Leon Walsh
University Hospital Limerick
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leon Walsh.
Digestive Surgery | 2015
J. Calvin Coffey; Mary F. Dillon; Rishabh Sehgal; Peter Dockery; Fabio Quondamatteo; Dara Walsh; Leon Walsh
Introduction: It is now well established that mesenteric-based colorectal surgery is associated with superior outcomes. Recent anatomic observations have demonstrated that the mesenteric organ is contiguous from the duodenojejunal to the anorectal junction. This led to similar observations in relation to associated peritoneum and fascia. The aim of this review was to demonstrate the relevance of the contiguity principle to resectional colorectal surgery. Methods: All literature in relation to mesenteric anatomy was reviewed from 1873 to the present, without language restriction. Results: Mesenteric-based surgery (i.e. complete mesocolic excision, total mesocolic and mesorectal excision) requires division of the peritoneal reflection (i.e. peritonotomy), and mesenteric mobilisation in the mesofascial plane. These are the fundamental technical elements of mesenterectomy. Mesenteric, peritoneal and fascial contiguity mean that in resectional surgery, these technical elements can be reproducibly applied at all levels from the origin at the superior mesenteric root, to the anorectal junction. Conclusions: The goals of complete mesocolic, total mesocolic and mesorectal excision can be universally achieved at any level from duodenojejunal flexure to anorectal junction, by adopting technical elements based on mesenteric, peritoneal and fascial contiguity.
Journal of Crohns & Colitis | 2018
Calvin Coffey; Miranda G. Kiernan; Shaheel Sahebally; Awad Jarrar; John P. Burke; Patrick A. Kiely; Bo Shen; David Waldron; Colin Peirce; Manus Moloney; Maeve Skelly; Paul Tibbitts; Hena Hidayat; Peter Faul; Vourneen Healy; Peter D O’Leary; Leon Walsh; Peter Dockery; Ronan O’Connell; Sean T. Martin; Fergus Shanahan; Claudio Fiocchi; Colum P. Dunne
Abstract Background and Aims Inclusion of the mesentery during resection for colorectal cancer is associated with improved outcomes but has yet to be evaluated in Crohn’s disease. This study aimed to determine the rate of surgical recurrence after inclusion of mesentery during ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Methods Surgical recurrence rates were compared between two cohorts. Cohort A [n = 30] underwent conventional ileocolic resection where the mesentery was divided flush with the intestine. Cohort B [n = 34] underwent resection which included excision of the mesentery. The relationship between mesenteric disease severity and surgical recurrence was determined in a separate cohort [n = 94]. A mesenteric disease activity index was developed to quantify disease severity. This was correlated with the Crohn’s disease activity index and the fibrocyte percentage in circulating white cells. Results Cumulative reoperation rates were 40% and 2.9% in cohorts A and B [P = 0.003], respectively. Surgical technique was an independent determinant of outcome [P = 0.007]. Length of resected intestine was shorter in cohort B, whilst lymph node yield was higher [12.25 ± 13 versus 2.4 ± 2.9, P = 0.002]. Advanced mesenteric disease predicted increased surgical recurrence [Hazard Ratio 4.7, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.71–13.01, P = 0.003]. The mesenteric disease activity index correlated with the mucosal disease activity index [r = 0.76, p < 0.0001] and the Crohn’s disease activity index [r = 0.70, p < 0.0001]. The mesenteric disease activity index was significantly worse in smokers and correlated with increases in circulating fibrocytes. Conclusions Inclusion of mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced recurrence requiring reoperation.
Case Reports | 2016
Leon Walsh; Bryan Kenny; Mazen El Bassiouni; J. C. Coffey
Ileal pouch-related adenocarcinoma remains a rarity; thus, guidelines on treatment are currently lacking. We present this case of a 54-year-old man who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with stapled ileal pouch–anal anastomosis formation for familial adenomatous polyposis during the 1980s. Despite undergoing annual surveillance endoscopy, the patient was noted to be anaemic and passing fresh blood per anus. Endoscopy and radiological investigation revealed the presence of a pouch-related adenocarcinoma. This was subsequently treated with short-course radiotherapy and pouch excision. The patient remains well until now and will follow six-monthly surveillance protocols with a transition to annual surveillance after 2 years.
Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2015
Gregory J. Nason; Leon Walsh; Ciaran E. Redmond; Niall Kelly; Barry B. McGuire; Vidit Sharma; Michael E. Kelly; D. Galvin; David W. Mulvin; Gerald M. Lennon; David M. Quinlan; Hugh D. Flood; Subhasis K. Giri
INTRODUCTION We compare the survival outcomes of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy (ASRN) and non-adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy (NASRN). METHODS We conducted an observational study based on a composite patient population from two university teaching hospitals who underwent RN for RCC between January 2000 and December 2012. Only patients with pathologically confirmed RCC were included. We excluded patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy, with loco-regional lymph node involvement. In total, 579 patients (ASRN = 380 and NASRN = 199) met our study criteria. Patients were categorized by risk groups (all stage, early stage and locally advanced RCC). Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed for risk groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS The median follow-up was 41 months (range: 12-157). There were significant benefits in OS (ASRN 79.5% vs. NASRN 63.3%; p = 0.001) and CSS (84.3% vs. 74.9%; p = 0.001), with any differences favouring ASRN in all stage. On multivariate analysis, there was a trend towards worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.759, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.943-2.309, p = 0.089) and CSS (HR 1.797, 95% CI 0.967-3.337, p = 0.064) in patients with NASRN (although not statistically significant). Of these patients, only 11 (1.9%) had adrenal involvement. CONCLUSIONS The inherent limitations in our study include the impracticality of conducting a prospective randomized trial in this scenario. Our observational study with a 13-year follow-up suggests ASRN leads to better survival than NASRN. ASRN should be considered the gold standard in treating patients with RCC, unless it is contraindicated.
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | 2018
Eoin White; Muireann McMahon; Michael Walsh; J. Calvin Coffey; Leon Walsh; Dara Walsh; Leonard O’Sullivan
AbstractPurposeThere is a paucity of methods to model soft anatomical tissues. Accurate modelling of these tissues can be difficult with current medical imaging technology. MethodsThe aim of this research was to develop a methodology to model non-intestinal colorectal tissues that are not readily identifiable radiologically to enhance contextual understanding of these tissues and inform medical device design. The models created were used to inform the design of a novel medical device to separate the mesocolon from the retroperitoneum during resection of the colon. We modelled the peritoneum and the mesentery. The mesentery was used to indicate the location of Toldt’s fascia.ResultsWe generated a point cloud dataset using cryosection images as the target anatomy is more visible than in CT or MRI images. The thickness of the mesentery could not be accurately determined as point cloud data do not have thickness. A denser point cloud detailing the mesenteric boundaries could be used to address this.ConclusionsExpert anatomical and surgical insight and point cloud data modelling methods can be used to model soft tissues. This research enhances the overall understanding of the mesentery and Toldt’s fascia in the human specimen which is necessary for medical device innovations for colorectal surgical procedures.
Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2015
Gregory J. Nason; Sher N Baig; Matthew J. Burke; Asadullah Aslam; Michael E. Kelly; Leon Walsh; Hugh D. Flood; S. K. Giri
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is the most commonly performed surgical emergency procedure. The aim of this study was to highlight a series of iatrogenic bladder injuries during LA and suggest a simple method of prevention. METHODS A retrospective review was carried out of all LA performed in a university teaching hospital over a two year period 2012-2013. Iatrogenic visceral injuries were identified and operative notes examined. RESULTS During the study period 1124 appendicectomies were performed. Four iatrogenic bladder injuries occurred related to secondary trocar insertion. No patient was catheterised preoperatively. One of the injuries was identified intra-operatively, another in the early postoperative period where as two re-presented acutely unwell post-discharge from hospital. Three were repaired by laparotomy and one laparoscopically. CONCLUSION Iatrogenic secondary trocar induced bladder injuries are a rare but preventable and potentially serious complication of LA. Urethral catheterisation during LA is a safe and simple method which can prevent this complication.
European Radiology | 2016
J. Calvin Coffey; Kevin Culligan; Leon Walsh; Rishab Sehgal; Colum P. Dunne; Deirdre McGrath; Dara Walsh; Michael Moore; Marie Staunton; Timothy Scanlon; Catherine Dewhurst; Bryan Kenny; Conor O’Riordan; Julie M. O’Brien; Fabio Quondamatteo; Peter Dockery
Mesentery and Peritoneum | 2018
Leon Walsh; Dara Walsh; Patrick A. Kiely; Peter Dockery; J. C. Coffey
Journal of Crohns & Colitis | 2017
Miranda G. Kiernan; Shaheel M. Sahebally; Patrick A. Kiely; David Waldron; M. Moloney; M. Skelly; Peter Faul; Donal P. O'Leary; Aoife J. Lowery; Leon Walsh; Colum P. Dunne; J. C. Coffey
Journal of Crohns & Colitis | 2017
Miranda G. Kiernan; Shaheel M. Sahebally; David Waldron; M. Moloney; M. Skelly; Hena Hidayat; Donal P. O'Leary; Aoife J. Lowery; Leon Walsh; Colum P. Dunne; J. C. Coffey