Lei Huo

Predictors of invasion in patients with core‐needle biopsy‐diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ

Among patients with core‐needle biopsy (CNB)‐diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the guidelines for the selection of patients to undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are not well defined, and many patients with no invasion undergo an unnecessary SLN biopsy. The objective of this study was to identify the predictors of invasion in patients with CNB‐diagnosed DCIS and, thus, to help determine the most appropriate candidates for SLN biopsy.

Pulmonary artery sarcoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases.

We report 12 cases of pulmonary artery sarcoma. The mean age at diagnosis was 48.4 years. Based on histomorphologic features and immunohistochemical findings, 2 tumors were classified as rhabdomyosarcoma, 4 as leiomyosarcoma, 1 as osteogenic sarcoma, 1 as angiosarcoma, and 4 as high-grade sarcoma. All patients underwent surgery. In addition, 7 patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Five patients died 3 to 23 months after surgery. Three patients were still alive at 8, 27, and 68 months at last follow-up. Another 3 patients were alive at 2, 15, and 40 months and then lost to follow-up. The 2 patients with the longest survival (40 months and 68 months) had a diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. Both patients with rhabdomyosarcoma died at 3 months after surgery. Pulmonary artery sarcoma is an uncommon entity with a poor prognosis. The role of early diagnosis, histologic classification, surgical treatment, and adjuvant therapy in patient outcome is discussed.

Polycomb group protein EZH2 is frequently expressed in inflammatory breast cancer and is predictive of worse clinical outcome.

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a member of polycomb group proteins, is involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and has been implicated in various human malignancies, including breast cancer, and also has been associated with aggressive tumor behavior. However, the clinical significance of EZH2 expression in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a rare but aggressive type of breast carcinoma, has not been explored. In this retrospective study, the authors examined EZH2 expression in IBC tumors and evaluated the relation between EZH2 expression and patient survival.

Which threshold for ER positivity? a retrospective study based on 9639 patients

BACKGROUND Guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy recently recommended that estrogen receptor (ER) status be considered positive if ≥1% of tumor cells demonstrate positive nuclear staining by immunohistochemistry. In clinical practice, a range of thresholds are used; a common one is 10% positivity. Data addressing the optimal threshold with regard to the efficacy of endocrine therapy are lacking. In this study, we compared patient, tumor, treatment and survival differences among breast cancer patients using ER-positivity thresholds of 1% and 10%. METHODS The study population consisted of patients with primary breast carcinoma treated at our center from January 1990 to December 2011 and whose records included complete data on ER status. Patients were separated into three groups: ≥10% positive staining for ER (ER-positive ≥10%), 1%-9% positive staining for ER (ER-positive 1%-9%) and <1% positive staining (ER-negative). RESULTS Of 9639 patients included, 80.5% had tumors that were ER-positive ≥10%, 2.6% had tumors that were ER-positive 1%-9% and 16.9% had tumors that were ER-negative. Patients with ER-positive 1%-9% tumors were younger with more advanced disease compared with patients with ER-positive ≥10% tumors. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, patients with ER-positive 1%-9% tumors had worse survival rates than did patients with ER-positive ≥10% tumors, with and without adjustment for clinical stage and grade. Survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with ER-positive 1%-9% and ER-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS Patients with tumors that are ER-positive 1%-9% have clinical and pathologic characteristics different from those with tumors that are ER-positive ≥10%. Similar to patients with ER-negative tumors, those with ER-positive 1%-9% disease do not appear to benefit from endocrine therapy; further study of its clinical benefit in this group is warranted. Also, there is a need to better define which patients of this group belong to basal or luminal subtypes.

Histologic Changes Associated With False-Negative Sentinel Lymph Nodes After Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Confirmed Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Before Treatment

A wide range of false‐negative rates has been reported for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether histologic findings in negative SLNs after preoperative chemotherapy are helpful in assessing the accuracy of SLN biopsy in patients with confirmed lymph node‐positive disease before treatment.

Prognostic significance of tumor grading and staging in mammary carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation

Invasive mammary carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation has been controversial in terms of its definition and clinical outcome. In 2003, the World Health Organization histologic classification of tumors designated this entity as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast and defined mammary neuroendocrine carcinoma as expression of neuroendocrine markers in more than 50% of tumor cells. It is an uncommon neoplasm. Our recent study showed that it is a unique clinicopathologic entity and has a poor clinical outcome compared with invasive mammary carcinoma with similar pathologic stage. Other investigators have also demonstrated a different molecular profile in this type of tumor from that of invasive ductal carcinoma. It is unknown whether the current prognostic markers for invasive mammary carcinoma are also applicable for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. In the current study, we reviewed the clinicopathologic features and outcome data in 74 cases of mammary neuroendocrine carcinoma from the surgical pathology files at The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, to identify relevant prognostic markers for this tumor type. As shown previously by univariate analysis, large tumor size, high nuclear grade, and presence of regional lymph node metastasis are adverse prognostic factors for overall survival and distant recurrence-free survival. In the current study, multivariate analysis revealed that overall survival was predicted by tumor size, lymph node status, and proliferation rate as judged by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Only nodal status proved to be a significant independent prognostic factor for distant recurrence-free survival. Neither mitosis score nor histologic grade predicted survival in mammary neuroendocrine carcinoma. Our data suggest that routine evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation index in these unusual tumors may provide more valuable information than mitotic count alone.

Invasive mammary carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: histological features and diagnostic challenges

Tang F, Wei B, Tian Z, Gilcrease M Z, Huo L, Albarracin C T, Resetkova E, Zhang H, Sahin A, Chen J, Bu H, Abraham S & Wu Y
(2011) Histopathology59, 106–115

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin A expression determined by immunohistochemistry is of limited utility in triple-negative breast cancer

Aims:  In addition to oestrogen and progesterone receptors, gross cystic disease fluid protein‐15 (GCDFP‐15) and mammaglobin A (MAM) are the most common markers used to identify breast origin by immunohistochemistry. GCDFP‐15 expression has been reported in approximately 60% of breast carcinomas and MAM expression in approximately 80%. Data on their expression in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) are very limited. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of these markers in TNBC to determine their utility in pathological diagnosis.

Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer

PurposeThe current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual uses tumor size, lymph node, and metastatic status to stage breast cancer across different subtypes. We examined the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC within the same stages and sub-stages to evaluate whether TNBC had worse prognosis than non-TNBC.MethodsWe reviewed the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and identified 158,358 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2012. The overall survival (OS) time and breast cancer cause-specific survival time were compared between patients with TNBC and non-TNBC in each stage and sub-stages. The results were validated using a dataset of 2049 patients with longer follow-up from our institution.ResultsCompared with patients with non-TNBC, patients with TNBC had worse OS and breast cancer cause-specific survival time in every stage and sub-stage in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor grade, and surgery and radiation treatments in the SEER data. The worse OS time in patients with TNBC was validated in our institutional dataset.ConclusionsPatients with TNBC have worse survival than patients with non-TNBC. The new AJCC staging manual should consider breast cancer biomarker information.

GCDFP-15 and Mammaglobin Expression by Immunohistochemistry is of Limited Utility in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Aims:  In addition to oestrogen and progesterone receptors, gross cystic disease fluid protein‐15 (GCDFP‐15) and mammaglobin A (MAM) are the most common markers used to identify breast origin by immunohistochemistry. GCDFP‐15 expression has been reported in approximately 60% of breast carcinomas and MAM expression in approximately 80%. Data on their expression in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) are very limited. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of these markers in TNBC to determine their utility in pathological diagnosis.