Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lavinia De Chiara is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lavinia De Chiara.


Current Neuropharmacology | 2013

Neurodevelopment in Schizophrenia: The Role of the Wnt Pathways

Isabella Panaccione; Flavia Napoletano; Alberto Forte; Giorgio D. Kotzalidis; Antonio Del Casale; Chiara Rapinesi; Chiara Brugnoli; Daniele Serata; Federica Caccia; Ilaria Cuomo; Elisa Ambrosi; Alessio Simonetti; Valeria Savoja; Lavinia De Chiara; Emanuela Danese; Giovanni Manfredi; Delfina Janiri; Marta Motolese; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Paolo Girardi; Gabriele Sani

Objectives. To review the role of Wnt pathways in the neurodevelopment of schizophrenia. Methods: Systematic PubMed search, using as keywords all the terms related to the Wnt pathways and crossing them with each of the following areas: normal neurodevelopment and physiology, neurodevelopmental theory of schizophrenia, schizophrenia, and antipsychotic drug action. Results: Neurodevelopmental, behavioural, genetic, and psychopharmacological data point to the possible involvement of Wnt systems, especially the canonical pathway, in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and in the mechanism of antipsychotic drug action. The molecules most consistently found to be associated with abnormalities or in antipsychotic drug action are Akt1, glycogen synthase kinase3beta, and beta-catenin. However, the extent to which they contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia or to antipsychotic action remains to be established. Conclusions: The study of the involvement of Wnt pathway abnormalities in schizophrenia may help in understanding this multifaceted clinical entity; the development of Wnt-related pharmacological targets must await the collection of more data.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2015

Three-year, naturalistic, mirror-image assessment of adding memantine to the treatment of 30 treatment-resistant patients with bipolar disorder.

Giulia Serra; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Lavinia De Chiara; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Leonardo Tondo; Paolo Girardi; Ross J. Baldessarini; Gino Serra

BACKGROUND Developing safe and effective long-term treatments for bipolar disorder remains a major challenge. Given available treatments, patients with bipolar disorder remain unwell in half of long-term follow-up, mostly in depression. As memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-glutamate receptor antagonist used to treat dementia, has been proposed for testing in bipolar disorder, we carried out a 3 + 3-year, mirror-image, chart-review study of the effects of adding memantine to stably continued, but insufficiently effective, ongoing mood-stabilizing treatments. METHOD Outpatients diagnosed with DSM-IV-TR bipolar disorder (I or II), followed intensively at the Lucio Bini Mood Disorder Center, Rome, Italy, had responded consistently unsatisfactorily to standard treatments (lithium, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and electroconvulsive therapy) for ≥ 3 years (2005-2013). Memantine (20-30 mg/d) was added clinically to otherwise stable regimens for another 3 years. On the basis of chart review, we compared morbidity measures and Clinical Global Impressions scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) score before versus during memantine treatment. RESULTS The 30 bipolar I (n = 17) and II (n = 13) subjects showed consistent morbidity for 3 years before memantine, but improved progressively (r = 0.28, P < .01) over 3 years with memantine (23 ± 4.8 mg/d). Markedly decreased (all P values ≤ .01) were (1) percentage of time ill (total, mania, or depression; averaging -75.0%), (2) CGI-BP severity scores (-67.8%), (3) duration of new episodes (-58.6%), and (4) episodes/year (-55.7%). Subjects with previous rapid or continuous cycling were particularly improved (t = 2.61, P = .016). Adverse effects were mild and rare. CONCLUSIONS Memantine added substantial long-term benefits by preventing or ameliorating depressive as well as mania-like morbidity in previously consistently poorly responsive patients with bipolar disorder. Further testing in randomized, controlled trials is required.


World journal of psychiatry | 2014

Memantine: new prospective in bipolar disorder treatment

Giulia Serra; Francesca Demontis; Francesca Serra; Lavinia De Chiara; Andrea Spoto; Paolo Girardi; Giulio Vidotto; Gino Serra

UNLABELLED We review preclinical and clinical evidences strongly suggesting that memantine, an old drug currently approved for Alzheimers dementia, is an effective treatment for acute mania and for the prevention of manic/hypomanic and depressive recurrences of manic-depressive illness. Lithium remains the first line for the treatment and prophylaxis of bipolar disorders, but currently available treatment alternatives for lithium resistant patients are of limited and/or questionable efficacy. Thus, research and development of more effective mood stabilizer drugs is a leading challenge for modern psychopharmacology. We have demonstrated that 21 d administration of imipramine causes a behavioural syndrome similar to a cycle of bipolar disorder, i.e., a mania followed by a depression, in rats. Indeed, such treatment causes a behavioural supersensitivity to dopamine D2 receptor agonists associated with an increase sexual activity and aggressivity (mania). The dopamine receptor sensitization is followed, after imipramine discontinuation, by an opposite phenomenon (dopamine receptor desensitization) and an increased immobility time (depression) in the forced swimming test of depression. Memantine blocks the development of the supersensitivity and the ensuing desensitization associated with the depressive like behavior. On the basis of these observations we have suggested the use of memantine in the treatment of mania and in the prophylaxis of bipolar disorders. To test this hypothesis we performed several naturalistic studies that showed an acute antimanic effect and a long-lasting and progressive mood-stabilizing action (at least 3 years), without clinically relevant side effects. To confirm the observations of our naturalistic trials we are now performing a randomized controlled clinical trial. Finally we described the studies reporting the efficacy of memantine in manic-like symptoms occurring in psychiatric disorders other than bipolar. LIMITATIONS A randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to confirm our naturalistic observations. CONCLUSION We believe that this review presents enough pharmacological and clinical information to consider the administration of memantine in the treatment of bipolar disorders that no respond to standard mood stabilizers.


Current Psychiatry Reports | 2015

Bipolar Disorder and ADHD: Comorbidity and Diagnostic Distinctions

Ciro Marangoni; Lavinia De Chiara; Gianni L. Faedda

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and bipolar disorder (BD) are neurodevelopmental disorders with onset in childhood and early adolescence, and common persistence in adulthood. Both disorders are often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and sometimes over diagnosed, leading to high rates of morbidity and disability. The differentiation of these conditions is based on their clinical features, comorbidity, psychiatric family history course of illness, and response to treatment. We review recent relevant findings and highlight epidemiological, clinical, family history, course, and treatment-response differences that can aid the differential diagnosis of these conditions in an outpatient pediatric setting.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2015

Features preceding diagnosis of bipolar versus major depressive disorders

Giulia Serra; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Lavinia De Chiara; Flavia Napoletano; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Giovanni Manfredi; Gianni L. Faedda; Paolo Girardi; Ross J. Baldessarini

BACKGROUND Better and earlier predictive differentiation of bipolar (BD) vs. unipolar major depressive disorder (UD) diagnoses should improve long-term clinical planning. METHODS We reviewed randomly selected clinical records of 334 adults diagnosed with DSM-IV-TR BD-I (n=109), BD-II (n=106), and UD (n=119) and compared features preceding major affective episodes or diagnoses, using bivariate, multivariate, and Bayesian methods. RESULTS We identified antecedents selectively associated with later BD vs. UD in 52.6% vs. 31.1% of subjects in childhood, starting at age 7.4 years, and 60.0% vs. 32.8% in adolescence, with far more features in BD than UD cases (10.3 vs. 4.64/100 person-years; p<0.001). In multivariate modeling, BD-selective factors were: younger at first clinical event > male sex > family BD-history > cyclothymic or hyperthymic temperament > antecedents/person-year. Nonaffective (anxiety, eating, or substance-use) disorders preceded BD vs. UD in 41.4% vs. 28.6% of subjects (p=0.02). By ROC analysis, differential prediction of BD vs. UD was optimal with any ≥ 3 factors/person. LIMITATIONS The validity and timing of antecedent events and factors identified retrospectively from clinical records could not be verified independently, but information was recorded systematically and consistently by a single mood-disorder expert prior to diagnosis, and extracted by two independent observers. COMMENT Early clinical features distinguished later BD from UD, often by years. Such prediction should improve treatment-planning and limit risk of mood-switching.


Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology | 2014

Memantine in the management of affective recurrences of bipolar disorders after the discontinuation of long-term lithium treatment: three case histories

Giulia Serra; Lavinia De Chiara; Giovanni Manfredi; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Gabriele Sani; Paolo Girardi; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Gino Serra

Discontinuation of long-term lithium treatment leads to early and severe affective recurrences [Baldessarini et al. 1999], and to a bipolar disorder course more severe than that before lithium treatment with an increased risk of suicide [Post, 2012], which is often resistant not only to other mood stabilizers, but also to the reinstitution of lithium treatment at the prior effective serum lithium level [Post, 2012]. Unfortunately, the currently available lithium-alternative mood stabilizers are of limited (anticonvulsants) [Geddes et al. 2010; Kessing et al. 2011; Greil and Kleindiest, 1999], or questionable (atypical neuroleptics) [Goodwin et al. 2011] efficacy. We have recently provided clinical observations strongly suggesting that memantine, a noncompetitive N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has a clinically relevant antimanic and a sustained mood-stabilizing effect in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder with excellent safety and tolerability [Koukopoulos et al. 2010, 2012; Sani et al. 2012; Serra et al. 2013]. More recently we have observed a long-lasting mood-stabilizing effect of memantine after lithium discontinuation in a bipolar I patient [Serra et al. 2013]. In order to evaluate further the effect of memantine in the prophylaxis of affective recurrences occurring after long-term lithium discontinuation, we administered the drug to three patients who had to discontinue lithium because of severe renal complications (two patients) or excessive tremor (one patient). These case histories confirm our previous observations, and suggest that memantine may be considered a useful lithium substitute to prevent the affective recurrences after lithium discontinuation. Case 1 Woman born in 1930, suffering from a bipolar II disorder with rapid cycling course. She has a family history of bipolar disorder. Her first affective episode was a depression in May 1979 (aged 49 years), followed by a hypomania until January 1980. She started lithium prophylaxis and had a very good response to lithium. In June 2009 lithium was gradually reduced to 150 mg every 2 days (serum lithium level 0.2 mmol/L) and then withdrawn because of renal impairment. After we had obtained the informed written consent, she was put on 20 mg/day memantine and lamotrigine (250 mg/day). She started with rapid cycling recurrences until May 2010. Since then she has been well and stable on memantine 20 mg/day, lamotrigine 250 mg/day and lithium 150 mg every 2 days (lithium serum level 0.2 mmol/L).


Current Neuropharmacology | 2017

Neurobiological Evidence for the Primacy of Mania Hypothesis

Georgios D. Kotzalidis; Chiara Rapinesi; Valeria Savoja; Ilaria Cuomo; Alessio Simonetti; Elisa Ambrosi; Isabella Panaccione; Silvia Gubbini; Pietro De Rossi; Lavinia De Chiara; Delfina Janiri; Gabriele Sani; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Giovanni Manfredi; Flavia Napoletano; Matteo Caloro; Lucia Pancheri; Antonella Puzella; Gemma Callovini; Gloria Angeletti; Antonio Del Casale

Background: Athanasios Koukopoulos proposed the primacy of mania hypothesis (PoM) in a 2006 book chapter and later, in two peer-reviewed papers with Nassir Ghaemi and other collaborators. This hypothesis supports that in bipolar disorder, mania leads to depression, while depression does not lead to mania. Objective: To identify evidence in literature that supports or falsifies this hypothesis. Method: We searched the medical literature (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library) for peer-reviewed papers on the primacy of mania, the default mode function of the brain in normal people and in bipolar disorder patients, and on illusion superiority until 6 June, 2016. Papers resulting from searches were considered for appropriateness to our objective. We adopted the PRISMA method for our review. The search for consistency with PoM was filtered through the neurobiological results of superiority illusion studies. Results: Out of a grand total of 139 records, 59 were included in our analysis. Of these, 36 were of uncertain value as to the primacy of mania hypothesis, 22 favoured it, and 1 was contrary, but the latter pooled patients in their manic and depressive phases, so to invalidate possible conclusions about its consistency with regard to PoM. All considered studies were not focused on PoM or superiority illusion, hence most of their results were, as expected, unrelated to the circuitry involved in superiority illusion. A considerable amount of evidence is consistent with the hypothesis, although indirectly so. Limitations. Only few studies compared manic with depressive phases, with the majority including patients in euthymia. Conclusion: It is possible that humans have a natural tendency for elation/optimism and positive self-consideration, that are more akin to mania; the depressive state could be a consequence of frustrated or unsustainable mania. This would be consistent with PoM.


Current Neuropharmacology | 2017

Pediatric mania: the controversy between euphoria and irritability

Giulia Serra; Mai Uchida; Claudia Battaglia; Maria Pia Casini; Lavinia De Chiara; Joseph Biederman; Stefano Vicari; Janet Wozniak

Abstract: Pediatric Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a highly morbid pediatric psychiatric disease, consistently associated with family psychiatric history of mood disorders and associated with high levels of morbidity and disability and with a great risk of suicide. While there is a general consensus on the symptomatology of depression in childhood, the phenomenology of pediatric mania is still highly debated and the course and long-term outcome of pediatric BD still need to be clarified. We reviewed the available studies on the phenomenology of pediatric mania with the aim of summarizing the prevalence, demographics, clinical correlates and course of these two types of pediatric mania. Eighteen studies reported the number of subjects presenting with either irritable or elated mood during mania. Irritability has been reported to be the most frequent clinical feature of pediatric mania reaching a sensitivity of 95–100% in several samples. Only half the studies reviewed reported on number of episodes or cycling patterns and the described course was mostly chronic and ultra-rapid whereas the classical episodic presentation was less common. Few long-term outcome studies have reported a diagnostic stability of mania from childhood to young adult age. Future research should focus on the heterogeneity of irritability aiming at differentiating distinct subtypes of pediatric psychiatric disorders with distinct phenomenology, course, outcome and biomarkers. Longitudinal studies of samples attending to mood presentation, irritable versus elated, and course, chronic versus episodic, may help clarify whether these are meaningful distinctions in the course, treatment and outcome of pediatric onset bipolar disorder.


Psychiatry Investigation | 2014

Low-Dose Acetazolamide in the Treatment of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Case Series

Gabriele Sani; Georgios D. Kotzalidis; Isabella Panaccione; Alessio Simonetti; Lavinia De Chiara; Antonio Del Casale; Elisa Ambrosi; Flavia Napoletano; Delfina Janiri; Emanuela Danese; Nicoletta Girardi; Chiara Rapinesi; Daniele Serata; Giovanni Manfredi; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Gloria Angeletti; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Paolo Girardi

The treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is far from satisfactory, as there is a high proportion of patients who do not respond to conventional treatment. The antidiuretic sulfonamide, acetazolamide, inhibits carbonic anhydrase and potentiates GABAergic transmission; the latter is putatively involved in PMDD. We therefore tried acetazolamide in a series of women with intractable PMDD. Here, we describe a series of eight women diagnosed with DSM-IV-TR PMDD, five of whom had comorbidity with a mood disorder and one with an anxiety disorder, who were resistant to treatment and responded with symptom disappearance after being added-on 125 mg/day acetazolamide for 7-10 days prior to menses each month. Patients were free from premenstrual symptoms at the 12-month follow-up. We suggest that acetazolamide may be used to improve symptoms of PMDD in cases not responding to other treatments. GABAergic mechanisms may be involved in counteracting PMDD symptoms.


Archives of Suicide Research | 2017

Child and Adolescent Clinical Features Preceding Adult Suicide Attempts.

Giulia Serra; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Lavinia De Chiara; Flavia Napoletano; Alexia E. Koukopoulos; Gabriele Sani; Gianni L. Faedda; Paolo Girardi; Daniela Reginaldi; Ross J. Baldessarini

The objective of this study was to identify the predictive value of juvenile factors for adult suicidal behavior. We reviewed clinical records to compare factors identified in childhood and adolescence between adult suicidal versus nonsuicidal major affective disorder subjects. Suicide attempts occurred in 23.1% of subjects. Age-at-first-symptom was 14.2 vs. 20.2 years among suicidal versus nonsuicidal subjects (p < 0.0001). More prevalent in suicidal versus non-suicidal subjects by multivariate analysis were: depressive symptoms, hyper-emotionality, younger-at-first-affective-episode, family suicide history, childhood mood-swings, and adolescence low self-esteem. Presence of one factor yielded a Bayesian sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 50%, and negative predictive power of 86%. Several juvenile factors were associated with adult suicidal behavior; their absence was strongly associated with a lack of adult suicidal behavior.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lavinia De Chiara's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paolo Girardi

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Del Casale

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chiara Rapinesi

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Flavia Napoletano

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriele Sani

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanni Manfredi

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gloria Angeletti

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge