Lawrence R. Schiller

Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility Associated with Diabetes Mellitus

Gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence occur frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus. In a survey of 136 diabetic outpatients, 76% had one or more gastrointestinal symptoms, the commonest symptom being constipation (found in 60%). In many cases these symptoms are thought to be due to abnormal gastrointestinal motility that, in turn, may be a manifestation of diabetic autonomic neuropathy involving the gastrointestinal tract. The pathophysiology of these gastrointestinal symptoms, clarified in recent studies, and the clinical features and treatment of these problems in diabetic patients are reviewed.

An Evidence-Based Position Statement on the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

IBS is characterized by abdominal discomfort associated with altered bowel function; structural and biochemical abnormalities are absent. e pathophysiology of IBS is multifactorial and of intense recent interest, largely because of the possibility of developing targeted therapies. As IBS is one of the most common disorders managed by gastroenterologists and primary care physicians, this monograph was developed to educate physicians about its epidemiology, diagnostic approach, and treatments. e American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) IBS Task Force updated the 2002 monograph because new evidence has emerged on the bene* t and risks of drugs used for IBS. Furthermore, new drugs also have been developed and the evidence for e+ cacy of these drugs needed to be assessed. To critically evaluate the rapidly expanding research about IBS, a series of systematic reviews were performed. Standard criteria for systematic reviews were met, including comprehensive literature searching, use of prespeci* ed study selection criteria, and use of a standardized and transparent process to extract and analyze data from studies. Evidence-based statements were developed from these data by the entire ACG IBS Task Force. Recommendations were graded using a formalized system that quanti* es the strength of evidence. Each recommendation was classi* ed as strong (grade 1) or weak (grade 2) and the strength of evidence classi* ed as strong (level A), moderate (level B), or weak (level C). Recommendations in this position statement may be crossreferenced with the supporting evidence in the accompanying article, “ An Evidenced Based Review on the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome ” .

Effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective To determine the effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane controlled trials register up to April 2008. Review methods Randomised controlled trials comparing fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil with placebo or no treatment in adults with irritable bowel syndrome were eligible for inclusion. The minimum duration of therapy considered was one week, and studies had to report either a global assessment of cure or improvement in symptoms, or cure of or improvement in abdominal pain, after treatment. A random effects model was used to pool data on symptoms, and the effect of therapy compared with placebo or no treatment was reported as the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of symptoms persisting. Results 12 studies compared fibre with placebo or no treatment in 591 patients (relative risk of persistent symptoms 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.00). This effect was limited to ispaghula (0.78, 0.63 to 0.96). Twenty two trials compared antispasmodics with placebo in 1778 patients (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Various antispasmodics were studied, but otilonium (four trials, 435 patients, relative risk of persistent symptoms 0.55, 0.31 to 0.97) and hyoscine (three trials, 426 patients, 0.63, 0.51 to 0.78) showed consistent evidence of efficacy. Four trials compared peppermint oil with placebo in 392 patients (0.43, 0.32 to 0.59). Conclusion Fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil were all more effective than placebo in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

Systematic Review on the Management of Chronic Constipation in North America

Systematic Review on the Management of Chronic Constipation in North America Lawrence J. Brandt, M.D., M.A.C.G., F.A.C.P., F.A.A.P.P.,1 Charlene M. Prather, M.D.,2 Eamonn M.M. Quigley, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.A.C.P., F.A.C.G., F.R.C.P.I.,3 Lawrence R. Schiller, M.D., F.A.C.P., F.A.C.G.,4 Philip Schoenfeld, M.D., M.S.Ed., M.Sc. (Epi),5 and Nicholas J. Talley, M.D., Ph.D.6 1Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; 2Division of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; 3Department of Medicine and Alimentary Pharmabiotic Center, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland; 4Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; 5Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, and Center for Excellence in Health Services Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; 6Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Efficacy of Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) are functional bowel disorders. Evidence suggests that disturbance in the gastrointestinal microbiota may be implicated in both conditions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in IBS and CIC.METHODS:MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to December 2013). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with IBS or CIC, which compared prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics with placebo or no therapy, were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were pooled using a standardized or weighted mean difference with a 95% CI.RESULTS:The search strategy identified 3,216 citations. Forty-three RCTs were eligible for inclusion. The RR of IBS symptoms persisting with probiotics vs. placebo was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70–0.89). Probiotics had beneficial effects on global IBS, abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics in IBS were sparse. Probiotics appeared to have beneficial effects in CIC (mean increase in number of stools per week=1.49; 95% CI=1.02–1.96), but there were only two RCTs. Synbiotics also appeared beneficial (RR of failure to respond to therapy=0.78; 95% CI 0.67–0.92). Again, trials for prebiotics were few in number, and no definite conclusions could be drawn.CONCLUSIONS:Probiotics are effective treatments for IBS, although which individual species and strains are the most beneficial remains unclear. Further evidence is required before the role of prebiotics or synbiotics in IBS is known. The efficacy of all three therapies in CIC is also uncertain.

AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Diarrhea

This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the committee on September 27, 1998.

American College of Gastroenterology monograph on the management of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic idiopathic constipation ((CIC) also referred to as functional constipation) are two of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders worldwide. IBS is a global problem, with anywhere from 5 to 15 % of the general population experiencing symptoms that would satisfy a defi nition of IBS ( 1,2 ). In a systematic review on the global prevalence of IBS, Lovell and Ford ( 1 ) documented a pooled prevalence of 11 % with all regions of the world suff ering from this disorder at similar rates. Given its prevalence, the frequency of symptoms, and their associated debility for many patients and the fact that IBS typically occurs in younger adulthood, an important period for furthering education, embarking on careers, and / or raising families, the socioeconomic impact of IBS is considerable. Th ese indirect medical costs are frequently compounded by the direct medical costs related to additional medical tests and the use of various medical and nonmedical remedies that may have limited impact. CIC is equally common; in another systematic review, Suares and Ford ( 3 ) reported a pooled prevalence of 14 % , and also noted that constipation was more common in females, in older subjects, and those of lower socioeconomic status ( 3 ). Chronic constipation has also been linked to impaired quality of life ( 4 ), most notably among the elderly ( 5 ). Neither IBS nor CIC are associated with abnormal radiologic or endoscopic abnormalities, nor are they associated with a reliable biomarker; diagnosis currently rests entirely, therefore, on clinical grounds. Although a number of clinical defi nitions of both IBS and CIC have been proposed, the criteria developed through the Rome process, currently in its third iteration, have been those most widely employed in clinical trials and, therefore, most relevant to any review of the literature on the management of these disorders. According to Rome III, IBS is defi ned on the basis of the presence of:

Effect of Antidepressants and Psychological Therapies, Including Hypnotherapy, in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder. Evidence relating to the treatment of this condition with antidepressants and psychological therapies continues to accumulate.METHODS:We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to December 2013). Trials recruiting adults with IBS, which compared antidepressants with placebo, or psychological therapies with control therapy or “usual management,” were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI).RESULTS:The search strategy identified 3,788 citations. Forty-eight RCTs were eligible for inclusion: thirty-one compared psychological therapies with control therapy or “usual management,” sixteen compared antidepressants with placebo, and one compared both psychological therapy and antidepressants with placebo. Ten of the trials of psychological therapies, and four of the RCTs of antidepressants, had been published since our previous meta-analysis. The RR of IBS symptom not improving with antidepressants vs. placebo was 0.67 (95% CI=0.58–0.77), with similar treatment effects for both tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The RR of symptoms not improving with psychological therapies was 0.68 (95% CI=0.61–0.76). Cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnotherapy, multicomponent psychological therapy, and dynamic psychotherapy were all beneficial.CONCLUSIONS:Antidepressants and some psychological therapies are effective treatments for IBS. Despite the considerable number of studies published in the intervening 5 years since we last examined this issue, the overall summary estimates of treatment effect have remained remarkably stable.

Pathogenesis of fecal incontinence in diabetes mellitus: evidence for internal-anal-sphincter dysfunction.

We studied 16 patients with diabetes and fecal incontinence. The onset of incontinence coincided with the onset of chronic diarrhea in most patients. Episodes of incontinence occurred when stools were frequent and loose; however, 24-hour stool weights were usually within normal limits. All patients had evidence of autonomic neuropathy, and one third had steatorrhea. Incontinent diabetics had a lower mean basal anal-sphincter pressure than 35 normal subjects (63 +/- 4 vs. 37 +/- 4 mm Hg; P less than 0.001), reflecting abnormal internal-anal-sphincter function. The increment in sphincter pressure with voluntary contraction (external-sphincter function) was not significantly different from normal. Incontinent diabetics also had impaired continence for a solid sphere and for rectally infused saline. In contrast, 14 diabetics without diarrhea or incontinence had normal sphincter pressures and normal results on tests of continence, even though 79 per cent had evidence of autonomic neuropathy and nearly half had steatorrhea. We conclude that incontinence in diabetic patients is related to abnormal internal-anal-sphincter function, and that as a group, diabetics without diarrhea do not have latent defects in continence.

Mechanism of the Antidiarrheal Effect of Loperamide

To determine whether the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide is due to an effect on intestinal motor function or to an acceleration of the rate of absorption by the intestine (as has been suggested recently), we studied absorption during experimental diarrhea produced by the rapid intragastric infusion of electrolyte solution. In studies in which a 2700-ml bolus of electrolyte solution was infused into the stomach over 90 min, loperamide delayed the appearance of rectal effluent in each of 5 subjects and decreased the volume of rectal effluent from 1090 +/- 118 to 770 +/- 73 ml (p = 0.05). When intragastric infusion was continued for 5 h, producing steady-state total gut perfusion, the volume of effluent produced per unit time and the concentration of a nonabsorbable polyethylene glycol marker in rectal effluent was not different with or without loperamide, indicating that loperamide did not alter the rate of absorption by intestinal mucosal cells. Loperamide also had no effect during steady-state perfusion when absorption rates were reduced by intravenous infusion of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Loperamide did substantially increase the intraluminal volume of the total gut, from 985 +/- 131 to 1764 +/- 195 ml (p less than 0.02). These results suggest that loperamide exerts its antidiarrheal effect by a change in the motor function of the intestine, which results in increased capacitance of the gut and a delay in the passage of fluid through the intestine. This change in motor function, rather than a change in the rate of absorption by intestinal mucosal cells, is responsible for the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide in our experimental diarrhea model.