Leora T. Yarboro
University of Virginia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leora T. Yarboro.
Annals of cardiothoracic surgery | 2014
Leora T. Yarboro; James D. Bergin; Jamie L.W. Kennedy; Carole Ballew; Emily M. Benton; Gorav Ailawadi; John A. Kern
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly utilized in the management of advanced heart failure. A transcutaneous driveline is necessary to power the LVAD, and although this technology has improved over the years in terms of smaller size and increased durability, driveline complications continue to develop in up to 20% of all devices implanted. Driveline infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. As more patients live longer with ventricular assist devices, minimizing driveline infections is paramount. A systematic, multidisciplinary approach can be used to develop a strategy to prevent, recognize and treat driveline infections. In this paper, we describe our approach to driveline management which has resulted in zero driveline infections between January 2012 and March 2014.
Journal of the American Heart Association | 2017
Ravi K. Ghanta; Damien J. LaPar; Qianzi Zhang; Vishal Devarkonda; James M. Isbell; Leora T. Yarboro; John A. Kern; Irving L. Kron; Alan M. Speir; Clifford E. Fonner; Gorav Ailawadi
Background Despite the epidemic rise in obesity, few studies have evaluated the effect of obesity on cost following cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with worse risk‐adjusted outcomes and higher cost. Methods and Results Medical records for 13 637 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (9702), aortic (1535) or mitral (837) valve surgery, and combined valve–coronary artery bypass grafting (1663) procedures were extracted from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons certified database. Patients were stratified by BMI: normal to overweight (BMI 18.5–30), obese (BMI 30–40), and morbidly obese (BMI >40). Differences in outcomes and cost were compared between BMI strata and also modeled as a continuous function of BMI with adjustment for preoperative risk using Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk indices. Morbidly obese patients incurred nearly 60% greater observed mortality than normal weight patients. Moreover, morbidly obese patients had greater than 2‐fold increase in renal failure and 6.5‐fold increase in deep sternal wound infection. After risk adjustment, a significant association was found between BMI and mortality (P<0.001) and major morbidity (P<0.001). The risk‐adjusted odds ratio for mortality for morbidly obese patients was 1.57 (P=0.02) compared to normal patients. Importantly, risk‐adjusted total hospital cost increased with BMI, with 17.2% higher costs in morbidly obese patients. Conclusions Higher BMI is associated with increased mortality, major morbidity, and cost for hospital care. As such, BMI should be more strongly considered in risk assessment and resource allocation.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2016
Sarah A. Schubert; Leora T. Yarboro; Sushma Madala; Karnika Ayunipudi; Irving L. Kron; John A. Kern; Gorav Ailawadi; George J. Stukenborg; Ravi K. Ghanta
OBJECTIVES The long-term evolution of coexistent mitral regurgitation (MR) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis remains poorly defined. Prior studies have demonstrated that acute improvement in MR after AVR is modest, and more aggressive approaches have been advocated. This study examines the evolution of MR after AVR and identifies prognostic indicators for MR improvement. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated demographic and echocardiographic data of 423 patients who underwent primary isolated AVR for aortic stenosis with coexistent mild (n = 314) or moderate (n = 109) MR at our institution, from 2004 to 2013. For each patient, preoperative and postoperative MR was extracted from 903 echocardiograms and graded on a 0 to 4+ scale. Hierarchic linear models were used to estimate postoperative residual MR over a 5-year follow-up period. Patients were then stratified by improvement in MR, and preoperative risk factors and survival were compared between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between survival and preoperative and postoperative MR. RESULTS The overall acute reduction in MR was -0.23 degrees per patient. Patients with moderate MR had a -0.53 degree reduction in MR, whereas patients with mild MR had only a -0.13 degree reduction in MR (P < .001). Residual MR, however, worsened over time and regressed back to baseline, particularly in patients with preoperative moderate MR. At last follow-up, 70 (17%) patients returned to 2+ or worse MR. Residual MR at last echocardiographic follow-up was not affected by left ventricular ejection fraction, severity of preoperative aortic valve gradient (AVG), magnitude of reduction of AVG, or other comorbidities. Degree of preoperative MR did not affect midterm survival. Patients whose MR improved after AVR demonstrated a trend toward improved survival (75% vs 65% 5-year survival; P = .06), compared with those without MR whose survival remained unchanged or worsened. CONCLUSIONS Coexistent MR modestly improves after AVR, but eventually regresses back to baseline or worsens over time in many patients. Preoperative AVG, reduction of AVG, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation was not predictive of residual MR. Moderate preoperative MR did not adversely affect 5-year survival. Patients with improvement in MR, however, demonstrated a trend toward improved survival at 5 years. More aggressive approaches for coexistent moderate MR should be considered in patients who need AVR for aortic stenosis.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2018
Robert B. Hawkins; J. Hunter Mehaffey; Kenan W. Yount; Leora T. Yarboro; Clifford E. Fonner; Irving L. Kron; Mohammed A. Quader; Alan M. Speir; Jeffrey B. Rich; Gorav Ailawadi
Objectives The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plans to institute a 5‐year trial of bundled payments for coronary artery bypass grafting through 90 days after discharge. To investigate the impact, we reviewed actual inpatient costs for patients undergoing bypass surgery relative to the target price. Methods A total of 13,276 Medicare patients with estimated cost data underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from 2008 to 2015 in 18 hospitals over 8 Medicare‐defined regions within the Commonwealth of Virginia. Actual 2015 inpatient costs were compared with estimated target prices for each year of the pilot, based on the previous 3 years and stratified by Diagnosis‐Related Group. Results The mean 2015 cost per patient was
Heart | 2018
Hunter J Mehaffey; Robert B. Hawkins; Sarah A. Schubert; Clifford E. Fonner; Leora T. Yarboro; Mohammed A. Quader; Alan M. Speir; Jeff Rich; Irving L. Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
50,394 with high variation (range,
Journal of Thoracic Disease | 2015
Lavone Smith; Leora T. Yarboro; Jamie L.W. Kennedy
27,862‐
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2018
Robert B. Hawkins; J. Hunter Mehaffey; Samuel M. Kessel; Jolian J. Dahl; Irving L. Kron; John A. Kern; Leora T. Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
74,169). On average, hospitals would receive a refund of
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2018
Robert B. Hawkins; J. Hunter Mehaffey; Abra Guo; Eric J. Charles; Alan M. Speir; Jeffrey B. Rich; Mohammed A. Quader; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T. Yarboro
17,682 in year 1, but then owe Medicare increasing amounts up to
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2018
Lily E. Johnston; Emily A. Downs; Robert B. Hawkins; Mohammed A. Quader; Alan M. Speir; Jeff Rich; Leora T. Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
367,985 in year 5. If 2015 were the final year of the pilot, 13 of the 18 hospitals (72%) would have owed Medicare for cost overruns averaging
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2018
Shawn M. Shah; Nicholas R. Teman; Eileen Dearth; Leora T. Yarboro; John A. Kern
614,270 (range,