Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lawrence X. Webb is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lawrence X. Webb.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2006

Recombinant human BMP-2 and allograft compared with autogenous bone graft for reconstruction of diaphyseal tibial fractures with cortical defects : A randomized, controlled trial

Alan L. Jones; Robert W. Bucholz; Michael J. Bosse; Sohail K. Mirza; Thomas Lyon; Lawrence X. Webb; Andrew N. Pollak; Jane Davis Golden; Alexandre Valentin-Opran

BACKGROUND Currently, the treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures associated with substantial bone loss often involves autogenous bone-grafting as part of a staged reconstruction. Although this technique results in high healing rates, the donor-site morbidity and potentially limited supply of suitable autogenous bone in some patients are commonly recognized drawbacks. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the benefit and safety of the osteoinductive protein recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) when implanted on an absorbable collagen sponge in combination with freeze-dried cancellous allograft. METHODS Adult patients with a tibial diaphyseal fracture and a residual cortical defect were randomly assigned to receive either autogenous bone graft or allograft (cancellous bone chips) for staged reconstruction of the tibial defect. Patients in the allograft group also received an onlay application of rhBMP-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge. The clinical evaluation of fracture-healing included an assessment of pain with full weight-bearing and fracture-site tenderness. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) was administered before and after treatment. Radiographs were used to document union, the presence of extracortical bridging callus, and incorporation of the bone-graft material. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled in each group. The mean length of the defect was 4 cm (range, 1 to 7 cm). Ten patients in the autograft group and thirteen patients in the rhBMP-2/allograft group had healing without further intervention. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly less in the rhBMP-2/allograft group. Improvement in the SMFA scores was comparable between the groups. No patient in the rhBMP-2/allograft group had development of antibodies to BMP-2; one patient had development of transient antibodies to bovine type-I collagen. CONCLUSIONS The present study suggests that rhBMP-2/allograft is safe and as effective as traditional autogenous bone-grafting for the treatment of tibial fractures associated with extensive traumatic diaphyseal bone loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2001

A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores

Michael J. Bosse; Ellen J. MacKenzie; James F. Kellam; Andrew R. Burgess; Lawrence X. Webb; Marc F. Swiontkowski; Roy Sanders; Alan L. Jones; Mark P. McAndrew; Brendan M. Patterson; Melissa L. McCarthy; Juliana K. Cyril

Background: High-energy trauma to the lower extremity presents challenges with regard to reconstruction and rehabilitation. Failed efforts at limb salvage are associated with increased patient mortality and high hospital costs. Lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems were developed to assist the surgical team with the initial decision to amputate or salvage a limb. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of five lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems. Methods: Five hundred and fifty-six high-energy lower-extremity injuries were prospectively evaluated with use of five injury-severity scoring systems for lower-extremity trauma designed to assist in the decision-making process for the care of patients with such injuries. Four hundred and seven limbs remained in the salvage pathway six months after the injury. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS); the Limb Salvage Index (LSI); the Predictive Salvage Index (PSI); the Nerve Injury, Ischemia, Soft-Tissue Injury, Skeletal Injury, Shock, and Age of Patient Score (NISSSA); and the Hannover Fracture Scale-97 (HFS-97) for ischemic and nonischemic limbs. The scores were analyzed in two ways: including and excluding limbs that required immediate amputation. Results: The analysis did not validate the clinical utility of any of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores. The high specificity of the scores in all of the patient subgroups did confirm that low scores could be used to predict limb-salvage potential. The converse, however, was not true. The low sensitivity of the indices failed to support the validity of the scores as predictors of amputation. Conclusions: Lower-extremity injury-severity scores at or above the amputation threshold should be cautiously used by a surgeon who must decide the fate of a lower extremity with a high-energy injury.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2005

Long-term persistence of disability following severe lower-limb trauma : Results of a seven-year follow-up

Ellen J. MacKenzie; Michael J. Bosse; Andrew N. Pollak; Lawrence X. Webb; Marc F. Swiontkowski; James F. Kellam; Douglas G. Smith; Roy Sanders; Alan L. Jones; Adam J. Starr; Mark P. McAndrew; Brendan M. Patterson; Andrew R. Burgess; Renan C. Castillo

BACKGROUND A recent study demonstrated that patients treated with amputation and those treated with reconstruction had comparable functional outcomes at two years following limb-threatening trauma. The present study was designed to determine whether those outcomes improved after two years, and whether differences according to the type of treatment emerged. METHODS Three hundred and ninety-seven patients who had undergone amputation or reconstruction of the lower extremity were interviewed by telephone at an average of eighty-four months after the injury. Functional outcomes were assessed with use of the physical and psychosocial subscores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and were compared with similar scores obtained at twenty-four months. RESULTS On the average, physical and psychosocial functioning deteriorated between twenty-four and eighty-four months after the injury. At eighty-four months, one-half of the patients had a physical SIP subscore of > or = 10 points, which is indicative of substantial disability, and only 34.5% had a score typical of a general population of similar age and gender. There were few significant differences in the outcomes according to the type of treatment, with two exceptions. Compared with patients treated with reconstruction for a tibial shaft fracture, those with only a severe soft-tissue injury of the leg were 3.1 times more likely to have a physical SIP subscore of 5 points (p < 0.05) and those treated with a through-the-knee amputation were 11.5 times more likely to have a physical subscore of 5 points (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the psychosocial outcomes according to treatment group. Patient characteristics that were significantly associated with poorer outcomes included older age, female gender, nonwhite race, lower education level, living in a poor household, current or previous smoking, low self-efficacy, poor self-reported health status before the injury, and involvement with the legal system in an effort to obtain disability payments. Except for age, predictors of poor outcome were similar at twenty-four and eighty-four months after the injury. CONCLUSIONS The results confirm previous conclusions that reconstruction for the treatment of injuries below the distal part of the femur typically results in functional outcomes equivalent to those of amputation. Regardless of the treatment option, however, long-term functional outcomes are poor. Priority should be given to efforts to improve post-acute-care services that address secondary conditions that compromise optimal recovery.


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2005

Impact of Smoking on Fracture Healing and Risk of Complications in Limb-threatening Open Tibia Fractures

Renan C. Castillo; Michael J. Bosse; Ellen J. MacKenzie; Brendan M. Patterson; Andrew R. Burgess; Alan L. Jones; James F. Kellam; Mark P. McAndrew; Melissa L. McCarthy; Charles A. Rohde; Roy Sanders; Marc F. Swiontkowski; Lawrence X. Webb; Julie Agel; Jennifer Avery; Denise Bailey; Wendall Bryan; Debbie Bullard; Carla Carpenter; Elizabeth Chaparro; Kate Corbin; Denise Darnell; Stephaine Dickason; Thomas DiPasquale; Betty Harkin; Michael Harrington; Dolfi Herscovici; Amy Holdren; Linda Howard; Sarah Hutchings

Objectives: Current data show smoking is associated with a number of complications of the fracture healing process. A concern, however, is the potential confounding effect of covariates associated with smoking. The present study is the first to prospectively examine time to union, as well as major complications of the fracture healing process, while adjusting for potential confounders. Setting: Eight Level I trauma centers. Patients: Patients with unilateral open tibia fractures were divided into 3 baseline smoking categories: never smoked (n = 81), previous smoker (n = 82), and current smoker (n = 105). Outcome Measure: Time to fracture healing, diagnosis of infection, and osteomyelitis. Methods: Survival and logistic analyses were used to study differences in time to fracture healing and the likelihood of developing complications, respectively. Multivariate models were used to adjust for injury severity, treatment variations, and patient characteristics Results: After adjusting for covariates, current and previous smokers were 37% (P = 0.01) and 32% (P = 0.04) less likely to achieve union than nonsmokers, respectively. Current smokers were more than twice as likely to develop an infection (P = 0.05) and 3.7 times as likely to develop osteomyelitis (P = 0.01). Previous smokers were 2.8 times as likely to develop osteomyelitis (P = 0.07), but were at no greater risk for other types of infection. Conclusion: Smoking places the patient at risk for increased time to union and complications. Previous smoking history also appears to increase the risk of osteomyelitis and increased time to union. The results highlight the need for orthopaedic surgeons to encourage their patients to enter a smoking cessation programs.


Biomaterials | 1987

Adhesive colonization of biomaterials and antibiotic resistance

Anthony G. Gristina; Cherri D. Hobgood; Lawrence X. Webb; Quentin N. Myrvik

This study addresses the problem of antibiotic resistance in adhesive, biomaterial-centred infections. It is suggested that this anionic, extracapsular, polysaccharide slime produced by bacteria protects them from antibiotics and sequesters critical ions from the surface of biomaterials. Biofilm-enclosed bacteria on the surface of stainless steel substrata in a test chamber were challenged with incremental levels of tobramycin. In this setting, the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal level of tobramycin for Staphylococcus epidermis were well above normal.


Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons | 2002

New Techniques in Wound Management: Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure

Lawrence X. Webb

&NA; Vacuum‐assisted wound closure (VAC) is a wound management technique that exposes the wound bed to negative pressure by way of a closed system. Edema fluid is removed from the extravascular space, thus eliminating an extrinsic cause of microcirculatory embarrassment and improving blood supply during this phase of inflammation. In addition, the mechanical tension from the vacuum may directly stimulate cellular proliferation of reparative granulation tissue. Orthopaedic indications for VAC include traumatic wounds after débridement, infection after débridement, and fasciotomy wounds for compartment syndrome. VAC also can be used as a dressing for anchoring an applied splitthickness skin graft. The technique is contraindicated in patients with thin, easily bruised or abraded skin; those with neoplasm as part of the wound floor; and those with allergic reactions to any of the components that contact the skin. Clinical experience with the technique has resulted in a low incidence of minor, reversible irritation to surrounding skin and no major complications. Further experience is required, as well as clinical and basic research, to define optimal indications and benefits compared with traditional methods of wound management.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2007

Health-care costs associated with amputation or reconstruction of a limb-threatening injury

Ellen J. MacKenzie; Alison Snow Jones; Michael J. Bosse; Renan C. Castillo; Andrew N. Pollak; Lawrence X. Webb; Marc F. Swiontkowski; James F. Kellam; Douglas G. Smith; Roy Sanders; Alan L. Jones; Adam J. Starr; Mark P. McAndrew; Brendan M. Patterson; Andrew R. Burgess

BACKGROUND Recent reports have suggested that functional outcomes are similar following either amputation or reconstruction of a severely injured lower extremity. The goal of this study was to compare two-year direct health-care costs and projected lifetime health-care costs associated with these two treatment pathways. METHODS Two-year health-care costs were estimated for 545 patients with a unilateral limb-threatening lower-extremity injury treated at one of eight level-I trauma centers. Included in the calculation were costs related to (1) the initial hospitalization, (2) all rehospitalizations for acute care related to the limb injury, (3) inpatient rehabilitation, (4) outpatient doctor visits, (5) outpatient physical and occupational therapy, and (6) purchase and maintenance of prosthetic devices. All dollar figures were inflated to constant 2002 dollars with use of the medical service Consumer Price Index. To estimate projected lifetime costs, the number of expected life years was multiplied by an estimate of future annual health-care costs and added to an estimate of future costs associated with the purchase and maintenance of prosthetic devices. RESULTS When costs associated with rehospitalizations and post-acute care were added to the cost of the initial hospitalization, the two-year costs for reconstruction and amputation were similar. When prosthesis-related costs were added, there was a substantial difference between the two groups (


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2004

Functional Outcomes Following Trauma-Related Lower-Extremity Amputation

Ellen J. MacKenzie; Michael J. Bosse; Renan C. Castillo; Douglas G. Smith; Lawrence X. Webb; James F. Kellam; Andrew R. Burgess; Marc F. Swiontkowski; Roy Sanders; Alan L. Jones; Mark P. McAndrew; Brendan M. Patterson; Thomas G. Travison; Melissa L. McCarthy

81,316 for patients treated with reconstruction and


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2007

The use of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the temporary treatment of soft-tissue injuries associated with high-energy open tibial shaft fractures.

Barnaby T Dedmond; Bill G. Kortesis; Kathleen Punger; Jordan Simpson; Joseph Argenta; Brenda Kulp; Michael J. Morykwas; Lawrence X. Webb

91,106 for patients treated with amputation). The projected lifetime health-care cost for the patients who had undergone amputation was three times higher than that for those treated with reconstruction (


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2005

The Insensate Foot Following Severe Lower Extremity Trauma: An Indication for Amputation?

Michael J. Bosse; Melissa L. McCarthy; Alan L. Jones; Lawrence X. Webb; Stephen H. Sims; Roy Sanders; Ellen Leap Mackenzie

509,275 and

Collaboration


Dive into the Lawrence X. Webb's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan L. Jones

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roy Sanders

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James F. Kellam

Loyola University Chicago

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge