Leanne Embree

Pharmacokinetic behavior of vincristine sulfate following administration of vincristine sulfate liposome injection

Abstract The pharmacokinetic behavior of vincristine sulfate (VINC) following administration of vincristine sulfate liposome injection (VSLI), 0.16 mg/ml, as an intravenous infusion over 60 min in 24 of 25 patients enrolled in a phase I clinical study of this drug is described. Plasma samples for determination of the pharmacokinetic behavior of VINC were collected during the infusion at 15, 30 and 60 min as well as at 2, 4, 8, 12, 48 and 72 h postinfusion. Total VINC concentration was determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay. Patients receiving doses of 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m2 VSLI did not provide useful pharmacokinetic data at late time-points owing to the limit of quantitation of the HPLC assay (28.6 ng/ml). Sufficient concentration-time data were available for seven of the patients receiving doses of VSLI from 2.0 to 2.8 mg/m2 for compartmental modelling. A two-compartment open model (PCNONLIN Model 10) was the best fit for the observed VINC plasma data for these patients. The mean maximum observed concentration values were significantly greater for patients receiving VSLI at 2.8 mg/m2 (2260 ± 212 ng/ml, n = 2) than for those receiving 2.0 mg/m2 and 2.4 mg/m2 (891 ± 671 ng/ml, n = 6; 679 ± 634 ng/ml, n = 6, respectively). No significant differences were observed in maximum concentration values between patients at 2.0 mg/m2 and those at 2.4 mg/m2. A trend towards higher parametric AUC (0 to ∞) values with increasing dose (on a milligram per meter squared basis) was observed but statistical significance was not reached. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic behavior of VSLI observed in this study with nonencapsulated VINC demonstrated that (1) the variability observed for VSLI pharmacokinetic parameters was similar to nonencapsulated VINC, (2) although variability in absolute concentration was observed␣between patients, the behavior of VSLI in individual patients followed a two- rather than a three-compartment open model, and (3) VINC plasma concentrations were significantly greater following administration of VSLI than described for nonencapsulated VINC. Overall, the results for patients treated with VSLI from 2.0 to 2.8 mg/m2 suggest that this formulation protects VINC from the early phase of rapid elimination seen with nonencapsulated drug, resulting in significantly elevated VINC plasma concentrations over extended periods of time.

Validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay method for quantification of total vincristine sulfate in human plasma following administration of vincristine sulfate liposome injection

The validation of a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay method for quantitation of total vincristine sulfate (VINC) in human plasma is described. VINC was extracted from plasma using BondElut CBA solid phase cartridges with vinblastine as the internal standard. Chromatography was accomplished using a Waters Symmetry C8 (250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.) analytical column, a Waters Delta-Pak ODS guard column with a mobile phase of 34.9% water-0.1% diethylamine (pH 7.0)-40% acetonitrile-25% methanol pumped isocratically at 1.0 ml min(-1) with ultraviolet detection at 297 nm. Above the limit of quantitation of 28.6 ng ml(-1), the area ratio precision (R.S.D. range 3.33-11.6%) and accuracy of predicted values (R.S.D. range 8.56-23.8% with the limit of quantitation being the only value above 20%) were acceptable. The assay was linear from 28.6-2860 ng ml(-1) VINC in plasma. Recovery of VINC from plasma and VINC from plasma spiked with vincristine sulfate liposome injection ranged from 74.9-87.1%. Stability of VINC in plasma stored at -20 degrees C for at least 49 days and of extracted plasma samples was demonstrated. Potential interference in quantitation of VINC from commonly co-administered drugs was evaluated along with day-to-day variability. The assay procedure was found suitable for evaluation of VINC clinical pharmacokinetics in plasma following administration of vincristine sulfate liposome injection prepared using distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC)/cholesterol liposomes for injection.

Gas-chromatographic analysis of busulfan for therapeutic drug monitoring

The development and validation of a gas chromatographic assay method for determination of total and free busulfan concentrations in human plasma for pharmacokinetic studies is reported. 1,6-Bis(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane, the internal standard, and a potential metabolite, 3-hydroxysulfolane, were synthesized. Plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate samples containing busulfan and internal standard were extracted with ethyl acetate and derivatized with 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol prior to gas chromatographic determination. The63Ni electron-capture detector provided a limit of detection of 0.0600 μg/ml with a limit of quantitation of 0.100 μg/ml busulfan in biological samples. Calibration curves were linear from 0.100 to 3.00 μg/ml in plasma (500 μl) and 0.100 to 2.00 μg/ml in plasma ultrafiltrate (100 μl). Extraction and derivatization yields ranged from 78.4% to 89.6% and 56.0% to 71.3%, respectively. Specificity of this assay for busulfan in the presence of its potential metabolites was demonstrated. Also, plasma samples containing co-administered drugs gave no response under these conditions. Clinical samples obtained following administration of a 1 mg/kg oral busulfan dose demonstrate the applicability of this method to analysis of total and free plasma concentrations.

Validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay method for pharmacokinetic evaluation of busulfan

The development and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for determination of busulfan concentrations in human plasma for pharmacokinetic studies is described. Plasma samples containing busulfan and 1,6-bis(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane, and internal standard, were prepared by derivatization with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) followed by addition of methanol and extraction with ethyl acetate. The extract was dried under nitrogen and the samples reconstituted with 100 microl of methanol prior to HPLC determination. Chromatography was accomplished using a Waters NovaPak octadecylsilyl (ODS) (150 x 3.9 mm I.D.) analytical column, NovaPak ODS guard column, and mobile phase of methanol-water (80:20, v/v) at a flow-rate of 0.8 ml/min with UV detection at 251 nm. The limit of detection was 0.0200 microg/ml (signal-to-noise ratio of 6) with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.0600 microg/ml for busulfan in plasma. Calibration curves were linear from 0.0600 to 3.00 microg/ml in plasma (500 microl) using a 1/y weighting scheme. Precision of the assay, as represented by C.V. of the observed peak area ratio values, ranged from 4.41 to 13.5% (13.5% at LOQ). No day-to-day variability was observed in predicted concentration values and the bias was low for all concentrations evaluated (bias: 0 to 4.76%; LOQ: 2.91%). The mean derivatization and extraction yield observed for busulfan in plasma at 0.200, 1.20 and 2.00 microg/ml was 98.5% (range 93.4 to 107%). Plasma samples containing potential busulfan metabolites and co-administered drugs, which may be present in clinical samples, provided no response indicating this assay procedure is selective for busulfan. This method was used to analyze plasma concentrations following administration of a 1 mg/kg oral busulfan dose.

A gas-chromatographic assay method for busulfan with sensitivity for test dose therapeutic monitoring

A gas-chromatographic assay method was developed and validated for determination of busulfan in human plasma for test dose therapeutic drug monitoring. Busulfan and the internal standard (1,6-bis-(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane) were extracted from plasma samples and derivatized with 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol prior to gas chromatographic determination. The 63Ni electron-capture detector provided a limit of quantitation of 0.0100 micrograms ml-1 busulfan in plasma with a linear response over the concentration range 0.0100-0.400 micrograms ml-1. Extraction and derivatization yields were 85.3%-91.0% and greater than 95%, respectively. Assay specificity for busulfan in the presence of potential metabolites was demonstrated. Potentially co-administered drugs gave no response under the sample preparation and chromatographic conditions described for quantification of busulfan. The applicability of this assay to the individualization of busulfan therapy based on a 2 mg test dose is discussed.

Validation of high-performance liquid chromatographic assay methods for the analysis of carboplatin in plasma ultrafiltrate

Validation of two HPLC assays for the quantitation of carboplatin in human plasma ultrafiltrate is described. Both assay methods employed a YMC ODS-AQ 3.9 x 150 mm (3 microm) column for the chromatographic separation. The first method utilized direct UV detection, the second method utilized UV detection following post-column derivatization with sodium bisulfite. Structural analogues of carboplatin were synthesized and used as internal standards for the assays. With direct UV detection, sample clean-up using solid-phase extraction on amino cartridges was required prior to injection, with extraction recoveries ranging from 80 to 90%. This extraction procedure was not necessary with the post-column reaction method, which employed a more selective analytical wavelength. Unfortunately, instability of the post-column reagent was a problem and led to greater variability in predicted concentration values. For standard curves, a weighted (1/y2) regression approach was used for plots of peak area or peak height ratio (carboplatin/internal standard) vs. carboplatin concentration. The limit of detection of both assays was 0.025 microg/ml and both were validated for carboplatin concentrations from 0.05 to 40 microg/ml. Accuracy and precision data were generated using three batches of validation samples, each batch consisting of a standard curve and five sets of quality control samples. Stability of carboplatin in blood, plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, and reconstituted extracts was evaluated. The assay methods were employed for the pharmacokinetic analysis of blood samples drawn from a pediatric patient that received a 400 mg/m2 dose of carboplatin.

Development of a high-performance liquid chromatographic-post-column fluorogenic assay for digoxin in serum.

A quantitative, sensitive and specific assay for digoxin was developed using a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) system with post-column (PC) fluorogenic derivatization. Separation of digoxin from its metabolites was accomplished using a 15 cm X 4.6 mm I.D., 3-microns octadecylsilyl HPLC column and an optimum mobile phase of methanol-ethanol-isopropanol-dehydroascorbic acid (52:3:1:45, v/v). Concentrated hydrochloric acid, used as the PC derivatization reagent, was delivered by hexane displacement from a polyvinyl chloride pressure vessel. Construction of the pressure vessel is described. The mixture of HPLC effluent and PC reagent was passed into a 20-m knitted reactor (PTFE tubing) maintained at 79.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C. The resultant fluorophores were monitored by a fluorescence detector equipped with a 360-nm excitation filter and a 425-nm emission filter. Specificity of this HPLC-PC assay for digoxin in the presence of its metabolites was demonstrated. Also, numerous steroids evaluated did not produce fluorescence under these conditions. An extraction procedure for evaluating digoxin in serum without interference from endogenous compounds was also developed. Detector response to digoxin was linear from 0.5 to 3.3 ng extracted from serum.

Electrochemical detection of the 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl derivative of dixogin by high-performance liquid chromatography

Electrochemical detection of 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl derivatives of digoxin and its metabolites following high-performance liquid chromatography is reported. Partial resolution of derivatized digoxin and dihydrodigoxin was obtained using a Spherisorb ODS II analytical column. Both single- and dual-electrode detection were investigated and a maximum sensitivity equivalent to 0.39 ng of digoxin was found with the dual-electrode method. This system has the necessary sensitivity and selectivity for development into a therapeutic monitoring assay method.