Laurens F. Tops

Noninvasive Evaluation of the Aortic Root With Multislice Computed Tomography : Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES In the present study, the anatomy of the aortic root was assessed noninvasively with multislice computed tomography (MSCT). BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been proposed as an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. For this procedure, detailed knowledge of aortic annulus diameters and the relation between the annulus and the coronary arteries is needed. METHODS In 169 patients (111 men, age 54 +/- 11 years), a 64-slice MSCT scan was performed for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Of these, 150 patients had no or mild aortic stenosis, and 19 patients had moderate to severe aortic stenosis. Reconstructed coronal and sagittal views were used for assessment of the aortic annulus diameter in 2 directions. In addition, the distance between the annulus and the ostium of the right and left coronary arteries and the length of the coronary leaflets were assessed. The LV outflow tract and interventricular septum were analyzed on the single oblique sagittal view at end-diastole. RESULTS The diameter of the aortic annulus was 26.3 +/- 2.8 mm on the coronal view, and 23.5 +/- 2.7 mm on the sagittal view. Mean difference between the 2 diameters was 2.9 +/- 1.8 mm, indicating an oval shape of the aortic annulus. Mean distance between the aortic annulus and the ostium of the right coronary artery was 17.2 +/- 3.3 mm, and mean distance between the annulus and the ostium of the left coronary artery was 14.4 +/- 2.9 mm. In 82 patients (49%), the length of the left coronary leaflet exceeded the distance between the annulus and the ostium of the left coronary artery. There were no significant differences in the diameter of annulus, diameter of sinus of Valsalva, or the distance between the annulus, left coronary leaflet, and the ostium of the left coronary artery, between the patient with and without severe aortic stenosis. CONCLUSIONS The MSCT can provide detailed information on the shape of the aortic annulus and the relation between the annulus and the ostia of the coronary arteries. Thereby, MSCT may be helpful for avoiding paravalvular leakage and coronary occlusion and may facilitate the selection of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of each type of strain for left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony assessment and its predictive value for a positive response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Furthermore, changes in extent of LV dyssynchrony for each type of strain were evaluated during follow-up. BACKGROUND Different echocardiographic techniques have been proposed for assessment of LV dyssynchrony. The novel 2-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking strain analysis technique can provide information on radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS), and longitudinal strain (LS). METHODS In 161 patients, 2D echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 6 months of CRT. Extent of LV dyssynchrony was calculated for each type of strain. Response to CRT was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume >/=15% at follow-up. RESULTS At follow-up, 88 patients (55%) were classified as responders. Differences in baseline LV dyssynchrony between responders and nonresponders were noted only for RS (251 +/- 138 ms vs. 94 +/- 65 ms; p < 0.001), whereas no differences were noted for CS and LS. A cut-off value of radial dyssynchrony >/=130 ms was able to predict response to CRT with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80%. In addition, a significant decrease in extent of LV dyssynchrony measured with RS (from 251 +/- 138 ms to 98 +/- 92 ms; p < 0.001) was demonstrated only in responders. CONCLUSIONS Speckle tracking radial strain analysis constitutes the best method to identify potential responders to CRT. Reduction in LV dyssynchrony after CRT was only noted in responders.

Comparison of Aortic Root Dimensions and Geometries Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by 2- and 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography and Multislice Computed Tomography

Background—3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may provide more accurate aortic annular and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) dimensions and geometries compared with 2D TEE. We assessed agreements between 2D and 3D TEE measurements with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and changes in annular/LVOT areas and geometries after transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI). Methods and Results—Two-dimensional circular (&pgr;×r2), 3D circular, and 3D planimetered annular and LVOT areas by TEE were compared with “gold standard” MSCT planimetered areas before TAVI. Mean MSCT planimetered annular area was 4.65±0.82 cm2 before TAVI. Annular areas were underestimated by 2D TEE circular (3.89±0.74 cm2, P<0.001), 3D TEE circular (4.06±0.79 cm2, P<0.001), and 3D TEE planimetered annular areas (4.22±0.77 cm2, P<0.001). Mean MSCT planimetered LVOT area was 4.61±1.20 cm2 before TAVI. LVOT areas were underestimated by 2D TEE circular (3.41±0.89 cm2, P<0.001), 3D TEE circular (3.89±0.94 cm2, P<0.001), and 3D TEE planimetered LVOT areas (4.31±1.15 cm2, P<0.001). Three-dimensional TEE planimetered annular and LVOT areas had the best agreement with respective MSCT planimetered areas. After TAVI, MSCT planimetered (4.65±0.82 versus 4.20±0.46 cm2, P<0.001) and 3D TEE planimetered (4.22±0.77 versus 3.62±0.43 cm2, P<0.001) annular areas decreased, whereas MSCT planimetered (4.61±1.20 versus 4.84±1.17 cm2, P=0.002) and 3D TEE planimetered (4.31±1.15 versus 4.55±1.21 cm2, P<0.001) LVOT areas increased. Aortic annulus and LVOT became less elliptical after TAVI. Conclusions—Before TAVI, 2D and 3D TEE aortic annular/LVOT circular geometric assumption underestimated the respective MSCT planimetered areas. After TAVI, 3D TEE and MSCT planimetered annular areas decreased as it assumes the internal dimensions of the prosthetic valve. However, planimetered LVOT areas increased due to a more circular geometry.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function

AIMS Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is one of the most frequent complications. However, the underlying mechanisms of this complication remain unclear. The present evaluation studied the anatomic and morphological features of the aortic valve annulus that may predict aortic regurgitation after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS In 53 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) assessment of the aortic valve apparatus was performed. For aortic valve annulus sizing, two orthogonal diameters were measured (coronal and sagittal). In addition, the extent of valve calcifications was quantified. At 1-month follow-up after procedure, MDCT was repeated to evaluate and correlate the prosthesis deployment to the presence of aortic regurgitation. Successful procedure was achieved in 48 (91%) patients. At baseline, MDCT demonstrated an ellipsoid shape of the aortic valve annulus with significantly larger coronal diameter when compared with sagittal diameter (25.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 22.9 +/- 2.0 mm, P < 0.001). At follow-up, MDCT showed a non-circular deployment of the prosthesis in six (14%) patients. Moderate post-procedural aortic regurgitation was observed in five (11%) patients. These patients showed significantly larger aortic valve annulus (27.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 24.8 +/- 2.4 mm, P = 0.007) and more calcified native valves (4174 +/- 1604 vs. 2444 +/- 1237 HU, P = 0.005) at baseline and less favourable deployment of the prosthesis after TAVI. CONCLUSION Multi-detector row computed tomography enables an accurate sizing of the aortic valve annulus and constitutes a valuable imaging tool to evaluate prosthesis location and deployment after TAVI. In addition, MDCT helps to understand the underlying mechanisms of post-procedural aortic regurgitation.

The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.

Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular conduction disorders. In cardiac pacing, the endocardial pacing lead is typically positioned at the right ventricular (RV) apex. At the same time, there is increasing indirect evidence, derived from large pacing mode selection trials and observational studies, that conventional RV apical pacing may have detrimental effects on cardiac structure and left ventricular function, which are associated with the development of heart failure. These detrimental effects may be related to the abnormal electrical and mechanical activation pattern of the ventricles (or ventricular dyssynchrony) caused by RV apical pacing. Still, it remains uncertain if the deterioration of left ventricular function as noted in a proportion of patients receiving RV apical pacing is directly related to acutely induced left ventricular dyssynchrony. The upgrade from RV pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy may partially reverse the deleterious effects of RV pacing. It has even been suggested that selected patients with a conventional pacemaker indication should receive cardiac resynchronization therapy to avoid the deleterious effects. This review will provide a contemporary overview of the available evidence on the detrimental effects of RV apical pacing. Furthermore, the available alternatives for patients with a standard pacemaker indication will be discussed. In particular, the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy and alternative RV pacing sites in these patients will be reviewed.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Sinus Anatomy and Its Relation to the Mitral Valve Annulus Implications for Percutaneous Mitral Annuloplasty

Background— Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty has been proposed as an alternative to surgical annuloplasty. In this respect, evaluation of the coronary sinus (CS) and its relation with the mitral valve annulus (MVA) and the coronary arteries is relevant. The feasibility of evaluating these issues noninvasively with multislice computed tomography was determined. Methods and Results— In 105 patients (72 men, age 59±11 years), 64-slice multislice computed tomography was performed for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Thirty-four patients with heart failure and/or severe mitral regurgitation were included. Three-dimensional reconstructions and standard orthogonal planes were used to assess CS anatomy and its relation with the MVA and circumflex artery. In 71 patients (68%), the circumflex artery coursed between the CS and the MVA with a minimal distance between the CS and the circumflex artery of 1.3±1.0 mm. The CS was located along the left atrial wall, rather than along the MVA, in the majority of the patients (ranging from 90% at the level of the MVA to 14% at the level of the distal CS). The minimal distance between the CS and MVA was 5.1±2.9 mm. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the minimal distance between the CS and the MVA was significantly greater as compared with patients without severe mitral regurgitation (mean 7.3±3.9 mm versus 4.8±2.5 mm, P<0.05). Conclusion— In the majority of the patients, the CS courses superiorly to the MVA. In 68% of the patients, the circumflex artery courses between the CS and the mitral annulus. Multislice computed tomography may provide useful information for the selection of potential candidates for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty.

Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement

AIMS To evaluate myocardial multidirectional strain and strain rate (S-and-SR) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), using two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain imaging (2D-STI). The long-term effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on S-and-SR was also evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS Changes in LV radial, circumferential, and longitudinal S-and-SR were evaluated in 73 severe AS patients (65 +/- 13 years; aortic valve area 0.8 +/- 0.2 cm2) with preserved LVEF (61 +/- 11%), before and 17 months after AVR. Strain and strain rate data were compared with data from 40 controls (20 healthy individuals and 20 patients with LV hypertrophy) matched by age, gender, body surface area, and LVEF. Compared with controls, severe AS patients had significantly decreased values of LV S-and-SR in the radial (33.1 +/- 14.8%, P = 0.2; 1.7 +/- 0.5 s(-1), P = 0.003), circumferential (-15.2 +/- 5.0%, P = 0.001; -0.9 +/- 0.3 s(-1), P < 0.0001), and longitudinal (-14.6 +/- 4.1%, P < 0.0001; -0.8 +/- 0.2 s(-1), P < 0.0001) directions. At 17 months after AVR, LV S-and-SR significantly improved in all the three directions, whereas LVEF remained unchanged (60 +/- 12%, P = 0.7). CONCLUSION In severe AS patients, impaired LV S-and-SR existed although LVEF was preserved. After AVR, a significant S-and-SR improvement in all the three directions was observed. These subtle changes in LV contractility can be detected by 2D-STI.

Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) required precise knowledge of the anatomic dimensions and physical characteristics of the aortic valve, annulus, and aortic root. Most groups currently use angiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess aortic annulus dimensions and anatomy. However, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) may allow more detailed 3-dimensional assessment of the aortic root. Twenty-six patients referred for TAVR underwent MSCT. Scans were also obtained for 18 patients after TAVR. All patients underwent pre- and postprocedural aortic root angiography, TTE, and TEE. Mean differences in measured aortic annular diameters were 1.1 mm (95% confidence interval 0.5, 1.8) for calibrated angiography and TTE, -0.9 mm (95% confidence interval -1.7, -0.1 mm) for TTE and TEE, -0.3 mm (95% confidence interval -1.1, 0.6 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TTE, and -1.2 mm (95% confidence interval -2.2, -0.2 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TEE. Coronal systolic measurements using MSCT, which corresponded to angiographic orientation, were 3.2 mm (1st and 3rd quartiles 2.6, 3.9) larger than sagittal systolic measurements, which were in the same anatomic plane as standard TTE and TEE views. There was no significant association between either shape of the aortic annulus or amount of aortic valve calcium and development of perivalvular aortic regurgitation. After TAVR, the prosthesis extended to or beyond the inferior border of the left main ostium in 9 of 18 patients (50%), and in 11 patients (61%), valvular calcium was <5 mm from the left main ostium. In conclusion, MSCT identified that the aortic annulus was commonly eccentric and often oval. This may in part explain the small, but clinically insignificant, differences in measured aortic annular diameters with other imaging modalities. MSCT after TAVR showed close proximity of both the prosthesis and displaced valvular calcium to the left main ostium in most patients. Neither eccentricity nor calcific deposits appeared to contribute significantly to severity of paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR.

Quarterly Focus Issue: Heart Rhythm DisordersState-of-the-Art PaperThe Effects of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing on Ventricular Function and Dyssynchrony: Implications for Therapy

Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular conduction disorders. In cardiac pacing, the endocardial pacing lead is typically positioned at the right ventricular (RV) apex. At the same time, there is increasing indirect evidence, derived from large pacing mode selection trials and observational studies, that conventional RV apical pacing may have detrimental effects on cardiac structure and left ventricular function, which are associated with the development of heart failure. These detrimental effects may be related to the abnormal electrical and mechanical activation pattern of the ventricles (or ventricular dyssynchrony) caused by RV apical pacing. Still, it remains uncertain if the deterioration of left ventricular function as noted in a proportion of patients receiving RV apical pacing is directly related to acutely induced left ventricular dyssynchrony. The upgrade from RV pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy may partially reverse the deleterious effects of RV pacing. It has even been suggested that selected patients with a conventional pacemaker indication should receive cardiac resynchronization therapy to avoid the deleterious effects. This review will provide a contemporary overview of the available evidence on the detrimental effects of RV apical pacing. Furthermore, the available alternatives for patients with a standard pacemaker indication will be discussed. In particular, the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy and alternative RV pacing sites in these patients will be reviewed.

Relation between global left ventricular longitudinal strain assessed with novel automated function imaging and biplane left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE Automated function imaging (AFI) is a novel algorithm based on speckle-tracking imaging that can be used for assessment of global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation between global longitudinal peak systolic strain average (GLPSS Avg) assessed by AFI and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS The study population consisted of 222 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (99 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 123 patients with advanced ischemic heart failure) and 20 age-matched controls. LVEF was calculated by Simpsons rule. The GLPSS Avg was obtained by AFI. RESULTS In the overall study group (65 +/- 10 years, 77% were men), mean GLPSS Avg was 11.1% +/- 4.8% and mean LVEF was 37% +/- 14%. Linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between GLPSS Avg and biplane LVEF for the overall study population (r = 0.83; P < .001). However, in patients with STEMI or heart failure the correlations were less strong (r = 0.42 and r = 0.62, both P < .001). CONCLUSION Systolic global longitudinal strain assessed by AFI was linearly related to biplane LVEF. In patients with STEMI or heart failure, less strong correlations were observed, suggesting that these 2 parameters reflect different aspects of systolic left ventricular function.