Lawrence F. Brass

Interactions of Mast Cell Tryptase with Thrombin Receptors and PAR-2

Tryptase is a serine protease secreted by mast cells that is able to activate other cells. In the present studies we have tested whether these responses could be mediated by thrombin receptors or PAR-2, two G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by proteolysis. When added to a peptide corresponding to the N terminus of PAR-2, tryptase cleaved the peptide at the activating site, but at higher concentrations it also cleaved downstream, as did trypsin, a known activator of PAR-2. Thrombin, factor Xa, plasmin, urokinase, plasma kallikrein, and tissue kallikrein had no effect. Tryptase also cleaved the analogous thrombin receptor peptide at the activating site but less efficiently. When added to COS-1 cells expressing either receptor, tryptase stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis. With PAR-2, this response was half-maximal at 1 nM tryptase and could be inhibited by the tryptase inhibitor, APC366, or by antibodies to tryptase and PAR-2. When added to human endothelial cells, which normally express PAR-2 and thrombin receptors, or keratinocytes, which express only PAR-2, tryptase caused an increase in cytosolic Ca2+. However, when added to platelets or CHRF-288 cells, which express thrombin receptors but not PAR-2, tryptase caused neither aggregation nor increased Ca2+. These results show that 1) tryptase has the potential to activate both PAR-2 and thrombin receptors; 2) for PAR-2, this potential is realized, although cleavage at secondary sites may limit activation, particularly at higher tryptase concentrations; and 3) in contrast, although tryptase clearly activates thrombin receptors in COS-1 cells, it does not appear to cleave endogenous thrombin receptors in platelets or CHRF-288 cells. These distinctions correlate with the observed differences in the rate of cleavage of the PAR-2 and thrombin receptor peptides by tryptase. Tryptase is the first protease other than trypsin that has been shown to activate human PAR-2. Its presence within mast cell granules places it in tissues where PAR-2 is expressed but trypsin is unlikely to reach.

Protease activated receptors: theme and variations

The four PAR family members are G protein coupled receptors that are normally activated by proteolytic exposure of an occult tethered ligand. Three of the family members are thrombin receptors. The fourth (PAR2) is not activated by thrombin, but can be activated by other proteases, including trypsin, tryptase and Factor Xa. This review focuses on recent information about the manner in which signaling through these receptors is initiated and terminated, including evidence for inter- as well as intramolecular modes of activation, and continuing efforts to identify additional, biologically-relevant proteases that can activate PAR family members.

An RNAi-Based Approach Identifies Molecules Required for Glutamatergic and GABAergic Synapse Development

We report the results of a genetic screen to identify molecules important for synapse formation and/or maintenance. siRNAs were used to decrease the expression of candidate genes in neurons, and synapse development was assessed. We surveyed 22 cadherin family members and demonstrated distinct roles for cadherin-11 and cadherin-13 in synapse development. Our screen also revealed roles for the class 4 Semaphorins Sema4B and Sema4D in the development of glutamatergic and/or GABAergic synapses. We found that Sema4D affects the formation of GABAergic, but not glutamatergic, synapses. Our screen also identified the activity-regulated small GTPase Rem2 as a regulator of synapse development. A known calcium channel modulator, Rem2 may function as part of a homeostatic mechanism that controls synapse number. These experiments establish the feasibility of RNAi screens to characterize the mechanisms that control mammalian neuronal development and to identify components of the genetic program that regulate synapse formation and/or maintenance.

Defects in secretion, aggregation, and thrombus formation in platelets from mice lacking Akt2

Prior studies have shown that PI3Ks play a necessary but incompletely defined role in platelet activation. One potential effector for PI3K is the serine/threonine kinase, Akt, whose contribution to platelet activation was explored here. Two isoforms of Akt were detected in mouse platelets, with expression of Akt2 being greater than Akt1. Deletion of the gene encoding Akt2 impaired platelet aggregation, fibrinogen binding, and granule secretion, especially in response to low concentrations of agonists that activate the G(q)-coupled receptors for thrombin and thromboxane A(2). Loss of Akt2 also impaired arterial thrombus formation and stability in vivo, despite having little effect on platelet responses to collagen and ADP. In contrast, reducing Akt1 expression had no effect except when Akt2 was also deleted. Activation of Akt by thrombin was abolished by deletion of Galpha(q) but was relatively unaffected by deletion of Galpha(i2), which abolished Akt activation by ADP. From these results we conclude that Akt2 is a necessary component of PI3K-dependent signaling downstream of G(q)-coupled receptors, promoting thrombus growth and stability in part by supporting secretion. The contribution of Akt1 is less evident except in the setting in which Akt2 is absent.

Activation of Rap1B by Gi Family Members in Platelets

It has become increasingly appreciated that receptors coupled to Gαi family members can stimulate platelet aggregation, but the mechanism for this has remained unclear. One possible mediator is the small GTPase, Rap1, which has been shown to contribute to integrin activation in several cell lines and to be activated by a calcium-dependent mechanism in platelets. Here, we demonstrate that Rap1 is also activated by Gαi family members in platelets. First, we show that platelets from mice lacking the Gαi family member Gαz (which couples to the α2A adrenergic receptor) are deficient in epinephrine-stimulated Rap1 activation. We also show that platelets from mice lacking Gαi2, which couples to the ADP receptor, P2Y12, exhibit reduced Rap1 activation in response to ADP. In contrast, platelets from mice that lack Gαq show no decrease in the ability to activate Rap1 in response to epinephrine but show a partial reduction in ADP-stimulated Rap1 activation. This result, combined with studies of human platelets treated with ADP receptor-selective inhibitors, indicates that ADP-stimulated Rap1 activation in human platelets is dependent on both the Gαi-coupled P2Y12 receptor and the Gαq-coupled P2Y1 receptor. Gαi-dependent activation of Rap1 in platelets does not appear to be mediated by enhanced intracellular calcium release because no increase in intracellular calcium concentration was detected in response to epinephrine and because the calcium response to ADP was not diminished in platelets from the Gαi2−/− mouse. Finally, using human platelets treated with selective inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mouse platelets selectively lacking the Gβγ-activated form of his enzyme (PI3Kγ), we show that Gi-mediated Rap1 activation is PI3K-dependent. In summary, activation of Rap1 can be stimulated by Gαi- and PI3K-dependent mechanisms in platelets and by Gq- and Ca2+-dependent mechanisms, both of which may play a role in promoting platelet activation.

Reconstitution of Receptors and GTP-binding Regulatory Proteins (G Proteins) in Sf9 Cells A DIRECT EVALUATION OF SELECTIVITY IN RECEPTOR·;G PROTEIN COUPLING

The selectivity in coupling of various receptors to GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) was examined directly by a novel assay entailing the use of proteins overexpressed in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells. Activation of G proteins was monitored in membranes prepared from Sf9 cells co-expressing selected pairs of receptors and G proteins (i.e. α, β1, and γ2 subunits). Membranes were incubated with [35S]guanosine 5′-(3-O-thio)triphosphate (GTPγS) ± an agonist, and the amount of radiolabel bound to the α subunit was quantitated following immunoprecipitation. When expressed without receptor (but with β1γ2), the G protein subunits αz, α12, and α13 did not bind appreciable levels of [35S]GTPγS, consistent with a minimal level of GDP/[35S]GTPγS exchange. In contrast, the subunits αs and αq bound measurable levels of the nucleotide. Co-expression of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) receptor promoted binding of [35S]GTPγS to αz but not to α12, α13, or αs. Binding to αz was enhanced by inclusion of serotonin in the assay. Agonist activation of both thrombin and neurokinin-1 receptors promoted a modest increase in [35S]GTPγS binding to αz and more robust increases in binding to αq, α12, and α13. Binding of [35S]GTPγS to αs was strongly enhanced only by the activated β1-adrenergic receptor. Our data identify interactions of receptors and G proteins directly, without resort to measurements of effector activity, confirm the coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to Gz and extend the list of receptors that interact with this unique G protein to the receptors for thrombin and substance P, imply constitutive activity for the 5-HT1A receptor, and demonstrate for the first time that the cloned receptors for thrombin and substance P activate G12 and G13.

