Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Laurent Roussarie is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Laurent Roussarie.


Archive | 2005

Aspectual Viewpoints, Speech Act Functions and Discourse Structure

Patrick Caudal; Laurent Roussarie

Introduction Most current formal theories of discourse incorporate some insight concerning the contribution of aspect to discourse structure, and many draw upon Hans Kamp’s analysis of the aspectual contribution of tenses, as well as Vlach’s notion of tenses as aspect-shift operators (cf. Vlach 1981). Thus, Kamp & Rohrer (1983) argue that the French imparfait acts as a ‘stativizer’, mapping non-stative event types onto stative ones. Moens & Steedman (1988), Kamp & Reyle (1993) as well as Asher (1993), Lascarides & Asher (1993), de Swart (1998) defended or developed related views, amounting to treating tenses as aspect-shift operators. Another, concurrent view on the aspectual contribution of tenses can be found in early works on aspect in Romance languages (e.g., Guillaume 1929), and has been recently revived in the formal community by Smith (1991). It consists in treating the aspectual contribution of tenses in terms of viewpoint, expressing the speaker’s perspective on the course of events. It does not reduces the aspectual content of tenses to aspect-shift or coercion operators ; they are not content with changing the internal structure of events, they add information of a new kind to it. Assuming that a viewpoint approach to aspectual semantics should be favoured (see Caudal 2000 for arguments supporting this position), the main goal of our paper will be to treat tenses as illocutionary viewpoint functions constraining rhetorical relations, and thereby interacting with discourse structure. It will appear that the illocutionary force of tenses is strongly connected with their aspectuo-temporal content. Our formal analysis will be couched within the SDRT framework ((Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, cf. Asher 1993, 1999, Asher & Lascarides 1994, 1998, 2001, Lascarides & Asher 1993). In SDRT, discourse constituents (formerly propositional content, labelled by terms K) are labelled by terms called π, to which rhetorical relations (which pertain to discourse structure) are applied. Under this new communicative perspective, the π labels are to be viewed as speech act referents and rhetorical relations as relational speech act functions (cf. Asher & Lascarides 2001).


Australian Journal of Linguistics | 2012

A semantic type-driven account of verb-formation patterns in Panyjima

Patrick Caudal; Alan Dench; Laurent Roussarie

In this paper we propose a semantic type-driven account of verb-formation patterns in Panyjima. By offering an explicit theory for the construal of semantically simplex event descriptions from morphologically complex verbal stems, we flesh out intuitions dating back to Clark and Clark (1979) about the role of derivational morphology in the interpretation of derived verbs, especially denominal verbs. This latter point is of particular relevance to a general theory of verb meaning (inclusive of, but not limited to, Aktionsart/lexical aspect), as most formal theories of lexical semantics have been primarily developed for languages with a rich verbal lexicon. By contrast, Australian languages often have a much smaller verbal lexicon and rely more heavily on productive processes of verbalization. The challenge we intend to meet is to provide a formal analysis that matches the productive morphology of the language under investigation. We offer an implementation couched within the Type Composition Logic (TCL) of Asher (2011), which demonstrates how TCL can successfully capture the contextual interpretation of productively derived Panyjima verbs.


Langue Francaise | 2003

L'imparfait, un temps inconséquent

Patrick Caudal; Carl Vetters; Laurent Roussarie


2004 Texas Linguistics#N#Society Conference | 2005

Brands of perfects : semantics and pragmatics

Patrick Caudal; Laurent Roussarie


Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society | 2000

Event Structure vs. Stage Structure and Abstract Aspectual Relations

Patrick Caudal; Laurent Roussarie


Studies in Language | 2018

From #[Je]F suis Charlie to #JeSuisCharlie

Fatima Hamlaoui; Laurent Roussarie


Archive | 2017

Marie Curie Actions TAMEAL IRSES Deliverable D 3.2 - Third collection of TAMEAL papers

Patrick Caudal; Alan Dench; Rachel Nordlinger; Maâøa Ponsonnet; Marie-Eve Ritz; Laurent Roussarie; Eva Schultze-Berndt; Melanie Seiss; Lesley Stirling; Marie-Elaine Egmond


ZASPiL | 2015

Je suis Charlie. Semantic and prosodic anatomy of an empathic copular sentence

Fatima Hamlaoui; Laurent Roussarie


Archive | 2012

Marie Curie Actions TAMEAL IRSES Deliverable D1.2 Collection of papers

Patrick Caudal; Alan Dench; Marie-Eve Ritz; Eva Schultze-Berndt; Jean-Christophe Verstraete; Laurent Roussarie; Rachel Nordlinger; Lesley Stirling


9h International Conference on Tense, Aspect & Modality (Chronos 9) | 2009

L'usitatif en Nyamal et la notion de méta-individu

Patrick Caudal; Laurent Roussarie

Collaboration


Dive into the Laurent Roussarie's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan Dench

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marie-Eve Ritz

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fatima Hamlaoui

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fatima Hamlaoui

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge