Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Leonard J. Weireter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Leonard J. Weireter.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2000

Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Andrew B. Peitzman; Brian V. Heil; Louis Rivera; Michael B. Federle; Brian G. Harbrecht; Keith D. Clancy; Martin A. Croce; Blaine L. Enderson; John A. Morris; David V. Shatz; J. Wayne Meredith; Juan B. Ochoa; Samir M. Fakhry; James G. Cushman; Joseph P. Minei; Mary McCarthy; Fred A. Luchette; Richard Townsend; Glenn Tinkoff; Ernest F. Block; Steven E. Ross; Eric R. Frykberg; Richard M. Bell; Frank W. Davis; Leonard J. Weireter; Michael B. Shapiro; G. Patrick Kealey; Fred Rogers; Larry M. Jones; John B. Cone

BACKGROUND Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults. METHODS A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended chi2 test. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS A total of 38.5 % of patients went directly to the operating room (group I); 61.5% of patients were admitted with planned nonoperative management. Of the patients admitted with planned observation, 10.8% failed and required laparotomy; 82.1% of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15 and 46.6% of patients with ISS > 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4% of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION In this multicenter study, 38.5% of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1991

Obesity and increased mortality in blunt trauma

Patricia Smith Choban; Leonard J. Weireter; Carolyn Maynes

To determine the effect of admission body weight on blunt trauma victims, a chart review of all patients greater than 12 years of age admitted to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital between January 1 and July 31, 1987 was undertaken. The charts of 351 patients were reviewed; 184 records contained admission height and weight. These 184 patients made up the study group and age, gender, injuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), ventilator days (VD), complications, length of stay (LOS), and outcome were noted. Body Mass Index (BMI) (weight (kg)/(height(m))2, was calculated for each patient. The average ISS was 21.87 (range, 1-66) and the average BMI was 25.15 kg/m2 (range, 16-46 kg/m2). The overall mortality for the population was 9%. The population was grouped according to BMI: average (less than 27 kg/m2), overweight (27-31 kg/m2), and severely overweight (greater than 31 kg/m2). The mortality of 5.0% and 8.0% in the average and overweight groups was not different. The severely overweight group had a higher mortality at 42.1% compared with the other two groups (p less than 0.0001). The groups did not differ in age, ISS, LOS, nor VD. Age, BMI, and ISS were subjected to regression analysis. By this method BMI and ISS were independent determinants of outcome (p less than 0.0001). There was an increase in complications, mainly pulmonary problems, in the SO group (p less than 0.05). The three groups were subdivided into survivors and nonsurvivors. The nonsurvivors had a longer average LOS at 26.6 days compared with nonsurvivors in the overweight (5.0 days) or severely overweight (8.62 days) groups (p less than 0.007). The severely group was characterized by a rapid deterioration and demise that was unresponsive to intervention. ISS did not differ among nonsuvivors. Among survivors the severely overweight group had a lower ISS, 9.73. This was different from the overweight group (21.57) and from the average group (20.21) (p less than 0.04).


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1999

Penetrating esophageal injuries: Multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Juan A. Asensio; Santiago Chahwan; Walter Forno; Robert C. Mackersie; Matthew J. Wall; Jeffrey Lake; Gayle Minard; Orlando C. Kirton; Kimberly Nagy; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Susan I. Brundage; David B. Hoyt; Robert J. Winchell; Kurt A. Kralovich; Marc J. Shapiro; Robert E. Falcone; Emmett McGuire; Rao R. Ivatury; Michael C. Stoner; Jay A. Yelon; Anna M. Ledgerwood; Fred A. Luchette; C. William Schwab; Heidi L. Frankel; Bobby Chang; Robert Coscia; Kimball I. Maull; Dennis Wang; Erwin F. Hirsch; Jorge I. Cue

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fishers exact test, Students T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2001

Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: Multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma

Brian G. Harbrecht; Andrew B. Peitzman; Louis Rivera; Brian V. Heil; Martin A. Croce; John A. Morris Jr.; Blaine L. Enderson; Stanley Kurek; Michael D. Pasquale; Eric R. Frykberg; Joseph P. Minei; Wayne Meredith; Jospeh Young; G. Patrick Kealey; Steven E. Ross; Fred A. Luchette; Mary McCarthy; Frank W. Davis; David V. Shatz; Glenn Tinkoff; Ernest F. Block; John B. Cone; Larry M. Jones; Thomas Chalifoux; Michael B. Federle; Keith D. Clancy; Juan B. Ochoa; Samir M. Fakhry; Richard Townsend; Richard M. Bell

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the contribution of age and gender to outcome after treatment of blunt splenic injury in adults. METHODS Through the Multi-Institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), 1488 adult patients from 27 trauma centers who suffered blunt splenic injury in 1997 were examined retrospectively. RESULTS Fifteen percent of patients were 55 years of age or older. A similar proportion of patients > or = 55 went directly to the operating room compared with patients < 55 (41% vs. 38%) but the mortality for patients > or = 55 was significantly greater than patients < 55 (43% vs. 23%). Patients > or = 55 failed nonoperative management (NOM) more frequently than patients < 55 (19% vs. 10%) and had increased mortality for both successful NOM (8% vs. 4%, p < 0.05) and failed NOM (29% vs. 12%, p = 0.054). There were no differences in immediate operative treatment, successful NOM, and failed NOM between men and women. However, women > or = 55 failed NOM more frequently than women < 55 (20% vs. 7%) and this was associated with increased mortality (36% vs. 5%) (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients > or = 55 had a greater mortality for all forms of treatment of their blunt splenic injury and failed NOM more frequently than patients < 55. Women > or = 55 had significantly greater mortality and failure of NOM than women < 55.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1997

Blunt Injury of the Abdominal Aorta: A Review

S. M. Roth; Jock R. Wheeler; Roger T. Gregory; Robert G. Gayle; F. N. Parent; Richard J. DeMasi; Jeffrey L. Riblet; Leonard J. Weireter; L. D. Britt

Injury to the abdominal aorta after blunt trauma occurs much less frequently than injury to the thoracic aorta. Although presentations vary, common themes continue to emerge with each patient. Within a 6-month period, our trauma unit diagnosed and treated two cases of blunt abdominal aortic trauma. Both patients were restrained passengers in motor vehicle crashes with resultant abdominal aortic injuries and demonstrated some of the most common associated injuries. Our two cases bring the number found in the literature to 62 and demonstrate the need for rapid recognition and treatment of this potentially lethal injury. This article is a comprehensive review of the management of abdominal aortic injury from blunt trauma.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2009

Initial Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Model: Implications for Timeliness of Care

Rebecca C. Britt; Leonard J. Weireter; L.D. Britt

BACKGROUND In July 2007, we introduced an acute care surgery service to an academic department of surgery staffed in a prearranged, dedicated rotation by critical care-trained surgeons to address all emergency department, inpatient, and transfer consultations. This study is designed to evaluate the impact on patient care and describe the case-mix experienced. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review was done of a prospectively collected database encompassing all patients evaluated. Diagnosis, operations performed, and times of operations were recorded. RESULTS Eight hundred sixty-one patients were evaluated. Four hundred ten patients (47.6%) had 500 operations; 368 (72.8%) were performed in the operating room and 132 (26.2%) at the bedside. Respiratory failure and malnutrition (n = 130), soft-tissue infection (n = 115), abdominal pain (n = 97), biliary (n = 94), bowel obstruction (n = 78), diseases of the colon (n = 49), and appendicitis (n = 46) were the most common diseases seen. The most common operations performed included incision and drainage (n = 61); tracheostomy or percutaneous gastrostomy, or both (n = 125); cholecystectomy (n = 53); appendectomy (n = 41); colectomy (n = 34); and complex abdominal wound care (n = 43). In the year before implementation, 55.4% of emergent procedures were performed between 7:30 am and 5:30 pm, compared with 70% after implementation (p = 0.0002). Procedures performed after 5:30 pm decreased from 44.6% to 30%. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an acute care surgery service has been positive in terms of facilitating the ability to provide more timely care by increasingly using the daytime operating room and providing a breadth of consultative and operative experience to the participating academic surgeons and trainees.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2010

Impact of acute care surgery on biliary disease.

Rebecca C. Britt; Christine Bouchard; Leonard J. Weireter; L.D. Britt

BACKGROUND We introduced an acute care surgery (ACS) service in July 2007 to address all new consults. This study examines the impact on treatment of biliary disease. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review was done of a prospective database of all inpatient operative biliary disease treated in a tertiary care hospital 1 year before and 2 years after implementation of an ACS service. Data collected included diagnosis, time from admission to operation, time of operation, length of stay, comorbidities, and complications. RESULTS There were 54 patients in the pre-ACS group and 132 in the post-ACS group, with no difference in percentage of females, comorbidities, and diagnosis. The post-ACS group had a trend toward a shorter time from consult to operating room (59.9 vs 68.7 hours, p = 0.45) and shorter hospital length of stay (5.5 vs 6.7 days, p = 0.27). In the acute cholecystitis post-ACS cohort, there was also a trend toward shorter time to operating room (39.8 vs 45.5 hours, p = 0.55) and shorter length of stay (4.6 vs 5.7 days, p = 0.39). The second year of ACS showed continued improvement in time to operating room (30.9 hours) compared with both pre-ACS and the first year of ACS. There was no significant difference in laparoscopic versus open surgery or complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS There is a trend toward improvement in timeliness of care for complex inpatient biliary disease with implementation of an ACS service, especially as the service matures. There remains wide variability in patient complexity, which affects timeliness of care.


Resuscitation | 1991

The rapid infusion system: a superior method for the resuscitation of hypovolemic trauma patients

C. Michael Dunham; Howard Belzberg; Robert Lyles; Leonard J. Weireter; David Skurdal; George Sullivan; Thomas Esposito; Mahnaz Namini

The rapid infusion system (RIS), which can deliver fluids/blood products rapidly at precise rates and normothermic conditions, was compared with conventional fluid administration (CFA) in a randomized study of 36 hypovolemic trauma patients. Admission stratification criteria of the groups were similar relative to age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and plasma lactate. Despite the lack of difference in blood loss between the 24-h survivors of the two groups, the CFA group required greater total fluids (23.6/20.21), red blood cells (5.5/4.61), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (2.8/1.91), platelets (523/204 ml), and crystalloids (12.9/10.61). Lactate levels were lower in the RIS group at virtually all times from hours 1 to 24 (4.3/5.3 mM/l, t-value = 3.3, DF = 279, P = 0.001). Post-admission hypothermia was greater in the CFA group at all times during the first 24 h (35.2/36.4 degrees C, t-value = 5.6, DF = 250, P = 0.001). The mean partial thromboplastin time was significantly higher in the CFA group (47.3/35.1 s, t-value = 3.1, DF = 279, P = 0.002). The PTT and PT were related to the degree of lactic acidosis (P = 0.0001) and hypothermia (P = 0.001) but not to the amount of FFP given (P = 0.14). The hospital costs, days in the ICU, and days on the ventilator were greater for the CFA group, as was the incidence of pneumonia (0/11 vs. 6/17; P = 0.03). Hypovolemic trauma patients resuscitated with the RIS needed fewer fluid/blood products and had less coagulopathy; more rapid resolution of hypoperfusion acidosis; better temperature preservation; and fewer hospital complications than those resuscitated with conventional methods of fluid/blood product administration.


Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | 2011

Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Science and Refinement of a National Guideline

E. Brooke Lerner; David C. Cone; Eric S. Weinstein; Richard B. Schwartz; Phillip L. Coule; Michael Cronin; Ian S. Wedmore; Eileen M. Bulger; Deborah Ann Mulligan; Raymond E. Swienton; Scott M. Sasser; Umair A. Shah; Leonard J. Weireter; Teri L. Sanddal; Julio Lairet; David Markenson; Lou Romig; Gregg Lord; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Robert E. O'Connor; Richard C. Hunt

Mass casualty triage is the process of prioritizing multiple victims when resources are not sufficient to treat everyone immediately. No national guideline for mass casualty triage exists in the United States. The lack of a national guideline has resulted in variability in triage processes, tags, and nomenclature. This variability has the potential to inject confusion and miscommunication into the disaster incident, particularly when multiple jurisdictions are involved. The Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed to be a national guideline for mass casualty triage to ensure interoperability and standardization when responding to a mass casualty incident. The Core Criteria consist of 4 categories: general considerations, global sorting, lifesaving interventions, and individual assessment of triage category. The criteria within each of these categories were developed by a workgroup of experts representing national stakeholder organizations who used the best available science and, when necessary, consensus opinion. This article describes how the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2009

Impact of a monitored program of care on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: results of a longterm performance-improvement project.

Leonard J. Weireter; Jay N. Collins; Rebecca C. Britt; Scott F. Reed; Novosel Tj; L.D. Britt

BACKGROUND Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a major source of morbidity, mortality, and expense in the ICU despite therapies directed against it. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of a prospectively developed performance-improvement project monitoring the incidence of VAP in two adjacent ICUs was conducted. In response to an excessive VAP rate, weekly multidisciplinary team meetings were instituted to review data, develop care protocols, and modify care routines. Protocol compliance was monitored daily and feedback provided weekly to the care teams. VAP rates were determined by the institutional Infection Control Committee and reviewed monthly with the ICU multidisciplinary team. Duration of the investigational period was 10 years. RESULTS A standardized ventilator-weaning protocol was instituted with confirmed 95% use. Additional modifications of care, such as patient positioning, use of specific endotracheal tubes to minimize aspiration of supraglottic secretions, an oral-care regimen, and aggressive antibiotic stewardship were standardized, with a compliance rate >90%. VAP rates dropped from 12.8 per 1,000 patient-days in 1998 to 1.1 in 2007 in the burn trauma ICU and from 21.2 to <1 in the neurotrauma ICU in the same time frame. Also, mean ventilator length of stay decreased from 6 days to 4.2 and from 5.8 days to 4.75 simultaneously in the respective ICUs. Such performance improvement has been sustained since implementation of the program. CONCLUSION A systematic, monitored program of standardized care protocols can markedly reduce VAP rate in the ICU.

Collaboration


Dive into the Leonard J. Weireter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.D. Britt

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay N. Collins

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rebecca C. Britt

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederic J. Cole

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott F. Reed

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Novosel Tj

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey L. Riblet

Eastern Virginia Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald M. Stewart

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge