Leos Pleva

Comparison of the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters and Everolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis The Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Study

Background—The aim of this prospective randomized noninferiority study was to compare the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) catheters and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in the treatment of bare metal stent restenosis. Methods and Results—A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. Each treatment group included 68 patients with 74 in-stent restenotic lesions. The primary end point was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 12 months. Secondary end points were the incidence of binary in-stent restenosis and 12-month major adverse cardiac events. The 2-sided 95% confidence interval of LLL difference between treatments (0.149–0.558) was greater than noninferiority margin (0.12), which demonstrates both noninferiority and superiority of PEB treatment. Furthermore, the PEB group had significantly less 12-month LLL than the EES group (0.02 versus 0.19 mm; P=0.0004). The difference in the incidence of repeated binary restenosis (8.7% versus 19.12%; P=0.078) and 12-month major adverse cardiac events (10.29% versus 19.12%; P=0.213) was not significant. The 12-month LLL was significantly less in the PEB group and also in subgroups with in-stent restenosis >10 mm (0.05 versus 0.26 mm; P=0.0002) and artery diameter <3 mm (0.05 versus 0.16 mm; P=0.003) compared with the EES groups, but not in the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus (P=0.254). In the EES group, repetitive binary restenosis had a significantly greater chance of occurring (odds ratio=3.132; 95% confidence interval, 1.058–9.269; P=0.039), even when adjusting for other risk factors. Conclusions—Treatment of bare metal stent restenosis using PEB led to significantly less 12-month LLL than the implantation of second-generation EES. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01735825.

Increased levels of MMP-3, MMP-9 and MPO represent predictors of in-stent restenosis, while increased levels of ADMA, LCAT, ApoE and ApoD predict bare metal stent patency.

AIMS We sought to identify biochemical predictors that indicate susceptibility to in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary artery bare-metal stenting. METHODS A total of 111 consecutive patients with post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in-stent restenosis of a target lesion within 12 months were matched for age, sex, vessel diameter, and diabetes with 111 controls without post-PCI ISR. Plasma or serum levels of biochemical markers were measured: matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2, 3, 9; myeloperoxidase (MPO); asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]); apolipoproteins E and D (ApoE and D); and lecitin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT). Multivariable logistic regression association tests were performed. RESULTS Increased plasma MMP-3 (OR: 1.013; 95% CI: 1.004-1.023; P = 0.005), MMP-9 (OR: 1.014; 95% CI: 1.008-1.020; P < 0.0001) or MPO (OR: 1,003; 95% CI: 1.001-1.005; P = 0.002) was significantly associated with increased risk of ISR. Increased levels of ADMA (OR: 0.212; 95% CI: 0.054-0.827; P = 0.026), ApoE (OR: 0.924; 95% CI: 0.899-0.951; P < 0.0001), ApoD (OR: 0.919; 95% CI: 0.880-0.959; P = 0.0001), or LCAT (OR: 0.927; 95% CI: 0.902-0.952; P < 0.0001) was associated with risk reduction. No correlation was found between plasma MMP-2 or Lp (a) and ISR risk. CONCLUSIONS Increased levels of MMP-3, MMP-9, and MPO represent predictors of ISR after bare-metal stent implantation. In contrast, increased ADMA, LCAT, and Apo E and D indicate a decreased in-stent restenosis occurrence.

Reference intervals of plasma matrix metalloproteinases 2, 3, and 9 and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine levels

Abstract Objective. The present study aimed to verify the reference intervals of plasma matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 2, 3, and 9 and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in a healthy population with an average age corresponding to that of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Methods. The study included 180 healthy volunteers. Plasma MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and serum ADMA levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These levels were analyzed for association with age and gender. The Cbstat5, R software, and NCSS 2007 programs were used for statistical analysis. Results. The average volunteer age was 47.4 years in the group in which MMP-3 and ADMA were analyzed, 40.3 years in the MMP-9 group, and 47.8 years for the MMP-2 group. Serum ADMA levels were determined to be independent of age and gender. Plasma MMP-2 levels were significantly correlated with age (p = 0.001), with lower levels detected in persons ≤ 49 years of age. Plasma MMP-3 was significantly associated with both age (p < 0.0001) and gender, with lower levels detected in persons of ≤ 47 years of age and among women. Plasma MMP-9 levels were not age dependent, but were associated with gender (p = 0.014), showing lower levels in women. Conclusions. Reference intervals of heparin-plasma MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9 and serum ADMA levels were determined. MMP-2 and MMP-3 levels were found to be age dependent, and MMP-3 and MMP-9 levels were gender dependent.

Response by Pleva et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Comparison of the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters and Everolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: The Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Study”

We read with great interest the letter by Alfonso et al with comments to our study.1We know the interesting results of the RIBS V study (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare-Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stent).2 Contrary to RIBS V, we used everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with platinum–chromium metallic platform and a different primary endpoint, 12-month late lumen loss (LLL) in our study.1 LLL and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) often serve as surrogate endpoint in percutaneous coronary intervention studies. We suppose that MLD values are highly dependent on previous vessel diameter, whereas LLL rather reflects thedifference …

Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study

The efficacy of paclitaxel‐eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug‐eluting stents for treatment of bare‐metal stent restenosis (BMS‐ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow‐up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long‐term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined.