Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Leonardo D. Borregales is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Leonardo D. Borregales.


The Journal of Urology | 2015

Surgical Management of Local Retroperitoneal Recurrence of Renal Cell Carcinoma after Radical Nephrectomy

Arun Z. Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Leonardo D. Borregales; Ly N. Hoang; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M. Tannir; Surena F. Matin; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

PURPOSE Isolated local retroperitoneal recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma poses a therapeutic challenge. We investigated outcomes in patients with localized retroperitoneal recurrence treated with surgical resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective, single institutional study of 102 patients with retroperitoneal recurrence treated with surgery from 1990 to 2014. Demographics, clinical and pathological features, location of retroperitoneal recurrence and perioperative complications are reported using descriptive statistics. We studied recurrence-free and cancer specific survival using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Median age at retroperitoneal recurrence diagnosis was 55 years (IQR 49-64). Cancer was pT3-4 in 62 patients (60.8%) and pN1 in 20 (19.6%). No patients had distant metastatic disease at retroperitoneal recurrence surgery. Median time from nephrectomy to retroperitoneal recurrence diagnosis was 19 months (IQR 5-38.8). The median size of the resected retroperitoneal recurrence was 4.5 cm (IQR 2.7-7). Median followup after recurrence surgery was 32 months (IQR 16-57). Metastatic progression was observed in 60 patients (58.8%) postoperatively. Neoadjuvant and salvage systemic therapy was administered in 46 (45.1%) and 48 patients (47.1%), respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological nodal stage at original nephrectomy and maximum diameter of retroperitoneal recurrence were identified as independent risk factors for cancer specific death. CONCLUSIONS Clinicopathological factors at nephrectomy as well as retroperitoneal recurrence surgery are important prognosticators. Aggressive surgical resection offers potential cure in a substantial number of patients with retroperitoneal recurrence with acceptable complications and still has a dominant role in the management of isolated locally recurrent RCC.


Therapeutic Advances in Urology | 2016

The role of neoadjuvant therapy in the management of locally advanced renal cell carcinoma

Leonardo D. Borregales; Mehrad Adibi; Arun Z. Thomas; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

In the past decade, the armamentarium of targeted therapy agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has significantly increased. Improvements in response rates and survival, with more manageable side effects compared with interleukin 2/interferon immunotherapy, have been reported with the use of targeted therapy agents, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and VEGF receptor antibodies (bevacizumab). Current guidelines reflect these new therapeutic approaches with treatments based on risk category, histology and line of therapy in the metastatic setting. However, while radical nephrectomy remains the standard of care for locally advanced RCC, the migration and use of these agents from salvage to the neoadjuvant setting for large unresectable masses, high-level venous tumor thrombus involvement, and patients with imperative indications for nephron sparing has been increasingly described in the literature. Several trials have recently been published and some are still recruiting patients in the neoadjuvant setting. While the results of these trials will inform and guide the use of these agents in the neoadjuvant setting, there still remains a considerable lack of consensus in the literature regarding the effectiveness, safety and clinical utility of neoadjuvant therapy. The goal of this review is to shed light on the current body of evidence with regards to the use of neoadjuvant treatments in the setting of locally advanced RCC.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2015

Surgical considerations for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Mehrad Adibi; Arun Z. Thomas; Leonardo D. Borregales; Surena F. Matin; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

Among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 25-30% present with metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis. Despite the ever-increasing array of treatment options available for these patients, surgery remains one of the cornerstones of therapy. Proper patient selection for cytoreductive surgery is paramount to its effective use in the management of patients with metastatic RCC despite the decrease in reported morbidity rates. We explore the evolving role cytoreductive surgery in metastatic RCC spanning the immunotherapy era to the targeted therapy era. Despite significant advances in the management of patients with metastatic RCC, further evidence on the definitive role of cytoreductive surgery in the targeted therapy era is awaited through large randomized trials.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2015

Percentage of sarcomatoid component as a prognostic indicator for survival in renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation

Mehrad Adibi; Arun Z. Thomas; Leonardo D. Borregales; Megan M. Merrill; Rebecca S. Slack; Hsiang Chun Chen; Kanishka Sircar; Paari Murugan; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M. Tannir; Surena F. Matin; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

OBJECTIVE Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (sRCC) is associated with higher stage of presentation and worse survival. The objective of this study was to examine the clinicopathologic characteristics associated with overall survival (OS), specifically examining the percentage of sarcomatoid component (PSC). METHODS We reviewed clinicopathologic data for all nephrectomized patients with confirmed sRCC. Histologic slides were rereviewed by dedicated genitourinary pathologists to ascertain PSC. Patient characteristics were tabulated overall and by disease stage. Cutpoints in the PSC providing a meaningful difference in OS were identified by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors selected included age group, gender, race, clinical stage, tumor histology, presurgical systemic therapy, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor size. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess differences in OS. RESULTS Among 186 patients with sRCC, 64 (34%) had localized, and 122 (66%) had metastatic disease at presentation. Patients had primarily clear cell histology (73%). Median follow-up was 12.1 months (range: 0.1-242.2mo). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.9mo). Univariate RPA identified a PSC cutpoint of 10% as prognostically significant. Patients with PSC>10% were at higher risk of death when compared with patients with PSC≤10% (45% vs. 61% 1-y OS; P = 0.04). Multivariate RPA revealed that tumor size, presence of metastatic disease, and PSC were significantly associated with OS. Among 4 identified groups, patients with localized disease and tumor size≤10cm were most likely to be alive at 1 year (89%), and patients with metastatic disease and PSC>40% were least likely to be alive at 1 year (28%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION PSC appears to be a prognostic factor in patients with sRCC, with larger percentage of involvement portending a worse survival, especially in patients with metastatic disease.


Current Opinion in Urology | 2015

Role of metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Arun Z. Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Leonardo D. Borregales; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

Purpose of review Management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma is challenging and continues to be delivered in a multidisciplinary context. Even with the advent of systemic targeted therapy, complete remission with these new agents is rare using systemic therapy alone. Surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastatic deposits continues to play an important role in managing patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma when aiming for complete remissions. To date, despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasectomy appears to prolong survival and achieve long-term cure in carefully selected patients. This review examines current evidence for the role of metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Recent findings Studies continue to consistently support a benefit of complete metastasectomy for overall and cancer-specific survival at most sites for resection, with the exception of brain and bone, which tend to perform for symptomatic relief and palliation. Metastasectomy has not yet been examined in a randomized setting. The debate of survival benefit because of selection bias of patients or differences in tumor biology is relevant and has yet to be resolved in the literature. Clearly, careful patient selection remains paramount in optimizing survival benefit from metastasectomy. Summary Patients with isolated surgically resectable metastatic disease, with long disease-free intervals, and with good performance status are likely to benefit the most from metastasectomy.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus

E. Jason Abel; Philippe E. Spiess; Vitaly Margulis; Viraj A. Master; Michael A. Mann; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Leonardo D. Borregales; Wade J. Sexton; Datta Patil; Surena F. Matin; Christopher G. Wood; Jose A. Karam

Purpose: Careful selection is critical to identify those with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy. Surgery in patients who have metastatic renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus is complex and may not benefit some patients with poor overall survival. We evaluated whether preoperative variables or risk stratification systems could predict overall survival following cytoreductive nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Prognostic factors for overall survival after surgery were evaluated in patients who had metastatic renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus at 5 institutions from 2000 to 2014. Prognostic variables, including metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk models, were evaluated for associations with overall survival. Multivariable analysis was used to determine independent associations of preoperative variables with overall survival. Results: A total of 427 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were identified with tumor thrombus. Patients with inferior vena cava thrombus above the diaphragm had shorter median overall survival vs those with renal vein only thrombus (9.2 months, IQR 4.2–30.8, vs 21.7, IQR 7.7–42.8, p = 0.0165). Individual risk factors from prognostic models were evaluated among other preoperative characteristics for associations with overall survival in 122 patients (32%) who died within 270 days of surgery. Independent predictors of overall survival included lactate dehydrogenase greater than the upper limit of normal (p = 0.003), systemic symptoms (p = 0.003), inferior vena cava thrombus above the diaphragm (p = 0.02) and sarcomatoid features (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Poor overall survival following cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus is associated with inferior vena cava thrombus above the diaphragm, poor risk group, systemic symptoms or sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Patients with expected poor overall survival should be considered for preoperative systemic therapy clinical trials.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2017

Incremental value of MRI for preoperative penile cancer staging.

Fabiano Rubião Lucchesi; Rodoldo Borges Reis; Eliney Ferreira Faria; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodrigo Ribeiro Rossini; Leonardo D. Borregales; Gyl Eanes Barros Silva; Valdair Francisco Muglia

To evaluate the incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), compared to clinical examination, for penile cancer (PC) local staging.


European Urology | 2016

Prediction of Pulmonary Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients with Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

Mehrad Adibi; Patrick A. Kenney; Arun Z. Thomas; Leonardo D. Borregales; Graciela M. Nogueras-Gonzalez; Xuemei Wang; Catherine E Devine; Jose A. Karam; Christopher G. Wood

BACKGROUND Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) are of uncertain significance in patients with renal cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine predictors of IPN progression to pulmonary metastasis and develop a tool for individualized risk stratification of patients who present with IPN on preoperative chest imaging in the setting of localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed all patients who had radical nephrectomy with no evidence of distant metastases at a single institution from 2005-2009 who had ≥1 IPN on chest computed tomography that measured <2 cm. All chest computed tomographies were rereviewed by a radiologist who was blinded to outcomes, to independently determine number, size, and location of nodules. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary objective of the study was to develop a prognostic model to predict pulmonary metastases among radical nephrectomy patients who present with IPN based on readily available preoperative imaging and postoperative pathological criteria. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the predictive factors for development of pulmonary metastasis. We developed a nomogram that predicted the 3-yr and 5-yr lung metastasis-free survival (LMFS), with assessment of discrimination and internal validation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 251 patients with IPN who underwent nephrectomy, 72 (29%) developed pulmonary metastases. Median follow-up for the cohort was 36.6 mo. Three-yr and 5-yr probability of LMFS for the overall cohort was 71% (95% confidence interval 65-77%) and 65% (95% confidence interval 57-72%), respectively. The nomogram developed included number and size of IPN along with postoperative pathological variables, and showed calibration with a concordance index (c-index) of 0.81 and a bootstrap corrected c-index of 0.78. Limitations include retrospective study with no external validation. CONCLUSIONS We developed a nomogram to predict the individualized risk LMFS for patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed outcomes among kidney cancer patients who presented with small lung nodules and developed a clinical tool to predict risk of developing lung metastases.


Translational Andrology and Urology | 2015

Cytoreductive surgery in the era of targeted molecular therapy.

Arun Z. Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Leonardo D. Borregales; Jose A. Karam; Christopher G. Wood

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was regarded standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the immunotherapy era. With the advent of targeted molecular therapy (TMT) for the treatment of mRCC, the routine use of CN has been questioned. Up to date evidence continues to suggest that CN remains an integral part of treatment in appropriately selected patients. This review details the original context in which the efficacy of CN was established and rationale for the continued use of cytoreductive surgery in the era of TMT.


Urology | 2018

The Adverse Survival Implications of Bland Thrombus in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Venous Tumor Thrombus

Ryan Hutchinson; Charles Rew; Gong Chen; Solomon L. Woldu; Laura Maria Krabbe; Matthew Meissner; Kunj R. Sheth; Nirmish Singla; Nabeel Shakir; Viraj A. Master; Jose A. Karam; Surena F. Matin; Leonardo D. Borregales; Christopher G. Wood; Timothy Masterson; R. Houston Thompson; Stephen A. Boorjian; Bradley C. Leibovich; E. Jason Abel; Aditya Bagrodia; Vitaly Margulis

OBJECTIVE To characterize the presence of bland (nontumor) thrombus in advanced renal cell carcinoma and assess the impact of this finding on cancer-specific survival. METHODS A multi-institutional database of patients treated with nephrectomy with caval thrombectomy for locally-advanced renal tumors was assembled from 5 tertiary care medical centers. Using clinicopathologic variables including patient age, body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor stage, grade, nodal status and histology, and nearest-neighbor and multiple-matching propensity score matched cohorts of bland thrombus vs nonbland thrombus patients were assessed. Multivariable analysis for predictors of cancer-specific survival was performed. RESULTS From an initial cohort of 579 patients, 446 met inclusion criteria (174 with bland thrombus, 272 without). At baseline, patients with bland thrombus had significantly worse performance status, higher tumor stage, higher prevalence of regional nodal metastases and higher nuclear grade (P < .01 for all). In both nearest-neighbor and multiple-matching propensity score matched cohorts, the presence of bland thrombus presence was associated with inferior median cancer-specific survival (28.1 months vs 156.8 months, and 28.1 months vs 76.7 months, P < .001 for both). The presence of bland thrombus remained independently associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 4.33, 95% confidence interval 2.79-6.73, P < .001). CONCLUSION Presence of bland thrombus is associated with adverse survival outcomes in patients treated surgically for renal tumors with venous tumor thrombus. These findings may have important implications in patient counseling, selection for surgery and inclusion in clinical trials.

Collaboration


Dive into the Leonardo D. Borregales's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher G. Wood

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jose A. Karam

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Surena F. Matin

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mehrad Adibi

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arun Z. Thomas

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pheroze Tamboli

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Jonasch

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nizar M. Tannir

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kanishka Sircar

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vitaly Margulis

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge