Le Zhu

Comparing soluble ferric pyrophosphate to common iron salts and chelates as sources of bioavailable iron in a Caco-2 cell culture model.

Iron bioavailability from supplements and fortificants varies depending upon the form of the iron and the presence or absence of iron absorption enhancers and inhibitors. Our objectives were to compare the effects of pH and selected enhancers and inhibitors and food matrices on the bioavailability of iron in soluble ferric pyrophosphate (SFP) to other iron fortificants using a Caco-2 cell culture model with or without the combination of in vitro digestion. Ferritin formation was the highest in cells treated with SFP compared to those treated with other iron compounds or chelates. Exposure to pH 2 followed by adjustment to pH 7 markedly decreased FeSO(4) bioavailability but had a smaller effect on bioavailabilities from SFP and sodium iron(III) ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), suggesting that chelating agents minimize the effects of pH on iron bioavailability. Adding ascorbic acid (AA) and cysteine to SFP in a 20:1 molar ratio increased ferritin formation by 3- and 2-fold, respectively, whereas adding citrate had no significant effect on the bioavailability of SFP. Adding phytic acid (10:1) and tannic acid (1:1) to iron decreased iron bioavailability from SFP by 91 and 99%, respectively. The addition of zinc had a marked inhibitory effect on iron bioavailability. Calcium and magnesium also inhibited iron bioavailability but to a lesser extent. Incorporating SFP in rice greatly reduced iron bioavailability from SFP, but this effect can be partially reversed with the addition of AA. SFP and FeSO(4) were taken up similarly when added to nonfat dry milk. Our results suggest that dietary factors known to enhance and inhibit iron bioavailability from various iron sources affect iron bioavailability from SFP in similar directions. However, the magnitude of the effects of iron absorption inhibitors on SFP iron appears to be smaller than on iron salts, such as FeSO(4) and FeCl(3). This supports the hypothesis that SFP is a promising iron source for food fortification and dietary supplements.

Green Tea Ingestion by Rats Does Not Affect Iron Absorption but Does Alter the Composition of the Saliva Proteome

We tested the hypothesis that rats adapt to the iron absorption inhibitory effects of tea by modifying the expression of salivary proteins. Thirty-six weanling rats were allocated into 6 groups. Two control groups were fed a semipurified diet containing 20 mg Fe(2+)/kg diet. Two groups were fed spray dried green tea infusion mixed into the diet (28.6 g tea/kg diet) and 2 groups were fed the control diet with a twice daily gavage of a tea solution (0.25 g tea/mL). Saliva samples were collected in 3 groups (control, gavage, and oral) on day 8 (acute) and in the remaining groups on day 31 (chronic). Iron absorption was assessed using a (58)Fe(3+) tracer administered on day 1 (acute) and day 24 (chronic). 2D gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry were used to assess the composition of the saliva proteome. There was no significant difference in iron absorption between the 3 groups on either day 1 or day 24. Salivary proline-rich proteins and submandibular gland secretory protein increased to a greater extent in the oral group than in the gavage group, when compared to control, within the same exposure time period. Amylase, chitinase, deoxyribonuclease, cysteine-rich secretory protein 1, and parotid secretory protein all decreased to a greater extent in the oral tea group, compared to the control, within the same exposure time period. Our results show that green tea did not decrease iron absorption in rats but it did have a marked effect on the saliva proteome when given orally.

Iron Absorption from NaFeEDTA Is Downregulated in Iron-Loaded Rats

NaFeEDTA is a promising fortificant for use in plant foods, because it is less susceptible to iron absorption inhibitors and has fewer undesirable impacts on sensory quality than ferrous sulfate. However, the hypothesis that iron absorption from NaFeEDTA is effectively downregulated in iron-overload conditions has not been thoroughly tested. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare downregulation of iron absorption from ferrous sulfate and NaFeEDTA in intact iron-loaded rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed diets containing either ferrous sulfate (35 mg Fe per 1 kg diet) or elemental iron (30,000 mg Fe per 1 kg diet) for 29 d to achieve basal or iron-loaded status. While body weights and hemoglobin concentrations were the same for basal and iron-loaded rats, nonheme-iron concentrations in liver, spleen, and kidney were all significantly higher in iron-loaded rats, indicating elevated iron status. Percentage of iron absorption from (59)Fe-labeled ferrous sulfate and NaFeEDTA, determined from whole-body retention of (59)Fe activity, was 64.7 and 49.4% in basal rats but decreased to 12.8 and 10.2% in iron-loaded rats, respectively. The reductions in percentage of iron absorption from both iron sources in rats as a result of iron loading were comparable (about -80% for both iron sources). Our results suggest that iron absorption from NaFeEDTA and ferrous sulfate is downregulated to a similar extent in iron-loaded rats. Hence, NaFeEDTA is no more likely than ferrous sulfate to exacerbate iron overload in subjects with adequate body iron stores.