Leon B. Ellwein
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leon B. Ellwein.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2000
Jialiang Zhao; Xiangjun Pan; Ruifang Sui; Sergio Muñoz; Robert D. Sperduto; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To assess the prevalence of refractive errors and vision impairment in school-age children in Shunyi District, northeast of Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China. METHODS Random selection of village-based clusters was used to identify a sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Resident registration books were used to enumerate eligible children in the selected villages and identify their current school. Ophthalmic examinations were conducted in 132 schools on children from 29 clusters during May 1988 to July 1998, including visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus. Independent replicate measurements of all children with reduced vision and a sample of those with normal vision were done for quality assurance monitoring in three schools. RESULTS A total of 6,134 children from 4,338 households were enumerated, and 5,884 children (95.9%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.5 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 12.8%, 10.9%, and 1.8%, respectively; 0.4% had best visual acuity 0.5 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 89.5% of the 1,236 eyes with reduced vision, amblyopia in 5%, other causes in 1.5%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 4%. Myopia -0.5 diopter or less in either eye was essentially absent in 5-year-old children, but increased to 36.7% in males and 55.0% in females by age 15. Over this same age range, hyperopia 2 diopters or greater decreased from 8.8% in males and 19.6% in females to less than 2% in both. Females had a significantly higher risk of both myopia and hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS Reduced vision because of myopia is an important public health problem in school-age children in Shunyi District. More than 9% of children could benefit from prescription glasses. Further studies are needed to determine whether the upward trend in the prevalence of myopia continues far beyond age 15 and whether the development of myopia is changing for more recent birth cohorts.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2000
Eugenio Maul; Silviana Barroso; Sergio Muñoz; Robert D. Sperduto; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To assess the prevalence of refractive errors and vision impairment in school-age children in a suburban area (La Florida) of Santiago, Chile. METHODS Random selection of geographically defined clusters was used to identify a representative sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Children in the 26 selected clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door survey and invited to report to a community health clinic for examination. Visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus were done from April through August 1998. Independent replicate examinations of all children with reduced vision and a sample of those with normal vision were done for quality assurance monitoring in six clusters. RESULTS A total of 6,998 children from 3,830 households were enumerated, and 5,303 children (75.8%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.50 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 15.8%, 14.7%, and 7.4%, respectively; 3.3% had best visual acuity 0.50 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 56.3% of the 1,285 eyes with reduced vision, amblyopia in 6.5%, other causes in 4.3%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 32.9%. Myopia -0.50 diopter or less in either eye was present in 3.4% of 5-year-old children, increasing to 19.4% in males and 14.7% in females by age 15. Over this same age range, hyperopia 2.00 diopters or greater decreased from 22.7% to 7.1% in males and from 26.3% to 8.9% in females. Females had a significantly higher risk of hyperopia than males. CONCLUSIONS Refractive error, associated primarily with myopia, is a major cause of reduced vision in school-age children in La Florida. More than 7% of children could benefit from the provision of proper spectacles. Efforts are needed to make existing programs that provide free spectacles for school children more effective. Further studies are needed to determine whether the upward trend in myopia continues far beyond 15 years of age.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2000
Gopal P. Pokharel; A.Dominique Negrel; Sergio Muñoz; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To assess the prevalence of refractive error and vision impairment in school age children in the terai area of the Mechi zone in Eastern Nepal. METHODS Random selection of village-based clusters was used to identify a sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Children in the 25 selected clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door household survey and invited to village sites for examination. Visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and anterior segment, media, and fundus examinations were done from May 1998 through July 1998. Independent replicate examinations for quality assurance monitoring took place in all children with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision in seven villages. RESULTS A total of 5,526 children from 3,724 households were enumerated, and 5,067 children (91.7%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.5 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 2.9%, 2.8%, and 1.4%, respectively; 0.4% had best visual acuity 0.5 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 56% of the 200 eyes with reduced uncorrected vision, amblyopia in 9%, other causes in 19%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 16%. Myopia -0.5 diopter or less in either eye or hyperopia 2 diopters or greater was observed in less than 3% of children. Hyperopia risk was associated with female gender and myopia risk with older age. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of reduced vision is very low in school-age children in Nepal, most of it because of correctable refractive error. Further studies are needed to determine whether the prevalence of myopia will be higher for more recent birth cohorts.
Archives of Ophthalmology | 2008
Susan Vitale; Leon B. Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L. Ferris; Robert D. Sperduto
OBJECTIVE To describe the prevalence of refractive error in the United States. METHODS The 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) used an autorefractor to obtain refractive error data on a nationally representative sample of the US noninstitutionalized, civilian population 12 years and older. Using data from the eye with a greater absolute spherical equivalent (SphEq) value, we defined clinically important refractive error as follows: hyperopia, SphEq value of 3.0 diopters (D) or greater; myopia, SphEq value of -1.0 D or less; and astigmatism, cylinder of 1.0 D or greater in either eye. RESULTS Of 14,213 participants 20 years or older who completed the NHANES, refractive error data were obtained for 12,010 (84.5%). The age-standardized prevalences of hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism were 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-4.0%), 33.1% (95% CI, 31.5%-34.7%), and 36.2% (95% CI, 34.9%-37.5%), respectively. Myopia was more prevalent in women (39.9%) than in men (32.6%) (P < .001) among 20- to 39-year-old participants. Persons 60 years or older were less likely to have myopia and more likely to have hyperopia and/or astigmatism than younger persons. Myopia was more common in non-Hispanic whites (35.2%) than in non-Hispanic blacks (28.6%) or Mexican Americans (25.1%) (P < .001 for both). CONCLUSION Estimates based on the 1999-2004 NHANES vision examination data indicate that clinically important refractive error affects half of the US population 20 years or older.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2000
A.Dominique Negrel; Eugenio Maul; Gopal P. Pokharel; Jialiang Zhao; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE The Refractive Error Study in Children was designed to assess the prevalence of refractive error and vision impairment in children of different ethnic origins and cultural settings. METHODS Population-based cross-sectional samples of children 5 to 15 years of age were obtained through cluster sampling. Presenting, uncorrected, and best-corrected visual acuity, along with refractive error under cycloplegia, were the main outcome measures. Amblyopia and other causes of uncorrectable vision impairment were determined. RESULTS Study design and sample size calculations, survey enumeration and ophthalmic examination methods, quality assurance monitoring, and da ta analyses and statistical methods are described. CONCLUSIONS The study design, sample size, and measurement methods ensure that the prevalence of age-specific and sex-specific refractive error can be estimated with reasonable accuracy in the target populations. With commonality of methods, a comparison of findings between studies in different ethnic origins and cultural settings is possible.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
P K Nirmalan; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; V Maneksha; R Rahmathullah; R Ramakrishnan; A Padmavathi; S R Munoz; Leon B. Ellwein
Aims: To assess the prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery and to evaluate visual acuity outcomes after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. Methods: Cluster sampling was used to randomly select a cross sectional sample of people ≥50 years of age living in the Tirunelveli district of south India. Eligible subjects in 28 clusters were enumerated through a door to door household survey. Visual acuity measurements and ocular examinations were performed at a selected site within each of the clusters in early 2000. The principal cause of visual impairment was identified for eyes with presenting visual acuity <6/18. Independent replicate testing for quality assurance monitoring was performed in subjects with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision for six of the study clusters. Results: A total of 5795 people in 3986 households were enumerated and 5411 (93.37%) were examined. The prevalence of presenting and best corrected visual acuity ≥6/18 in both eyes was 59.4% and 75.7%, respectively. Presenting vision <6/60 in both eyes (the definition of blindness in India) was found in 11.0%, and in 4.6% with best correction. Presenting blindness was associated with older age, female sex, and illiteracy. Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 70.6% of blind people. The prevalence of cataract surgery was 11.8%—with an estimated 56.5% of the cataract blind already operated on. Surgical coverage was inversely associated with illiteracy and with female sex in rural areas. Within the cataract operated sample, 31.7% had presenting visual acuity ≥6/18 in both eyes and 11.8% were <6/60; 40% were bilaterally operated on, with 63% pseudophakic. Presenting vision was <6/60 in 40.7% of aphakic eyes and in 5.1% of pseudophakic eyes; with best correction the percentages were 17.6% and 3.7%, respectively. Refractive error, including uncorrected aphakia, was the main cause of visual impairment in cataract operated eyes. Vision <6/18 was associated with cataract surgery in government, as opposed to that in non-governmental/private facilities. Age, sex, literacy, and area of residence were not predictors of visual outcomes. Conclusion: Treatable blindness, particularly that associated with cataract and refractive error, remains a significant problem among older adults in south Indian populations, especially in females, the illiterate, and those living in rural areas. Further study is needed to better understand why a significant proportion of the cataract blind are not taking advantage of free of charge eye care services offered by the Aravind Eye Hospital and others in the district. While continuing to increase cataract surgical volume to reduce blindness, emphasis must also be placed on improving postoperative visual acuity outcomes.
Ophthalmology | 1999
Shaozhen Li; Xu J; Mingguang He; Wu K; Sergio Muñoz; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To assess blindness prevalence and that caused specifically by cataract in rural southern China. DESIGN Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 5342 persons older than 50 years of age. METHODS Visual acuity and eye examinations were performed in the summer of 1997 in a random sample of villages in Doumen County. Differences in blindness prevalence associated with age, gender, and education were explored using logistic regression. The survey was preceded by a pilot study in which operational methods were refined and quality assurance measures were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Distance visual acuity and lens status. RESULTS Bilateral blindness (presenting visual acuity < 0.10) was found in 4.37% (95% confidence interval, 3.67%-5.06%). Blindness was associated with increasing age (P < 0.001) and with the lack of education (P < 0.01). Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 61.5% of blind people, with refractive error responsible for another 10%. An estimated 40% of the cataract blind were operated on; surgical coverage was lowest among the elderly, women, and those without schooling, although not at statistically significant levels. CONCLUSIONS Despite the increased attention given to eye care in Doumen County, blindness remains a major public health problem. Cataract surgery is reaching fewer than half of those who could benefit from it.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1998
Jialiang Zhao; Ruifang Sui; Lijan Jia; Astrid E. Fletcher; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To measure visual acuity and vision-related quality of life in individuals in rural China operated on for cataract. METHODS Five thousand fifty-two persons age 50 years and older, 90.9% (5,052/5,555) of a randomly selected population in Shunyi County, were examined in the fall of 1996. Visual functioning and quality of life questionnaires were administered to those with presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in either eye and to those who were aphakic or pseudophakic. RESULTS Of the 87 individuals operated on for cataract, 12% (10/87) had presenting visual acuity of 6/18 or more in both eyes, and 24.1% (21/87) had less than 6/60. Twenty-five percent (29/116) of the 116 eyes operated on for cataract had presenting visual acuity of 6/18 or more, and 44.8% (52/116) had less than 6/60. Aphakic cases without glasses and uncorrectable aphakia attributable to surgical complications were common. In a multivariate regression model, including time period of surgery, hospital type, and surgical procedure, only pseudophakia was associated with better outcomes (P = .05). On a scale from 0 (maximum problems) to 100 (no problems), the mean visual functioning score (+/-SD) for the operated-on population was 61.9 +/- 30.0, and 71.0 +/- 31.8 for the quality of life questionnaire. These scores were comparable to those of the unoperated-on population with moderate bilateral blindness (<6/60 to > or =3/60 in the better eye). Visual functioning and quality of life scores were closely correlated with visual acuity in operated-on (r = 0.64 and r = 0.61, respectively) and unoperated-on populations (r = 0.68 and r = 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Both clinical and patient-reported cataract surgery outcomes are below what should be achievable. Improvement in outcomes must be given greater emphasis if the potential of cataract surgery in restoring sight is to be realized.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 1998
G P Pokharel; G Regmi; S K Shrestha; A D Negrel; Leon B. Ellwein
BACKGROUND A national eye care programme was launched in Nepal in the early 1980s. The impact of this programme on blindness and cataract surgery prevalence was evaluated in two geographic zones. METHODS People aged 45 years and older were sampled using a stratified cluster design. Within randomly selected clusters, door to door enumeration was followed by visual acuity measurement and eye examinations at conveniently located sites. The full survey was preceded by a pilot study where operational methods were refined and quality assurance measures carried out. RESULTS Of the 5112 enumerated individuals 90% were examined. Blindness, defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in both eyes, was found in 5.3% (95% CI 3.6, 6.8) of individuals examined, with cataract being the principal cause in at least one eye in 78% of cases. Considering both cataract operated and unoperated cataract blind cases, surgical coverage was approximately 42%. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that blindness prevalence may have decreased slightly from that estimated in a 1981 national survey, both overall and cataract related. Similarly, cataract surgical coverage may have increased somewhat. None of these changes, however, are at statistically significant levels. Accordingly, the blindness problem remains challengingly high.
Ophthalmology | 2001
Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy; Leon B. Ellwein; Sanjeev Gupta; K Tanikachalam; Mantosh Ray; Vijay K Dada
PURPOSE To assess the outcomes of cataract surgery in rural northwest India. DESIGN Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 549 cataract-operated persons (723 operated eyes). METHODS Cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting a cross-sectional sample of persons 50 years of age or older for visual acuity measurement, refraction, and slit-lamp and direct ophthalmoscope examination early in 1999. Those operated on for cataract were queried as to the date and place of surgery. The principal cause of reduced vision was identified for all examined eyes with presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Presenting and best-corrected visual acuity and cause of vision loss. RESULTS Presenting visual acuity was less than 6/60 in the better eye in 33.7% of cataract-operated persons and greater than or equal to 6/18 in both eyes in 8.2%; 31.7% were bilaterally operated on. Of cataract-operated eyes, 44.1% initially had visual acuity less than 6/60 and 31.5% greater than or equal to 6/18; with best correction, the corresponding percentages were 14.0% and 61.5%. Intracapsular cataract extraction was used in 92% of cases, and 66% had been operated on in surgery camps. Surgical complications were common and a major cause of vision impairment. In multiple logistic regression modeling, female gender and residence in a rural area were associated negatively with both presenting and best-corrected visual acuity outcomes, and surgery conducted before 1990 was associated negatively with best-corrected visual acuity. Place of surgery and subject schooling were not associated with vision outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Cataract surgery subjects in rural areas of India that are without adequately equipped facilities and skilled surgeons, and lack of availability of intraocular lenses, are not realizing the full sight-restoring potential of modern-day surgery. Emphasis on the quality of cataract surgery outcomes must be increased to keep pace with that being given to increasing surgical volume.