Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Laurent Azoulay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Laurent Azoulay.


Diabetes Care | 2012

Metformin and the Risk of Cancer: Time-related biases in observational studies

Samy Suissa; Laurent Azoulay

OBJECTIVE Time-related biases in observational studies of drug effects have been described extensively in different therapeutic areas but less so in diabetes. Immortal time bias, time-window bias, and time-lag bias all tend to greatly exaggerate the benefits observed with a drug. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS These time-related biases are described and shown to be prominent in observational studies that have associated metformin with impressive reductions in the incidence of and mortality from cancer. As a consequence, metformin received much attention as a potential anticancer agent; these observational studies sparked the conduction of randomized, controlled trials of metformin as cancer treatment. However, the spectacular effects reported in these studies are compatible with time-related biases. RESULTS We found that 13 observational studies suffered from immortal time bias; 9 studies had not considered time-window bias, whereas other studies did not consider inherent time-lagging issues when comparing the first-line treatment metformin with second- or third-line treatments. These studies, subject to time-related biases that are avoidable with proper study design and data analysis, led to illusory extraordinarily significant effects, with reductions in cancer risk with metformin ranging from 20 to 94%. Three studies that avoided these biases reported no effect of metformin use on cancer incidence. CONCLUSIONS Although observational studies are important to better understand the effects of drugs, their proper design and analysis is essential to avoid major time-related biases. With respect to metformin, the scientific evidence of its potential beneficial effects on cancer would need to be reassessed critically before embarking on further long and expensive trials.


BMJ | 2012

The use of pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer in people with type 2 diabetes: nested case-control study

Laurent Azoulay; Hui Yin; Kristian B. Filion; Jonathan Assayag; Agnieszka Majdan; Michael Pollak; Samy Suissa

Objective To determine if the use of pioglitazone is associated with an increased risk of incident bladder cancer in people with type 2 diabetes. Design Retrospective cohort study using a nested case-control analysis. Setting Over 600 general practices in the United Kingdom contributing to the general practice research database. Participants The cohort consisted of people with type 2 diabetes who were newly treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 2009. All incident cases of bladder cancer occurring during follow-up were identified and matched to up to 20 controls on year of birth, year of cohort entry, sex, and duration of follow-up. Exposure was defined as ever use of pioglitazone, along with measures of duration and cumulative dosage. Main outcome measure Risk of incident bladder cancer associated with use of pioglitazone. Results The cohort included 115 727 new users of oral hypoglycaemic agents, with 470 patients diagnosed as having bladder cancer during follow-up (rate 89.4 per 100 000 person years). The 376 cases of bladder cancer that were diagnosed beyond one year of follow-up were matched to 6699 controls. Overall, ever use of pioglitazone was associated with an increased rate of bladder cancer (rate ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.05). The rate increased as a function of duration of use, with the highest rate observed in patients exposed for more than 24 months (1.99, 1.14 to 3.45) and in those with a cumulative dosage greater than 28 000 mg (2.54, 1.05 to 6.14). Conclusion The use of pioglitazone is associated with an increased risk of incident bladder cancer among people with type 2 diabetes.


BMJ | 2013

Concurrent use of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of acute kidney injury: nested case-control study.

Francesco Lapi; Laurent Azoulay; Hui Yin; Sharon J. Nessim; Samy Suissa

Objectives To assess whether a double therapy combination consisting of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers with addition of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the triple therapy combination of two of the aforementioned antihypertensive drugs to which NSAIDs are added are associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Design Retrospective cohort study using nested case-control analysis. Setting General practices contributing data to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episodes Statistics database. Participants A cohort of 487 372 users of antihypertensive drugs. Main outcome measures Rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals of acute kidney injury associated with current use of double and triple therapy combinations of antihypertensive drugs with NSAIDs. Results During a mean follow-up of 5.9 (SD 3.4) years, 2215 cases of acute kidney injury were identified (incidence rate 7/10 000 person years). Overall, current use of a double therapy combination containing either diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers with NSAIDs was not associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury. In contrast, current use of a triple therapy combination was associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury (rate ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.53). In secondary analyses, the highest risk was observed in the first 30 days of use (rate ratio 1.82, 1.35 to 2.46). Conclusions A triple therapy combination consisting of diuretics with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and NSAIDs was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. The risk was greatest at the start of treatment. Although antihypertensive drugs have cardiovascular benefits, vigilance may be warranted when they are used concurrently with NSAIDs.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2011

Metformin and the incidence of prostate cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes

Laurent Azoulay; Sophie Dell'Aniello; Bruno Gagnon; Michael Pollak; Samy Suissa

Background: Several in vitro studies have indicated that metformin may reduce the risk of prostate cancer; however, epidemiologic studies have been inconclusive. The objective of this study was to determine whether metformin decreases the risk of prostate cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A nested case–control analysis was conducted within a population-based cohort from the UK General Practice Research Database. The cohort included patients over the age of 40 who were prescribed a first oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) between 1988 and 2009. Cases of prostate cancer were matched up to ten controls on year of birth, date of cohort entry, and duration of follow-up. Adjusted rate ratios (RR) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Results: The cohort included 63,049 incident users of OHAs, in which 739 cases of prostate cancer were matched to 7,359 controls. Metformin use did not decrease the risk of prostate cancer (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99–1.52). In secondary analyses, prostate cancer risk was found to increase as a function of the number of metformin prescriptions received (one to seven prescriptions: RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.80–1.37; seven to eighteen prescriptions: RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.99–1.69; eighteen to thirty-six prescriptions: RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.04–1.81; more than thirty-six prescriptions: RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.03–1.89). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that metformin does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Impact: The secondary analyses need to be interpreted with caution given the inverse association between type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(2); 337–44. ©2010 AACR.


European Heart Journal | 2014

Initiation of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: early effects on ischaemic strokes

Laurent Azoulay; Sophie Dell'Aniello; Teresa A. Simon; Christel Renoux; Samy Suissa

AIMS An increased risk of stroke was observed in two atrial fibrillation (AF) trials of oral factor Xa inhibitors, when patients were transitioned to open label warfarin at the end of the study. The objective of this study is to determine whether initiation of warfarin is associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a nested case-control analysis was conducted within a cohort of 70 766 patients with AF between 1993 and 2008. Stroke cases were randomly matched with up to 10 controls on age, sex, date of AF diagnosis, and time since AF diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of stroke associated with current warfarin use classified according to time since initiation of treatment (<30 days, 31-90 days, and >90 days), when compared with non-use. A total of 5519 patients experienced a stroke during follow-up. Warfarin was associated with a 71% increased risk of stroke in the first 30 days of use (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.39-2.12), while decreased risks were observed with initiation >30 days before the event (31-90 days: RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.75 and >90 days: RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.50-0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION Patients initiating warfarin may be at an increased risk of stroke during the first 30 days of treatment, supporting the biological plausibility of a transient hypercoagulable state at the start of the treatment, although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.


BMJ | 2016

Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study

Marco Tuccori; Kristian B. Filion; Hui Yin; Oriana Hoi Yun Yu; Robert W. Platt; Laurent Azoulay

Objective To determine whether pioglitazone compared with other antidiabetic drugs is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer in people with type 2 diabetes. Design Population based cohort study. Setting General practices contributing data to the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants A cohort of 145 806 patients newly treated with antidiabetic drugs between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2013, with follow-up until 31 July 2014. Main outcome measures The use of pioglitazone was treated as a time varying variable, with use lagged by one year for latency purposes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals of incident bladder cancer associated with pioglitazone overall and by both cumulative duration of use and cumulative dose. Similar analyses were conducted for rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione not previously associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. Results The cohort generated 689 616 person years of follow-up, during which 622 patients were newly diagnosed as having bladder cancer (crude incidence 90.2 per 100 000 person years). Compared with other antidiabetic drugs, pioglitazone was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (121.0 v 88.9 per 100 000 person years; hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.19). Conversely, rosiglitazone was not associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (86.2 v 88.9 per 100 000 person years; 1.10, 0.83 to 1.47). Duration-response and dose-response relations were observed for pioglitazone but not for rosiglitazone. Conclusion The results of this large population based study indicate that pioglitazone is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. The absence of an association with rosiglitazone suggests that the increased risk is drug specific and not a class effect.


European Urology | 2011

Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and the Risk of Stroke in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Laurent Azoulay; Hui Yin; Serge Benayoun; Christel Renoux; Jean-François Boivin; Samy Suissa

BACKGROUND Some evidence indicates that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) increases the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. To date, few studies have investigated whether this therapy also increases the risk of cerebrovascular events. OBJECTIVE To determine whether different types of ADT increase the risk of stroke/transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) in patients with prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a population-based cohort study using a nested case-control analysis within the United Kingdoms General Practice Research Database population. The cohort included all patients at least 40 yr of age newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 2008, and followed until December 31, 2009. Cases consisted of those who experienced a first-ever stroke/TIA during follow-up. Up to 10 controls were matched to each case on age, year of cohort entry, and duration of follow-up. MEASUREMENTS Adjusted rate ratios (RRs) of stroke/TIA associated with the use of different ADTs (gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] agonists, oral antiandrogens, combined androgen blockade, bilateral orchiectomy, and others) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The cohort included 22 310 patients with prostate cancer, followed for a mean of 3.9 yr, where 938 patients experienced a first-ever stroke/TIA (rate: 10.7 per 1000/yr). Compared with nonusers of ADT, current users of GnRH agonists (adjusted RR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.39), oral antiandrogens (adjusted RR: 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-2.01), and those who underwent bilateral orchiectomy (adjusted RR: 1.77; 95% CI, 1.25-2.39) were at an increased risk of stroke/TIA. No statistically significant increased risks were observed for patients on combined androgen blockade and other ADTs, but the small numbers do not rule out a possible association. CONCLUSIONS The results of this large population-based study provide additional evidence that different forms of ADT may increase the risk of stroke/TIA.


Diabetes Care | 2013

The Use of Metformin and the Incidence of Lung Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Brielan Smiechowski; Laurent Azoulay; Hui Yin; Michael Pollak; Samy Suissa

OBJECTIVE Observational studies have associated metformin use with a decreased risk of lung cancer incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the studies had important methodological shortcomings. The objective of this study was to determine whether metformin use is associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes, while avoiding previous biases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using the U.K. General Practice Research Database, we assembled a cohort of patients newly treated with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) between 1988 and 2009. A nested case–control analysis was conducted, where case subjects with lung cancer occurring during follow-up were matched with up to 10 control subjects for age, sex, calendar time, and duration of follow-up. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted rate ratios of lung cancer associated with ever use of metformin, along with measures of duration and cumulative dose. Models were adjusted for potential confounders, which included smoking. RESULTS The cohort included 115,923 new users of OHAs, with 1,061 patients diagnosed with lung cancer during follow-up (rate 2.0/1,000 person-years). Metformin use was not associated with a decreased rate of lung cancer (rate ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.76–1.17]). No dose-response was observed by number of prescriptions received, cumulative duration of use, and dose. CONCLUSIONS Metformin use is not associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. The decreased risk reported in other observational studies is likely due to bias from methodological shortcomings. Nonetheless, greater consideration should be given to clarify inconsistencies between experimental models and population studies.


JAMA | 2013

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Francesco Lapi; Laurent Azoulay; M. Tamim Niazi; Hui Yin; Serge Benayoun; Samy Suissa

IMPORTANCE The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer has been shown to delay the clinical progression of the disease. However, the testosterone suppression associated with this therapy may lead to a hypogonadal condition that can have detrimental effects on renal function, thus raising the hypothesis that ADT-induced hypogonadism could potentially lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of ADT is associated with an increased risk of AKI in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING A nested case-control analysis using medical information extracted from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episodes Statistics database. PARTICIPANTS Men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2008, were selected and followed up until December 31, 2009. Cases were patients with incident AKI during follow-up who were randomly matched with up to 20 controls on age, calendar year of prostate cancer diagnosis, and duration of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs of AKI associated with the use of ADT. ADT was categorized into 1 of 6 mutually exclusive groups: gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, oral antiandrogens, combined androgen blockade, bilateral orchiectomy, estrogens, and combination of the above. RESULTS A total of 10,250 patients met the study inclusion criteria. During a mean follow-up of 4.1 (SD, 2.9) years, 232 incident cases of AKI were identified (rate, 5.5/1000 person-years). Overall, current use of any ADT was associated with an increased risk of AKI when compared with never use (OR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.61-3.82]), generating a rate difference of 4.43/1000 persons per year (95% CI, 1.54-7.33). This association was mainly driven by a combined androgen blockade consisting of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists with oral antiandrogens (OR, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.61-7.78]), estrogens (OR, 4.00 [95% CI, 1.06-15.03]), other combination therapies (OR, 4.04 [95% CI, 1.88-8.69]), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (OR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.20-3.10]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic prostate cancer, the use of ADT was significantly associated with an increased risk of AKI. These findings require replication in other well-designed studies as well as further investigation of their clinical importance.


BMJ | 2014

Incretin based drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes: cohort study

Jean-Luc Faillie; Laurent Azoulay; Valerie Patenaude; Dominique Hillaire-Buys; Samy Suissa

Objectives To determine whether the use of incretin based drugs, compared with sulfonylureas, is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Design Population based cohort study. Setting 680 general practices in the United Kingdom contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants From 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2012, 20 748 new users of incretin based drugs were compared with 51 712 users of sulfonylureas and followed up until 31 March 2013. Main outcome measures Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for acute pancreatitis in users of incretin based drugs compared with users of sulfonylureas. Models were adjusted for tenths of high dimensional propensity score (hdPS). Results The crude incidence rate for acute pancreatitis was 1.45 per 1000 patients per year (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.11) for incretin based drug users and 1.47 (1.23 to 1.76) for sulfonylurea users. The rate of acute pancreatitis associated with the use of incretin based drugs was not increased (hdPS adjusted hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.70) relative to sulfonylurea use. Conclusions Compared with use of sulfonylureas, the use of incretin based drugs is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. While this study is reassuring, it does not preclude a modest increased risk, and thus additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Collaboration


Dive into the Laurent Azoulay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hui Yin

Jewish General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge