Leo G. Rebholz
Clemson University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leo G. Rebholz.
Archive | 2012
William J. Layton; Leo G. Rebholz
At high Reynolds number the fluid velocity is exponentially sensitive to perturbations of the problem data. This sensitivity, however, is not uniform. The large structures (large eddies) evolve deterministically and are thus not sensitive [BFG02]. The small eddies are sensitive because they have a random character.
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 2011
Michael A. Case; Vincent J. Ervin; Alexander Linke; Leo G. Rebholz
This article studies two methods for obtaining excellent mass conservation in finite element computations of the Navier-Stokes equations using continuous velocity fields. With a particular mesh construction, the Scott-Vogelius element pair has recently been shown to be inf-sup stable and have optimal approximation properties, while also providing pointwise mass conservation. We present herein the first numerical tests of this element pair for the time dependent Navier-Stokes equations. We also prove that the limit of the grad-div stabilized Taylor-Hood solutions to the Navier-Stokes problem converges to the Scott-Vogelius solution as the stabilization parameter tends to infinity. That is, we provide theoretical justification that choosing the grad-div parameter large does not destroy the solution. Numerical tests are provided which verify the theory and show how both Scott-Vogelius and grad-div stabilized Taylor-Hood (with large stabilization parameter) elements can provide accurate results with excellent mass conservation for Navier-Stokes approximations.
Advances in Computational Mathematics | 2014
Eleanor W. Jenkins; Volker John; Alexander Linke; Leo G. Rebholz
Abstract Standard error analysis for grad-div stabilization of inf-sup stable conforming pairs of finite element spaces predicts that the stabilization parameter should be optimally chosen to be 𝒪(1)
Siam Review | 2017
Volker John; Alexander Linke; Christian Merdon; Michael Neilan; Leo G. Rebholz
\mathcal O(1)
Journal of Computational Physics | 2010
Maxim A. Olshanskii; Leo G. Rebholz
. This paper revisits this choice for the Stokes equations on the basis of minimizing the H1(Ω)
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 2007
Leo G. Rebholz
H^{1}(\Omega )
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 2014
Keith J. Galvin; Leo G. Rebholz; Catalin Trenchea
error of the velocity and the L2(Ω)
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences | 2010
Leo G. Rebholz; Myron Sussman
L^{2}(\Omega )
Computational methods in applied mathematics | 2011
Carolina C. Manica; Monika Neda; Maxim A. Olshanskii; Leo G. Rebholz; Nicholas E. Wilson
error of the pressure. It turns out, by applying a refined error analysis, that the optimal parameter choice is more subtle than known so far in the literature. It depends on the used norm, the solution, the family of finite element spaces, and the type of mesh. In particular, the approximation property of the pointwise divergence-free subspace plays a key role. With such an optimal approximation property and with an appropriate choice of the stabilization parameter, estimates for the H1(Ω)
Journal of Computational Physics | 2017
Sergey Charnyi; Timo Heister; Maxim A. Olshanskii; Leo G. Rebholz
H^{1}(\Omega )