Leonie N.C. Visser
University of Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leonie N.C. Visser.
Stress | 2017
Leonie N.C. Visser; Marieke S. Tollenaar; Jos A. Bosch; Lorenz J.P. van Doornen; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Ellen M.A. Smets
Abstract Patients forget 20–80% of information provided during medical consultations. The emotional stress often experienced by patients during consultations could be one of the mechanisms that lead to limited recall. The current experimental study therefore investigated the associations between (analog) patients’ psychophysiological arousal, self-reported emotional stress and their (long term) memory of information provided by the physician. One hundred and eighty one cancer-naïve individuals acted as so-called analog patients (APs), i.e. they were instructed to watch a scripted video-recoding of an oncological bad news consultation while imagining themselves being in the patient’s situation. Electrodermal and cardiovascular activity (e.g. skin conductance level and heart rate) were recorded during watching. Self-reported emotional stress was assessed before and after watching, using the STAI-State and seven Visual Analog Scales. Memory, both free recall and recognition, was assessed after 24–28 h. Watching the consultation evoked significant psychophysiological and self-reported stress responses. However, investigating the associations between 24 psychophysiological arousal measures, eight self-reported stress measures and free recall and recognition of information resulted in one significant, small (partial) correlation (r = 0.19). Considering multiple testing, this significant result was probably due to chance. Alternative analytical methods yielded identical results, strengthening our conclusion that no evidence was found for relationships between variables of interest. These null-findings are highly relevant, as they may be considered to refute the long-standing, but yet untested assumption that a relationship between stress and memory exists within this context. Moreover, these findings suggest that lowering patients’ stress levels during the consultation would probably not be sufficient to raise memory of information to an optimal level. Alternative explanations for these findings are discussed.
BMC Medical Research Methodology | 2018
Leonie N.C. Visser; Nadine Bol; Marij A. Hillen; Mathilde G. E. Verdam; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Julia C. M. van Weert; Ellen M. A. Smets
BackgroundVideo vignettes are used to test the effects of physicians’ communication on patient outcomes. Methodological choices in video-vignette development may have far-stretching consequences for participants’ engagement with the video, and thus the ecological validity of this design. To supplement the scant evidence in this field, this study tested how variations in video-vignette introduction format and camera focus influence participants’ engagement with a video vignette showing a bad news consultation.MethodsIntroduction format (A = audiovisual vs. B = written) and camera focus (1 = the physician only, 2 = the physician and the patient at neutral moments alternately, 3 = the physician and the patient at emotional moments alternately) were varied in a randomized 2 × 3 between-subjects design. One hundred eighty-one students were randomly assigned to watch one of the six resulting video-vignette conditions as so-called analogue patients, i.e., they were instructed to imagine themselves being in the video patient’s situation. Four dimensions of self-reported engagement were assessed retrospectively. Emotional engagement was additionally measured by recording participants’ electrodermal and cardiovascular activity continuously while watching. Analyses of variance were used to test the effects of introduction format, camera focus and their interaction.ResultsThe audiovisual introduction induced a stronger blood pressure response during watching the introduction (p = 0.048, ηpartial2
Alzheimers & Dementia | 2018
Leonie N.C. Visser; Marleen Kunneman; Laxsini Murugesu; Femke H. Bouwman; Wiesje M. van der Flier; Ellen M. A. Smets
Alzheimers & Dementia | 2018
Leonie N.C. Visser; Sophie Pelt; Marij A. Hillen; Femke H. Bouwman; Wiesje M. van der Flier; Ellen M. A. Smets
{\eta}_{partial}^2
Patient Education and Counseling | 2017
N.M. Medendorp; Leonie N.C. Visser; Marij A. Hillen; J.C.J.M. de Haes; E. M. A. Smets
Patient Education and Counseling | 2016
Leonie N.C. Visser; Marieke S. Tollenaar; Jos A. Bosch; Lorenz J.P. van Doornen; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Ellen M.A. Smets
= 0.05) and the consultation part of the vignette (p = 0.051, ηpartial2
Patient Education and Counseling | 2016
Leonie N.C. Visser; Marij A. Hillen; Mathilde G. E. Verdam; Nadine Bol; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Ellen M.A. Smets
Patient Education and Counseling | 2016
I.R. van Bruinessen; I.T.A. van den Ende; Leonie N.C. Visser; S. van Dulmen
{\eta}_{partial}^2
Patient Education and Counseling | 2018
Leonie N.C. Visser; Sanne Schepers; Marieke S. Tollenaar; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Ellen M.A. Smets
Patient Education and Counseling | 2017
Leonie N.C. Visser; Marieke S. Tollenaar; Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes; Ellen M.A. Smets
= 0.05), when compared to the written introduction. With respect to camera focus, results revealed that the variant focusing on the patient at emotional moments evoked a higher level of electrodermal activity (p = 0.003, ηpartial2