Laurent Vecellio

Aerosol Deposition in Neonatal Ventilation

Lung deposition of inhaled drugs in ventilated neonates has been studied in models of questionable relevance. With conventional nebulizers, pulmonary deposition has been limited to 1% of the total dose. The objective of this study was to assess lung delivery of aerosols in a model of neonatal ventilation using a conventional and novel electronic micropump nebulizer. Aerosol deposition studies with 99mTc diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in four macaques (2.6 kg) that were ventilated through a 3.0-mm endotracheal tube (with neonatal settings (peak inspiratory pressure 12–14 mbar, positive end-expiratory pressure 2 mbar, I/E ratio 1/2, respiratory rate 40/min), comparing a jet-nebulizer MistyNeb (3-mL charge, 4.8 μm), an electronic micropump nebulizer operating continuously [Aeroneb Professional Nebulizer (APN-C); 0.5-mL charge, 4.6 μm], and another synchronized with inspiration [Aeroneb Professional Nebulizer Synchronized (APN-S); 0.5-mL charge, 2.8 μm]. The amount of radioactivity deposited into lungs and connections and remaining in the nebulizer was measured by a gamma counter. Despite similar amounts of 99mTc-DTPA in the respiratory circuit with all nebulizers, both APN-S and APN-C delivered more drug to the lungs than MistyNeb (14.0, 12.6, and 0.5% in terms of percentage of nebulizer charge, respectively; p = 0.006). Duration of delivery was shorter with APN-C than with the two other nebulizers (2 versus 6 and 10 min for the APN-S and the MistyNeb, respectively; p < 0.001). Electronic micropump nebulizers are more efficient to administer aerosols in an animal model of ventilated neonates. Availability of Aerogens electronic micropump nebulizers offers new opportunities to study clinical efficacy and risks of aerosol therapy in ventilated neonates.

Lipid nanocapsules: Ready-to-use nanovectors for the aerosol delivery of paclitaxel

Aerosol drug delivery permits the development of dose-intensification strategies in severe, malignant lung diseases. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that the encapsulation of paclitaxel in lipid nanocapsules (LNCs), a novel drug nanocarrier for lipophilic components, allows one to provide pulmonary drug delivery of paclitaxel by nebulisation, thereby allowing preclinical and clinical studies. LNC dispersions are made into aerosols with commercial nebulisers. The structure, drug payload and cytotoxicity of nebulised LNCs were compared to fresh LNCs. The results demonstrated that LNC dispersions could be made into aerosols by using mesh nebulisers without altering the LNC structure. Only eFlow rapid-produced aerosols are compatible with human use: the mean duration to nebulise 3 ml of LNC dispersion is less than 9 min, with an aerosol mass median aerodynamic diameter equal to 2.7+/-0.1 microm and a fine-particle fraction (between 1.0 and 5.0 microm) of 81.5+/-3.1%. No modifications of drug payload or cytotoxicity effects of paclitaxel-loaded LNC (PTX-LNC) were observed. In order to carry out preclinical studies, a scaled-up LNC formulation protocol was used. Chemical parameters, such as acidity and osmolarity, were optimised, and a storage procedure for PTX-LNC batches was set-up. Animal studies are now needed to determine the tolerance and therapeutic potential of LNC dispersion aerosols.

Aerosolized Gemcitabine in Patients with Carcinoma of the Lung: Feasibility and Safety Study

BACKGROUND We investigated the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and feasibility of aerosolized gemcitabine (GCB) in patients with lung carcinoma. METHOD Eleven patients with carcinoma localized in the lungs were studied in a dose escalation study of aerosolized GCB administered 1 day/week for 9 consecutive weeks. Safety data, scintigraphic assessment of the delivered dose and pharmacokinetic monitoring were analyzed. Patients were treated with doses of between 1 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg (dose in the nebulizer), using a new inhaler device (Aeroneb Pro with an Idehaler Chamber). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The total dose of GCB delivered to the patients lung was 42±16% of the initial amount of dose in the nebulizer. Safety data showed no hematologic toxicity, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity. At 4 mg/kg, one patient experienced grade 4 pulmonary toxicity (bronchospasm), which was the dose-limiting toxicity. Grade 2 and 3 toxic effects included fatigue, vomiting, dyspnea, and cough. Overall response: minor response in one patient, stable disease in four patients, progressive disease in four patients. Pharmacokinetic data showed very low plasma GCB levels. Maximal plasma concentration was observed at the end of nebulization. Aerosolized gemcitabin was safe, with minimal toxicity, for patients with lung carcinoma.

Aerodynamical, Immunological and Pharmacological Properties of the Anticancer Antibody Cetuximab Following Nebulization

PurposeDespite an increasing interest in the use of inhalation for local delivery of molecules for respiratory diseases and systemic disorders, methods to deliver therapy through airways has received little attention for lung cancer treatment. However, inhalation of anticancer drugs is an attractive alternative route to systemic administration which results in limited concentration of the medication in the lungs, and triggers whole-body toxicity. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of nebulization for therapeutic antibodies, a new class of fully-approved anticancer drugs in oncology medicine.Materials and methodsCetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), was nebulized using three types of delivery devices: a jet nebulizer PARI LC+®, a mesh nebulizer AeronebPro® and an ultrasonic nebulizer SYST’AM® LS290. Aerosol size distribution was measured using a cascade impactor and aerosol droplets were observed under optical microscopy. The immunological and pharmacological properties of cetuximab were evaluated following nebulization using A431 cells.ResultsThe aerosol particle clouds generated with the three nebulizers displayed similar aerodynamical characteristics, but the IgG formed aggregates in liquid phase following nebulization with both the jet and ultrasonic devices. Flow cytometry analyses and assays of EGFR-phosphorylation and cell growth inhibitions on A431 demonstrated that both the mesh and the jet nebulizers preserved the binding affinity to EGFR and the inhibitory activities of cetuximab.ConclusionsAltogether, our results indicate that cetuximab resists the physical constraints of nebulization. Thus, airway delivery represents a promising alternative to systemic administration for local delivery of therapeutic antibodies in lung cancer treatment.

Disposable versus reusable jet nebulizers for cystic fibrosis treatment with tobramycin.

BACKGROUND Jet nebulizers are commonly used to administer aerosolized tobramycin to CF patients. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of disposable jet nebulizers as an alternative to reusable nebulizers such as the Pari LC Plus. METHOD From a survey conducted in 49 CF centers in France, 18 disposable jet nebulizer systems were selected. An in vitro study was performed with 20 jet nebulizer/air source combinations (18 disposable and 2 reusable) to determine their performance with tobramycin solution (300 mg/5 mL). A scintigraphic deposition study in baboons was performed to validate the in vitro data. RESULTS In vitro and in vivo results correlated. There was no overall relationship between the compressed air source and nebulizer performance, but the nebulizer interface was responsible for significantly different results. CONCLUSIONS None of the disposable nebulizers tested in this study can be recommended as an alternative to the Pari LC Plus nebulizer for tobramycin.

Delivery efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer under different configurations.

BACKGROUND Jet nebulizers coupled to spacers are frequently used to promote drug lung deposition, but their clinical efficacy has not been established. Few in vivo studies have been performed with mesh nebulizers, commonly used to nebulize antibiotics. Our study compared inhaled mass and urinary drug concentration of amikacin by using three different nebulizer delivery configuration systems: a standard unvented jet nebulizer (Sidestream(®)) used alone or coupled to a 110-mL corrugated piece of tubing and a vibrating mesh nebulizer (e-Flow rapid(®)). METHOD The inhaled mass of amikacin was assessed using the residual gravimetric method. Delivery efficacy was evaluated by assessing amikacin urinary drug concentration in six healthy spontaneously breathing volunteers. Urinary amikacin was monitored by fluorescent polarization immunoassay then cumulative excreted amount and antibiotic elimination rate were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The total daily amount of amikacin urinary excretion (Cu) was almost twice as high with eFlow rapid(®) compared to Sidestream(®) used alone; intermediate values being observed when the device was coupled to a corrugated piece of tubing. The latter configuration was also associated with a higher total daily amount of amikacin urinary excretion. In vivo drug output rate was around threefold higher with the eFlow Rapid(®) than with the Sidestream(®) used in any configuration. These results were concordant to those obtained with in vitro analysis comparing inhaled mass of amikacin for the three nebulizers. The elimination constant (Ke) and the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) did not differ between the three devices. In conclusion, the vibrating mesh nebulizer is more efficient, promoting larger urinary drug concentration and drug output. Coupling a corrugated piece of tubing to the standard jet nebulizer favors delivery efficacy.

Deposition of aerosols delivered by nasal route with jet and mesh nebulizers

PURPOSE To quantify the amount of aerosol deposited in different parts of the airways with a commercially available nasal sonic jet nebulizer (NJN) using a sound effect, and to compare its performance with a new nasal mesh nebulizer (NMN). METHODS Seven healthy non-smoking male volunteers aged 21-36 years with a mean weight of 77±10 kg were included in this single-center study. Both nebulizer systems were loaded with (99m)Tc-DTPA and scintigraphies were performed with a gamma camera. Particle size distribution of the aerosols produced by the two nebulizer systems was measured. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the two nebulizers in terms of fraction of particles smaller than 5 μm (44±4% vs 45±2%) (p>0.9). Aerosol deposition in the nasal region was 73±10% (% of aerosol deposited in airways) with the NJN, and 99±3% with the NMN (p=0.01). Total nasal deposition was 9.6±1.9% of the nebulizer charge with the NJN and 28.4±8.9% with the NMN (p=0.01). 0.5±0.3% of the nebulizer charge was deposited in the maxillary sinuses with the NJN, compared to 2.2±1.6% with the NMN (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Although the two nebulizers had the same particle size, NMN significantly improved aerosol deposition in nasal cavity and prevents deposition into the lungs.

Aerosol delivery through tracheostomy tubes: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND Our study investigated the influence of the cannulas inner diameter (ID) and of its removal on the expected respiratory dose of amikacin, using three different jet nebulizer configurations (Sidestream(®)): vented (N1), unvented with a piece of corrugated tubing attached to the expiratory limb of the T attachment (N2), and unvented alone (N3). METHODS The jet nebulizer was filled with amikacin (500 mg/4 mL) and was attached to the tracheostomy tube. A lung model simulating spontaneous breathing was connected to the tracheostomy tube. A filter was connected between the nebulizer and the tracheostomy tube to measure the inhaled dose, and between the tracheostomy tube and the lung model to measure the respiratory dose. Different cannula IDs were tested (6.5, 8, 8.5, and 10 mm), and aerosol lost in the cannulas was determined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Respiratory dose varied between 96±1 mg and 44±3 mg, with higher values observed with N2. The aerosol lost in the cannula was significant and represented up to 63% of the inhaled dose. There was a negative correlation between the cannulas ID and the aerosol lost in the cannula. After removal of the internal cannula, an increase in the respiratory dose of up to 31.3% was observed. We recommend removing the inner tracheostomy cannula to nebulize a larger amount of drug through a tracheostomy tube. Among the three jet nebulizer configurations studied, we recommend the unvented one with a piece of corrugated tubing attached to the expiratory limb of the T attachment.

Sonic aerosol therapy to target maxillary sinuses

AIM Intranasal aerosol administration of drugs is widely used by ENT specialists. Although clinical evidence is still lacking, intranasal nebulization appears to be an interesting therapeutic option for local drug delivery, targeting anatomic sites beyond the nasal valve. The sonic nebulizer NL11SN associates a 100Hertz (Hz) sound to the aerosolization to improve deposition in the nasal/paranasal sinuses. The aim of the present study was: to evaluate in vivo the influence of associating a 100Hz sound on sinus ventilation and nasal and pulmonary aerosol deposition in normal volunteers, and; to quantify in vitro aerosol deposition in the maxillary sinuses in a plastinated head model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Scintigraphic analysis of (81m)Kr gas ventilation and of sonic aerosol ((99m)Tc-DTPA) deposition using the NL11SN was performed in vivo in seven healthy volunteers. In parallel, NL11SN gentamicin nebulization was performed, with or without associated 100Hz sound, in a plastinated human head model; the gross amount of gentamicin delivered to the paranasal sinuses was determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Associating the 100Hz sound to (81m)Kr gas ensured paranasal sinus ventilation in healthy volunteers. (99m)Tc-DTPA particles nebulized with the NL11SN were deposited predominantly in the nasal cavities (2/3, vs 1/3 in the lungs). In vitro, the use of NL11SN in sonic mode increased gentamicin deposition threefold in the plastinated model sinuses (P<0.002); the resulting antibiotic deposit would be sufficient to induce a local therapeutic effect. CONCLUSION The NL11SN nebulizer ensured preferential nasal cavity aerosol deposition and successfully targeted the maxillary sinuses.

Nebulization as a delivery method for mAbs in respiratory diseases

Introduction: The pulmonary route is not invasive and can be used to target drugs directly to the lungs, limiting the exposure of secondary organs. It is, thus, an attractive alternative to the intravenous route, for the delivery of mAbs, which display limited transfer from blood into the lungs. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the pharmacological properties of antibody-based treatments, describes those for respiratory diseases and discusses preclinical/clinical results of aerosolized antibody-based therapeutics. The advantages and limitations of aerosol devices and the formulation for the administration of aerosolized mAbs are also detailed. Expert opinion: Overall, the inhalation of mAbs for therapeutic purposes is both appropriate and feasible. The size and structure of the biotherapeutic molecule are important properties to be taken into account when trying to achieve long-term retention. Mesh nebulizers currently appear to be the most appropriate devices for the safe delivery of large amounts of active mAb into the lungs. mAbs should be formulated so as to prevent their degradation and possible immunogenicity. General guidelines can be given for mAb aerosolization, but the formulation and device combination should be adapted for each therapeutic and clinical application.