Lee E. Smith

Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection.

IntroductionAlthough Seprafilm® has been demonstrated to reduce adhesion formation, it is not known whether its usage would translate into a reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, single-blind, controlled study. This report focuses on those patients who underwent intestinal resection (n = 1,701). Before closure of the abdomen, patients were randomized to receive Seprafilm® or no treatment. Seprafilm® was applied to adhesiogenic tissues throughout the abdomen. The incidence and type of bowel obstruction was compared between the two groups. Time to first adhesive small-bowel obstruction was compared during the course of the study by using survival analysis methods. The mean follow-up time for the occurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction was 3.5 years.ResultsThere was no difference between the treatment and control group in overall rate of bowel obstruction. The incidence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation was significantly lower for Seprafilm® patients compared with no-treatment patients: 1.8 vs. 3.4 percent (P < 0.05). This finding represents an absolute reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation of 1.6 percent and a relative reduction of 47 percent. In addition, a stepwise multivariate analysis indicated that the use of Seprafilm® was the only predictive factor for reducing adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation. In both groups, 50 percent of first adhesive small-bowel obstruction episodes occurred within 6 months after the initial surgery with nearly 30 percent occurring within the first 30 days. Additionally no first adhesive small-bowel obstruction events were reported in Years 4 and 5 of follow-up.ConclusionsThe overall bowel obstruction rate was unchanged; however, adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation was significantly reduced by the use of Seprafilm®, which was the only factor that predicted this outcome.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, or TEM, is a technique that can be used for the treatment for early staged rectal cancer. This technique utilizes carbon dioxide insufflation through a 40 mm rectoscope to create better endoscopic visualization of the operative field. TEM has been praised for its access to middle and upper-third rectal cancers. However, one limitation of TEM is its inability to address local lymph node involvement. Therefore, an adequate preoperative assessment is crucial before using TEM as a curative modality. TEM can be used to remove virtually any benign lesion that can be brought into view. In addition, there are several studies that have shown TEM is a safe and effective way to treat T1 cancers and may have a role in the treatment of T2 and T3 cancers when combined with radiation and chemotherapy. TEM has lower recurrence rates, faster recovery, and fewer complications when compared to other local excision techniques and radical surgeries. The future of TEM is growing in acceptance as more surgeons learn to master this technique.

Fiberoptic colonoscopy: complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy.

SummaryMembers of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were polled regarding complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Sixty per cent of the members responded. One hundred sixty-two surgeons were found to be performing colonoscopy, and this paper presents the accumulated data on complications. A total of 20,139 colonoscopies were performed, with 12,746 diagnostic procedures and 7,393 polypectomies. The overall complication rate was 0,4 per cent with diagnostic colonoscopy and 1.8 per cent with polypectomy. Based upon these complications, guidelines in regard to history, preparation, and technique of colonoscopy and polypectomy are discussed.

Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review our experience with patients with rectoceles using very selective criteria for operative repair and to critically review our surgical results. METHODS: This is a review of patients selected for rectocele repair between 1989 and 1994. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine patients were evaluated for pelvic outlet symptoms in our clinic. Defecography was performed in 180 patients; rectocele was seen in 143 patients (79 percent; 135 females and 8 males). On physical examination, 132 patients had a palpable rectocele (73 percent). Rectocele repair was recommended for 35 patients (13 percent); 33 (32 females and 1 male) underwent this procedure. Mean age was 55 (range, 16–78) years. Although many patients complained of constipation, incontinence and pelvic pain, in these 33 patients criteria for repair included the sensation of a vaginal mass or bulge that required digital support and/or rectal digitizing for evacuation (58 percent), retention of barium in the rectocele on defecography (55 percent), or a very large rectocele with internal anterior rectal wall prolapse (6 percent). A hysterectomy had been performed previously in 47 percent of women repaired. Rectocele repair was performed by a standard transanal approach in 31 patients and transabdominally in 2 patients. Hospital stay averaged 3.7 (range, 1–8) days. Few postoperative complications occurred; urinary retention was the most common (18 percent). All patients were followed postoperatively, and 26 patients (79 percent) answered a standardized questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 31 (range, 5–64) months. Eighty percent of patients questioned who initially complained of a vaginal mass or bulge reported complete resolution (significant improvement by the sign test,P< 0.5). Subjectively, 92 percent of patients questioned reported improvement in their preoperative symptoms and satisfaction with the operation. CONCLUSION: Rectoceles are frequently identified during defecography, which is performed for pelvic floor complaints, yet are often asymptomatic. In contrast to other recent reports of rectocele repair, our data indicate that careful selection of patients using specific criteria may result in very good clinical results.

Ileal pouch vaginal fistulas: Incidence, etiology, and management

Some of the initial problems associated with the ileonal reservoir have been solved. In their place, other complications have been recognized. Among these, the ileal pouch vaginal fistula stands out as a recently recognized difficult management problem. This multicenter study was undertaken to gain insight into the causes for, and treatment of, pouch vaginal fistulas. Cases were gathered from 11 surgical practices, throughout North America, in which the ileoanal reservoir procedure is frequently performed. Overall, 304 females had undergone ileoanal reservoir procedures by these surgical groups. Twenty-one patients developed 22 pouch vaginal fistulas for an overall incidence of 6.9 percent. Five additional patients with pouch vaginal fistulas, whose restorative proctocolectomies were done elsewhere, were referred to these surgeons for treatment. The courses of these 26 patients form the basis of this report. This study details the risk factors which predispose to the development of a pouch vaginal fistula, as well as the various treatment options available.

Complications of colostomy closure

A series of 126 colostomy closures was analyzed to evaluate factors contributing to morbidity. There were no deaths, but there was a 33 percent complication rate. Patients with penetrating abdominal trauma and foreign-body rectal perforations had fewer serious complications following colostomy closures than patients with diverticulitis or cancer. No significant difference was found in the anastomotic leak rate, length of surgery or length of hospitalization in patients with sutured or stapled anastomoses. Most patients in this series had end colostomies that required limited resection and anastomoses. Complication rates were comparable with previous series, which consisted predominantly of loop colostomy closures. The incidence of surgical complications was not related to the time interval between colostomy formation and closure. Timing of closure, however, significantly influenced the complication rate in two specific patient groups: patients with intraperitoneal colon perforation at the initial procedure when closure was performed within four weeks, and patients with surgical complications at the time of colostomy creation if they underwent closure within eight weeks. Early closures in patients still recovering from colostomy complications were associated with the highest incidence of anastomotic leak. Wound infections at stoma sites were decreased by leaving the skin open. The average hospitalization was 11.1 days for patients without complications, 15.5 days for those with wound infection, 18.5 days for patients with ileus, and 20.4 days for patients with anastomotic leaks. This study illustrates that the optimal time for colostomy closure must be determined on an individual basis. The morbidity can be minimized by delaying closure in specific groups of patients for one to two months. Delaying closure for an arbitrary time interval in all patients, however, is not warranted.

Transanal endoscopic excision of rectal adenomas

AbstractTransanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive surgical technique for performing local excision of rectal lesions in the mid and upper rectum that would otherwise be inaccessible for local excision by the direct transanal approach. In the absence of this approach, low anterior resection would be required, which is major abdominal surgery. The justification for excising adenomas of the colon and rectum is their malignant potential, which correlates with the size of the lesion. This retrospective review examines our experience using TEM for excision of adenomas of the rectum from February 1991 to the present. The decision for using TEM is based on a precise localization of the lesion with particular attention to the upper margin of the lesion and its diameter. A total of 56 adenomas were removed. The average diameter was 4.9 cm (range, 3–8 cm). The average distance from the anal verge was 7.92 cm (range, 5–12 cm). Carcinoma in situ was seen in 7 lesions, and the remaining lesions were benign. Morbidity was minimal, with one conversion to an open procedure for an intraperitoneal perforation that required a low anterior resection. No patient required transfusion and there was no mortality. The hospital stay was short, with half of the patients being discharged the same day. The average cost from July 1996 to December 1999 was

Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution's analysis and comparison to existing data.

7775 for TEM versus

The superior mesenteric artery

34,018 for LAR. Subsequent follow-up average was 38.8 months (range, 1–100 months), during which time two patients had recurrence of their adenomas. This was successfully treated with reexcision. In conclusion, TEM is an accurate, safe, and relatively inexpensive technique when compared to low anterior resection. This technique significantly reduces the proportion of adenomas requiring abdominal surgery.

Colitis cystica profunda

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of early-stage rectal cancer, carcinoid tumors, and adenomas, is shown to be a safe procedure with very low perioperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery at a large volume tertiary care center with the existing literature. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 325 transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures and looked for risk factors associated with complications. Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery included rectal adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and carcinoids. SETTING: Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a large-volume tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled over a 20-year period, and data were collected on demographics, perioperative details, tumor characteristics, and complications. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed on all 325 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were urinary retention, late bleeding requiring intervention, dehiscence, peritoneal cavity entry, conversion to abdominal approach, fecal soiling, and rectovaginal fistula. RESULTS: Intraoperative bleeding was associated with larger tumor size, whereas postoperative bleeding requiring intervention was not associated with any factors studied. Peritoneal cavity entry and urinary retention were more likely if the tumor was in either the anterior or lateral position in the rectum. The peritoneal cavity was entered in 9 patients, and conversion to abdominal approach occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperative bleeding, by surgeon’s choice, and urinary retention, by patient’s choice, were associated with a greater likelihood of admission to the inpatient ward. Fecal soiling was not reported by patients and not recorded. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because it was a retrospective analysis CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an extremely safe procedure, offering very low perioperative morbidity. The overall morbidity found in our study was 10.5%, on par with published data for large series of 21%, 7.7%, and 14.9%. In contrast, complications from radical resection are reported at 18% to 55%.