LeisaJ. Freeman

The 'think test': a further technique to elicit hyperventilation.

Hyperventilation can undermine cardiovascular homeostasis by generating autonomic imbalance, sympathetic dominance, hypokalemia, and intracellular alkalosis with calcium ion shifts. The role of hyperventilation in episodic disorders such as arrhythmia and coronary vasospasm can be difficult to identify if the patient does not present in an attack and so a provocation challenge is required. Today, the standard challenge is the forced hyperventilation provocation test (FHPT). A capnograph enables the resting end-tidal PCO2 to be compared with the level 3 min after the period of overbreathing. We report the use of a patient-specific challenge. After the FHPT, the subject is invited to close his eyes and think about the circumstances of an attack, feelings and sensations experienced (breathing is not mentioned) or topics that were seen to disturb the rhythm of breathing when the medical history was taken. A fall of end-tidal PCO2 of 10 mmHg or more lasting at least one minute was taken as a positive response. Out of 57 patients with cardiovascular symptoms suggesting a hypocapnic influence, resting hypocapnia (end-tidal Pco2=30 mmHg) was present in 3 (5%). Of the remaining 54, the FHPT was positive in 16 (30%) and the ‘think test’ in 33 (61%). This suggests that patient-specific stimulation has advantages over an unspecific challenge in testing for episodic hypocapnia.

Physiological responses to psychological challenge under hypnosis in patients considered to have the hyperventilation syndrome: implications for diagnosis and therapy.

Thirty patients who were considered to have the hyperventilation syndrome on clinical grounds (history and observation) were referred for testing: 29 patients completed a forced hyperventilation provocation test, and 28 underwent hypnosis during which time a psychological challenge was introduced which was meaningful to each individual patient. In 19/27 of these patients the PetCO2 fell by an average of 18.2 mmHg and persisted spontaneously for more than three minutes. In 10 normal controls studied in a similar fashion there was an average fall of 5 mmHg. The difference in response between responders and controls/non-responders was highly significant (P< 0.001). A review of the literature is presented, for comparison. It is considered that a psychological challenge under hypnosis may have important implications for diagnosis and therapy in some patients considered to have the hyperventilation syndrome.