J. Midgley
Archive | 2017
Laurence M. Kruger; Tristan Charles-Dominique; William J. Bond; Jeremy J. Midgley; Dave A. Balfour; Abednig Mkhwanazi; Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt; Sally Archibald; Norman Owen-Smith