Endothelial Cell Thrombin Receptors and PAR-2 TWO PROTEASE-ACTIVATED RECEPTORS LOCATED IN A SINGLE CELLULAR ENVIRONMENT

Human endothelial cells express thrombin receptors and PAR-2, the two known members of the family of protease-activated G protein-coupled receptors. Because previous studies have shown that the biology of the human thrombin receptor varies according to the cell in which it is expressed, we have taken advantage of the presence of both receptors in endothelial cells to examine the enabling and disabling interactions with candidate proteases likely to be encountered in and around the vascular space to compare the responses elicited by the two receptors when they are present in the same cell and to compare the mechanisms of thrombin receptor and PAR-2 clearance and replacement in a common cellular environment. Of the proteases that were tested, only trypsin activated both receptors. Cathepsin G, which disables thrombin receptors, had no effect on PAR-2, while urokinase, kallikrein, and coagulation factors IXa, Xa, XIa, and XIIa neither substantially activated nor noticeably disabled either receptor. Like thrombin receptors, activation of PAR-2 caused pertussis toxin-sensitive phospholipase C activation as well as activation of phospholipase A2, leading to the release of PGI2. Concurrent activation of both receptors caused a greater response than activation of either alone. It also abolished a subsequent response to the PAR-2 agonist peptide, SLIGRL, while only partially inhibiting the response to the agonist peptide, SFLLRN, which activates both receptors. After proteolytic or nonproteolytic activation, PAR-2, like thrombin receptors, was cleared from the endothelial cell surface and then rapidly replaced with new receptors by a process that does not require protein synthesis. Selective activation of either receptor had no effect on the clearance of the other. These results suggest that the expression of both thrombin receptors and PAR-2 on endothelial cells serves more to extend the range of proteases to which the cells can respond than it does to extend the range of potential responses. The results also show that proteases that can disable these receptors can distinguish between them, just as do most of the proteases that activate them. Finally, the residual response to SFLLRN after activation of thrombin receptors and PAR-2 raises the possibility that a third, as yet unidentified member of this family is expressed on endothelial cells, one that is activated by neither thrombin nor trypsin.

Regulated surface expression and shedding support a dual role for semaphorin 4D in platelet responses to vascular injury.

Semaphorin 4D (sema4D; CD100) is an integral membrane protein and the ligand for two receptors, CD72 and plexin-B1. Soluble sema4D has been shown to evoke angiogenic responses from endothelial cells and impair monocyte migration, but the origin of soluble sema4D, particularly at sites of vascular injury, has been unclear. Here we show that platelets express sema4D and both of its receptors and provide evidence that these molecules promote thrombus formation. We also show that the surface expression of sema4D and CD72 increases during platelet activation, followed by the gradual shedding of the sema4D extracellular domain. Shedding is blocked by metalloprotease inhibitors and abolished in mouse platelets that lack the metalloprotease ADAM17 (TACE). Mice that lack sema4D exhibit delayed arterial occlusion after vascular injury in vivo, and their platelets show impaired collagen responses in vitro. In resting platelets, as in B lymphocytes, CD72 is associated with the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Platelet activation causes dissociation of the complex, as does the addition of soluble sema4D. These findings suggest a dual role for sema4D in vascular responses to injury. As thrombus formation begins, platelet-associated sema4D can bind to its receptors on nearby platelets, promoting thrombus formation. As thrombus formation continues, sema4D is shed from the platelet surface and becomes available to interact with receptors on endothelial cells and monocytes, as well as continuing to interact with platelets.

Reaction of mast cell proteases tryptase and chymase with protease activated receptors (PARs) on keratinocytes and fibroblasts.

Protease activated receptors (PARs) compose a family of G protein signal transduction receptors activated by proteolysis. In this study, the susceptibility of PARs expressed on human keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts to the human mast cell proteases tryptase and chymase was evaluated. PAR activation was measured by monitoring cytosolic [Ca2+] in cells loaded with the fluorescent Ca2+ probe Fura‐2. Tryptase produced transient cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization in keratinocytes, but not in fibroblasts. Ca2+ mobilization in keratinocytes required enzymatically active tryptase, demonstrated desensitization, and was blocked by pretreatment of cells with the PAR‐2 peptide agonist SLIGKV, trypsin, or the phospholipase inhibitor U73122. Heparin, a GAG that binds to tryptase, stabilizing its functional form, also inhibited tryptase‐induced Ca2+ mobilization. The maximal response elicited by tryptase was smaller than that observed upon treatment of keratinocytes with trypsin, a known activator of PAR‐2, and keratinocytes made refractory to tryptase by pretreatment with the protease remained responsive to trypsin. Pretreatment of keratinocytes with thrombin, an activator of PAR‐1 and ‐3 (thrombin receptors), had no detectable effect on the tryptase or trypsin responses. These data suggest that in keratinocytes tryptase may be activating a subpopulation of PAR‐2 receptors. Treatment of keratinocytes or fibroblasts with human chymase did not produce Ca2+ mobilization, nor did it affect Ca2+ mobilization produced by trypsin. However, chymase pretreatment of fibroblasts rapidly inhibited the ability of these cells to respond to thrombin. Inhibition was dependent on chymase enzymatic activity and was not significantly affected by the presence of heparin. This finding is consistent with studies indicating that PAR‐1 may be susceptible to proteases with chymotrypsin‐like specificity. These results suggest that the proteases tryptase and chymase secreted from mast cells in skin may affect the behavior of surrounding cells by the hydrolysis of PARs expressed by these cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 176:365–373, 1998.

Megakaryocyte precursors, megakaryocytes and platelets express the HIV co‐receptor CXCR4 on their surface: determination of response to stromal‐derived factor‐1 by megakaryocytes and platelets

Thrombocytopenia is a late complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown to be a co‐receptor for lymphocyte‐tropic HIV‐1 strains. CXCR4 is also a natural receptor for the chemokine SDF‐1. We have previously shown that CXCR1 and CXCR2 are present on megakaryocytes and platelets. Although interleukin‐8 (IL‐8) and other chemokines that bind to these two receptors do not activate platelets, they are able to inhibit megakaryocytopoiesis, presumably through these receptors. We therefore examined whether CXCR4 is present on developing and mature megakaryocytes and on platelets. Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) demonstrated the presence of CXCR4 message. Immature and mature αIIbβ3+ megakaryocytes, and platelets were also positive for CXCR4 by flow cytometric studies using a CXCR4‐specific antibody. We then tested whether SDF‐1 can affect the biology of these cells. CD34+ cells and immature αIIbβ3+ cells responded to SDF‐1 as indicated by Ca2+ mobilization and chemotaxis. However, mature megakaryocytes failed to demonstrate either of these responses, in spite of their continued ability to bind 125I‐SDF‐1. Further, SDF‐1 failed to inhibit megakaryocyte colony growth. Platelets bound 125I‐SDF‐1 with a KD similar to the affinity seen for CXCR4 on other cells, yet SDF‐1 did not aggregate washed platelets nor augment aggregation by low‐dose ADP or thrombin. SDF‐1 also failed to stimulate Ca2+ mobilization, granular release or expression of P‐selectin in platelets. Accordingly, although our studies demonstrate that CD34+ precursors, megakaryocytes and platelets all express CXCR4 and bind SDF‐1, biological effects were only demonstrable of SDF‐1 on CD34+ precursors. The potential biological implications of CXCR4 expression on maturing megakaryocytes and platelets in normal individuals and following HIV infection are discussed.