Laurent de Landsheere
University of Liège
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laurent de Landsheere.
International Urogynecology Journal | 2011
Boris Gabriel; C. Rubod; Mathias Brieu; Bruno Dedet; Laurent de Landsheere; V. Delmas; Michel Cosson
Introduction and hypothesisDespite minimal fundamental works, there is an increasing use of meshes in urogynecology. The concept is mainly based on experiences with abdominal wall surgery. We aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue, abdominal aponeurosis, and skin.MethodsSamples from 11 fresh women cadavers without prolapse were collected. Uniaxial tension tests were performed and stress–strain curves were obtained.ResultsBiomechanical properties of the vagina, aponeurosis, and skin differed significantly. The aponeurosis was much more rigid and less extendible than the vagina and skin. Vaginal tissue was less rigid but more extendible than skin. There was no difference between the vagina and skin at low strains (p = 0.341), but a highly significant difference at large strains (p = 0.005).ConclusionsSkin and aponeurosis are not suited to predict vaginal tissue biomechanics. We should be cautious when transferring experiences from abdominal wall surgery to vaginal reconstructive surgery.
International Urogynecology Journal | 2013
Laurent de Landsheere; Carine Munaut; Betty Nusgens; Catherine Maillard; C. Rubod; Michelle Nisolle; Michel Cosson; Jean-Michel Foidart
Introduction and hypothesisThe pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is incompletely understood. The purpose of this study is to describe the current knowledge about histology of the vaginal wall and its possible involvement in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse.MethodsEligible studies were selected through a MEDLINE search covering January 1986 to December 2012. The research was limited to English-language publications.ResultsInvestigations of changes in the vaginal tissue that occur in women with genital prolapse are currently still limited and produced contrary results. The heterogeneity of the patients and the control groups in terms of age, parity and hormonal status, of the localization of biopsies and the histological methods as well as the lack of validation of the quantification procedures do not allow clear and definitive conclusions to be drawn.ConclusionsThis review shows that current knowledge of the histological changes observed in women with POP are inconclusive and relatively limited. More studies are needed in this specific field to better understand the mechanisms that lead to POP.
International Urogynecology Journal | 2014
Laurent de Landsheere; Silvia Blacher; Carine Munaut; Betty Nusgens; C. Rubod; Agnès Noël; Jean-Michel Foidart; Michel Cosson; Michelle Nisolle
Introduction and hypothesisThe purpose of this study was to analyze the histomorphometric properties of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).MethodsIn 15 women undergoing surgery for POP, full-thickness biopsies were collected at two different sites of location from the anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall. Properties of the precervical area (POP-Q point C/D) were compared with the most distal portion of the vaginal wall (POP-Q point Ba/Bp) using histological staining and immunohistochemistry. The densities of total collagen fibers, elastic fibers, smooth muscle cells, and blood vessels were determined by combining high-resolution virtual imaging and computer-assisted digital image analysis.ResultsThe mean elastin density was significantly decreased in the lamina propria and muscularis layer of the vaginal wall from the most distal portion of the prolapsed vaginal wall compared with the precervical area. This difference was statistically significant in the lamina propria for both anterior (8.4 ± 1.2 and 12.1 ± 2.0, p = 0.048) and posterior (6.8 ± 0.5 and 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) locations, and in the muscularis for the anterior (5.2 ± 0.4 and 8.4 ± 1.2, p = 0.009) vaginal wall. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean densities of collagen fibers, smooth muscle cells or blood vessels between the two locations.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed changes in elastin density in two different locations of the vaginal wall from women with POP. The histomorphometric properties of the vaginal wall can be variable from one place to another in the same patient. This result supports the existence of most vulnerable locations within the vaginal wall and the potential benefit of site-specific prolapse surgery.
Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials | 2016
Mathias Brieu; Pierre Chantereau; Jean Gillibert; Laurent de Landsheere; Pauline Lecomte; Michel Cosson
To understand the mechanical behavior of soft tissues, two fields of science are essential: biomechanics and histology. Nonetheless, those two fields have not yet been studied together often enough to be unified by a comprehensive model. This study attempts to produce such model. Biomechanical uniaxial tension tests were performed on vaginal tissues from 7 patients undergoing surgery. In parallel, vaginal tissue from the same patients was histologically assessed to determine the elastic fiber ratio. These observations demonstrated a relationship between the stiffness of tissue and its elastin content. To extend this study, a mechanical model, based on an histologic description, was developed to quantitatively correlate the mechanical behavior of vaginal tissue to its elastic fiber content. A satisfactory single-parameter model was developed assuming that the mechanical behavior of collagen and elastin was the same for all patients and that tissues are only composed of collagen and elastin. This single-parameter model showed good correlation with experimental results. The single-parameter mechanical model described here, based on histological description, could be very useful in helping to understand and better describe soft tissues with a view to their characterization. The mechanical behavior of a tissue can thus be determined thanks to its elastin content without introducing too many unidentified parameters.
International Urogynecology Journal | 2016
Laurent de Landsheere; Mathias Brieu; Silvia Blacher; Carine Munaut; Betty Nusgens; C. Rubod; Agnès Noël; Jean-Michel Foidart; Michelle Nisolle; Michel Cosson
Introduction and hypothesisThe aim of the study was to correlate histological and biomechanical characteristics of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).MethodsTissue samples were collected from the anterior [point Ba; POP Questionnaire (POP-Q)] and/or posterior (point Bp; POP-Q) vaginal wall of 15 women who underwent vaginal surgery for POP. Both histological and biomechanical assessments were performed from the same tissue samples in 14 of 15 patients. For histological assessment, the density of collagen and elastin fibers was determined by combining high-resolution virtual imaging and computer-assisted digital image analysis. For biomechanical testing, uniaxial tension tests were performed to evaluate vaginal tissue stiffness at low (C0) and high (C1) deformation rates.ResultsBiomechanical testing highlights the hyperelastic behavior of the vaginal wall. At low strains (C0), vaginal tissue appeared stiffer when elastin density was low. We found a statistically significant inverse relationship between C0 and the elastin/collagen ratio (p = 0.048) in the lamina propria. However, at large strain levels (C1), no clear relationship was observed between elastin density or elastin/collagen ratio and stiffness, likely reflecting the large dispersion of the mechanical behavior of the tissue samples.ConclusionHistological and biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall vary from patient to patient. This study suggests that elastin density deserves consideration as a relevant factor of vaginal stiffness in women with POP.
International Urogynecology Journal | 2018
Iva Urbankova; Geertje Callewaert; Silvia Blacher; Dries Deprest; Lucie Hympanova; Andrew Feola; Laurent de Landsheere; Jan Deprest
Introduction and hypothesisAnimal models are useful for investigating the genesis of pelvic floor dysfunction and for developing novel therapies for its treatment. There is a need for an alternative large-animal model to the nonhuman primate. Therefore we studied the effects of the first vaginal delivery, ovariectomy and systemic hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on the biomechanical and structural properties of the ovine vagina.MethodsWe examined the gross anatomical properties of nulliparous, primiparous, ovariectomized multiparous, and ovariectomized hormone-replaced multiparous sheep (six animals per group). We also harvested mid-vaginal and distal vaginal tissue to determine smooth muscle contractility and passive biomechanical properties, for morphometric assessment of the vaginal wall layers, to determine collagen and elastin content, and for immunostaining for α-smooth muscle actin and estrogen receptor-α.ResultsThere were no regional differences in the nulliparous vagina. One year after the first vaginal delivery, stiffness and contractility of the distal vagina were decreased, whereas the elastin content increased. The mid-vagina of ovariectomized sheep was stiff, and its epithelium was thin and lacked glycogen. HRT decreased the stiffness of the mid-vagina by 45% but had no measurable effect on contractility or elastin content, and increased epithelial thickness and glycogen content. HRT also increased the epithelial thickness and glycogen content of the distal vagina. At this location, there were no changes in morphology or stiffness.ConclusionIn sheep, life events including delivery and ovariectomy affect the biomechanical properties of the vagina in a region-specific way. Vaginal delivery mainly affects the distal region by decreasing stiffness and contractility. HRT can reverse the increase in stiffness of the mid-vagina observed after surgical induction of menopause. These observations are in line with scanty biomechanical measurements in comparable clinical specimens.
Urology | 2012
Chrystèle Rubod; Mathias Brieu; Michel Cosson; Géraldine Rivaux; Jean-Charles Clay; Laurent de Landsheere; Boris Gabriel
International Urogynecology Journal | 2010
Laurent de Landsheere; Jean Philippe Lucot; Jean-Michel Foidart; Michel Cosson
Pelvi-perineologie | 2011
Géraldine Rivaux; C. Rubod; Bruno Dedet; Mathias Brieu; Boris Gabriel; Laurent de Landsheere; P. Devos; V. Delmas; Michel Cosson
Gynecological Surgery | 2016
Laurent de Landsheere; Stefan Smajda; Didier Oberweis; Hania Keuller; Sylvie Dehon; Mireille Smets; Anne Pastijn; Michelle Nisolle